The orexinergic system influences conditioned odor aversion learning in the rat: a theory on the processes and hypothesis on the circuit involved
Barbara Ferry- Centre of Research in Neuroscience Lyon, CNRS UMR 5292 - INSERM U1028 UCBL1, Lyon, France
A large variety of behaviors that are essential for animal survival depend on the perception and processing of surrounding smells present in the natural environment. In particular, food-search behavior, which is conditioned by hunger, is directly driven by the perception of odors associated with food, and feeding status modulates olfactory sensitivity. The orexinergic hypothalamic peptide orexin A (OXA), one of the central and peripheral hormones that triggers food intake, has been shown to increase olfactory sensitivity in various experimental conditions including the conditioned odor aversion learning paradigm (COA). COA is an associative task that corresponds to the association between an olfactory conditioned stimulus (CS) and a delayed gastric malaise. Previous studies have shown that this association is formed only if the delay separating the CS presentation from the malaise is short, suggesting that the memory trace of the odor is relatively unstable. To test the selectivity of the OXA system in olfactory sensitivity, a recent study compared the effects of fasting and of central infusion of OXA during the acquisition of COA. Results showed that the increased olfactory sensitivity induced by fasting and by OXA infusion was accompanied by enhanced COA learning performances. In reference to the duration of action of OXA, the present work details the results obtained during the successive COA extinction tests and suggests a hypothesis concerning the role of the OXA component of fasting on the memory processes underlying CS-malaise association during COA. Moreover, referring to previous data in the literature we suggest a functional circuit model where fasting modulates olfactory memory processes through direct and/or indirect activation of particular OXA brain targets including the olfactory bulb, the locus coeruleus (LC) and the amygdala.
Introduction
A large variety of behaviors that are essential for animal survival depend on the sensory perception and processing of odors present in the natural environment. In particular, food-search behavior, which is conditioned by hunger, is directly driven by the perception of odors associated with food (Le Magnen, 1959) and several studies have demonstrated that odor processing is influenced by the nutritional status of the animal. For example, olfactory system activity was shown to be directly modulated according to hunger and satiation status (Pager et al., 1972; Pager, 1974, 1978; Royet et al., 1983; Apelbaum et al., 2005). Moreover, fasting enhanced odor detection in rats whereas satiety reduced detection of odors in general (Aimé et al., 2007), and more precisely of one odorant specifically associated with the food type involved in the satiation (O’Doherty et al., 2000; Mulligan et al., 2002). Some data suggest that the central nervous system (CNS) regulates food-search behavior by modulating the detection threshold of the food odorant itself through centrifugal innervations (Doucette et al., 2007; Doucette and Restrepo, 2008; Fletcher and Chen, 2010). A large body of data indicates that the hypothalamus plays an important role in this process. Firstly, anatomic characterization of the lateral hypothalamus (LH) has shown the existence of a functional loop between structures involved in the first level of odor detection and the hypothalamus (Peyron et al., 1998; Sakurai, 2005; Swanson et al., 2005; Hahn and Swanson, 2010). Secondly, the crucial role of the basal hypothalamus, and in particular of orexigenic (appetite-stimulating) and anorexigenic (appetite-inhibiting) neurochemicals, in appetite regulation and energy balance has long been established (see Rodgers et al., 2002 for review). Thirdly, among the multitude of neurochemicals found in the hypothalamus, the most recently discovered orexigenic peptides (orexin A, OXA and orexin B, OXB) have been shown to be strongly involved in the regulation of feeding and energy metabolism (see Willie et al., 2001 for review) and the OXA has been involved in olfactory sensitivity. In particular, our team showed that intracerebroventricular (icv) infusion of OXA in rat increased olfactory detection performance in the same way as physiologically induced fasting (Aimé et al., 2007; Julliard et al., 2007). Fourthly, lateral hypothalamic orexin neurons project directly to the olfactory bulb (OB; Peyron et al., 1998; Nambu et al., 1999; Caillol et al., 2003; Shibata et al., 2008) and the two classes of receptors for OXA and for OXB have been found in OB neurons (Caillol et al., 2003; Hardy et al., 2005). In addition, central infusion of OXA increased OB Fos responses to food odor in both fasted and satiated animals (Prud’homme et al., 2009). All these results indicate that the orexin system is involved in the control of feeding behavior by modulating olfactory sensitivity.
It is, however, very unlikely that olfactory sensitivity is completely dissociated from olfactory memory. Rusiniak et al. (1982) and Slotnick et al. (1997) showed that the more intense the odor, the stronger the memory of its association with a reinforcement. Interestingly, other than its projection on the primary olfactory centers, the hypothalamic OXA neurons project to various structures involved in olfactory associative learning (see Rodgers et al., 2002 for review). Moreover, the OXA system was shown to be involved in the memory processes underlying various kinds of learning (Jaeger et al., 2002; Telegdy and Adamik, 2002; Mair and Hembrook, 2008; Di Sebastiano et al., 2011; Sears et al., 2013; Soya et al., 2013). In addition, Touzani and Sclafani (2002) have shown that the lesion of the LH induced a deficit in conditioned flavor aversion paradigms. Therefore, it can be suggested that the OXA system, may influence odor memory formation, directly, by modulating olfactory sensitivity, and indirectly, by activating particular hypothalamus target regions through the modulation of olfactory sensitivity.
In a natural environment, the relevance of the odor coming from a food source encountered by an animal during food-search is a crucial key, determining approach and ingestion of the food. Whether the odor of the food is new to the animal or has previously acquired a hedonic valence during a first intake experience will condition either approach or avoidance. Acquisition of hedonic valence by a food item has been shown to result from conditioned learning during which the sensory stimuli characterizing a particular food (odor and taste) become associated with the positive (energy input) or negative (gastric malaise, poisoning) consequences of the ingestion of the food, so that processing the odor and taste stimuli will cue the appropriate approach or avoidance responses (Rescorla, 1988; Holland, 1990; Mackintosh, 1991). These kinds of association have been experimentally studied for years (Slotnick and Katz, 1974; Nigrosh et al., 1975; Slotnick, 1984) and conditioned food aversion paradigms, such as conditioned taste or odor/taste-potentiated odor aversion learning, have provided fundamental insights into the mechanisms and CNS structures involved in food-reward/food-poisoning associations (see Miranda, 2012 for review).
One such paradigm, conditioned odor aversion (COA), is the avoidance of an odorized-tasteless solution (conditioned stimulus, CS) the ingestion of which precedes toxicosis (unconditioned stimulus, US). During COA acquisition, the presentation of the CS is separated from the US administration by a temporal gap that can be of various amplitudes depending on whether the CS is mixed (proximal presentation; Slotnick et al., 1997; Chapuis et al., 2007) or presented close to the solution (Palmerino et al., 1980; Rusiniak et al., 1982; Ferry et al., 1996, 2006). Thus COA is a trace conditioning that has been suggested to result from the association of the memory trace of the CS and the delayed US (see Bures and Buresova, 1990; Roldan and Bures, 1994).
Taking these data together with the fact that (i) the amygdala has been widely involved in the processes underlying the association between the CS and the delayed US during COA (see Miranda, 2012 for review), (ii) OXA neurons project to the amygdala and (iii) hypothalamic OXA neurons are activated by cues associated with consummatory rewards such as food (Harris et al., 2005), it is suggested that the OXA system may play a role in the learning and memory processes linked to higher cognitive aspects of feeding.
