Skip to main content

METHODS article

Front. Microbiol., 22 September 2016
Sec. Food Microbiology
This article is part of the Research Topic Biofilms from a food microbiology perspective: structures, functions and control strategies View all 16 articles

Development of a Method to Determine the Effectiveness of Cleaning Agents in Removal of Biofilm Derived Spores in Milking System

\r\nIevgeniia Ostrov,Ievgeniia Ostrov1,2Avraham HarelAvraham Harel3Solange BernsteinSolange Bernstein1Doron SteinbergDoron Steinberg2Moshe Shemesh*Moshe Shemesh1*
  • 1Department of Food Quality and Safety, Institute for Postharvest Technology and Food Sciences, Agricultural Research Organization, Rishon LeZion, Israel
  • 2Biofilm Research Laboratory, The Hebrew University-Hadassah, Jerusalem, Israel
  • 3Israeli Dairy Board, Yehud, Israel

Microbial damages caused by biofilm forming bacteria in the dairy industry are a fundamental threat to safety and quality of dairy products. In order to ensure the optimal level of equipment hygiene in the dairy industry, it is necessary to determine the biofilm removal efficiency of cleaning agents used for cleaning-in-place (CIP) procedures. However, currently there is no standard method available for evaluating and comparing cleaning agents for use in CIP procedures in the dairy industry under realistic conditions. The present study aims to establish a CIP model system to evaluate the effectiveness of cleaning agents in removal of biofilm derived spores from the surfaces of stainless steel which is the predominant substrate in milking equipment on dairy farms. The system is based on Bacillus subtilis spores surrounded with exopolymeric substances produced by bacteria during biofilm formation. The spores applied on sampling plates were mounted on T-junctions protruding 1.5–11-times the milk pipe diameter from the main loop to resemble different levels of cleaning difficulty. The cleaning tests were conducted using commercial alkaline detergents and caustic soda at conditions which are relevant to actual farm environment. The spores removal effect was evaluated by comparing the number of viable spores (attached to sampling plates) before and after cleaning. Evaluation of the cleaning and disinfecting effect of cleaning agents toward biofilm derived spores was further performed, which indicates whether spores elimination effect of an agent is due to killing the spores or removing them from the surfaces of dairy equipment. Moreover, it was established that the presence of extracellular matrix is an important factor responsible for high level of cleaning difficulty characteristic for surface attached spores. In overall, the results of this study suggest that the developed model system simulates actual farm conditions for quantitative evaluation of the effectiveness of cleaning and disinfecting agents and their cleaning and disinfecting effect on removal of biofilm derived spores.

Introduction

Bacterial contamination can adversely affect the quality, functionality, and safety of dairy products. It appears that the major source of the contamination of dairy products is often associated with biofilms on the surfaces of dairy processing equipment (Flint et al., 1997; Sharma and Anand, 2002a). Biofilms are highly structured multicellular communities, which allow bacteria to survive in hostile environments (Hall-Stoodley et al., 2004; Kolter and Greenberg, 2006). Bacterial cells in biofilms are characterized by increased resistance to antimicrobial agents and cleaning chemicals (Sharma and Anand, 2002a; Shaheen et al., 2010; Checinska et al., 2015). Biofilms found in the dairy production lines contain significant milk residues, particularly protein, and minerals such as calcium phosphate. The persistence of accumulated microorganisms in the form of biofilms on dairy equipment causes pre- and post-processing contamination, leading to lowered shelf-life of products and possible transmission of diseases (Faille et al., 2002; Sharma and Anand, 2002b; Shaheen et al., 2010). Biofilms are not only a potential source of contamination, but can also increase corrosion rate of metal pipes and equipment often used in the dairy industry, reduce heat transfer and increase fluid frictional resistance (Kumar and Anand, 1998). Thus, it becomes increasingly clear that bacterial biofilms are a major concern to modern dairy industry; especially with current trends toward longer production runs, the use of complex equipment, the automation of plants and increasingly stringent microbiological requirements.

Members of the Bacillus genus are of the most common bacteria found in dairy farms and processing plants (Sharma and Anand, 2002a; Simoes et al., 2010). Biofilms of Bacillus species may contain both vegetative bacteria and spores. Spore formation occurs preferentially when the biofilm is in direct contact with the oxygen in air and a water-saturated atmosphere (Ryu and Beuchat, 2005; Wijman et al., 2007). This corresponds very well to the situation in a milk line. It was reported that biofilm of Bacillus species could consist of up to 90% spores (Wijman et al., 2007; Faille et al., 2014). Since spores are much more resistant to heat and chemicals, they are much more difficult to eliminate than vegetative bacteria (Ryu and Beuchat, 2005). Moreover, the biofilm matrix offers additional protection for imbedded endospores, allowing survival, and colonization of the surrounding environment when conditions are favorable (Branda et al., 2001).

