Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Genet., 29 September 2015
Sec. Genomic Assay Technology

Rice transcriptome analysis to identify possible herbicide quinclorac detoxification genes

\r\nWenying XuWenying Xu1Chao DiChao Di1Shaoxia ZhouShaoxia Zhou1Jia LiuJia Liu2Li LiLi Li1Fengxia LiuFengxia Liu1Xinling YangXinling Yang2Yun Ling*Yun Ling2*Zhen Su*Zhen Su1*
  • 1State Key Laboratory of Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, College of Biological Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China
  • 2Department of Applied Chemistry, College of Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China

Quinclorac is a highly selective auxin-type herbicide and is widely used in the effective control of barnyard grass in paddy rice fields, improving the world's rice yield. The herbicide mode of action of quinclorac has been proposed, and hormone interactions affecting quinclorac signaling has been identified. Because of widespread use, quinclorac may be transported outside rice fields with the drainage waters, leading to soil and water pollution and other environmental health problems. In this study, we used 57K Affymetrix rice whole-genome array to identify quinclorac signaling response genes to study the molecular mechanisms of action and detoxification of quinclorac in rice plants. Overall, 637 probe sets were identified with differential expression levels under either 6 or 24 h of quinclorac treatment. Auxin-related genes such as GH3 and OsIAAs responded to quinclorac treatment. Gene Ontology analysis showed that genes of detoxification-related family genes were significantly enriched, including cytochrome P450, GST, UGT, and ABC and drug transporter genes. Moreover, real-time RT-PCR analysis showed that top candidate genes of P450 families such as CYP81, CYP709C, and CYP72A were universally induced by different herbicides. Some Arabidopsis genes of the same P450 family were up-regulated under quinclorac treatment. We conducted rice whole-genome GeneChip analysis and the first global identification of quinclorac response genes. This work may provide potential markers for detoxification of quinclorac and biomonitors of environmental chemical pollution.

Introduction

Rice (Oryza sativa) is a major crop feeding about half of the world's population. However, some grass weeds such as barnyard grass (Echinochloa crusgalli) significantly reduce the world's rice yield. Quinclorac (3,7-dichloro-8-quinolinecarboxylic acid) is a herbicide with specific selectivity between annual grass weeds and some graminaceous crops (Koo et al., 1996; Resgalla et al., 2007). Quinclorac is a compound of the chemical group of quinolines with toxicological class III (low toxicity), and in the recent years, it has been widely used on paddy rice fields to effectively control barnyard grass (Resgalla et al., 2007). Quinclorac is a highly selective auxin-type herbicide, originally emerged from lead optimization with more than 3000 synthesized derivatives by BASF and was introduced into rice cultivation systems in 1988 (Haden et al., 1985; Grossmann, 2000b, 2003).

Many studies have examined the mode of quinclorac action including plant uptake, translocation, metabolism, biochemical and molecular mechanism, etc. (Haden et al., 1985; Grossmann, 2000a,b, 2003). For example, the physiological and biochemical basis for quinclorac resistance in a false cleavers (Galium spurium L.) biotype was examined for the auxin signal transduction pathway and the mechanism of quinclorac action (Van Eerd et al., 2005). A model of the selective mode of action of quinclorac in grasses was proposed in which, in sensitive grasses, the quinclorac induces ACC (1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid) synthase activity in the root, and then, ACC is transported to the shoot, where it is converted to ACC to ethylene and cyanide and causes phytotoxicity, whereas quinclorac cannot induce ACC synthase in resistant grasses (Grossmann, 2000b). The stimulation of ACC synthase acts as the target process responsible for the herbicidal growth inhibition in sensitive grasses, but the overproduction of cyanide (an ethylene co-product) is more important in growth inhibition and the actual cell death response to quinclorac (Grossmann, 1996) because cyanide accumulation in susceptible grasses is the primary phytotoxic compound that causes growth inhibition and tissue necrosis with physiologically damaging concentrations. The model also shows that ethylene further elicits the downward curvature of leaves and stimulates abscisic acid (ABA) biosynthesis through increasing xanthophyll cleavage to the ABA precursor xanthoxin by 9-cis-epoxycarotenoid dioxygenase in the plastid (Hansen and Grossmann, 2000; Grossmann, 2000a; Grossmann et al., 2001; Raghavan et al., 2006; Kraft et al., 2007). There is only a slight change in concentrations of other phytohormones such as gibberellins and cytokinins (Grossmann, 2000a).

Due to widespread use, quinclorac may be transported outside rice fields with the drainage waters, leading to soil and water pollution and other severe environmental health problems. The auxinic herbicide quinclorac, unlike endogenous auxin, has a long-lasting effect, and risk analyses of herbicide quinclorac residues in irrigated rice areas are very important. Recently, deterministic and probabilistic risk analyses were carried out for seven hydrographic basins in the State of Santa Catarina (Brazil) (Resgalla et al., 2007)—quinclorac was the most frequently detected agrochemical residue, occurring in five of seven hydrographic basins. Furthermore, quinclorac residues were also detected in rivers flowing through irrigated rice production areas. The effect of quinclorac on animals and microbes has also been studied. The potential effect on culturable microorganisms was investigated in a flooded paddy soil to which different quinclorac concentrations were added. Quinclorac concentration is a key factor affecting the populations of various culturable microorganisms (Lü et al., 2004a,b, 2006; Chen et al., 2005). In addition, quinclorac caused increased enzyme activity in the brain of silver catfish and inhibitions in muscle tissue (Moraes et al., 2007). Therefore, the quinclorac detoxification analysis is very important for herbicide tolerance of crops and environmental health issues. Enzyme activity analysis showed that superoxide dismutase is critical in the defense against quinclorac-induced oxidative stress (Lu et al., 2007). The action of quinclorac has been broadly studied and discussed (Haden et al., 1985; Grossmann and Kwiatkowski, 2000; Grossmann, 2000a,b, 2003), but molecular-based detoxification analysis of quinclorac remains limited. There have been many reports concerning resistance to and detoxification of other herbicides (Still and Kuzirian, 1967; Shimabukuro, 1975; Dixon et al., 2003; Hirose et al., 2005; Karavangeli et al., 2005; Labrou et al., 2005; Marcacci et al., 2005; Poienaru and Sarpe, 2006). Plant transcriptome mapping studies have become popular in revealing the possible mechanisms of herbicide and insecticide resistance and hormone signal transduction pathways (Hansen and Grossmann, 2000; Zhong and Burns, 2003; Armstrong et al., 2004; Pasquer et al., 2005; Andersson-Gunnerås et al., 2006; Laskowski et al., 2006; Nemhauser et al., 2006; Kim et al., 2007; Lee et al., 2007; Manabe et al., 2007; Shimono et al., 2007; Zhang et al., 2007a,b; Bruce et al., 2008; Poupardin et al., 2008; Vriezen et al., 2008; Wenzel et al., 2008). For example, microarray screening identified up-regulation of benzothiadiazole (BTH)- and salicylic acid (SA)-inducible WRKY transcription factor (TF) genes within 3 h of BTH treatment. Two defense-related genes, encoding a glutathione S-transferase and a cytochrome P450, were regulated by WRKY45 (Laskowski et al., 2006). Among the enzyme systems, glutathione S-transferase and cytochrome P450 monooxygenase are the enzymes most responsible for increasing herbicide metabolism. Using a similar approach, Arabidopsis genes induced by cis-jasmone were revealed to affect the chemical ecology of multitrophic interactions with aphids and their parasitoids, including a cytochrome P450 (Poupardin et al., 2008). Recently, RNA-seq has been applied to characterize the transcriptome responding to quinclorac in barnyard grass (Li et al., 2013a; Yang et al., 2013).