In order to test this hypothesis, a recent study has aimed to describe the role of the central OXA system in COA learning (Ferry and Duchamp-Viret, 2014). The results showed that fasting and icv infusion of OXA before the acquisition significantly enhanced COA performances. Moreover in that study, data obtained during the elevated plus maze task showed enhanced anxiety in Fasted but not in OXA infused animals suggesting that the enhancing effect of fasting on COA performances is likely mediated, at least in part, by the OXA component of fasting. In order to further precise which process the OXA system is involved in, the present experiment extends our previous one (Ferry and Duchamp-Viret, 2014) and includes a comparison between the effect of icv OXA infusion and fasting on the extinction of COA learning.
Material and Methods
The description of the material and methods has been simplified and subjects, surgery and microinfusion procedure are detailed in a previous article (Ferry and Duchamp-Viret, 2014).
Briefly, three groups of animals were acclimated for 7 days to a 23 h 45 min water deprivation schedule. Groups OXA and artificial CSF (aCSF) were constituted by animals implanted in the lateral ventricle that were microinfused with OXA (10 µg dissolved in 3 µl of sterile CSF, Sigma) or aCSF (3 µl, Harvard Apparatus) 20 min before the acquisition of the COA task (on Day 8). A third experimental group (Fasted) was constituted by animals placed in a 24-h food-deprivation schedule before acquisition of COA. Acquisition of COA consisted by the presentation of an olfactory CS (scented water corresponding to isoamylacetate, Sigma-Aldrich France, mixed with tap water at a final concentration of 10−6) followed 20 min after by an injection of 0.15 M lithium chloride-inducing gastric malaise (LiCl, 10 ml/kg; i.p., US). Conditioned aversion to the odor was tested 48 h later (on Day 11) and COA extinction learning took place from Days 12 to 15. All the testing and extinction sessions were conducted under a food-satiated condition in order to prevent any effect of fasting on the olfactory sensitivity between groups (Aimé et al., 2007; Julliard et al., 2007) and consisted of 15-min presentation of the CS (one bottle test). This procedure is based on previous studies (Julliard et al., 2007 for the OXA infusion and fasting Ferry et al., 2007 for the COA procedure). In order to focus our study on the role of OXA system in memory processes underlying COA learning, it is important to note that animals in our procedure received one OXA infusion before the CS-US pairing and not during the test.
Results
Figure 1 illustrates the mean scented water intake measured during the acquisition (Day 8), the test (Day 11) and the four successive COA extinction sessions (Days 11 to 15) for the various groups. For comparison purpose, the last water-drinking habituation session (Day 7) has also been represented. As shown by this figure, performances obtained during the test and the number of extinction sessions differed between groups, depending on the treatment.
Figure 1. Effects of icv infusion of orexin (10 µg/3 µl, OXA group), icv infusion of artificial CSF (3 µl, aCSF group) and food-deprivation (Fasted group) on COA acquisition and extinction. The curves represent mean odorized-solution intakes (± SEM) for each group from Day 8 (acquisition) to Day 15. The mean water intake measured on the last day of habituation (Day 7) is also represented for each group for purposes of comparison. The Fasted group was food-deprived only during acquisition. All animals were habituated and tested while food satiated. *, ** and ***: P < 0.05, P < 0.01 and p < 0.001 between OXA and aCSF group. ◯◯ and ◯◯◯ P < 0.01 and 0.001 between Fasted and aCSF group. • P < 0.05 between OXA and Fasted group.
A two-factor ANOVA with repeated measures with Treatment (aCSF, OXA and Fasted) as between-subjects variable and Session of extinction (Day 11 to Day 15) as within-subject variable revealed significant Treatment (F(2,25) = 8.96, P < 0.001) and Session effects (F(4,100) = 103.85, P < 0.001) and a significant Treatment × Session interaction (F(8,100) = 5.40, P < 0.001).
Between-group analysis confirmed that the OXA and Fasted groups developed a stronger COA that extinguished more slowly than the aCSF group. One-way ANOVA on the mean scented water intake confirmed these observations, with inter-group differences at Day 11, Day 12, Day 13 and Day 14 (F(2,25) = 12.86, P < 0.001; (F(2,25) = 8.51, P < 0.01; F(2,25) = 9.95, P < 0.001 and F(2,25) = 6.83, P < 0.01 respectively). Post-hoc Bonferroni pairwise comparisons revealed significant differences between aCSF and both OXA and Fasted groups at Day 11, Day 12 and Day 13 (from P < 0.001 to P < 0.05), while the OXA group differed from the aCSF and Fasted groups at Day 14 (P < 0.01 and P < 0.05 respectively). One-way ANOVA within-group comparisons showed a significant effect of factor Session on COA performances in each of the groups (F(4,40) = 9.99; P < 0.001; F(4.45) = 12.54; P < 0.001 and F(4,40) = 15.85; P < 0.001 for aCSF, OXA and fasted groups respectively). In the aCSF group the extinction curve increased rapidly between D11 and D15. Post-hoc Bonferroni’s tests confirmed this observation and showed only a significant difference in the variables obtained in D11 and D12 compared to those obtained in D14 and D15 (P < 0.05 to 0.001). In the OXA and Fasted group, extinction curves reached a ceiling more slowly than the aCSF group. Post-hoc Bonferroni tests confirmed this observation and showed a significant difference in the means solution intake in D11 and D12 compared to D14 and D15 (P < 0.05 to 0.001) and a significant difference in the same variable between D13 and D15 (P < 0.001 and P < 0.01) in the OXA and Fasted groups respectively).
These statistical analyses show that scented water (CS) intake increased significantly in each group throughout the sessions, but it has to be borne in mind that the curves combine two distinct if related phenomena: extinction of COA learning and extinction of CS neophobia.
Concerning the neophobia, the figure shows a decrease in the mean solution intake between D7 and D8 in the three experimental groups and the decrease appears to be stronger in the Fasted group. A two-factor ANOVA with repeated measures with Treatment (aCSF, OXA and Fasted) as between-subjects variable and Session (Day 7 versus Day 8) as within-subject variable confirmed this description and revealed significant Treatment (F(2,25) = 6.24, P < 0.01) and Session effects (F(1,25) = 395.3, P < 0.001) and a significant Treatment × Session interaction (F(2,25) = 27.1, P < 0.001). Pairwise intergroup comparisons (one-way ANOVA) indicated no difference between groups on D7 and a significant decrease in mean scented water intake in Fasted group compared to aCSF and OXA groups (one-way ANOVA (2,25) = 28.92; P < 0.001, post-hoc Bonferroni P < 0.001).
Experimental COA extinction reflects not loss of the original memory trace but rather new learning whereby the CS comes to predict no US. It has been suggested that this learning inhibits the previously acquired conditioned response to the olfactory CS (Rescorla and Heth, 1975; Robbins, 1990).
Therefore, and in order to establish the real number of sessions needed to extinguish COA in each group taking the neophobia effect into account, additional analyses were performed considering the mean scented water intake measured during the acquisition in the variables.