The most common Bacillus species found in dairy associated environment are B. licheniformis, B. cereus, B. subtilis, B. mycoides and B. megaterium (Andersson et al., 1995; Bartoszewicz et al., 2008; De Jonghe et al., 2008; Ledenbach and Marshall, 2009; Ostrov et al., 2015). It was previously shown that the majority of isolates from raw milk from organic and conventional dairy farms belonged to the genus Bacillus and showed at least 97% 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity with type strains of B. licheniformis, B. pumilus, B. circulans, B. subtilis and B. cereus (Coorevits et al., 2008). Moreover, B. cereus and B. licheniformis were shown to be predominant species originated from dairy processing environments, raw materials, and processed foods, while B. subtilis was among prevalent heat-resistant and highly thermoresistant spore-formers (According to Lücking et al., 2013). B. licheniformis was shown to affect the quality of pasteurized milk and cream (Gilmour and Rowe, 1990). B. cereus was found to be responsible for sweet curdling (without pH reduction) both in homogenized and non-homogenized low-pasteurized milk (Andersson et al., 1995). B. subtilis has been associated with ropiness in raw and pasteurized milk as well as the spoilage of UHT and canned milk products (Heyndrickx and Scheldeman, 2002). Strains belonging to the B. subtilis and B. cereus groups were shown to be strongly proteolytic (Lücking et al., 2013). Interestingly, Bacillus strains including B. cereus (Wijman et al., 2007), B. licheniformis (Hoong et al., 2012; Ostrov et al., 2015) and B. subtilis (Bridier et al., 2011) are able to form submerged surface-associated biofilm.

Biofilm formation depends on the synthesis of an extracellular matrix that holds the constituent cells together. In B. subtilis, the model organism within the Bacillus genus, the matrix has two main components, an exopolysaccharide (EPS) synthesized by the products of the epsA-O operon, and amyloid fibers encoded by tasA located in the tapA-sipW-tasA operon (Kearns et al., 2005; Branda et al., 2006; Chu et al., 2006; Vlamakis et al., 2013).

Since biofilm forming microorganisms in the dairy associated environment may hold spoilage and/or health risks, dairy products manufacturing is a subject to extremely stringent regulations (Bremer et al., 2006). The effective cleaning and disinfecting procedures in the dairy industry are a fundamental requirement to ensure the safety and quality of dairy products. Cleaning and disinfection in food manufacturing industries have been incorporated into the cleaning-in-place (CIP) regimes which include regular cleaning of processing equipment, usually with alkaline and acidic liquids at high temperatures (Zottola and Sasahara, 1994; Bremer et al., 2006). However, bacterial contamination and product spoilage due to biofilm formation are recurring problems (Carpentier et al., 1998). The result of the cleaning limitation of CIP procedures is accumulation of microorganisms on the equipment surfaces and formation of biofilm that is very difficult to remove by subsequent cleaning and disinfecting cycles (Peng et al., 2002; Hall-Stoodley et al., 2004). The biofilm formed by thermoresistant bacteria in a milk line can rapidly grow to such an extent that the passing milk is contaminated with cells released from the biofilm (Wirtanen et al., 1996).

Elimination of biofilm and spores is facilitated by a high degree of turbulence of the cleaning solution (Wirtanen et al., 1996) and by the presence of oxidizing substances such as hypochlorite and hydrogen peroxide (Kumar and Anand, 1998). Chlorine-based detergents can therefore facilitate the removal of biofilm. However, rapid recovery of biofilms after chlorine treatment is often observed. This may be due to the rapid regrowth of surviving cells, residual biofilm providing a conditioning layer for enhanced biofilm development, or selection of resistant microorganisms that survive and thrive after chlorine treatment (Flint et al., 1997). Currently, environmental concerns are driving dairy farms toward the use of chlorine-free detergents, although there is uncertainty about their effectiveness and thus it is difficult to judge whether this change can result in increased milk hygiene problems (Sundberg et al., 2011).

In order to ensure the optimal level of equipment hygiene in the dairy industry it is necessary to determine the removal efficiency of surface attached bacteria by cleaning solutions used for CIP procedures (Parkar et al., 2003; Bremer et al., 2006). However, currently there is no agreed standard method available for evaluating and comparing cleaning agents for use in CIP-procedures in the dairy industry under realistic conditions. Some progress has been made in a study which investigated the cleaning effects of various detergents under controlled realistic temperature and flow conditions (Sundberg et al., 2011). However, this study did not fully simulate the type of hygiene problems common in practice for instance the presence of extracellular matrix. Furthermore, previous studies could not evaluate the cleaning and disinfecting effect of the cleaning agents (whether the elimination effect is due to killing bacteria or removing them from the surfaces of dairy equipment). To this extent the necessity of not only killing bacteria in biofilms, but also removing them together with the extracellular matrix was previously emphasized (Zottola and Sasahara, 1994; Kumar and Anand, 1998; Parkar et al., 2003).

In the present study, we aimed to establish a model system to evaluate the effectiveness of cleaning agents in removal of biofilm derived spores from the surfaces of stainless steel which is predominant surface in milking equipment on dairy farms. Therefore, we developed a system in order to evaluate the cleaning outcome based on Bacillus subtilis spores surrounded with exopolymeric substances produced by bacteria during biofilm formation. The developed model system simulates actual farm conditions for quantitative evaluation of effectiveness of cleaning and disinfection agents and their cleaning and disinfecting effect on biofilm derived spores.