In this study, we carried out rice whole-genome array screening for quinclorac response genes and used real-time RT-PCR validation and bioinformatics data mining. There were two main purposes: to give an overview of the transcription map for rice under quinclorac treatment and global function classification for the response genes; and most importantly, to obtain a number of candidate genes, especially P450 and GST genes, potentially acting as detoxification markers for quinclorac.

Materials and Methods

Plant Material and Growth Conditions

Rice (Oryza sativa L. cv. Nipponbare) seeds were surface-sterilized in 5% sodium hypochlorite for 20 min and washed in distilled water for three or four times, and then germinated in a greenhouse (28/25°C and 12/12 h light/dark cycles with 83% relative humidity). About 3 weeks after germination, rice plants were at the second leaf stage and were treated with different chemicals.

Arabidopsis thaliana (Col-0) seeds were surface-sterilized and sown on MS-agar Petri plates. Then seeds were stratified for 3 d at 4°C in darkness, and then transferred into a growth chamber (16/8 h light/dark at 22°C). The plants were grown on MS medium for a further 2 weeks and then treated with quinclorac.

Chemical Treatments and RNA Isolation

All pure herbicides were obtained commercially as follows: quinclorac from BASF AG, Ludwigshafen (Germany), bentazone from Sigma Aldrich, clomazone [2-(2-chlorophenyl)methyl-4,4-dimethyl-3-isoxazolidinone] from Amersham Co., metsulfuron-methyl from Aventis Pharma (Frankfurt/M), and methyl viologen (paraquat) from Aldrich Chem. Co. (Cat. No. 85617-7). The chemical structures of these five herbicides are shown in Figure 4.

Based on the dosage used in the field and references concerning several sensitivity or resistance experiments (Qian and Ma, 2004; Abdallah et al., 2006; Peng et al., 2008), the plants were sprayed with the chemicals at the following concentrations: 1.65 mM of quinclorac, 19.98 mM of bentazone, 1.31 mM of metsulfuron-methyl, 1.75 mM of clomazone, and 10 μM of methyl viologen, with 1% DMSO (dimethyl sulfoxide) as a solvent in all cases. The plant samples were harvested after chemical treatment, frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at −80°C for further analysis. Control samples (treated with 1% DMSO) were also harvested at the same time. Rice shoots were treated with quinclorac for 3, 6, and 24 h, and the Arabidopsis seedlings were treated with quinclorac for 6 and 12 h. Rice shoots were also treated with the other chemicals for 6 h.

Total RNA was extracted using TRizol (Invitrogen, CA, USA) and purified by using Qiagen RNeasy kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). OD260/OD280 and OD260/OD230 measurements were taken to determine the concentration and quality of RNA solution using an Eppendorf Biophotometer.

Affymetrix GeneChip Analysis

For each sample, 8 μg of total RNA was used to make biotin-labeled cRNA targets. All the processing for cDNA and cRNA synthesis, cRNA fragmentation, hybridization, washing and staining, and scanning, followed the GeneChip Standard Protocol (Eukaryotic Target Preparation). In this experiment, a Poly-A RNA Control Kit and a One-Cycle cDNA Synthesis kit were applied. Affymetrix GCOS software was used for data normalization and comparative analysis. Raw chip data for the expression profilings are shown in Data Sheet 1.

Reverse Transcription and Real-time RT-PCR

Reverse transcription was performed with 10-μl samples containing 2 μg of total RNA using M-MLV (Invitrogen). The cDNA samples were diluted to 8 ng/μl. Triplicate quantitative assays were performed on 1 μl of each cDNA dilution using the SYBR Green Master Mix (Applied Biosystems, PN 4309155) with an ABI 7900 sequence detection system according to the manufacturer's protocol (Applied Biosystems). The gene-specific primers were designed by using Primer Express software. The amplification of 18S rRNA was used as an internal control to normalize all data (forward primer, 5′-CGGCTACCACATCCAAGGAA-3′ and reverse primer, 5′-TGTCACTACCTCCCCGTGTCA-3′). Gene-specific primers are listed in Supplemental Table 2. The relative quantification method (ΔΔCT) was used to evaluate quantitative variation between the replicates examined.

Microarray Data Analysis

All CEL files were processed using Affymetrix GCOS software to produce the CHP file, and the TGT (target mean value) was scaled as 500 for each chip. The raw expression data is listed in the Data Sheet 1.