One-way ANOVAs performed on these variables revealed a significant effect of factor Session in the aCSF and OXA groups (F(5,48) = 8.17; P < 0.001; F(5,54) = 14.1; P < 0.001 respectively). In the aCSF group, post-hoc Bonferroni analyses revealed that only mean scented water intake at Day 11 significantly differed from Day 8 (P < 0.01), suggesting that COA extinguished in a single session in this group. In the OXA group, post-hoc Bonferroni analyses revealed significant differences in the data obtained at Day 8 versus Day 11, Day 12 and Day 13 (P < 0.001, P < 0.001 and P < 0.05 respectively), suggesting that COA extinguished over three sessions in this group. Concerning the Fasted group, the fact that animals were conditioned and tested under two different conditions (food-deprived versus food-satiated), rendered the comparison between D8 and the following extinction sessions irrelevant due to the fact that the high level of CS neophobia displayed by the Fasted group on D8 may be attributed to stress induced by the fasting condition (see Section Discussion). Therefore, the data obtained in the Fasted group from Days 11 to 15 were compared to those of the aCSF group on Day 8. Here, one-way ANOVA revealed an effect of the session (F(5,48) = 16.2; P < 0.001) and post-hoc Bonferroni tests revealed a significant difference between data measured at D8 versus D11, D12 and D13 (P < 0.001, P < 0.001 and P < 0.05 respectively), suggesting that COA extinguished over three sessions in this group.
Taken together, these data show that COA extinction was significantly faster in the aCSF than in the OXA and Fasted groups. Moreover, the fact that the OXA group differed from the aCSF and Fasted groups at Day 14 might suggest that the process of COA extinction differed between OXA and fasted groups.
Discussion
One of the main results represented on Figure 1 was that fasting and central OXA infusion induced similar COA enhancement compared to the Control group. The fact that all animals were satiated during the test rules out the possibility that factors such as olfactory hypersensitivity or stress induced by food-deprivation may have influenced the process of COA extinction and/or retrieval.
As shown in Figure 1, the Fasted group displayed a decrease in mean scented solution intake between the last water-drinking habituation session (Day 7) and the acquisition (Day 8), suggesting that, despite the use of a very low concentration of isoamylacetate solution (ISO, 10−6), the acute 24-h food and water deprivation schedule enhanced neophobia for a novel olfactory stimulus.
Neural processing of olfactory information is closely linked to the physiological and nutritional status of the organism, and fasting has been shown to increase OB reactivity (Pager et al., 1972; Apelbaum et al., 2005) and olfactory detection in rats (Aimé et al., 2007). Therefore, the strong neophobia toward the scented water observed in the Fasted group during acquisition may have resulted from the enhanced olfactory sensitivity induced by starvation. Although this starvation effect on olfactory sensitivity has been suggested to be mediated by activation of the central OXA system (Julliard et al., 2007), the very slight difference observed at acquisition (Day 8) between the OXA and aCSF groups suggests that the neophobia toward the CS displayed by the Fasted group at acquisition cannot have been simply and exclusively due to OXA-induced enhancement of olfactory detection under fasting. In this respect, data have shown that short-term (24-h) food deprivation induced a significant increase in serum corticosterone (Das et al., 2005; Johansson et al., 2008; Nowland et al., 2011) and anxiety levels (Ferry and Duchamp-Viret, 2014). Therefore, it can be assumed that the strong neophobia observed in the Fasted group at COA acquisition may have resulted, at least in part, from the combination of enhanced olfactory detection and increased anxiety induced by fasting. Moreover, the fact that OXA infusion did not induce any anxiety (Ferry and Duchamp-Viret, 2014) suggests the strong neophobia observed in the Fasted group at Day 8 was unlikely to have been mediated by central release of OXA.
The results presented in Figure 1 show that COA extinction differed between groups: while the aCSF group needed one session to extinguish COA, the Fasted and OXA groups needed three. The extinction phenomenon reflects the inhibition of the conditioned response by new learning of CS-no US (Rescorla and Heth, 1975) and it has been suggested that resistance to extinction of a CS-US association is directly dependent on the strength of the CS-US memory trace (Eisenberg et al., 2003). The present results suggest that the fasting and OXA infusion conditions both enhanced CS-US association strength, and the similarity between the Fasted and OXA groups in terms of extinction suggests that the enhancing effect of fasting on CS-US association strength is mediated, at least in part, by a central release of OXA.
Now COA is a trace conditioning that results from several processes that follow one another over time: during acquisition, CS and US processing is followed by association of the two stimuli; then, the CS-US association is consolidated and finally retrieved during the test when the CS is presented for the second time. Some studies have shown that behavioral effects of icv OXA infusion, such as feeding and drinking behavior or olfactory hypersensitivity, persist for at least 3 h (Sakurai et al., 1998; Edwards et al., 1999; Kunii et al., 1999; Julliard et al., 2007). Therefore, the effects of fasting and OXA infusion on COA observed in the present study may have resulted from changes in the processes of acquisition and/or consolidation taking place on Day 8.
Hypothesis on the Processes by which Fasting and OXA May have Influenced COA Learning
CS-US acquisition
Olfactory hypersensitivity and olfactory memory trace duration. As discussed in the Introduction, the acquisition of COA reflects the association between the memory trace of the olfactory CS and the delayed visceral US (see Bures and Buresova, 1990; Roldan and Bures, 1994). Several studies have shown that, when ingested, a tasteless olfactory stimulus (such as ISO) acquires a strong aversive value, even with CS-US intervals equivalent to those generally used for tastes (Rusiniak et al., 1982; Bouton et al., 1986; Slotnick et al., 1997; Chapuis et al., 2007). At a concentration of 10−4 in tap water, ISO, used as the CS for COA, has been shown to be resistant to a relatively long interval (up to 30 min) before delivery of the US (Chapuis et al., 2007; Ferry et al., 2007; Miranda et al., 2007). Interestingly, results obtained in aCSF group showed that ISO mixed in tap water at a concentration of 10−6 was able to induce a mild COA that extinguished in one session when the time interval (ISI) separating the CS from the US was about 20 min. Therefore, it is suggested that, in our conditions, the CS trace decayed over the 20-min ISI, at the end of which it is weakly associated to the US.
The effectiveness of an olfactory CS in inducing strong COA when paired with a delayed illness has been shown to be directly related to the intensity of the CS used during acquisition (Rusiniak et al., 1982; Slotnick et al., 1997). Thus, in the light of the increased olfactory sensitivity previously reported with 24-h fasting and icv OXA infusion (Julliard et al., 2007), it is possible that the strong COA obtained in the Fasted and OXA groups was directly linked to an enhanced memory for the CS resulting from the change in olfactory perception. Interestingly, a similar cause-effect relationship was described in a previous experiment by our team, in which entorhinal cortex lesion enhanced COA learning performances, an effect that was accompanied by olfactory hypersensitivity (Ferry et al., 1996). Therefore, by enhancing olfactory sensitivity, fasting and OXA infusion may have enhanced the duration of the olfactory trace by enhancing CS salience, thus rendering possible its association to the delayed toxicosis.
