Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Microbiol., 18 August 2015
Sec. Microbiotechnology
This article is part of the Research Topic Applied Microbiology for Chemical Syntheses View all 32 articles

Heterologous expression of Mus musculus immunoresponsive gene 1 (irg1) in Escherichia coli results in itaconate production

\r\nKiira S. Vuoristo*Kiira S. Vuoristo1*Astrid E. MarsAstrid E. Mars2Stijn van LoonStijn van Loon1Enrico OrsiEnrico Orsi1Gerrit EgginkGerrit Eggink2Johan P. M. SandersJohan P. M. Sanders2Ruud A. Weusthuis*Ruud A. Weusthuis1*
  • 1Bioprocess Engineering, Wageningen University, Wageningen, Netherlands
  • 2Biobased Products, Wageningen University and Research Centre, Wageningen, Netherlands

Itaconic acid, a C5-dicarboxylic acid, is a potential biobased building block for the polymer industry. It is obtained from the citric acid cycle by decarboxylation of cis-aconitic acid. This reaction is catalyzed by CadA in the native itaconic acid producer Aspergillus terreus. Recently, another enzyme encoded by the mammalian immunoresponsive gene 1 (irg1), was found to decarboxylate cis-aconitate to itaconate in vitro. We show that heterologous expression of irg1 enabled itaconate production in Escherichia coli with production titres up to 560 mg/L.

Introduction

Itaconic acid is a biotechnologically produced monomer, which can be used as a precursor for many industrially important chemicals such as acrylic plastics, acrylate latices, and absorbents. After being listed as a top 12 value-added biobased chemical compound (Werpy and Petersen, 2004), microbial production of itaconic acid has been of special interest for a decade.

Studies on the biotechnological production of itaconic acid have either focused on strain breeding of natural itaconic acid producers (mainly Aspergillus terreus), or on the heterologous expression of cadA, the key gene encoding cis-aconitate decarboxylase in A. terreus in other host organisms (Klement and Büchs, 2013). The economics of itaconic acid production with A. terreus are negatively influenced by the slow growth of the organism and the sensitivity of the filamentous pellets to hydro-mechanical stress, which inhibits mass transfer and consequently oxygen supply to the cells. Consequently, the production costs are still too high for industrial application of itaconic acid as a starting material (Steiger et al., 2013). Development of alternative hosts for itaconate production could overcome these problems. Escherichia coli may be a suitable candidate host as it grows rapidly under both aerobic and anaerobic conditions and has well-established protocols for genetic modification.

The mammalian immunoresponsive gene 1 (irg1) was recently found to have in vitro cis-aconitate decarboxylase activity, although it has only 24% amino acid sequence identity with CadA from A. terreus (Michelucci et al., 2013). However, both Irg1 and CadA share high identity with MmgE/PrpD family of proteins (Lohkamp et al., 2006; Kanamasa et al., 2008). Irg1 from Mus musculus was highly active in mammalian macrophages during inflammation and was linked to having a role in immune defense by catalyzing itaconic acid production (Michelucci et al., 2013), making the enzyme also an interesting candidate for biotechnological itaconic acid production. E. coli has been successfully used as a host for itaconic acid production by expressing cadA (Li et al., 2011; Okamoto et al., 2014; Vuoristo et al., 2015) and is therefore an interesting candidate to test whether irg1 can be used for microbial itaconate production.

In earlier studies inclusion body formation was observed in E. coli that was overexpressing cadA from A. terreus (Vuoristo et al., 2015). Expression of heterologous genes in E. coli often causes problems such as protein miss-folding and inclusion body formation, which lead to synthesis of inactive enzymes. In recent years many tools, such as codon harmonization, have been developed to optimize a codon usage to its best. Compared to codon optimization, which substitutes codons by the most frequently used codons of the expression host (Makrides, 1996), codon harmonization selects the codons with usage frequencies in the expression host that most closely match the usage frequencies in the native host (Angov et al., 2008). This harmonization leads to better control of the translation speed and may prevent miss-folding of the nascent polypeptide (Angov et al., 2011).

In this study, we heterologously expressed irg1 in E. coli. The proposed itaconate pathway in E. coli is shown in Figure 1. The effect of codon-harmonization on itaconate production and enzyme activity was determined. We showed that expression of mammalian immunoresponsive gene 1 (irg1) results in itaconate production in E. coli.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 1. Itaconate production pathway in Escherichia coli. The bold arrows indicate the introduced pathway consisting of genes encoding citrate synthase (gltA) and aconitase (acnA) from Corynebacterium glutamicum and cis-aconitate decarboxylase (cadA) from Aspergillus terreus or immunoresponsive gene 1 (irg1) from Mus musculus. The dotted lines indicate that phosphate acetyltransferase (pta) and lactate dehydrogenase (ldhA) were deleted.