The signal intensity for each probe set of GeneChip microarray was extracted by MAS 5.0 algorithm. To determine differentially expressed genes between quinclorac treatment and control samples, the log2-transformed signal ratio of each gene was calculated by applying the GCOS baseline tool. Another, algorithm dChip was also applied to these raw chip data, and the expression difference of each gene was calculated by the “compare samples” tool. For each time point (6 or 24 h treatment), the probe set assigned significant changes according to the following rules: the expression ratios (quinclorac vs. mock treatment) were ≥ 2 [i.e., signal log ratio (SLR) ≥ 1 or SLR ≤ −1] in both biological duplicates based on MAS 5.0 algorithm; the difference in expression levels was considered as significant based on dChip algorithm.

EasyGO (http://bioinformatics.cau.edu.cn/easygo) (Zhou and Su, 2007) and GeneBins (Goffard and Weiller, 2007) were used for functional categorization. MapMan (http://mapman.gabipd.org) was used for key regulation group analysis.

Results

A Microarray-based Screen of Quinclorac-regulated Transcripts

To identify quinclorac signaling response genes, 57K Affymetrix rice whole-genome array was used to generate the expression patterns. To simulate the field effect (Qian and Ma, 2004; Abdallah et al., 2006; Peng et al., 2008), we sprayed 3-week-old rice (Nipponbare in japonica cultivar-group) plants with 1.65 mM quinclorac (about 400 mg/L) and 1% DMSO as mock and extracted RNAs from shoot tissue samples of quinclorac- and mock-treated plants at 6 and 24 h after treatment. Two sets of biological duplicates were collected and a total of eight chips were analyzed.

Two algorithms were applied to the GeneChip data: MAS5 and dChip (Li and Wong, 2001). The change of expression level for each gene under quinclorac treatment was compared with mock treatment using the MAS5 algorithm through GCOS baseline tool and the dChip sample comparison tool. We selected the probe sets that were considered to change significantly during quinclorac treatment by both algorithms and in both two duplicates in 6 or 24 h. In total, there were 637 probe sets with the expression level changed either at 6 or at 24 h quinclorac treatment (p ≤ 0.05); these genes were considered as quinclorac response genes for further analysis. The detailed expression level (based on MAS5 algorithm) and annotation of each probe set are listed in Supplemental Table 1. Among the 637 probe sets, 626 probe sets were associated to 551 locus IDs based on the annotations from TIGR Rice Genome version 5. There were 233 probe sets up-regulated with 6 h and 173 up-regulated with 24 h quinclorac treatment, and 76 of these were up-regulated for both 6 and 24 h; there were 252 probe sets down-regulated with 6 h and 82 down-regulated with 24 h quinclorac treatment, and 14 of these were down-regulated for both 6 and 24 h (Figure 1).

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Venn diagram of rice genes (probe sets) responded to quinclorac.

Gene Ontology (GO)-based Functional Categorization of Quinclorac Response Genes

We employed GO category enrichment analysis to obtain an overview of these quinclorac response genes. We searched the GO terms using EasyGO (Zhou and Su, 2007) for respective up- and down-regulated probe sets at 6 and 24 h treatments. Using p ≤ 0.05 as cut-off, there were no significant GO categories within the down-regulated probe sets; however, there were significantly enriched GO terms in both 6 and 24 h up-regulated probe sets. Supplemental Figure 1 shows the GO category results of molecular function enrichment analysis. Among these up-regulated probe sets, several GO terms including monooxygenase, iron ion binding, heme binding, UDP-glycosyltransferase, drug transporter, and glutathione transferase were significantly enriched both in 6 and 24 h quinclorac treatment. These GO terms enriched > 2-folds are shown in Figure 2. Supplemental Figure 2 shows the enriched GO categories of biological process, several GO terms including toxin catabolic process, electron transport, and drug transport, and regulation of transcription were significantly enriched under quinclorac treatment.

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. The significantly enriched GO terms of the quinclorac-induced genes. The white bars represent the percentage of each GO terms in rice whole-genome chip, the light gray bars (top) represent the percentage of each GO terms in the quinclorac-induced genes at 6 h of treatment, the dark gray bars (bottom) represent the percentage of each GO terms in the quinclorac-induced genes at 24 h of treatment.

Furthermore, we classified these quinclorac-regulated genes using another analysis tool, GeneBins (Goffard and Weiller, 2007). Supplemental Figure 3 highlights several classes (BINs) of genes significantly up-regulated at 6 and 24 h treatment including glutathione S-transferase, flavonol 3-O- glycosyltransferase, unspecific monooxygenase, membrane transport, glutathione metabolism, and tryptophan metabolism.

The results of the two independent tools highlighted similar groups. In addition, most probe sets highlighted in GO term monooxygenase, iron ion binding, and heme binding were cytochrome P450 genes. Four GO terms and function categorization were highlighted in the quinclorac up-regulated genes including glutathione S-transferase, P450 family genes, UDP-glycosyltransferase, and drug transporter. Listed genes for these four families extracted from the 637 probe sets are shown in Table 1.

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. The quinclorac-responsive genes related to significant GO categories.

The names of rice P450 genes are based on the nomenclature of Nelson's paper (Nelson et al., 2004). There were 25 P450 genes (belong to 17 sub-families) showing significant change under quinclorac treatment; notably seven of them were induced by quinclorac both for 6 and 24 h: CYP81A6, CYP709C5, CYP709C9, CYP72A17, CYP72A18, CYP89B9, and CYP704A4. In addition to these seven P450 genes, six genes were only up-regulated by quinclorac at 6 h, two genes were only up-regulated at 24 h, one gene was down-regulated both at 6 and 24 h, six genes were only down-regulated at 6 h, and one gene was only down-regulated at 24 h.

All nine glutathione S-transferase family genes were up-regulated under quinclorac treatment. Seven of them were induced by quinclorac both at 6 and 24 h, including six GSTU6 genes on chromosome 10. Among 13 UDP-glucosyl transferase family genes, 12 were up-regulated by quinclorac treatment including five indole-3-acetate beta-glucosyltransferase genes and four cytokinin-related glucosyltransferase genes. The one exception was LOC_Os04g12970 (indole-3-acetate beta-glucosyltransferase), which was up-regulated at 6 h and down-regulated at 24 h of treatment.