Higher US processing. In the same vein, Garcia and Koelling (1967) demonstrated that the strength of a conditioned response to an ingested CS previously paired with a gastric malaise US varies directly with the intensity of the US. Concerning the COA, similar results have been described and the strength of COA varied directly with the intensity of the US used (Rusiniak et al., 1982; Bouton et al., 1986; Slotnick et al., 1997; Chapuis et al., 2007; Ferry et al., 2007). It could therefore be argued that the enhanced COA observed in the fasted group resulted from the visceral discomfort induced by injecting the LiCl used in the COA protocol, being more intense in a 24-h fasted animal, enhancing the strength of the CS-US association. However, some studies have shown that the orexinergic system is independent of the system that deals with visceral processing of the LiCl-induced intoxication in conditioned aversive learning (Touzani and Sclafani, 2002; Di Sebastiano et al., 2011). Therefore, any indirect effect of fasting or OXA infusion on COA strength via a change in US processing may be discounted.
Regardless of this, Winsky-Sommerer et al. (2004) have shown that OXA system is activated by the corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) that is released in condition of acute stress. Considering these data, it could be suggested that the stress induced by the US administration may have influenced the release of OXA through the activation of the CRF system in both groups of animals. If the fasting condition also enhanced the OXA level by the same route, it could be argued that the similarity in the COA performances obtained in Fasted and OXA groups was due to similar enhanced level of OXA with the different experimental conditions. If so, this would suggest that the stress induced by the US LiCl may have influenced the CS-US association or the processes underlying the CS-US memory. Even though this hypothesis could explain the similarity in the COA performances between Fasted and satiated OXA groups, however future studies will aim at verifying whether an acute restraint stress can be physiologically compared to this induced by a LiCl-induced intoxication and also whether the administration of the US in our conditions can induce OXA release.
CS-US consolidation
Finally, the temporal evolution of CS-US consolidation remains largely unknown; however, Dudai (1996) and Dudai and Morris (2000) proposed that consolidation involves two types of processes: synaptic consolidation, accomplished within the first minutes to hours after the CS-US association has been acquired; and system consolidation, involving reorganization of the brain circuits encoding the memory, which takes weeks, months or even years to be accomplished. Considering the duration of OXA action (at least 3 h, Sakurai et al., 1998; Edwards et al., 1999; Kunii et al., 1999; Julliard et al., 2007), it may be suggested that the enhanced COA observed in the OXA group was mediated by enhanced synaptic consolidation of the memory processes. According to this view, recent data have shown that central OXA system is involved in the acquisition and in the consolidation of fear conditioned learning (Soya et al., 2013). In order to test the involvement of the OXA system in COA consolidation process, it could be of interest to test the effect of selective blockade of OXA receptors at various times during COA learning. In this way, we assume that if the OXA system is selectively involved in the CS-US acquisition process, infusion of the antagonist before the CS presentation would disrupt both short (3–4 h after acquisition) and long term (24 h) memories. In contrast, if the OXA system is involved in consolidation, the pharmacological blockade of OXA receptors would impair selectively long-term memory leaving short-term memory intact (Sears et al., 2013).
As a first conclusion, the present results show that physiological or OXA-induced fasting affected COA through changes in memory processes occurring during the acquisition of a CS-US association and/or during the synaptic consolidation of this association. The olfactory hypersensitivity induced by fasting may influence acquisition of the CS-US association by enhancing the formation and maintenance of the CS memory trace.
Hypothesis on the Neurobiological Substrate Involved in the Effects of Fasting and OXA on COA
The neurobiological substrate through which OXA affects the memory processes underlying COA learning remains to be elucidated. However, some reports open up a number of possible hypotheses according to which OXA release during fasting may enhance learning performance through a direct or indirect influence on particular hypothalamic projection targets.
Olfactory bulb (OB) and locus coeruleus (LC)
As previously mentioned, olfactory sensitivity cannot be dissociated from olfactory memory, and some data suggest that the indirect effects of fasting and OXA on the olfactory memory trace formation through increased olfactory sensitivity may involve the olfactory bulb (OB). As previously mentioned, olfactory sensitivity cannot be dissociated from olfactory memory, and some data suggest that the indirect effects of fasting and OXA on the olfactory memory trace formation through increased olfactory sensitivity may involve the OB. Firstly, in addition to its well documented role in detection and discrimination, the OB is involved in memory processes underlying various kinds of olfactory learning in adult rats (see Mandairon and Linster, 2009 for review). Moreover, the OB receives direct OXA innervation from the LH (de Lecea et al., 1998; Peyron et al., 1998; Sakurai et al., 1998; Shibata et al., 2008) and an increase in OB electrophysiological response induced by fasting and OXA has been described (Pager et al., 1972; Gervais and Pager, 1982; Apelbaum and Chaput, 2003; Apelbaum et al., 2005; Hardy et al., 2005). In addition, Prud’homme et al. (2009) found that OXA antagonist treatment blocked the enhancement of OB Fos responses to a food odor. Secondly, some evidence suggests that the OXA neurons terminating in the locus coeruleus (LC) may provide a second indirect pathway for orexinergic modulation of olfactory processing: direct OXA fibers innervate the LC (Horvath et al., 1999) and activation of OXA receptors in the LC increases cell firing of intrinsic noradrenergic (NA) neurons (Trivedi et al., 1998; Hagan et al., 1999). In addition, the LC projects over 40% of its neurons directly into the OB (McLean et al., 1989) and this large NA input has been shown to modulate OB excitability, olfactory perception and olfactory learning and memory abilities (see Devore and Linster, 2012 for review).
These data suggest that the fasting-induced increase in olfactory sensitivity observed in the present and other studies probably involved the OXA system in the OB. Moreover, and in the light of the work by Escanilla et al. (2012), it may be suggested that this increased olfactory sensitivity resulted directly from OXA system activation (Hardy et al., 2005) in the OB and/or indirectly through the effect of LC-OXA system activation on NA release in the OB. Finally, it is possible that activation of both systems may simultaneously influence the strength of olfactory memory through enhanced olfactory processing. In order to test this hypothesis, future studies will aim at verifying whether the presentation of a new olfactory stimulus in fasted animals can be correlated to changes in NA release in the OB.
Amygdala and locus coeruleus (LC)
Orexinergic innervation of the extended amygdala (including the basolateral amygdala, BLA) was clearly described by Schmitt et al. (2012). OXA administered into the LH significantly elevated cFos-immunoreactivity in the amygdala (Mullett et al., 2000) and fasting increased OXA mRNA levels in the amygdala (Lu et al., 2000). OXA applied in acute rat brain slices activated neurons in the amygdala (Bisetti et al., 2006). Moreover, the amygdala receives OB and visceral inputs (Saper and Loewy, 1980; Inui et al., 2006), and may be a nodal point at which olfactory and neuroendocrine stimuli are integrated to modulate feeding behavior (King, 2006).
Otherwise, a large amount of data indicates that the amygdala, and more precisely the BLA, is involved in the acquisition of COA (Sevelinges et al., 2009) and more precisely in the processes underlying the formation of the olfactory memory trace and its maintenance across the ISI during COA (Ferry et al., 1995; Ferry and Di Scala, 1997, 2000). Although a direct effect of starvation-induced OXA release in the amygdala on COA cannot be excluded, to our knowledge, the involvement of the OXA system in the amygdala has never been demonstrated in learning and memory.