Materials and Methods

Bacterial Strains and Plasmids

The bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study are listed in Table 1.

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

TABLE 1. Escherichia coli strains and plasmids used in this study.

Codon-Optimization and Codon-Harmonization

Codon-optimization was done according to the algorithm of OptimumGeneTM (GenScript). The codon usage of cadA from A. terreus and irg1 from M. musculus was harmonized to that of E. coli. For this, the codon usage frequency per codon was determined for the native organism and for the host by using the graphical codon usage analyser tool (Fuhrmann et al., 2004). The codons used in the harmonized genes are the E. coli codons that mimicked the codon usage frequencies in the native organism the best. Genes were synthesized by GenScript and nucleotide sequences were deposited to NCBI BankIt (accession numbers: cadA optimized KM464677, cadA harmonized KT273316, irg1 optimized KT273318, and irg1 harmonized KT273317).

Construction of pACYCDuet-1 Expression Vectors

All strains and plasmids used in this work are given in Table 1. All optimized and harmonized cadA and irg1 sequences were expressed by using the T7 promotor in MCS1 of pACYCDuet-1. The control vector pKV-GA was derived from pKV-GACopt by cloning the acnA and gltA-containing part of pKV-GACopt in MCS2 of pACYCDuet-1. In addition, harmonized cadA, optimized irg1 or harmonized irg1 sequences were cloned in MCS1 of pKV-GA resulting in pKV-GAChar, pKV-GAIopt and pKV-GAIhar, respectively. Constructed plasmids were verified by sequencing.

Culture Media

For plasmid construction, E. coli strains were cultured at 37°C on lysogeny broth (LB) agar plates or in LB liquid medium and agitation rates of 200 rpm. Medium and plates were supplemented with chloramphenicol (35 μg/mL).

The other cultivations were done in M9 minimal medium (MM), which contained per 1 L: 200 mL 5 × M9 Minimal Salts (BD Difco) supplemented with 50 mM of glucose, 2 mM of MgSO4, 0.1 mM of CaCl2, 15 mg of thiamine, and 0.30 mg of selenite and US* trace elements (Panke et al., 1999). Medium was buffered with 0.1 M 3-(N-morpholino) propanesulfonic acid (MOPS) and the pH was adjusted to 6.9 with NaOH. Induction of gene expression was started by the addition of 0.5 mM of isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) when the optical density at 600 nm (OD600) of the culture reached approximately 0.4.

SDS-PAGE

For SDS-PAGE, E. coli BW25113 (DE3) Δpta–ΔldhA containing either pKV-GA, pKV-GACopt, pKV-GAChar, pKV-GAIopt, or pKV-GAIhar was cultivated for 16 h at 37°C and 200 rpm in 2 mL MM. Subsequently, the overnight cultures were transferred into 20 mL of fresh MM and incubated at 25°C and 200 rpm. When the cultures reached an OD600 of approximately 0.4, they were induced with 0.5 mM IPTG and incubated overnight at 25°C and 200 rpm.

Sixteen-milliliter of the cultures were used to make cell free extracts (CFE) according to the Y-PER Yeast Protein Extraction Reagent kit instructions (Thermo Scientific). Four-milliliter of the cultures were harvested by centrifugation (2 min, 14000 rpm), resuspended in a small volume of water, and loaded on pre-casted Criterion XT SDS-PAGE gels (Bio-Rad) together with the CFE’s according to manufacturer’s instructions (CriterionTM Cell, Bio-Rad). The proteins were stained by Bio-Safe Coomassie staining (Bio-Rad). Protein sizes were determined by using Precision Plus ProteinTM All Blue Standards ladder (Bio-Rad).