Table 1 lists 28 transport genes with up- or down-regulation under quinclorac treatment: 20 of which were up-regulated and 7 down-regulated; and one gene, LOC_Os07g15460 (metal transporter Nramp6), was up-regulated at 6 h and down-regulated at 24 h of treatment. Of different transport protein families, all five ABC genes and four Multidrug/Oligosaccharidyl-lipid/Polysaccharide (MOP) Flippase genes were up-regulated under treatment; among five major facilitator (MFS) genes, two were down-regulated and the other three were up-regulated. The other quinclorac-induced transporter genes included K+ Transporter (Trk), K+ Uptake Permease (KUP), Mitochondrial Carrier (MC), Monovalent Cation: Proton Antiporter-1 (CPA1), Oligopeptide Transporter, and Sulfate Permease (SulP).

Regulatory Proteins Including Transcription Factor and Kinase Genes in the Quinclorac Response Genes

We further analyzed some specific regulation functional groups. Based on MapMan analysis (Thimm et al., 2004), we found that a large number of transcription factor (TF) and other regulatory protein genes responded to quinclorac treatment (Supplemental Figure 4). TFs are well known to be primarily involved in the initiation stage of RNA transcription, and they are the key factors in regulating gene expression level. There were 48 diverse TF genes up- or down-regulated by quinclorac treatment (Table 2). Most genes in BHLH and HSF were up-regulated, whereas C2C2-CO-like genes, C2H2, and C3H genes were significantly down-regulated under quinclorac treatment. In addition, some abiotic and biotic stress-related TF genes also responded to quinclorac treatment; they belonged to various families such as ARF, AUX/IAA AP2-EREBP, bZIP, MYB, NAC, ZIM, and WRKY families.

TABLE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Regulatory proteins responded to quinclorac treatment.

We found an interesting phenomenon during gene function classification, in that most kinase genes were down-regulated under quinclorac treatment, especially at 6 h treatment. We listed 18 kinase genes; 15 of which were down-regulated under quinclorac treatment including four members from the DUF26 family and five from LRR families (Table 2). However, three PP2Cs including ABI2 were up-regulated under quinclorac treatment.

Real-time RT-PCR Validation of Microarray Data

We selected some genes for real-time RT-PCR analysis under quinclorac treatment including five P450 genes, one GH3 (auxin-responsive GH3 gene), one GST (glutathione S-transferase), one UGT (indole-3-acetate beta-glucosyltransferase), and OPR2 (12-oxophytodienoate reductase 2). The five cytochrome P450 genes were induced by quinclorac treatment: CYP72A17, CYP72A18, CYP81A6, CYP709C5, and CYP709C9 (Figure 3). CYP81A6 was much more induced at 24 h, and CYP709C9 was much more induced at 6 h; CYP72A17 and CYP709C5 were highly induced in similar level all the time, whereas CYP72A18 was only slightly induced at 24 h. All the other genes were induced by quinclorac, most reaching a peak at 6 h, and only UGT (LOC_Os09g34250) kept increasing throughout the treatment time.

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. The expression pattern of selected rice genes responded to different times of quinclorac treatment. The expression values were detected by real-time RT-PCR. The gray bars indicate the fold change of the gene between quinclorac treatment and mock; the error bars represent the standard error of three replicates. LOC_Os01g43700—CYP72A17; LOC_Os01g43710—CYP72A18; LOC_Os03g55240—CYP81A6; LOC_Os07g23570—CYP709C9; LOC_Os07g44140—CYP709C5; LOC_Os01g55940—GH3; LOC_Os09g20220—GST; LOC_Os09g34250—UGT; LOC_Os06g11290—OPR2.

Discussion

Cross-talk Among Hormone-related Genes Under Quinclorac Treatment in Rice

Because quinclorac is an auxin-type herbicide, we investigated the response of auxin and other hormone-related genes under quinclorac treatment using MapMan in which we assigned the rice GeneChip probe sets by BLAST against Arabidopsis genes using 1.0E-5 as the e-value cut-off. Auxin and other hormone-related genes were up- or down-regulated under quinclorac treatment (Supplemental Figure 4). While searching the MapMan database, we found that auxin-related genes significantly responded to quinclorac treatment including GH3 (indole-3-acetic acid-amido synthetase), OsIAA (auxin-responsive Aux/IAA), OsSAUR39, and IN2-2 genes. Most auxin-related genes were up-regulated, especially at 24 h of treatment. Ethylene has a crucial role in the herbicide mode of action of quinclorac (Grossmann and Scheltrup, 1997; Grossmann, 2000a,b). Based on microarray data, some rice ethylene response genes were down-regulated under quinclorac treatment. Other plant hormone gene expression was also investigated through microarray analysis, such SA and GA. This suggested that there may be cross-talks between herbicide quinclorac and plant hormones.

Comparison Between Quinclorac and Other Herbicide-response Genes

GO analysis for the quinclorac response genes showed that three families of genes were significantly enriched including cytochrome P450 family genes, glutathione S-transferase (GST), and UDP-glycosyltransferase. Especially, P450 enzymes are the most important enzyme system for phase I herbicide metabolism in plants, joining GST (phase II metabolism) as the primary enzyme system metabolizing exogenous chemicals entering the plant system. GSTs found in all eukaryotes detoxify electrophilic xenobiotics including herbicides by catalyzing their conjugation with glutathione. Several quinclorac-response GST genes were recently identified in E. crusgalli recently (Li et al., 2013b). Following the hydroxylation of herbicides by P450 monooxygenases, the UDP-glucosyltransferases typically add glucose to herbicides. These gene families may be associated with general herbicide detoxification. We compared the rice genes responding to different herbicide treatments, such as bentazone, metsulfuron-methyl, clomazone, and methyl viologen.