Materials and Methods

Strains and Growth Media

The B. subtilis wild type strain NCIB3610 (Branda et al., 2001) and its derivatives: RL3852 (ΔepsH::tet), YC668 (ΔabrB::kan) and YC189 (PtapA -cfp at the amyE locus) (Table 1) were used in this study. The wild type strain was used for evaluation of effectiveness in removal of biofilm derived spores in the CIP model system as well as evaluation of cleaning/disinfecting effect of the cleaning agents and determining the role of the extracellular matrix in persistence of biofilm derived spores toward cleaning procedures. The RL3852 and YC668 strains were used for determining the role of the extracellular matrix in persistence of biofilm derived spores toward cleaning procedures. The YC189 was used for analysis of the level of the matrix gene expression. For routine growth, the strains were propagated in Lysogeny broth (LB; 10 g of tryptone, 5 g of yeast extract and 5 g of NaCl per liter) or on solid LB medium supplemented with 1.5% agar.

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

TABLE 1. Strains used in this study.

Generation of Biofilm Derived Spores

Biofilm colonies were generated at 30°C in biofilm promoting medium LBGM [LB + 1% (v/v) glycerol + 0.1 mM MnSO4] (Shemesh and Chai, 2013) (Figure 1A). The grown colonies were collected and suspended in phosphate buffer saline (PBS; 0.01 M phosphate buffer, 0.0027 M KCl, 0.137 M NaCl per 200 ml, Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). Chained and bundled cells from the collected biofilm colony were disrupted by mild sonication (amplitude–50%, pulse–10 s, pause–5 s, duration–1.5 min.). Then, heat killing was performed at 80°C for 20 min. Cell numbers after heat killing were quantified by the plating method using LB agar plates.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 1. Generation of Bacillus subtilis biofilm derived spores. (A) Schematics showing that the spores, harvested from biofilm of B. subtilis 3610 (wild type strain) generated on LBGM agar plates, were mounted on the sampling plate. (B) Transcription of the tapA-sipW-tasA operon responsible for the matrix production in B. subtilis is greatly upregulated in LBGM following either 48 or 72 h of biofilm development. Intensity of the tapA expression by the cells that bear the PtapA -cfp transcriptional fusion (B. subtilis YC189) is presented in the middle-hand panel. The biofilm forming cells were obtained as previously reported (Shemesh and Chai, 2013) and analyzed using confocal laser scanning microscope (CSLM, Leica, Germany) visualization. Scale –10 μm.

Preparation and Enumeration of the Spores on the Sampling Plates

Prior to the cleaning tests, 200 μl portions from the suspension of spores (prepared as described above) were applied on each sampling plate and carefully distributed over the sampling area (Figure 1A). The goal was to attach approximately two million spores onto each plate. The plates were then placed upright in biological laminar hood to dry for around 1 h. Two or three sampling plates were prepared but not cleaned in the test installation. Otherwise, the subsequent treatment of these control plates was precisely the same as for the cleaned plates. Average spore counts on the control plates were used as the initial value for all plates cleaned on that day when calculating the level of spore reduction.

For enumeration of spores, the sampling area on each plate was carefully swabbed with cotton swabs moistened in PBS buffer. Swabs from each plate were then agitated in PBS in separate test tubes. Serial dilutions from each sample were prepared, followed by spread plating on LB agar for CFU analysis. Plates were incubated for 24 h at 37°C before colonies were counted.

Cleaning Solutions

We choose to use for this study caustic soda (NaOH, pH value–13) and five different commercial alkaline detergents (defined as solutions A–E; pH value between 11–12) which are commonly used in the Israeli dairy farms. All detergents were used at concentration of 0.5% (v/v) in accordance with the manufacturer’s recommendations. Caustic soda was used at concentration of 0.5% (m/v). As a control, tap water was used (pH value around 7.7) with a standard level of hardness (~50 mg/l Ca2+, 50 mg/l Mg2+) without addition of any detergent.

Test Installations

The cleaning tests were carried out in the CIP-model system which was designed to resemble farm conditions as closely as possible. The main components were a 5-m stainless steel milk line (25 mm internal diameter; fitted with a test outfit) for pumping the cleaning agents from the basin (Figure 2A), milk releaser, and stainless steel return line to the basin. To generate flushing pulsation of the circulating liquid, air was introduced into the milk line at controlled intervals (every 8 s, Supplementary Video 1). The test outfit had removable sampling plates, attached at the end of T-junctions that protruded either 75 mm or 35 mm from the main loop. In order to reflect different degrees of cleaning difficulty (characteristic for dairy equipment), removable stainless steel nozzles were used to increase the length of T-junctions in certain cleaning tests. The length of each nozzle constituted 50 mm. Thereby, the length of each T-junction could be increased by 50–200 mm (Figures 2B,C). The sampling plates were made from stainless steel (304) and the sampling area exposed to the cleaning solutions was about 5.7 cm2. The temperature of the cleaning agent during the cleaning tests constituted 50°C. The flow rate with air injection was 34.5 l per minute; the flow rate without air injection was 43 liter per minute. The duration of each cleaning cycle was 10 min.

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 2. Description of the developed CIP-model system. (A) Schematic design of the model system used in the cleaning tests: (1) sink with the heater, (2) milk pump, (3) releaser, (4) two 35 mm T-junctions, (5) the mane pipeline, Ø25 mm, (6) two 75 mm-T junctions, (7) air injection, (8) pipeline of water supply from the sink and the flow direction of circulating liquid. (B) The shortest T-junction (35 mm). (C) 75 mm T-junction elongated using removable stainless steel nozzles to the total length of 275 mm.