Bioreactor Cultures

Escherichia coli BW25113 (DE3) Δpta–ΔldhA containing either pKV-GA, pKV-GACopt, pKV-GAChar, pKV-GAIopt, or pKV-GAIhar was cultivated at 25°C in 0.5 L Mini Bioreactors, connected to myControl controller units (Applikon, The Netherlands) with a working volume of 400 ml. The pH was maintained at 6.9 by the automated addition of 2 M NaOH. Bioreactors were inoculated with 5% (v/v) of a pre-culture that was grown at 37°C in a 250 mL Erlenmeyer flasks with 50 mL of MM at 250 rpm for 24 h. The bioreactor cultures were stirred at 500 rpm and sparged with air at 200 mL/min for 8 h, after which the stirring speed was increased to 1200 rpm and the sparging rate was increased to at 400 mL/min. Samples of 2 mL were regularly taken to determine the OD600 of the cultures and the concentrations of substrate and products.

cis-Aconitate Decarboxylase Assay

For enzymatic assays, 30 mL of bioreactor culture was harvested by centrifugation (5 min, 7745 × g) after 17 h of cultivation in the presence of IPTG. CFE were made according to the Y-PER Yeast Protein Extraction Reagent kit instructions (Thermo Scientific). Protein concentrations were determined by using the Total Protein Kit, Micro Lowry, Onishi and Barr Modification (Sigma–Aldrich).

The activity of CadA and Irg1 was measured with cis- and trans-aconitate according to Vuoristo et al. (2015). Besides, the Irg1 activity was measured by using a method adapted from Michelucci et al. (2013) with the following modifications: CFE’s were incubated with 200 mM of cis-aconitate in 25 mM HEPES buffer (pH 7.1) supplied with proteinase inhibitor (cOmplete Protease Inhibitor Cocktail Tablets, Roche) for 50 min at 30°C.

For whole cell assays, 20 mL of bioreactor culture was harvested by centrifugation (5 min, 7745 ×g) after 17 h of cultivation in the presence of IPTG. Cells were washed with M9 salts in 100 mM MOPS (pH 7.1) and resuspended in 10 ml of the same medium. Twenty-millimeter of substrate (cis- or trans-aconitate) was added to 2 mL of the cell suspension and incubated at 30°C and 100 rpm. 1 M HCl was added to terminate the reaction, after which the supernatants were analyzed for itaconate formation by HPLC.

Analytical Methods

The cell density was determined by measuring the OD600 by using a DR6000 spectrophotometer (Hach Lange).

The concentrations of glucose and organic acids were determined by using a Perkin Elmer (200 series) HPLC equipped with an RI detector (PerkinElmer, Flexar) for measuring glucose and an UV detector (PerkinElmer, Flexar UV/V, at 210 nm) for citric acid, itaconic acid, cis- and trans-aconitic acid. The samples were separated on a Micro Guard Cation H pre-column (30 mm × 4.6 mm, Biorad) and an Aminex HPX-87H column (300 mm × 7.8 mm, Biorad) at 35°C, using 0.5 mL/min of 5 mM H2SO4 as eluent.

Results

Heterologous Expression of cadA and irg1

Optimized and harmonized gene sequences of cadA from A. terreus and irg1 from M. musculus were expressed in E. coli BW25113 (DE3) Δpta–ΔldhA together with gltA and acnA from Corynebacterium glutamicum. The strains were cultivated in shake flasks on MM at 25°C and induced with IPTG. Samples of culture pellets and CFE of the cultures were analyzed by SDS-PAGE. A protein band of around 53 kDa appeared on the SDS-PAGE gels, which is the expected size of the proteins encoded by cadA and irg1 (figure provided in the Supplementary Material). The samples of culture pellets gave very thick protein bands at the expected sizes, while much thinner bands were obtained with CFE’s, indicating that CadA and Irg1 were mostly in the form of inclusion bodies. No large differences were observed between the amounts of CadA or Irg1 on the gels after expression of the optimized and harmonized genes. The proteins encoded by gltA and acnA have sizes of 49 kDA and 114 kDA.

Enzymatic Assays

cis-Aconitate decarboxylase activity was measured in CFE’s of bioreactor cultures after 17 h of cultivation at 25°C in the presence of IPTG. The specific conversion rate of cis-aconitate to itaconate in CFE of E. coli BW25113 (DE3) Δpta–ΔldhA with pKV-GAChar was 1.39 μmol itaconate/min/mg protein, which was 1.7 times higher than with pKV-GACopt. CadA activities were higher than those previously obtained with cells cultivated at 30 and 37°C (Vuoristo et al., 2015), indicating that inclusion body formation is more suppressed at 25°C. Itaconate formation was not detected with CFE’s of cultures with pKV-GA, pKV-GAIopt, or pKV-GAIhar. Instead, cis-aconitate was converted to citrate, which is likely caused by the activity of aconitase in the CFE. Itaconate formation was also absent in cell lysates of pKV-GAIopt and pKV-GAIhar that were not centrifuged, indicating that Irg1 activity is not present in the membrane fraction of the cells. Trans-aconitate was not converted by any of the CFE’s.