We performed text mining based on the paper from Shimono (Shimono et al., 2007), which showed the microarray data on rice genes responding to bentazone treatment. Bentazone, a benzothiadiazinone contact herbicide, is normally used for controlling many broadleaf weeds and sedges including rice and leguminous crops (McFadden et al., 1990). We re-mapped the locus ID from the TIGR database to the gene names used in Shimono's paper and listed the rice genes responding to both quinclorac and bentazone treatments (Table 3). The herbicide quinclorac up-regulated P450, GST, and UGT genes were up-regulated under bentazone treatment. Notably, some P450 genes (Table 3) were already widely utilized for engineering crops for trait improvements. For example, CYP81A6 was identified as conferring resistance to two different classes of herbicides including bentazone and sulfonylurea (Pan et al., 2006). We also found that the TF genes such as WRKY45 and WRKY76 were up-regulated under both quinclorac and bentazone treatments. WRKY45 regulated glutathione S-transferase (such as GSTU6) and cytochrome P450 (such as CYP709C9) during bentazone treatment (Shimono et al., 2007). Most bentazone-responsive genes in Arabidopsis were reported to be regulated by NPR (Wang et al., 2006). We found that a NPR1 gene was up-regulated in both herbicide treatments. These results suggest that these two herbicides may share a similar detoxification pathway in rice.

TABLE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3. List of selected rice genes responded to both quinclorac and bentazone treatment.

Furthermore, we studied the responses of the five highlighted rice cytochrome P450 genes under different herbicide treatments. We selected several herbicides including quinclorac, bentazone, metsulfuron-methyl, clomazone, and methyl viologen (Figure 4). Clomazone is an herbicide that kills susceptible species by blocking pigment synthesis (Norman et al., 1990a,b). Metsulfuron-methyl is used to control select broadleaf weeds and some annual grasses (Sanyal et al., 2006). Methyl viologen (paraquat) induces oxidative stresses in plants (Tsang et al., 1991; Beligni and Lamattina, 1999; Cummins et al., 1999; Lim et al., 2008). We used real-time RT-PCR to analyze the expression pattern of the five rice cytochrome P450 genes under the selected herbicide treatments. CYP709C5 and CYP709C9 were induced at 6 h of treatment for all the herbicides and highly induced by bentazone and clomazone (Figure 5). CYP72A17 and CYP72A18 were induced by quinclorac, bentazone, and clomazone, whereas CYP81A6 was induced by all herbicides and highly induced by clomazone and methyl viologen (Figure 5).

FIGURE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4. The chemical structures of five herbicides.

FIGURE 5
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 5. The expression pattern of selected rice cytochrome P450 genes responded to different chemical treatments. The expression values were detected by real-time RT-PCR. The gray bars indicated the fold change of the gene between chemical treatment and mock; the error bars represent the standard error of three replicates. LOC_Os01g43700—CYP72A17; LOC_Os01g43710—CYP72A18; LOC_Os03g55240—CYP81A6; LOC_Os07g23570—CYP709C9; LOC_Os07g44140—CYP709C5.

Cross-species Analysis for the Expression Patterns of Quinclorac Up-regulated P450 Genes Between Rice and Arabidopsis

The primary function of P450 is detoxification of xenobiotics, and they utilize herbicides as substrates. Our microarray results showed that multiple rice P450s were responsible for the metabolism of quincorac. We selected several members of the cytochrome P450 family in Arabidopsis (CYP72 and CYP81) and studied their responses to quinclorac treatment using real-time RT-PCR. Three Arabidopsis cytochrome P450 genes were induced by quinclorac treatment; CYP81D11 increased from 3 to 12 h treatment; CYP81D8 and CYP72A8 were highly induced at 3 and 12 h but slightly decreased at 6 h of treatment (Figure 6). As marker genes, GH3 was up-regulated at 12 h, and UGT74E2 and UGT75B1 were much more induced at 3 h by the quinclorac treatment. The Arabidopsis CYP81D11 and CYP81D8 are possible orthologs/homologs of rice CYP81A6, and Arabidopsis CYP72A8 is a possible ortholog/homolog of members of the rice CYP72A subfamily. Therefore, some specific members of CYP81 and CYP72 responded to quinclorac both in the dicot Arabidopsis and the monocot rice. They may play critical roles for detoxification of and resistance to quinclorac.

FIGURE 6
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 6. The expression pattern of selected Arabidopsis genes responded to different times of quinclorac treatment. The expression values were detected by real-time RT-PCR. The gray bars indicated the fold change of the gene between quinclorac treatment and mock; the error bars represent the standard error of three replicates. At3g28740—CYP81D11; At4g37370—CYP81D8; At3g14620—CYP72A8; At1g59500—GH3; At1g05680—UGT74E2; At1g05560—UGT75B1.

In summary, microarray analysis indicated that quinclorac showed an auxin-like nature, inducing rice auxin response genes and affecting expression patterns of genes related to other hormones. The GO analysis showed that the detoxification genes including P450, GST, UGT, ABC, and other drug transporter genes were up-regulated and significantly enriched among all quinclorac response genes. These gene families are strongly related to herbicide resistance and detoxification. Real-time RT-PCR results showed that some members of the P450 gene family (CYP81, CYP709C, and CYP72A) were universally induced by different herbicides and also showed up-regulation both in rice and Arabidopsis. Interestingly, some rice receptor-like kinase genes and ubiquitination-related genes were down-regulated under quinclorac treatment. This may open discussion concerning the regulation of quinclorac-involved signal transduction pathways in rice plants. We believe it will be very important for further explanation of the selectivity of quincorac in resistant rice plants and susceptible grasses and dicot weeds. In the meanwhile, the discovery of some key family genes for herbicide resistance will be beneficial to produce transgenic plants to monitor some environmental pollution caused by herbicides; for example, CYP81A6 is already applied for rendering transgenic rice sensitive to bentazone (Lin et al., 2008). Glutathione transferases functioned as glutathione peroxidases in resistance to multiple herbicides in black-grass (Cummins et al., 1999). Furthermore, the detoxification-related genes such as P450s and GSTs may play important roles in protection from herbicide-caused soil and water pollution and improve worldwide environmental health.

Funding

This work was supported by grants from the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (Grant Numbers: 31371291 and 30570139) and the Ministry of Education of China (Grant Numbers: NCET-09-0735).

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

We thank Xue Zheng, Lan Liu, and Qunlian Zhang for their technical support.

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fgene.2015.00306

Data Sheet 1. The raw chip data for the rice expression profilings under quinclorac treatment.

Supplemental Figure 1. The GO category (molecular function) enrichment analysis result of the up-regulated probe sets under quinclorac treatment for 6 and 24 h.

Supplemental Figure 2. The GO category (biological process) enrichment analysis result of the up-regulated probe sets under quinclorac treatment for 6 and 24 h.