Evaluation of the Effect of the Cleaning Agents on the Viability of B. subtilis Spores

The tested detergents (0.5%, v/v) and caustic soda (0.5%, m/v) were added to spore suspension of B. subtilis 3610 containing around 1 × 107 CFU/ml spores. Whereas, the spore suspension within water without addition of detergents was used as control. The samples were incubated in closed tubes at conditions simulating those in CIP-model system (50°C, 200 rpm) for 30 min. The CFU-measurements of the number of viable spores were made every 10 min.

Statistical Analysis

Student’s t test was used to calculate the significance of the difference between the mean expression of a given experimental samples and the control samples. A P value of < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

Developing a Model Based on Biofilm Derived Spores

In order to simulate biofilm derived spores, we have developed the system that is based on B. subtilis spores surrounded with exopolymeric substances produced by bacteria during biofilm formation. To stimulate the sporulation in biofilm context, we generated B. subtilis colonies in the biofilm promoting medium LBGM (Figure 1A). To confirm the high level production of extracellular matrix in the biofilm colonies, we analyzed the level of the matrix gene expression in LBGM using transcriptional fusion of the promoter for tapA-sipW-tasA to the cfp gene encoding cyan fluorescent protein (Chai et al., 2008) similarly as described previously (Shemesh et al., 2010). We found that the expression of the PtapA-cfp was enhanced in a large number of cells both after 48 and 72 h of biofilm development (Figure 1B). This finding indicates that B. subtilis spores harvested from biofilm colonies could be surrounded with extracellular polymeric substances.

Evaluation of Effectiveness of Biofilm Derived Spores Removal in the CIP Model System

It was suggested that the hydrodynamic effects such as turbulent flow of cleaning agent may facilitate the removal of surface associated bacteria in dairy equipment (Wirtanen et al., 1996; Leliévre et al., 2002, 2003). However, dairy equipment has many so called “dead legs” (milk meters, clusters, etc.) protruding from the main pipelines in which the flow of liquid is much less turbulent. Such “dead legs” might represent higher levels of cleaning difficulty compared to other sites of dairy equipment. To simulate different levels of cleaning difficulty characteristic for dairy equipment in the CIP model system, we used removable stainless steel nozzles to increase the length of T-junctions (Figures 2B,C). We hypothesized that the level of efficiency of cleaning agents toward removal of biofilm derived spores is inversely proportional to the length of T-junctions (Supplementary Video 2).

Primarily, we evaluated mechanical effect of water circulation in the CIP system. Cleaning with water alone reflects the mechanical cleaning effect brought about by the flow of liquid in the installation (Sundberg et al., 2011). The difference in cleaning effect between water and a cleaning agent reflects the chemical/biological effect from the substances present in the agent. We found that effectiveness of water in removal of biofilm derived spores was inversely proportional to the length of T-junctions and constituted about 1.8 and 1.7 log reduction in spore counts for 35- and 75-mm T-junctions, respectively; while 1.3 log reduction for 125-mm T-junctions and about 0.7 log reduction for 225- and 275-mm T-junctions, respectively (Figure 3). These results confirm that mechanical effect of flow turbulence facilitates the removal of biofilm derived spores.

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 3. Mechanical effect of water and chemical/biological effect of cleaning agents on removal of biofilm derived spores in the CIP-model system. Sampling plates, each maintaining approximately 2 million spores of B. subtilis wild type strain, were mounted on T-junctions protruding 35, 75, 125, 225, and 275 mm from the main loop of the CIP model system, and cleaned in the installation. Caustic soda (NaOH) and five different commercial alkaline detergents (defined as A–E) were used as the cleaning agents. The detergents were dosed as 0.5% (v/v) in accordance with the manufacturer’s recommendations. Caustic soda was dosed as 0.5% (m/v). As a control, tap water without addition of any detergent was used. The cleaning effect was evaluated by comparing the numbers of viable spores (attached to sampling plates) before and after cleaning. The results represent the means and standard deviation (SD) of two independent biological experiments performed in duplicates.statistically significant difference (P < 0.05) between reduction in viable spore counts in given sample versus reduction in spore counts after cleaning with water (control).

Next, spores removal efficiency of caustic soda and five different commercial alkaline detergents with chlorine was determined. It was shown that chemical/biological effect of the tested detergents constituted additional 0.5–2 log reduction compared to mechanical effect of water circulation. Among all tested detergents, solution A had the highest removal efficiency leading to additional 2 log reduction in spore counts irrespective of the length of T-junctions (Figure 3).

As the water circulates by flushing pulsation in the commercial cleaning units, we tested the effect of air introduction into the CIP system on the spores removal efficiency of the tested agents. Our experiments established that there was no significant difference (P < 0.26) in the removal efficiency without the air introduction into the milk line (data not shown). We also tested the effect of temperature on the removal efficiency. We found about 0.5 log improvement in the efficiency of cleaning out biofilm derived spores by elevating the temperature from 35°C to 50°C (data not shown).

Evaluation of the Cleaning and Disinfecting Effect of the Cleaning Agents

Primarily, we determined the ability of the tested agents to reduce the number of viable spores (disinfecting effect). For this, B. subtilis spores suspensions were incubated with each of the tested agents in conditions simulating those in the CIP-model system. We found that solution A and caustic soda could not notably reduce the spore counts compared to control (about 0.2 log after 30 min of incubation) (Figure 4). At the same time, other tested agents leaded to noticeable reduction (about 0.5 log) in the number of viable spores even after 10 min of incubation.