Irg1 activities were also determined according to Michelucci et al. (2013). Again, no itaconate formation was detected under these conditions (results not shown). The absence of conversion of cis-aconitate to itaconate in CFE of E. coli BW25113 (DE3) Δpta–ΔldhA expressing irg1 suggests that Irg1 was inactivated in the period between the harvest of the cells and the measurements.

Whole Cells Assays

Conversion of cis-aconitate to itaconate by cells of E. coli BW25113 (DE3) Δpta–ΔldhA containing pKV-GA, pKV-GACopt, pKV-GAChar, pKV-GAIopt, and pKV-GAIhar was measured by incubating cells in the presence of 20 mM of cis- or trans-aconitate and measuring the formation of itaconate in the supernatant. Whole cells containing pKV-GACopt, pKV-GAChar, pKV-GAIopt, and pKV-GAIhar converted cis-aconitate to itaconate. Trans-aconitate was not converted (data not shown). The highest conversion rate was observed with pKV-GAIhar (1.10 μmol itaconate/min/mg cells, Figure 2), which was much higher than with pKV-GAIopt (0.19 μmol itaconate/min/mg cells). The conversion rates of pKV-GACopt and pKV-GAChar were (0.41 and 0.31 μmol itaconate/min/mg cells).

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 2. Conversion of cis-aconitate to itaconate (μmol itaconate/min/mg cells) by whole cells of E. coli BW25113 (DE3) Δpta–ΔldhA containing pKV-GA, pKV-GACopt, pKV-GAChar, pKV-GAIopt, and pKV-GAIhar. The average values of duplicate measurements are given.

Bioreactor Cultures

The effect of expression of cadA and irg1 on itaconate production was studied in E. coli BW25113 (DE3) Δpta–ΔldhA, in which the genes encoding phosphate acetyltransferase and lactate dehydrogenase were disrupted. gltA and acnA from C. glutamicum were expressed together with the target genes. The strains were cultivated under aerobic conditions in pH-controlled bioreactors on MM at 25°C. Itaconate was produced in all cultures, except in the control pKV-GA (Figure 3). Strains containing the harmonized genes (pKV-GAChar and pKV-GAIhar) produced slightly less itaconate than those containing the optimized genes (pKV-GACopt and pKV-GAIopt). The latter strains produced 5.5 and 4.3 mM, respectively.

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 3. Itaconate production in bioreactor cultures containing E. coli BW25113 (DE3) Δpta–ΔldhA with pKV-GA, pKV-GACopt, or pKV-GAChar (A) or pKV-GA, pKV-GAIopt, or pKV-GAIhar (B). The average values and SD of duplicate cultures are given.

Discussion

Since the identification of the gene encoding cis-aconitate decarboxylase (cadA) in A. terreus (Kanamasa et al., 2008), there has been a growing interest to produce itaconic acid in recombinant hosts such as E. coli (Liao and Chang, 2010; Li et al., 2011). Metabolic engineering strategies to increase the flux through the citric acid cycle and to reduce by-product formation have significantly increased the itaconate titres obtained with E. coli (Okamoto et al., 2014; Vuoristo et al., 2015), but they are still far below those obtained with A. terreus (Hevekerl et al., 2014). One of the possible bottlenecks in E. coli is the low activity of the heterologous CadA.

Although E. coli is a widely used cell-factory for the production of proteins and chemicals, problems such as inclusion body formation and low enzyme activity are often associated with heterologous production of proteins. For instance, low enzyme activities may occur when the frequency of synonymous codons in foreign coding DNA significantly differs from that of the host (Rosano and Ceccarelli, 2014). Harmonization of the codon usage frequencies of the target gene with those of the expression host can increase their expression (Angov et al., 2008; Van Zyl et al., 2014). We compared expression of codon optimized and harmonized sequences of cadA and irg1 by determining enzyme activities and performance in bioreactor cultures. The specific enzymatic activity with harmonized cadA was 1.7 times higher than with optimized cadA. In contrast, the specific conversion rate of cis-aconitate by whole cells containing pKV-GAChar was only 75% of the rate observed with pKV-GACopt, and the titre obtained in bioreactor cultures with pKV-GAChar was 74% of that obtained with pKV-GACopt. This suggests that other factors, like itaconate export, by-product formation, or levels of other enzymes involved in itaconate biosynthesis have a larger effect on itaconate production than the activity of CadA.