Supplemental Figure 3. The significant enriched BINs of the up-regulated probe sets under quinclorac treatment for 6 h (top) and 24 h (bottom) through GeneBins analysis.

Supplemental Figure 4. The quinclorac-responsive genes for 6 h (left) and 24 h (right) of treatment related to regulation categories. The colored squares represent the expression change of probe sets in log2 ratio, with red indicating the gene induced by quinclorac treatment and the blue indicating the gene reduced by quinclorac treatment, detailed range is shown as a colored bar.

Supplemental Table 1. List of 637 probe sets responed to quinclorac treatment in rice.

Supplemental Table 2. List of primer sequences used in real-time RT-PCR.

References

Abdallah, I., Fischer, A., Elmore, C., Saltveit, M., and Zaki, M. (2006). Mechanism of resistance to quinclorac in smooth crabgrass (Digitaria ischaemum). Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 84, 38–48. doi: 10.1016/j.pestbp.2005.05.003

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Andersson-Gunnerås, S., Mellerowicz, E. J., Love, J., Segerman, B., Ohmiya, Y., Coutinho, P. M., et al. (2006). Biosynthesis of cellulose-enriched tension wood in Populus: global analysis of transcripts and metabolites identifies biochemical and developmental regulators in secondary wall biosynthesis. Plant J. 45, 144–165. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2005.02584.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Armstrong, J. I., Yuan, S., Dale, J. M., Tanner, V. N., and Theologis, A. (2004). Identification of inhibitors of auxin transcriptional activation by means of chemical genetics in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 101, 14978–14983. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0404312101

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Beligni, M. V., and Lamattina, L. (1999). Nitric oxide protects against cellular damage produced by methylviologen herbicides in potato plants. Nitric Oxide 3, 199–208. doi: 10.1006/niox.1999.0222

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bruce, T. J., Matthes, M. C., Chamberlain, K., Woodcock, C. M., Mohib, A., Webster, B., et al. (2008). cis-Jasmone induces Arabidopsis genes that affect the chemical ecology of multitrophic interactions with aphids and their parasitoids. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105, 4553–4558. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0710305105

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chen, Y., Ni, H., Zhang, H., Li, X., and Li, J. (2005). [Prevention efficiency of Exserohilum monoceras with chemical herbicides against Echinochloa crus-galli in paddy field]. Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao 16, 1104–1107.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Cummins, I., Cole, D. J., and Edwards, R. (1999). A role for glutathione transferases functioning as glutathione peroxidases in resistance to multiple herbicides in black-grass. Plant J. 18, 285–292. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313X.1999.00452.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dixon, D. P., Mcewen, A. G., Lapthorn, A. J., and Edwards, R. (2003). Forced evolution of a herbicide detoxifying glutathione transferase. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 23930–23935. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M303620200

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Goffard, N., and Weiller, G. (2007). GeneBins: a database for classifying gene expression data, with application to plant genome arrays. BMC Bioinformatics 8:87. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-8-87

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Grossmann, K. (1996). A role for cyanide, derived from ethylene biosynthesis, in the development of stress symptoms. Physiol. Plant 97, 772–775. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1996.tb00543.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Grossmann, K. (2000a). Mode of action of auxin herbicides: a new ending to a long, drawn out story. Trends Plant Sci. 5, 506–508. doi: 10.1016/S1360-1385(00)01791-X

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text

Grossmann, K. (2000b). “The mode of action of quinclorac: a case study of a new auxin-type herbicide” in Herbicides and their Mechanisms of Action, eds A. H. Cobb and R. C. Kirkwood (Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press), 181–214.

Grossmann, K. (2003). Mediation of herbicide effects by hormone interactions. J. Plant Growth Regul. 22, 109–122. doi: 10.1007/s00344-003-0020-0

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Grossmann, K., and Kwiatkowski, J. (2000). The mechanism of quinclorac selectivity in grasses. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 66, 83–91. doi: 10.1006/pest.1999.2461

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Grossmann, K., Kwiatkowski, J., and Tresch, S. (2001). Auxin herbicides induce H(2)O(2) overproduction and tissue damage in cleavers (Galium aparine L.). J. Exp. Bot. 52, 1811–1816. doi: 10.1093/jexbot/52.362.1811

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Grossmann, K., and Scheltrup, F. (1997). Selective induction of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC) synthase activity is involved in the selectivity of the auxin herbicide quinclorac between barnyard grass and rice. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 58, 145–153. doi: 10.1006/pest.1997.2290

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Haden, E., Menck, B.-H., and Honecker, H. (1985). Quinclorac (BAS 514H) - a new herbicide to control Echinochloa spp. in rice. Br. Crop Conf. Weeds 77–83.

Hansen, H., and Grossmann, K. (2000). Auxin-induced ethylene triggers abscisic acid biosynthesis and growth inhibition. Plant Physiol. 124, 1437–1448. doi: 10.1104/pp.124.3.1437

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hirose, S., Kawahigashi, H., Ozawa, K., Shiota, N., Inui, H., Ohkawa, H., et al. (2005). Transgenic rice containing human CYP2B6 detoxifies various classes of herbicides. J. Agric. Food Chem. 53, 3461–3467. doi: 10.1021/jf050064z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Karavangeli, M., Labrou, N. E., Clonis, Y. D., and Tsaftaris, A. (2005). Development of transgenic tobacco plants overexpressing maize glutathione S-transferase I for chloroacetanilide herbicides phytoremediation. Biomol. Eng. 22, 121–128. doi: 10.1016/j.bioeng.2005.03.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kim, J. I., Sharkhuu, A., Jin, J. B., Li, P., Jeong, J. C., Baek, D., et al. (2007). yucca6, a dominant mutation in Arabidopsis, affects auxin accumulation and auxin-related phenotypes. Plant Physiol. 145, 722–735. doi: 10.1104/pp.107.104935

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Koo, S. J., Neal, J. C., and Ditomaso, J. M. (1996). 3,7-Dichloroquinolinecarboxylic Acid Inhibits Cell-Wall Biosynthesis in Maize Roots. Plant Physiol. 112, 1383–1389.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Kraft, M., Kuglitsch, R., Kwiatkowski, J., Frank, M., and Grossmann, K. (2007). Indole-3-acetic acid and auxin herbicides up-regulate 9-cis-epoxycarotenoid dioxygenase gene expression and abscisic acid accumulation in cleavers (Galium aparine): interaction with ethylene. J. Exp. Bot. 58, 1497–1503. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erm011