FIGURE 4
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 4. The effect of the tested cleaning agents on the viability of B. subtilis spores. Caustic soda (NaOH) and five different commercial alkaline detergents (defined as A–E), were added to the tubes with spore suspension of WT B. subtilis within distilled sterile water, containing approximately 107 CFU/ml spores. The detergents were dosed as 0.5% (v/v) in accordance with the manufacturer’s recommendations. Caustic soda was dosed as 0.5% (m/v). Spore suspension without any detergent was used as control. The samples were incubated at 50°C for 30 min. The ability of detergents to eradicate spores (disinfecting effect) was evaluated by comparing the numbers of viable spores in control and after the treatment with a tested detergent at different time points of incubation. The results represent the means and standard deviation (SD) of two independent biological experiments performed in duplicates.statistically significant difference (P < 0.05) between viable spore counts in given sample versus spore counts after cleaning with water (control).

To determine a correlation between the cleaning and disinfecting effect of the tested detergents we defined the ability of a cleaning agent to reduce the number of viable spores after 10 min of incubation (as the duration of cleaning cycle in the CIP model system is 10 min) as disinfecting effect. We compared the percentage of the disinfecting effect to the total chemical/biological effect of a cleaning agent determined in the CIP system after 10 min of cleaning test conduction (taken as 100%). The difference between the total chemical/biological effect of a cleaning agent and disinfecting effect was defined as cleaning effect. It was established that chemical/biological effect of solution A and caustic soda was mostly due to removal of surface attached spores, solution E was characterized by approximately equal cleaning and disinfecting properties; while chemical/biological effect of B, C, and D was mostly due to disinfecting (Figure 5).

FIGURE 5
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 5. Correlation between cleaning and disinfecting effect of the tested agents. The ability of a cleaning agent to reduce the number of viable spores (B. subtilis wild type strain) after 10 min of incubation (as the duration of cleaning cycle in the CIP model system is 10 min) was defined as disinfecting effect. The percentage of the disinfecting effect was compared to the total chemical/biological effect of a cleaning agent determined in the CIP system after 10 min of cleaning test conduction (taken as 100%). The difference between the total chemical/biological effect of a cleaning agent and disinfecting effect was defined as cleaning effect. The results represent the means and standard deviation (SD) of two independent biological experiments performed in duplicates. statistically significant difference (P < 0.05) between reduction in spore counts due to cleaning or disinfecting effect versus total chemical/biological effect of a tested agent.

Determining the Role of the Extracellular Matrix in Persistence of Biofilm Derived Spores toward Cleaning Procedures

To support the assumption that there is an extracellular matrix around the spores which may provide a protection, we evaluated mechanical effect of water circulation toward the spores produced by ΔepsH strain of B. subtilis (this mutant strain cannot produce exopolysaccharide component of extracellular matrix). As we hypothesized, there was a notable increase in reduction of viable spore counts for ΔepsH compared to wild type strain for the two higher lengths of the T-junctions (Figure 6). Furthermore, we evaluated the mechanical effect of water circulation toward the spores produced by the ΔabrB of B. subtilis (this mutant strain overproduces extracellular matrix). We found that it was far more difficult to remove the spores of ΔabrB strain compared to wild type (Figure 6). These results indicate that the presence of extracellular matrix is an important factor responsible for high levels of cleaning difficulty.

FIGURE 6
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 6. The role of extracellular matrix in persistence of biofilm derived spores against removing by cleaning procedures. Sampling plates, each maintaining approximately 2 million spores of WT B. subtilis, B. subtilis RL3582 (ΔepsH), B. subtilis YC668 (ΔabrB), were mounted on T-junctions protruding 35, 125, and 275 mm from the main loop of the CIP model system, and cleaned in the installation. Tap water without addition of any detergent was used as a cleaning agent. The cleaning effect was evaluated by comparing the numbers of viable spores (attached to sampling plates) before and after cleaning. The cleaning effect for B. subtilis 3610 was taken as 100%. The results represent the means and standard deviation (SD) of two independent biological experiments performed in triplicates.statistically significant difference (P < 0.05); ∗∗statistically significant difference (P < 0.006) between reduction in viable spore counts in given sample versus reduction in spore counts in control wild type bacteria.

Discussion

It becomes increasingly clear that the major source of the contamination of dairy products is often associated with attached bacteria on the surfaces of dairy processing equipment (Flint et al., 1997). Thus, there is a need to develop a model system for evaluating and comparing the effectiveness of cleaning agents in removal of attached bacteria from the surfaces of stainless steel under realistic conditions.

This study, investigated the removal efficiency of caustic soda and commercial alkaline detergents toward biofilm derived spores using a developed CIP model system under well-controlled realistic temperature and flow conditions.

We used Bacillus spores as a model, because of their high adherence to various materials (Faille et al., 2001) and their resistance to heat and chemicals (Faille et al., 2002). Several previous studies investigated cleaning efficiency during CIP procedures (Leliévre et al., 2003; Sundberg et al., 2011; Faille et al., 2013) using Bacillus spores as a model. However, previous models do not fully reflect the type of hygiene problems common in practice such as the presence of extracellular matrix of biofilm origin. The conditions, encountered in the dairy equipment are often propitious for bacterial growth and eventually a biofilm is formed. Previous works have demonstrated that sporulation could occur in biofilms, suggesting that biofilms would be a significant source of food contamination with spores (Wijman et al., 2007; Faille et al., 2014). Consequently, the spores derived from biofilm represent continuous microbial problem which could be very hard to eliminate partially due to the presence of extracellular matrix that might influence their resistance during cleaning procedures.