On the other hand, some data indicate that the enhancing effect of starvation on COA memory processes could be indirectly mediated by activation of the NA system in the amygdala. The LC projects strongly onto the amygdala (Fallon et al., 1978) and the BLA β-adrenergic system is involved in the memory processes underlying the association between odor and delayed US during COA (Miranda et al., 2007). Given the direct action of LH orexinergic neurons on the LC (Horvath et al., 1999; van den Pol et al., 2002), activation of the LC-amygdala NA system during processing of the new odor CS may be potentiated by fasting-induced OXA release. Possibly, the strength of the olfactory memory trace, and/or its association to the US, was influenced by activation of this pathway in the Fasted and OXA groups.
Although the results shown on Figure 1 do not identify particular structures receiving OXA projections as being involved in the memory processes underlying COA acquisition, all the above-mentioned data lead us to propose a model according to which OXA release during fasting enhances learning performance through a direct or indirect influence on the circuit involved in COA. Our model shown on Figure 2 comprises some of the structures involved in this circuit including the LC, amygdala and OB, which receive LH-OXA projections. According to this model, the activation of the LH-OXA system induced by fasting reinforces the role of each structure in the circuit by enhancing the neural processes underlying attention and olfactory memory through direct and/or indirect influences.
Figure 2. Representation of a hypothetic model according to which OXA terminating in regions such as the OB, LC and amygdala may constitute a pathway for orexinergic modulation of the olfactory memory trace formation underlying COA. The left panel represents the sequence of events that may take place during presentation of a new olfactory CS in the satiated condition. 1a) Olfactory CS induces activation of the OB. 1b) The novelty of the olfactory CS induces LC activation, which results in NA release in the OB and BLA. 2) The olfactory information is transmitted to the BLA where the odor trace is formed pending its association with the US. In the case of a short ISI, this sequence of events results in normal COA. The right panel represents the sequence of events that may take place during presentation of a new olfactory CS in the fasting condition. Fasting induces release of OXA in the OB, BLA and LC, preparing the system to respond to any food-odor event. 2a) Olfactory CS induces activation of the OB, potentiated by activation of the OXA system and LC-mediated NA system in the OB. In the fasting condition, CS leads to improved olfactory detection and processing. 2b) The novelty of the olfactory CS induces LC activation, resulting in enhanced NA release in the OB and BLA. 3) The enhanced olfactory information is transmitted to the BLA. Combined with OXA system activation, LC-mediated NA release in the BLA and potentiated OB activation, the olfactory memory trace strengthened or lengthened, and can thus be associated to a delayed US. This sequence of events results in COA when a long ISI is used.
This model is consistent with the idea of Cleland and Linster (2005) according to which the multiple feedback and feed-forward interactions between olfactory and non-olfactory areas contribute to complex processes, such as filtering and constructing olfactory representations, and compare these representations to those previously acquired in order to cue an appropriate response to relevant stimuli. The present model also supports the hypothesis that centrifugal modulatory inputs influence olfactory processing and learning mechanisms within the OB (Sullivan et al., 2000; Linster and Cleland, 2002; Yuan et al., 2003), leading us to extend these influences to other key structures involved in attention and olfactory learning and memory (Aston-Jones and Cohen, 2005; Miranda, 2012).
Of course the list of structures included in this model is not exhaustive; involvement of other feedback and feed-forward interactions between these structures and others (e.g., piriform cortex, entorhinal cortex, orbitofrontal cortex, hippocampus, etc.) will have to be considered in order to achieve a more realistic idea of the circuit actually involved in food conditioned learning (see Ferry et al., 2006, 2007; Chapuis et al., 2009; Sahay et al., 2011; Wilson and Sullivan, 2011; Chapuis et al., 2013).
Conclusion
Feeding behavior is part of a complex integrated adaptive system, governed by the brain, in which the processing of metabolic signals reflecting the animal’s nutritional state (gastrointestinal distention, blood glucose, feeding peptides such as OXA, etc.) and of olfactory signals indicative of food determines the appropriate response to a food source. However, the differentiation between palatable and unpalatable items that conditions ingestive behavior often depends on previous experience during which the odor of the food acquired (or did not, in the case of a new odor) a hedonic valence after feeding, through CS-US associative learning. By showing that OXA system influenced the processes underlying the CS-US association, or/and consolidation of this association during COA, the present study introduces a new mechanism by which the LH-OXA system may influence the processes that enable animals to learn to select food available in the environment and to adapt their behavior to previous experience through a modulation of complex neural circuit activity. Finally, the OXA system represents a critical link between peripheral energy balance and CNS mechanisms that coordinate olfactory processing and memory, especially in the physiological state of fasting.
Conflict of Interest Statement
The author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the LABEX CORTEX (ANR-11-LABX-0042) of Université de Lyon, within the program “Investissements d’Avenir” (ANR-11-IDEX-0007) operated by the French National Research Agency (ANR).
References
Aimé, P., Duchamp-Viret, P., Chaput, M. A., Savigner, A., Mahfouz, M., and Julliard, A. K. (2007). Fasting increases and satiation decreases olfactory detection for a neutral odor in rats. Behav. Brain Res. 179, 258–264. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2007.02.012
Apelbaum, A. F., and Chaput, M. A. (2003). Rats habituated to chronic feeding restriction show a smaller increase in olfactory bulb reactivity compared to newly fasted rats. Chem. Senses 28, 389–395. doi: 10.1093/chemse/28.5.389
Apelbaum, A., Perrut, A., and Chaput, M. (2005). Orexin A effects on the olfactory bulb spontaneous activity and odor responsiveness in freely breathing rats. Regul. Pept. 129, 49–61. doi: 10.1016/j.regpep.2005.01.003
Aston-Jones, G., and Cohen, J. D. (2005). An integrative theory of locus coeruleus-norepinephrine function: adaptive gain and optimal performance. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 28, 403–450. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.28.061604.135709
Bisetti, A., Cvetkovic, V., Serafin, M., Bayer, L., Machard, D., Jones, B. E., et al. (2006). Excitatory action of hypocretin/orexin on neurons of the central medial amygdala. Neuroscience 142, 999–1004. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2006.07.018
Bouton, M. E., Jones, D. E., McPhillips, S. A., and Swartzentruber, D. (1986). Potentiation and overshadowing in odor-aversion learning: role of method of odor presentation, the distal–proximal cue distinction and the conditionability of odor. Learn. Motiv. 17, 115–138. doi: 10.1016/0023-9690(86)90006-8
Bures, J., and Buresova, O. (1990). Reversible lesions allow reinterpretation of system level studies of brain mechanisms of behavior. Concepts Neurosci. 1, 69–89.