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Labrou, N. E., Karavangeli, M., Tsaftaris, A., and Clonis, Y. D. (2005). Kinetic analysis of maize glutathione S-transferase I catalysing the detoxification from chloroacetanilide herbicides. Planta 222, 91–97. doi: 10.1007/s00425-005-1520-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Laskowski, M., Biller, S., Stanley, K., Kajstura, T., and Prusty, R. (2006). Expression profiling of auxin-treated Arabidopsis roots: toward a molecular analysis of lateral root emergence. Plant Cell Physiol. 47, 788–792. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcj043

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lee, J. J., Woodward, A. W., and Chen, Z. J. (2007). Gene expression changes and early events in cotton fibre development. Ann. Bot. (Lond.) 100, 1391–1401. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcm232

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, C., and Wong, W. H. (2001). Model-based analysis of oligonucleotide arrays: expression index computation and outlier detection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98, 31–36. doi: 10.1073/pnas.98.1.31

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, G., Wu, S., Cai, L., Wang, Q., Zhao, X., and Wu, C. (2013a). Identification and mRNA expression profile of glutamate receptor-like gene in quinclorac-resistant and susceptible Echinochloa crus-galli. Gene 531, 489–495. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2013.09.013

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, G., Wu, S., Yu, R., Cang, T., Chen, L., Zhao, X., et al. (2013b). Identification and expression pattern of a glutathione S-transferase in Echinochloa crus-galli. Weed Res. 53, 314–321. doi: 10.1111/wre.12031

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lim, C. E., Choi, J. N., Kim, I. A., Lee, S. A., Hwang, Y. S., Lee, C. H., et al. (2008). Improved resistance to oxidative stress by a loss-of-function mutation in the Arabidopsis UGT71C1 gene. Mol. Cells 25, 368–375.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Lin, C., Fang, J., Xu, X., Zhao, T., Cheng, J., Tu, J., et al. (2008). A built-in strategy for containment of transgenic plants: creation of selectively terminable transgenic rice. PLoS ONE 3:e1818. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0001818

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lu, Y. Q., Baker, J., and Preston, C. (2007). The spread of resistance to acetolactate synthase inhibiting herbicides in a wind borne, self-pollinated weed species, Lactuca serriola L. Theor. Appl. Genet. 115, 443–450. doi: 10.1007/s00122-007-0576-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lü, Z., Min, H., Li, N., Shao, T., and Ye, Y. (2006). Variations of bacterial community structure in flooded paddy soil contaminated with herbicide quinclorac. J. Environ. Sci. Health B 41, 821–832. doi: 10.1080/03601230600805873

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lü, Z., Min, H., and Xia, Y. (2004a). The response of Escherichia coli, Bacillus subtilis, and Burkholderia cepacia WZ1 to oxidative stress of exposure to quinclorac. J. Environ. Sci. Health B 39, 431–441. doi: 10.1081/PFC-120035928

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lü, Z., Min, H., and Ye, Y. (2004b). [Effect of herbicide quinclorac on microbic populations in a paddy soil]. Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao 15, 605–609.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Manabe, Y., Tinker, N., Colville, A., and Miki, B. (2007). CSR1, the sole target of imidazolinone herbicide in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Physiol. 48, 1340–1358. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcm105

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Marcacci, S., Raventon, M., Ravanel, P., and Schwitzguébel, J. P. (2005). The possible role of hydroxylation in the detoxification of atrazine in mature vetiver (Chrysopogon zizanioides Nash) grown in hydroponics. Z Naturforsch C 60, 427–434. doi: 10.1515/znc-2005-5-611

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

McFadden, J. J., Gronwald, J. W., and Eberlein, C. V. (1990). In vitro hydroxylation of bentazon by microsomes from naphthalic anhydride-treated corn shoots. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 168, 206–213. doi: 10.1016/0006-291X(90)91695-O

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Moraes, B. S., Loro, V. L., Glusczak, L., Pretto, A., Menezes, C., Marchezan, E., et al. (2007). Effects of four rice herbicides on some metabolic and toxicology parameters of teleost fish (Leporinus obtusidens). Chemosphere 68, 1597–1601. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.03.006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nelson, D. R., Schuler, M. A., Paquette, S. M., Werck-Reichhart, D., and Bak, S. (2004). Comparative genomics of rice and Arabidopsis. Analysis of 727 cytochrome P450 genes and pseudogenes from a monocot and a dicot. Plant Physiol. 135, 756–772. doi: 10.1104/pp.104.039826

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nemhauser, J. L., Hong, F., and Chory, J. (2006). Different plant hormones regulate similar processes through largely nonoverlapping transcriptional responses. Cell 126, 467–475. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.05.050

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Norman, M. A., Liebl, R. A., and Widholm, J. M. (1990a). Site of clomazone action in tolerant-soybean and susceptible-cotton photomixotrophic cell suspension cultures. Plant Physiol. 94, 704–709. doi: 10.1104/pp.94.2.704

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Norman, M. A., Liebl, R. A., and Widholm, J. M. (1990b). Uptake and metabolism of clomazone in tolerant-soybean and susceptible-cotton photomixotrophic cell suspension cultures. Plant Physiol. 92, 777–784. doi: 10.1104/pp.92.3.777

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pan, G., Zhang, X., Liu, K., Zhang, J., Wu, X., Zhu, J., et al. (2006). Map-based cloning of a novel rice cytochrome P450 gene CYP81A6 that confers resistance to two different classes of herbicides. Plant Mol. Biol. 61, 933–943. doi: 10.1007/s11103-006-0058-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pasquer, F., Isidore, E., Zarn, J., and Keller, B. (2005). Specific patterns of changes in wheat gene expression after treatment with three antifungal compounds. Plant Mol. Biol. 57, 693–707. doi: 10.1007/s11103-005-1728-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Peng, H., Zhang, J., and Xie, Q. (2008). A quinclorac sensitive lethality rice mutant: its discovery, genetics and potential application. Plant Breed. 127, 490–493. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0523.2008.01501.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Poienaru, S., and Sarpe, N. (2006). The residual effect of imazethapyr applied in soybean to barley and winter wheat in Romania. Commun. Agric. Appl. Biol. Sci. 71, 829–835.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Poupardin, R., Reynaud, S., Strode, C., Ranson, H., Vontas, J., and David, J. P. (2008). Cross-induction of detoxification genes by environmental xenobiotics and insecticides in the mosquito Aedes aegypti: impact on larval tolerance to chemical insecticides. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 38, 540–551. doi: 10.1016/j.ibmb.2008.01.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Qian, S., and Ma, P. (2004). A review on technological system of paddy weed control mainly depend on herbicides. Weed Sci. 2004, 1–4.