Our results show that spores removing efficiency during cleaning procedures was inversely proportional to the length of T-junctions (Figure 3). This is in consistence with previous papers suggesting that turbulence may influence removal of surface attached bacteria (Wirtanen et al., 1996; Leliévre et al., 2002, 2003). It is generally considered that a “dead leg” is cleanable when the flow is directed into the “dead leg” and its length does not exceed twice the diameter of the pipeline (Chisti, 1999). In our study, the T-junctions were 35–275 mm that is 1.5–11-times the diameter of the pipeline. Therefore, it is conceivable that we observed notable decrease in effectiveness of spores elimination by the tested agents with the increase of the length of T-junctions. These results confirm that the developed CIP model system simulates different levels of the cleaning difficulty that facilitates proper evaluation of spores elimination effectiveness of cleaning agents at realistic conditions.

Interestingly, our experiments demonstrated that there was no significant difference in spores removal efficiency without the air introduction into the milk line. This could be explained by the relatively low diameter of pipeline which was used in the developed system. Most likely, the differences in flow rate and turbulence were not significant with or without introduction of air.

Moreover, we found around 0.5 log improvement in the spores removal efficiency by elevating the temperature from 35–50°C. This finding is also in consistence with previous studies which demonstrated dependence of the cleaning efficiency on temperature (Peng et al., 2002; Sundberg et al., 2011). Taken together, our results suggest that elevated temperature as well as chemical/biological effect may help to eliminate biofilm derived spores in milking equipment.

The methods of evaluation of cleaning effectiveness described earlier (Parkar et al., 2003; Bremer et al., 2006; Sundberg et al., 2011) do not show if chemical/biological effect of cleaning agents is due to killing bacteria (disinfecting effect) or to removing them from the surfaces of dairy associated equipment (cleaning effect). The necessity of not only killing bacteria in biofilms, but also removing the immobilized bacteria is suggested (Flint et al., 1997; Kumar and Anand, 1998; Parkar et al., 2003) as rapid recovery of biofilms after disinfectant treatment is often observed. Therefore, we developed a method to evaluate the cleaning and disinfecting effect of cleaning agents toward biofilm derived spores. Using this approach it is shown whether chemical/biological effect of a detergent is due to cleaning, disinfecting or both.

In conclusion, a CIP model system was developed and used to evaluate the efficiency of cleaning agents in removing biofilm derived spores from the surfaces of dairy equipment. The developed system simulates actual farm conditions for proper evaluation of the spores elimination effectiveness and cleaning and disinfecting effect of cleaning and disinfection agents.

Author Contributions

IO and MS planned the experiments and wrote the original manuscript. IO performed the experiments described in the manuscript. AH and MS designed the CIP-model system described in the manuscript. AH and SB provided technical assistance for conduction of experiments. DS revised the manuscript. IO, DS, and MS integrated all of the data throughout the study and crafted the final manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Israel Dairy Board grant 421-0254-15. This work was also partially supported by the COST ACTION FA1202 BacFoodNet. IO is a recipient of the scholarship as a new immigrant Ph.D. student from the Ministry of Immigration & Absorption of Israeli Government. IO is also recipient of excellence in research scholarship for Ph.D. students granted by Israel Dairy Board.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

Contribution from the Agricultural Research Organization The Volcani Center, Rishon LeZion, Israel, No. 754/16-E Series. We thank Dr. Uzi Merin from ARO and Prof. Eran Lavy from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem for the helpful discussions. We would like to acknowledge Dr. Ilan Halachmi for assistance in drawing the schematics for the CIP-model system. We thank Mr. Eduard Belausov, Konstantin Sudakov, Ms. Hani Tsemah, and Mr. Golan Yakov for excellent technical assistance. We are also grateful to Drs. Shmuel Fridman, Mor Freed, and Adin Shwimmer for their supportive suggestions and discussions.

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fmicb.2016.01498

References

Andersson, A., Rönner, U., and Granum, P. E. (1995). What problems does the food industry have with the spore-forming pathogens Bacillus cereus and Clostridium perfringens? Int. J. Food Microbiol. 28, 145–155. doi: 10.1016/0168-1605(95)00053-4

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bartoszewicz, M., Hansenb, B. M., and Swiecickaa, I. (2008). The members of the Bacillus cereus group are commonly present contaminants of fresh and heat-treated milk. Food Microbiol. 25, 588–596. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2008.02.001

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Branda, S. S., Chu, F., Kearns, D. B., Losick, R., and Kolter, R. (2006). A major protein component of the Bacillus subtilis biofilm matrix. Mol. Microbiol. 59, 1229–1238. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.05020.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Branda, S. S., González-Pastor, J. E., Ben-Yehuda, S., Losick, R., and Kolter, R. (2001). Fruiting body formation by Bacillus subtilis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98, 11621–11626. doi: 10.1073/pnas.191384198

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bremer, P. J., Fillery, S., and McQuillan, A. J. (2006). Laboratory scale Clean-In-Place (CIP) studies on the effectiveness of different caustic and acid wash steps on the removal of dairy biofilms. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 106, 254–262. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2005.07.004

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bridier, A., Le Coq, D., Dubois-Brissonnet, F., Thomas, V., Aymerich, S., and Briandet, R. (2011). The spatial architecture of Bacillus subtilis biofilms deciphered using a surface associated model and in situ imaging. PLoS ONE 6:e16177. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016177

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Carpentier, B., Wong, A. C. L., and Cerf, O. (1998). Biofilms on dairy plant surface. Bull. Int. Dairy Fed. 329, 32–35.