Caillol, M., Aïoun, J., Baly, C., Persuy, M. A., and Salesse, R. (2003). Localization of orexins and their receptors in the rat olfactory system: possible modulation of olfactory perception by a neuropeptide synthetized centrally or locally. Brain Res. 960, 48–61. doi: 10.1016/s0006-8993(02)03755-1
Chapuis, J., Messaoudi, B., Ferreira, G., and Ravel, N. (2007). Importance of retronasal and orthonasal olfaction for odor aversion memory in rats. Behav Neurosci. 121, 1383–1392. doi: 10.1037/0735-7044.121.6.1383
Chapuis, J., Garcia, S., Messaoudi, B., Thevenet, M., Ferreira, G., Gervais, R., et al. (2009). The way an odor is experienced during aversive conditioning determines the extent of the network recruited during retrieval: a multisite electrophysiological study in rats. J. Neurosci. 29, 10287–10298. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0505-09.2009
Chapuis, J., Cohen, Y., He, X., Zhang, Z., Jin, S., Xu, F., et al. (2013). Lateral entorhinal modulation of piriform cortical activity and fine odor discrimination. J. Neurosci. 33, 13449–13459. doi: 10.1523/jneurosci.1387-13.2013
Cleland, T. A., and Linster, C. (2005). Computation in the olfactory system. Chem. Senses 30, 801–813. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bji072
Das, A., Rai, D., Dikshit, M., Palit, G., and Nath, C. (2005). Nature of stress: differential effects on brain acetylcholinesterase activity and memory in rats. Life Sci. 77, 2299–2311. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2005.02.020
de Lecea, L., Kilduff, T. S., Peyron, C., Gao, X., Foye, P. E., Danielson, P. E., et al. (1998). The hypocretins: hypothalamus-specific peptides with neuroexcitatory activity. PNAS 95, 322–327. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.1.322
Devore, S., and Linster, C. (2012). Noradrenergic and cholinergic modulation of olfactory bulb sensory processing. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 6:52. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2012.00052
Di Sebastiano, A. R., Wilson-Pérez, H. E., Lehman, M. N., and Coolen, L. M. (2011). Lesions of orexin neurons block conditioned place preference for sexual behavior in male rats. Horm. Behav. 59, 1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2010.09.006
Doucette, W., and Restrepo, D. (2008). Profound context-dependent plasticity of mitral cell responses in olfactory bulb. PLoS Biol. 6:e258. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0060258
Doucette, W., Milder, J., and Restrepo, D. (2007). Adrenergic modulation of olfactory bulb circuitry affects odor discrimination. Learn. Mem. 14, 539–547. doi: 10.1101/lm.606407
Dudai, Y. (1996). Consolidation: fragility on the road to the engram. Neuron 17, 367–370. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80168-3
Dudai, Y., and Morris, R. G. M. (2000). “To consolidate or not to consolidate: what are the questions?,” in Brain, Perception, Memory. Advances in Cognitive Sciences, eds J. J. Bolhuis (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 149–162.
Edwards, C. M., Abusnana, S., Sunter, D., Murphy, K. G., Ghatei, M. A., and Bloom, S. R. (1999). The effect of the orexins on food intake: comparison with neuropeptide Y, melanin-concentrating hormone and galanin. J. Endocrinol. 160, R7–R12. doi: 10.1677/joe.0.160r007
Eisenberg, M., Kobilo, T., Berman, D. E., and Dudai, Y. (2003). Stability of retrieved memory: inverse correlation with trace dominance. Science 301, 1102–1104. doi: 10.1126/science.1086881
Escanilla, O., Alperin, S., Youssef, M., Ennis, M., and Linster, C. (2012). Noradrenergic but not cholinergic modulation of olfactory bulb during processing of near threshold concentration stimuli. Behav. Neurosci. 126, 720–728. doi: 10.1037/a0030006
Fallon, J. H., Koziell, D. A., and Moore, R. Y. (1978). Catecholamine innervation of the basal forebrain. II. Amygdala, suprarhinal cortex and entorhinal cortex. J. Comp. Neurol. 180, 509–532. doi: 10.1002/cne.901800308
Ferry, B., and Duchamp-Viret, P. (2014). The orexin component of fasting triggers memory processes underlying food selection in the rat. Learn. Mem. 21, 185–189. doi: 10.1101/lm.033688.113
Ferry, B., Sandner, G., and Di Scala, G. (1995). Neuroanatomical and functional specificity of basolateral amygdaloid nucleus in taste potentiated odor aversion. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem. 64, 169–180. doi: 10.1006/nlme.1995.1056
Ferry, B., Herbeaux, K., Traissard, N., Cosquer, B., Galani, R., and Cassel, J. C. (2007). Immunotoxic cholinergic lesions in the basal forebrain reverse the effects of entorhinal cortex lesions on conditioned odor aversion in the rat. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem. 88, 114–126. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2007.01.007
Ferry, B., Ferreira, G., Traissard, N., and Majchrzak, M. (2006). Selective involvement of the lateral entorhinal cortex in the control of the olfactory memory trace during conditioned odor aversion in the rat. Behav. Neurosci. 120, 1180–1186. doi: 10.1037/0735-7044.120.5.1180
Ferry, B., and Di Scala, G. (1997). Bicuculline administration into basolateral amygdala facilitates trace conditioning of odor aversion in the rat. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem. 67, 80–83. doi: 10.1006/nlme.1996.3743
Ferry, B., and Di Scala, G. (2000). Basolateral amygdala NMDA receptors are selectively involved in the acquisition of taste potentiated odor aversion in the rat. Behav. Neurosci. 114, 1005–1010. doi: 10.1037/0735-7044.114.5.1005
Ferry, B., Oberling, P., Jarrard, L. E., and Di Scala, G. (1996). Facilitation of conditioned odor aversion by entorhinal cortex lesions in the rat. Behav. Neurosci. 110, 443–450. doi: 10.1037/0735-7044.110.3.443
Fletcher, M. L., and Chen, W. R. (2010). Neural correlates of olfactory learning: critical role of centrifugal neuromodulation. Learn. Mem. 17, 561–570. doi: 10.1101/lm.941510
Garcia, J., and Koelling, R. A. (1967). A comparison of aversions induced by X rays, toxins and drugs in the rat. Radiat. Res. Suppl. 7, 439–450. doi: 10.2307/3583736
Gervais, R., and Pager, J. (1982). Functional changes in waking and sleeping rats after lesions in the olfactory pathways. Physiol. Behav. 29, 7–15. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(82)90358-4
Hagan, J. J., Leslie, R. A., Patel, S., Evans, M. L., Wattam, T. A., Holmes, S., et al. (1999). Orexin A activates locus coeruleus cell firing and increases arousal in the rat. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A 96, 10911–10916. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.19.10911
Hahn, J. D., and Swanson, L. W. (2010). Distinct patterns of neuronal inputs and outputs of the juxtaparaventricular and suprafornical regions of the lateral hypothalamic area in the male rat. Brain Res. 64, 14–103. doi: 10.1016/j.brainresrev.2010.02.002
Hardy, A. B., Aioun, J., Baly, C., Julliard, K. A., Caillol, M., Salesse, R., et al. (2005). Orexin A modulates mitral cell activity in the rat olfactory bulb: patch-clamp study on slices and immunocytochemical localization of orexin receptors. Endocrinol. 146, 4042–4053. doi: 10.1210/en.2005-0020
Harris, G. C., Wimmer, M., and Aston-Jones, G. (2005). A role for lateral hypothalamic orexin neurons in reward seeking. Nature 437, 556–559. doi: 10.1038/nature04071
Holland, P. (1990). Event representation in pavlovian conditioning: image and action. Cognition 37, 105–131. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(90)90020-k
Horvath, T. L., Peyron, C., Diano, S., Ivanov, A., Aston-Jones, G., Kilduff, T. S., et al. (1999). Hypocretin (orexin) activation and synaptic innervation of the locus coeruleus noradrenergic system. J. Comp. Neurol. 415, 145–159. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1096-9861(19991213)415:2<145::aid-cne1>3.0.co;2-2
Inui, T., Shimura, T., and Yamamoto, T. (2006). Effects of brain lesions on taste-potentiated odor aversion in rats. Behav. Neurosci. 120, 590–599. doi: 10.1037/0735-7044.120.3.590
Jaeger, L. B., Farr, S. A., Banks, W. A., and Morley, J. E. (2002). Effects of orexin-A on memory processing. Peptides 23, 1683–1688. doi: 10.1016/s0196-9781(02)00110-9
Johansson, A., Fredriksson, R., Winnergren, S., Hulting, A. L., Schiöth, H. B., and Lindblom, J. (2008). The relative impact of chronic food restriction and acute food deprivation on plasma hormone levels and hypothalamic neuropeptide expression. Peptides 29, 1588–1595. doi: 10.1016/j.peptides.2008.04.018
Julliard, A. K., Chaput, M. A., Apelbaum, A., Aimé, P., Mahfouz, M., and Duchamp-Viret, P. (2007). Changes in rat olfactory detection performance induced by orexin and leptin mimicking fasting and satiation. Behav. Brain Res. 183, 123–129. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2007.05.033
King, B. M. (2006). Amygdaloid lesion-induced obesity: relation to sexual behavior, olfaction and the ventromedial hypothalamus. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 291, R1201–R1214. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00199.2006
Kunii, K., Yamanaka, A., Nambu, T., Matsuzaki, I., Goto, K., and Sakurai, T. (1999). Orexins/hypocretins regulate drinking behaviour. Brain Res. 842, 256–261. doi: 10.1016/s0006-8993(99)01884-3
Le Magnen, J. (1959). The role of olfacto-gustatory stimuli in the regulation of the alimentary behavior of the mammal. J. Psychol. Norm. Pathol. (Paris) 56, 137–160.