Okamoto et al. (2014) measured increased intracellular itaconate concentrations in their production strains and suggested that extracellular secretion of itaconate in E. coli limits the production. Itaconate transport has been studied in Aspergillus species and a few putative candidates have been characterized (Li et al., 2011). Expression of A. terreus mitochondrial transporter mttA and plasma membrane transporter mfsA were beneficial to production in A. niger (Li et al., 2013; van der Straat et al., 2014). So far, itaconate transporters have not been identified in E. coli, and the transport mechanism is unknown, which makes them obvious research targets for the future.

Besides CadA, alternative cis-aconitate decarboxylases can facilitate itaconate production. Recently, the gene product of immunoresponse gene 1 (irg1) from M. musculus was shown to catalyze the decarboxylation of cis-aconitate to itaconic acid in vitro (Michelucci et al., 2013). We were unable to detect any cis-aconitate decarboxylase activity in CFE’s of E. coli cultures expressing irg1, although the cultures were producing itaconate. This indicates that the enzyme was inactivated during preparation of CFE’s. Whole cells of pKV-GAIhar converted cis-aconitate nearly 5.5 times as fast as pKV-GAIopt. Still, the titre of pKV-GAIhar was less than the titre of pKV-GAIopt.

We showed for the first time that introduction of this mammalian enzyme also results in itaconate production in E. coli with titres up to 560 mg/L. The titres are similar to those obtained with cadA-expressing E. coli strains (700 mg/L), although the protein sequences are only 24% identical.

Conclusion

We have successfully expressed a mammalian cis-aconitate decarboxylase encoded by irg1 from M. musculus in E. coli. Titres up to 560 mg/L of itaconate were obtained with irg1, which are comparable to those obtained with cadA from A. terreus (700 mg/L). Codon harmonization increased the activity CadA in CFE, but this did not result in higher itaconate production in bioreactor cultures, suggesting that other factors are limiting. Besides irg1 from mouse, also other immunoresponse genes are known. Many of them may possess CadA activity and it should be investigated which ones are best for itaconate production.

Author Contributions

KV performed the bioreactor experiments, enzymatic assays and drafted the manuscript. AM participated in the design of the experiments and helped to draft the manuscript. SL and EO constructed the strains and verified the expression of heterologous genes on SDS-PAGE. GE supervised the project and commented the manuscript. JS conceived the project and commented the manuscript. RW conceived, designed and supervised the project, and contributed to the writing of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

This work has been carried out with a grant from the BE-BASIC program FS 01.002 Itaconic/fumaric acids: Novel Economic and eco-efficient processes for the production of itaconic and fumaric acid. We thank Applikon, The Netherlands, for providing Mini Bioreactors.

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fmicb.2015.00849

References

Angov, E., Hillier, C. J., Kincaid, R. L., and Lyon, J. A. (2008). Heterologous protein expression is enhanced by harmonizing the codon usage frequencies of the target gene with those of the expression host. PLoS ONE 3:e2189. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002189

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Angov, E., Legler, P. M., and Mease, R. M. (2011). Adjustment of codon usage frequencies by codon harmonization improves protein expression and folding. Methods Mol. Biol. 705, 1–13. doi: 10.1007/978-1-61737-967-3_1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fuhrmann, M., Hausherr, A., Ferbitz, L., Schödl, T., Heitzer, M., and Hegemann, P. (2004). Monitoring dynamic expression of nuclear genes in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii by using a synthetic luciferase reporter gene. Plant Mol. Biol. 55, 869–881. doi: 10.1007/s11103-005-2150-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hevekerl, A., Kuenz, A., and Vorlop, K. D. (2014). Influence of the pH on the itaconic acid production with Aspergillus terreus. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 98, 10005–10012. doi: 10.1007/s00253-014-6047-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kanamasa, S., Dwiarti, L., Okabe, M., and Park, E. (2008). Cloning and functional characterization of the cis -aconitic acid decarboxylase (CAD) gene from Aspergillus terreus. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 80, 223–229. doi: 10.1007/s00253-008-1523-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Klement, T., and Büchs, J. (2013). Itaconic acid – A biotechnological process in change. Bioresour. Technol. 135, 422–431. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.11.141

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, A., Pfelzer, N., Zuijderwijk, R., Brickwedde, A., Van Zeijl, C., and Punt, P. (2013). Reduced by-product formation and modified oxygen availability improve itaconic acid production in Aspergillus niger. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 9, 3901–3911. doi: 10.1007/s00253-012-4684-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, A., Van Luijk, N., Ter Beek, M., Caspers, M., Punt, P., and Van Der Werf, M. (2011). A clone-based transcriptomics approach for the identification of genes relevant for itaconic acid production in Aspergillus. Fungal Genet. Biol. 48, 602–611. doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2011.01.013

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liao, J. C., and Chang, P. C. (2010). Genetically Modified Microorganisms for Producing Itaconic Acid with High Yields. Hsin Chu: Industrial Technology Research Institute.