Raghavan, C., Ong, E. K., Dalling, M. J., and Stevenson, T. W. (2006). Regulation of genes associated with auxin, ethylene and ABA pathways by 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid in Arabidopsis. Funct. Integr. Genomics 6, 60–70. doi: 10.1007/s10142-005-0012-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Resgalla, C. Jr., Noldin, J. A., Tamanaha, M. S., Deschamps, F. C., Eberhardt, D. S., and Rorig, L. R. (2007). Risk analysis of herbicide quinclorac residues in irrigated rice areas, Santa Catarina, Brazil. Ecotoxicology 16, 565–571. doi: 10.1007/s10646-007-0165-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sanyal, N., Pramanik, S. K., Pal, R., and Chowdhury, A. (2006). Laboratory simulated dissipation of metsulfuron methyl and chlorimuron ethyl in soils and their residual fate in rice, wheat and soybean at harvest. J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. B 7, 202–208. doi: 10.1631/jzus.2006.B0202

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shimabukuro, R. H. (1975). Herbicide metabolism by glutathione conjugation in plants. Environ. Qual. Saf. 4, 140–148.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Shimono, M., Sugano, S., Nakayama, A., Jiang, C. J., Ono, K., Toki, S., et al. (2007). Rice WRKY45 plays a crucial role in benzothiadiazole-inducible blast resistance. Plant Cell 19, 2064–2076. doi: 10.1105/tpc.106.046250

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Still, C. C., and Kuzirian, O. (1967). Enzyme detoxication of 3′,4′-dichloropropionanilide in rice and barnyard grass, a factor in herbicide selectivity. Nature 216, 799–800. doi: 10.1038/216799a0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Thimm, O., Blasing, O., Gibon, Y., Nagel, A., Meyer, S., Kruger, P., et al. (2004). MAPMAN: a user-driven tool to display genomics data sets onto diagrams of metabolic pathways and other biological processes. Plant J. 37, 914–939. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2004.02016.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tsang, E. W., Bowler, C., Herouart, D., Van Camp, W., Villarroel, R., Genetello, C., et al. (1991). Differential regulation of superoxide dismutases in plants exposed to environmental stress. Plant Cell 3, 783–792. doi: 10.1105/tpc.3.8.783

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Van Eerd, L. L., Stephenson, G. R., Kwiatkowski, J., Grossmann, K., and Hall, J. C. (2005). Physiological and biochemical characterization of quinclorac resistance in a false cleavers (Galium spurium L.) biotype. J. Agric. Food Chem. 53, 1144–1151. doi: 10.1021/jf048627e

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Vriezen, W. H., Feron, R., Maretto, F., Keijman, J., and Mariani, C. (2008). Changes in tomato ovary transcriptome demonstrate complex hormonal regulation of fruit set. New Phytol. 177, 60–76. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02254.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, D., Amornsiripanitch, N., and Dong, X. (2006). A genomic approach to identify regulatory nodes in the transcriptional network of systemic acquired resistance in plants. PLoS Pathog. 2:e123. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.0020123

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wenzel, C. L., Hester, Q., and Mattsson, J. (2008). Identification of genes expressed in vascular tissues using NPA-induced vascular overgrowth in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Physiol. 49, 457–468. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcn023

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yang, X., Yu, X. Y., and Li, Y. F. (2013). De novo assembly and characterization of the Barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) transcriptome using next-generation pyrosequencing. PLoS ONE 8:e69168. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0069168

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, H., Kim, M. S., Krishnamachari, V., Payton, P., Sun, Y., Grimson, M., et al. (2007a). Rhizobacterial volatile emissions regulate auxin homeostasis and cell expansion in Arabidopsis. Planta 226, 839–851. doi: 10.1007/s00425-007-0530-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, Z., Li, Q., Li, Z., Staswick, P. E., Wang, M., Zhu, Y., et al. (2007b). Dual regulation role of GH3.5 in salicylic acid and auxin signaling during Arabidopsis-Pseudomonas syringae interaction. Plant Physiol. 145, 450–464. doi: 10.1104/pp.107.106021

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhong, G. Y., and Burns, J. K. (2003). Profiling ethylene-regulated gene expression in Arabidopsis thaliana by microarray analysis. Plant Mol. Biol. 53, 117–131. doi: 10.1023/B:PLAN.0000009270.81977.ef

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhou, X., and Su, Z. (2007). EasyGO: gene ontology-based annotation and functional enrichment analysis tool for agronomical species. BMC Genomics 8:246. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-8-246

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: rice, quinclorac, transcriptome, P450, gene ontology

Citation: Xu W, Di C, Zhou S, Liu J, Li L, Liu F, Yang X, Ling Y and Su Z (2015) Rice transcriptome analysis to identify possible herbicide quinclorac detoxification genes. Front. Genet. 6:306. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2015.00306

Received: 10 July 2015; Accepted: 13 September 2015;
Published: 29 September 2015.

Edited by:

Rajib Bandopadhyay, The University of Burdwan, India

Reviewed by:

Bhaskar Gupta, Presidency University, India
George A. Garinis, University of Crete, Greece

Copyright © 2015 Xu, Di, Zhou, Liu, Li, Liu, Yang, Ling and Su. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Zhen Su, State Key Laboratory of Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, College of Biological Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China, zhensu@cau.edu.cn;
Yun Ling, Department of Applied Chemistry, College of Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China, lyun@cau.edu.cn

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.