Chai, Y., Chu, F., Kolter, R., and Losick, R. (2008). Bistability and biofilm formation in Bacillus subtilis. Mol. Microbiol. 67, 254–263. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2007.06040.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Checinska, A., Paszczynski, A., and Burbank, M. (2015). Bacillus and other spore-forming genera: variations in responses and mechanisms for survival. Annu. Rev. Food Sci. Technol. 6, 351–369. doi: 10.1146/annurev-food-030713-092332

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chisti, Y. (1999). “Modern systems of plant cleaning,” in Encyclopedia of Food Microbiology, Vol 3, ed. R. K. Robinson (San Diego, CA: Academic Press), 1806–1815.

Google Scholar

Chu, F., Kearns, D. B., Branda, S. S., Kolter, R., and Losick, R. (2006). Targets of the master regulator of biofilm formation in Bacillus subtilis. Mol. Microbiol. 59, 1216–1228. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.05019.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Coorevits, A., De Jonghe, V., Vandroemmed, J., Reekmansa, R., Heyrmana, J., Messensc, W., et al. (2008). Comparative analysis of the diversity of aerobic spore-forming bacteria in raw milk from organic and conventional dairy farms. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 31, 126–140. doi: 10.1016/j.syapm.2008.03.002

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

De Jonghe, V., Coorevits, A., Vandroemme, J., Heyrman, J., Herman, L., De Vos, P., et al. (2008). Intraspecific genotypic diversity of Bacillus species from raw milk. Int. Dairy J. 18, 496–505. doi: 10.1016/j.idairyj.2007.11.007

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Faille, C., Bénézech, T., Blel, W., Ronse, A., Ronse, G., Clarisse, M., et al. (2013). Role of mechanical vs. chemical action in the removal of adherent Bacillus spores during CIP procedures. Food Microbiol. 33, 149–157. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2012.09.010

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Faille, C., Fontaine, F., and Bénézech, T. (2001). Potential occurrence of adhering living Bacillus spores in milk product processing lines. J. Appl. Microbiol. 90, 892–900. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2001.01321.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Faille, C., Jullien, C., Fontaine, F., Bellon-Fontaine, M. N., Slomianny, C., and Bénézech, T. (2002). Adhesion of Bacillus spores and Escherichia coli cells to inert surfaces: role of surface hydrophobicity. Can. J. Microbiol. 48, 728–738. doi: 10.1139/W02-063

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Faille, C. T., Bénézech, G., Midelet-bourdin, Y., Lequette, M., Clarisse, G., Ronse, A., et al. (2014). Sporulation of Bacillus spp. within biofilms: a potential source of contamination in food processing environments. Food Microbiol. 40, 64–67. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2013.12.004

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Flint, S. H., Bremer, P. J., and Brooks, J. D. (1997). Biofilms in dairy manufacturing plant description, current concerns and methods of control. Biofouling 11, 81–97. doi: 10.1080/08927019709378321

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gilmour, A., and Rowe, M. T. (1990). “Microorganisms associated in milk in dairy microbiology,” in Dairy Microbiology, 2nd Edn, Vol 1, ed. R. K. Robinson (London: Elsevier Applied Science), 37–76.

Google Scholar

Hall-Stoodley, L., Costerton, J. W., and Stoodley, P. (2004). Bacterial biofilms: from the natural environment to infectious diseases. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2, 95–108. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro821

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Heyndrickx, M., and Scheldeman, P. (2002). “Bacilli associated with spoilage in dairy and other food products,” in Applications and Systematics of Bacillus and Relatives, eds R. Berkeley, M. Heyndrickx, N. Logan, and P. De Vos (Oxford: Blackwell Science), 64–82.

Google Scholar

Hoong, K., Flint, S., Palmer, J., Andrewes, P., Bremer, P., and Lindsay, D. (2012). Proteolysis produced within biofilms of bacterial isolates from raw milk tankers. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 157, 28–34. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2012.04.008

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kearns, D. B., Chu, F., Branda, S. S., Kolter, R., and Losick, R. (2005). A master regulator for biofilm formation by Bacillus subtilis. Mol. Microbiol. 55, 739–749. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2004.04440.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kolter, R., and Greenberg, E. P. (2006). Microbial sciences: the superficial life of microbes. Nature 441, 300–302. doi: 10.1038/441300a

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kumar, C. G., and Anand, S. K. (1998). Significance of microbial biofilms in food industry: a review. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 42, 9–27. doi: 10.1016/S0168-1605(98)00060-9

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ledenbach, L. H., and Marshall, R. T. (2009). “Microbiological spoilage of dairy products,” in Compendium of the Microbiological Spoilage of Foods and Beverages, eds W. H. Sperber and N. P. Doyle (New York, NY: Springer Science & Business media LLS), 41–67.