Linster, C., and Cleland, T. A. (2002). Cholinergic modulation of sensory representations in the olfactory bulb. Neural Netw. 15, 709–717. doi: 10.1016/s0893-6080(02)00061-8
Lu, X. Y., Bagnol, D., Burke, S., Akil, H., and Watson, S. J. (2000). Differential distribution and regulation of OX1 and OX2 orexin/hypocretin receptor messenger RNA in the brain upon fasting. Horm. Behav. 37, 335–344. doi: 10.1006/hbeh.2000.1584
Mackintosh, N. J. (1991). “Simple conditioning,” in Perspectives on Cognitive Neuroscience, eds R. G. Lister and H. J. Weingartner (London: Oxford University Press), 65–75.
Mair, R. G., and Hembrook, J. R. (2008). Memory enhancement with event-related stimulation of the rostral intralaminar thalamic nuclei. J. Neurosci. 28, 14293–14300. doi: 10.1523/jneurosci.3301-08.2008
Mandairon, N., and Linster, C. (2009). Odor perception and olfactory bulb plasticity in adult mammals. J. Neurophysiol. 101, 2204–2209. doi: 10.1152/jn.00076.2009
McLean, J. H., Shipley, M. T., Nickell, W. T., Aston-Jones, G., and Reyher, C. K. (1989). Chemoanatomical organization of the noradrenergic input from locus coeruleus to the olfactory bulb of the adult rat. J. Comp. Neurol. 285, 339–349. doi: 10.1002/cne.902850305
Miranda, M. I. (2012). Taste and odor recognition memory: the emotional flavor of life. Rev. Neurosci. 23, 481–499. doi: 10.1515/revneuro-2012-0064
Miranda, M. A., Ferry, B., and Ferreira, G. (2007). Basolateral amygdala noradrenergic activity is involved in the acquisition of conditioned odor aversion in the rat. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem. 88, 260–263. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2007.04.008
Mullett, M. A., Billington, C. J., Levine, A. S., and Kotz, C. M. (2000). Hypocretin I in the lateral hypothalamus activates key feeding-regulatory brain sites. Neuroreport 11, 103–108. doi: 10.1097/00001756-200001170-00021
Mulligan, C., Moreau, K., Brandolini, M., Livingstone, B., Beaufrère, B., and Boirie, Y. (2002). Alterations of sensory perceptions in healthy elderly subjects during fasting and refeeding. A pilot study. Gerontology 48, 39–43. doi: 10.1159/000048923
Nambu, T., Sakurai, T., Mizukami, K., Hosoya, Y., Yanagisawa, M., and Goto, K. (1999). Distribution of orexin neurons in the adult rat brain. Brain Res. 827, 243–260. doi: 10.1016/s0006-8993(99)01336-0
Nigrosh, B. J., Slotnick, B. M., and Nervin, J. A. (1975). Olfactory discrimination, reversal learning, and stimulus control in rats. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 89, 285–294. doi: 10.1037/h0076821
Nowland, M. H., Hugunin, K. M., and Rogers, K. L. (2011). Effects of short-term fasting in male Sprague-Dawley rats. Comp. Med. 61, 138–144.
O’Doherty, J., Rolls, E. T., Francis, S., Bowtell, R., McGlone, F., Kobal, G., et al. (2000). Sensory-specific satiety-related olfactory activation of the human orbitofrontal cortex. Neuroreport 11, 893–897. doi: 10.1097/00001756-200003200-00046
Pager, J. (1974). A selective modulation of the olfactory bulb electrical activity in relation to the learning of palatability in hungry and satiated rats. Physiol. Behav. 12, 189–195. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(74)90172-3
Pager, J., Giachetti, I., Holley, A., and Le Magnen, J. (1972). A selective control of olfactory bulb electrical activity in relation to food deprivation and satiety in rats. Physiol. Behav. 9, 573–579. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(72)90014-5
Pager, J. (1978). Ascending olfactory information and centrifugal influx contributing to a nutritional modulation of the rat mitral cell responses. Brain Res. 140, 251–269. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(78)90459-6
Palmerino, C. C., Rusiniak, K. W., and Garcia, J. (1980). Flavor–illness aversions: the peculiar roles of odor and taste in memory for poison. Science 208, 753–755. doi: 10.1126/science.7367891
Peyron, C., Tighe, D., van Den Pol, A. N., De Lecea, L., Heller, H. C., Sutcliffe, J. G., et al. (1998). Neurons containing hypocretin (orexin) project to multiple neuronal systems. J. Neurosci. 18, 9996–10015.