Google Scholar

Lohkamp, B., Bäuerle, B., Rieger, P.-G., and Schneider, G. (2006). Three-dimensional structure of iminodisuccinate epimerase defines the fold of the MmgE/PrpD protein family. J. Mol. Biol. 362, 555–566. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2006.07.051

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Makrides, S. C. (1996). Strategies for achieving high-level expression of genes in Escherichia coli. Microbiol. Rev. 60, 512–538.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Michelucci, A., Cordes, T., Ghelfi, J., Pailot, A., Reiling, N., Goldmann, O., et al. (2013). Immune-responsive gene 1 protein links metabolism to immunity by catalyzing itaconic acid production. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 110, 7820–7825. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1218599110

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Okamoto, S., Chin, T., Hiratsuka, K., Aso, Y., Tanaka, Y., Takahashi, T., et al. (2014). Production of itaconic acid using metabolically engineered Escherichia coli. J. Gen. Appl. Microbiol. 60, 191–197. doi: 10.2323/jgam.60.191

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Panke, S., Meyer, A., Huber, C. M., Witholt, B., and Wubbolts, M. G. (1999). An alkane-responsive expression system for the production of fine chemicals. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65, 2324–2332.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Rosano, G. L., and Ceccarelli, E. A. (2014). Recombinant protein expression in Escherichia coli: advances and challenges. Front. Microbiol. 5:172. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00172

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Steiger, M. G., Blumhoff, M. L., Mattanovich, D., and Sauer, M. (2013). Biochemistry of microbial itaconic acid production. Front. Microbiol. 4:23. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2013.00023

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

van der Straat, L., Vernooij, M., Lammers, M., Van Den Berg, W., Schonewille, T., Cordewener, J., et al. (2014). Expression of the Aspergillus terreus itaconic acid biosynthesis cluster in Aspergillus niger. Microb. Cell Fact. 13, 11. doi: 10.1186/1475-2859-13-11

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Van Zyl, L. J., Taylor, M. P., Eley, K., Tuffin, M., and Cowan, D. A. (2014). Engineering pyruvate decarboxylase-mediated ethanol production in the thermophilic host Geobacillus thermoglucosidasius. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 98, 1247–1259. doi: 10.1007/s00253-013-5380-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Vuoristo, K. S., Mars, A. E., Vidal Sangra, J., Springer, J., Eggink, G., Sanders, J. P. M., et al. (2015). Metabolic engineering of itaconate production in Escherichia coli. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 99, 221–228. doi: 10.1007/s00253-014-6092-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Werpy, T., and Petersen, G. (2004). “Top value added chemicals from biomass,” in Results of Screening for Potential Candidates from Sugars and Synthesis Gas, Vol. 1 (Oak Ridge, TN: Pacific Northwest National Laboratory and National Renewable Energy Laboratory).

Google Scholar

Keywords: itaconic acid, Escherichia coli, metabolic engineering, cis-aconitate decarboxylase, immunoresponsive gene 1, codon optimization, codon harmonization

Citation: Vuoristo KS, Mars AE, van Loon S, Orsi E, Eggink G, Sanders JPM and Weusthuis RA (2015) Heterologous expression of Mus musculus immunoresponsive gene 1 (irg1) in Escherichia coli results in itaconate production. Front. Microbiol. 6:849. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00849

Received: 22 May 2015; Accepted: 04 August 2015;
Published: 18 August 2015.

Edited by:

Mattijs Julsing, TU Dortmund University, Germany

Reviewed by:

Dayananda Chandrappa, University of Exeter, UK
Claire Roa-Pu Shen, National Tsing Hua University, Taiwan
Dirk Tischler, Technische Universität Bergakademie Freiberg, Germany

Copyright © 2015 Vuoristo, Mars, van Loon, Orsi, Eggink, Sanders and Weusthuis. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Ruud A. Weusthuis and Kiira S. Vuoristo, Bioprocess Engineering, Wageningen University, UR P.O. Box 16, 6700AA Wageningen, Gelderland, Netherlands, ruud.weusthuis@wur.nl; kiira.vuoristo@wur.nl

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.