Google Scholar

Leliévre, C., Antonini, G., Faille, C., and Bénézech, T. (2002). Cleaning-in-place, modelling of cleaning kinetics of pipes soiled by Bacillus spores assuming a process combining removal and deposition. Food Bioprod. Process. 80, 305–311. doi: 10.1205/096030802321154826

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Leliévre, C., Legentilhomme, P., Legrand, J., Faille, C., and Bénézech, T. (2003). Hygenic design: influence of the local wall shear stress variations on the cleanability of a three-way valve. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 81, 1071–1076. doi: 10.1205/026387603770866209

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lücking, G., Stoeckel, M., Atamer, Z., Hinrichs, J., and Ehling-Schulz, M. (2013). Characterization of aerobic spore-forming bacteria associated with industrial dairy processing environments and product spoilage. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 166, 270–279. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2013.07.004

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ostrov, I., Sela, N., Freed, M., Khateb, N., Kott-Gutkowski, M., Inbar, D., et al. (2015). Draft genome sequence of Bacillus licheniformis S127 isolated from sheep udder clinical infection. Genome Announc. 3, e00971-15. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00971-15

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Parkar, S. G., Flint, S. H., and Brooks, J. D. (2003). Physiology of biofilms of thermophilic bacilli –potential consequences for cleaning. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 30, 553–560. doi: 10.1007/s10295-003-0081-x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pasvolsky, R., Zakin, V., Ostrova, I., and Shemesh, M. (2014). Butyric acid released during milk lipolysis triggers biofilm formation of Bacillus species Int. J. Food Microbiol. 181, 19–27. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2014.04.013

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Peng, J. S., Tsai, W. C., and Chou, C. C. (2002). Inactivation and removal of Bacillus cereus by sanitizer and detergent. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 77, 11–18. doi: 10.1016/S0168-1605(02)00060-0

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ryu, J. H., and Beuchat, L. R. (2005). Biofilm formation and sporulation by Bacillus cereus on a stainless steel surface and subsequent resistance of vegetative cells and spores to chlorine, chlorine dioxide, and a peroxyacetic acid-based sanitizer. J. Food Prot. 68, 2614–2622.

Google Scholar

Shaheen, R., Svensson, B., Andersson, M. A., Christiansson, A., and Salkinoja-Salonen, M. (2010). Persistence strategies of Bacillus cereus spores isolated from dairy silo tanks. Food Microbiol. 27, 347–355. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2009.11.004

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sharma, M., and Anand, S. K. (2002a). Biofilms evaluation as an essential component of HACCP for food/dairy processing industry – a case. Food Control. 13, 469–477. doi: 10.1016/S0956-7135(01)00068-8

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sharma, M., and Anand, S. K. (2002b). Characterization of constitutive microflora of biofilms in dairy processing lines. Food Microbiol. 19, 627–636. doi: 10.1006/yfmic.472

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shemesh, M., and Chai, Y. (2013). A combination of glycerol and manganese promotes biofilm formation in Bacillus subtilis via histidine kinase KinD signaling. J. Bacteriol. 195, 2747–2754. doi: 10.1128/JB.00028-13

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shemesh, M., Kolter, R., and Losick, R. (2010). The biocide chlorine dioxide stimulates biofilm formation in Bacillus subtilis by activation of the histidine kinase KinC. J. Bacteriol. 192, 6352–6356. doi: 10.1128/JB.01025-10

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Simoes, M., Simoes, L. C., and Vieira, M. J. (2010). A review of current and emerging control strategies. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 43, 573–583. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2009.12.008

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sundberg, M., Christiansson, A., Lindahl, C., Wahlund, L., and Birgersson, C. (2011). Cleaning effectiveness of chlorine-free detergents for use on dairy farms. J. Dairy Res. 78, 105–110. doi: 10.1017/S0022029910000762

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Vlamakis, H., Chai, Y., Beauregard, P., Losick, R., and Kolter, R. (2013). Sticking together: buildinga biofilm the Bacillus subtilis way. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 11, 157–168. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2960

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wijman, J. G., de Leeuw, P. P., Moezelaar, R., Zwietering, M. H., and Abee, T. (2007). Air-liquid interface biofilms of Bacillus cereus: formation, sporulation, and dispersion. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73, 1481–1488. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01781-06

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wirtanen, G., Husmark, U., and Mattila-Sandholm, T. (1996). Microbial evaluation of the biotransfer potential from surfaces with Bacillus biofilms after rinsing and cleaning procedures in closed food-processing systems. J. Food Prot. 59, 727–733.

Google Scholar

Zottola, E. A., and Sasahara, K. C. (1994). Microbial biofilms in the food processing industry – should they be a concern? Int. J. Food Microbiol. 23, 125–148. doi: 10.1016/0168-1605(94)90047-7

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: dairy industry, biofilm, Bacillus subtilis, biofilm derived spores, spores removal effectiveness, cleaning-in-place

Citation: Ostrov I, Harel A, Bernstein S, Steinberg D and Shemesh M (2016) Development of a Method to Determine the Effectiveness of Cleaning Agents in Removal of Biofilm Derived Spores in Milking System. Front. Microbiol. 7:1498. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01498

Received: 13 April 2016; Accepted: 07 September 2016;
Published: 22 September 2016.

Edited by:

Romain Briandet, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, France

Reviewed by:

Efstathios D. Giaouris, University of the Aegean, Greece
Akos T. Kovacs, University of Jena, Germany

Copyright © 2016 Ostrov, Harel, Bernstein, Steinberg and Shemesh. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Moshe Shemesh, moshesh@agri.gov.il

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.