Prud’homme, M. J., Lacroix, M. C., Badonnel, K., Gougis, S., Baly, C., Salesse, R., et al. (2009). Nutritional status modulates behavioural and olfactory bulb Fos responses to isoamyl acetate or food odour in rats: roles of orexins and leptin. Neuroscience 162, 1287–1298. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2009.05.043
Rescorla, R. A., and Heth, C. D. (1975). Reinstatement of fear to an extinguished conditioned stimulus. J. Exp. Psychol. Anim. Behav. Process 1, 88–96. doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.1.1.88
Rescorla, R. A. (1988). Behavioral studies of Pavlovian conditioning. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 11, 329–352. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.11.1.329
Robbins, S. J. (1990). Mechanisms underlying spontaneous recovery in autoshaping. J. Exp. Psychol. Anim. Behav. Process 16, 235–249. doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.16.3.235
Rodgers, R. J., Ishii, Y., Halford, J. C., and Blundell, J. E. (2002). Orexins and appetite regulation. Neuropeptides 36, 303–325. doi: 10.1016/s0143-4179(02)00085-9
Roldan, G., and Bures, J. (1994). Tetrodotoxin blockade of amygdala overlapping with poisoning impairs acquisition of conditioned taste aversion in rats. Behav. Brain Res. 65, 213–219. doi: 10.1016/0166-4328(94)90107-4
Royet, J. P., Gervais, R., and Araneda, S. (1983). Effect of local 6-OHDA and 5, 6-DHT injections into the rat olfactory bulb on neophobia and learned aversion to a novel food. Behav. Brain Res. 10, 297–309. doi: 10.1016/0166-4328(83)90036-0
Rusiniak, K. W., Palmerino, C. C., Rice, A. G., Forthman, D. L., and Garcia, J. (1982). Flavor-illness aversions: potentiation of odor by taste with toxin but not shock in rats. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 96, 527–539. doi: 10.1037/h0077902
Sahay, A., Wilson, D. A., and Hen, R. (2011). Pattern separation: a common function for new neurons in hippocampus and olfactory bulb. Neuron 70, 582–588. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.05.012
Sakurai, T., Amemiya, A., Ishii, M., Matsuzaki, I., Chemelli, R. M., Tanaka, H., et al. (1998). Orexins and orexin receptors: a family of hypothalamic neuropeptides and G protein-coupled receptors that regulate feeding behavior. Cell 92, 573–585. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80949-6
Sakurai, T. (2005). Roles of orexin/hypocretin in regulation of sleep/wakefulness and energy homeostasis. Sleep Med. Rev. 9, 231–241. doi: 10.1016/j.smrv.2004.07.007
Saper, C. B., and Loewy, A. D. (1980). Efferent connections of the parabrachial nucleus in the rat. Brain Res. 197, 291–317. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(80)91117-8
Schmitt, O., Usunoff, K. G., Lazarov, N. E., Itzev, D. E., Eipert, P., Rolfs, A., et al. (2012). Orexinergic innervation of the extended amygdala and basal ganglia in the rat. Brain Struct. Funct. 217, 233–256. doi: 10.1007/s00429-011-0343-8
Sears, R. M., Fink, A. E., Wigestrand, M. B., Farb, C. R., de Lecea, L., and Ledoux, J. E. (2013). Orexin/hypocretin system modulates amygdala-dependent threat learning through the locus coeruleus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A 110, 20260–20265. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1320325110
Sevelinges, Y., Desgranges, B., and Ferreira, G. (2009). The basolateral amygdala is necessary for the encoding and the expression of odor memory. Learn. Mem. 16, 235–242. doi: 10.1101/lm.1247609
Shibata, M., Mondal, M. S., Date, Y., Nakazato, M., Suzuki, H., and Ueta, Y. (2008). Distribution of orexins-containing fibers and contents of orexins in the rat olfactory bulb. Neurosci. Res. 61, 99–105. doi: 10.1016/j.neures.2008.01.017
Slotnick, B. M., Westbrook, F., and Darling, F. M. C. (1997). What the rat’s nose tells the rat’s mouth: long delay aversion conditioning with aqueous odors and potentiation of taste by odors. Anim. Learn. Behav. 25, 357–369. doi: 10.3758/bf03199093
Slotnick, B. M. (1984). Olfactory stimulus control in the rat. Chem. Senses 9, 157–165. doi: 10.1093/chemse/9.2.157
Slotnick, B. M., and Katz, H. M. (1974). Olfactory learning set formation in rats. Science 185, 796–798. doi: 10.1126/science.185.4153.796
Soya, S., Shoji, H., Hasegawa, E., Hondo, M., Miyakawa, T., Yanagisawa, M., et al. (2013). Orexin receptor-1 in the locus coeruleus plays an important role in cue-dependent fear memory consolidation. J. Neurosci. 33, 14549–14557. doi: 10.1523/jneurosci.1130-13.2013
Sullivan, R. M., Stackenwalt, G., Nasr, F., Lemon, C., and Wilson, D. A. (2000). Association of an odor with activation of olfactory bulb noradrenergic beta-receptors or locus coeruleus stimulation is sufficient to produce learned approach responses to that odor in neonatal rats. Behav. Neurosci. 114, 957–962. doi: 10.1037/0735-7044.114.5.957
Swanson, L. W., Sanchez-Watt, G., and Watt, A. G. (2005). Comparison of melanin-concentrating hormone and hypocretin/orexin mRNA expression patterns in a new parceling scheme of the lateral hypothalamic zone. Neurosci. Lett. 387, 80–84. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2005.06.066
Telegdy, G., and Adamik, A. (2002). The action of orexin A on passive avoidance learning. Regul. Pept. 104, 105–110. doi: 10.1016/s0167-0115(01)00341-x
Touzani, K., and Sclafani, A. (2002). Lateral hypothalamic lesions impair flavour-nutrient and flavour-toxin trace learning in rats. Eur. J. Neurosci. 16, 2425–2433. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9568.2002.02404.x
Trivedi, P., Yu, H., MacNeil, D. J., Van der Ploeg, L. H., and Guan, X. M. (1998). Distribution of orexin receptor mRNA in the rat brain. FEBS Lett. 438, 71–75. doi: 10.1016/s0014-5793(98)01266-6
van den Pol, A. N., Ghosh, P. K., Liu, R. J., Li, Y., Aghajanian, G. K., and Gao, X. B. (2002). Hypocretin (orexin) enhances neuron activity and cell synchrony in developing mouse GFP-expressing locus coeruleus. J. Physiol. 541, 169–185. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2002.017426
Willie, J. T., Chemelli, R. M., Sinton, C. M., and Yanagisawa, M. (2001). To eat or to sleep? Orexin in the regulation of feeding and wakefulness. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 24, 429–458. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.429
Wilson, D. A., and Sullivan, R. M. (2011). Cortical processing of odor objects. Neuron 72, 506–519. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.10.027
Winsky-Sommerer, R., Yamanaka, A., Diano, S., Borok, E., Roberts, A. J., Sakurai, T., et al. (2004). Interaction between the corticotropin-releasing factor system and hypocretins (orexins): a novel circuit mediating stress response. J. Neurosci. 24, 11439–11448. doi: 10.1523/jneurosci.3459-04.2004
Keywords: associative learning, olfactory memory, orexin, fasting, rat
Citation: Ferry B (2014) The orexinergic system influences conditioned odor aversion learning in the rat: a theory on the processes and hypothesis on the circuit involved. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 8:164. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00164
Received: 05 February 2014; Accepted: 18 April 2014;
Published online: 06 May 2014.
Edited by:
Regina M. Sullivan, Nathan Kline Institute and NYU School of Medicine, USAReviewed by:
Guillaume Ferreira, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), FranceGina Lorena Quirarte, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Mexico
Markus Fendt, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Germany
Copyright © 2014 Ferry. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Barbara Ferry, Centre of Research in Neuroscience Lyon, CNRS UMR 5292 - INSERM U1028 UCBL1, 50 Avenue Tony Garnier, 69366 Lyon, France e-mail: bferry@olfac.univ-lyon1.fr