Spiking patterns of neocortical L5 pyramidal neurons in vitro change with temperature

Introduction

Many neurons in the mammalian CNS fire action potentials in brief, high-frequency bursts. Bursts may be a more reliable mechanism of information transfer than single action potentials at synapses at which short-term facilitation of transmitter release can occur (Lisman, 1997).

Most pyramidal neurons in neocortex exhibit a regular spiking pattern, firing action potentials at constant frequency during maintained suprathreshold current injection at the soma. A subset of pyramidal neurons fire discrete clusters of 2–6 action potentials at regular intervals during constant current injection (Connors et al., 1982; McCormick et al., 1985; Agmon and Connors, 1989; Chagnac-Amitai et al., 1990; Mason and Larkman, 1990). The somata of these “intrinsically bursting” neurons are found only in layer 5 (Connors et al., 1982; McCormick et al., 1985; Agmon and Connors, 1989; Chagnac-Amitai et al., 1990; Mason and Larkman, 1990) and in these neurons bursting results from the activation of sodium and calcium conductances in the apical dendrite (Silva et al., 1991; Schwindt and Crill, 1999; Williams and Stuart, 1999; Larkum et al., 2001; Larkum and Zhu, 2002).

Within layer 5, regularly spiking and intrinsically bursting neurons co-exist. There is evidence that regularly spiking and intrinsically bursting neurons in layer 5 are morphologically distinct from each other (Chagnac-Amitai et al., 1990; Mason and Larkman, 1990), suggesting that spiking pattern could be used to differentiate between two discrete classes of layer 5 pyramidal neurons.

Here we show that individual layer 5 pyramidal neurons in acute slices from mouse primary motor cortex can adopt both regular and burst spiking patterns during constant current injection at the soma, changing from regularly spiking to burst firing upon cooling the slice from 36 to 37°C toward room temperature. Hence these spiking patterns are more interchangeable than previously thought.

Materials and Methods

All experiments and procedures were approved by the Northwestern University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC).

Slice Preparation

P42–P54 C57BL-6 mice were anesthetized using isoflurane (3%, inhaled) and decapitated. The brain was quickly removed into ice-cold artificial cerebrospinal fluid (ACSF): 125 mM NaCl, 2.5 mM KCl, 1.25 mM NaH₂PO₄, 20 mM NaHCO₃, 5 mM HEPES, 25 mM glucose, 1 mM CaCl₂, 2 mM MgCl₂, pH 7.3, gassed with 95% O₂/5% CO₂. Two hundred micrometer-thick parasagittal slices were cut using a vibrating microslicer (Vibratome, St. Louis, MO, USA). Slices were held in ACSF at 37°C for 5–15 min and thereafter at room temperature until use.

Electrophysiology

Slices were transferred to the stage of an upright microscope (Olympus BX51) and continuously perfused with ACSF gassed with 95% O₂/5% CO₂ and warmed to 35–37°C. Whole-cell recordings were obtained from pyramidal neurons in layer 5 of primary motor cortex under visual guidance with a ×40/NA 0.8 or ×20/NA 1.0 water-immersion objective and infra-red difference interference contrast optics. Layer 5 pyramidal neurons were identified by their large, pyramidal somata, located 720–960 μm from the pial edge of the slice (seven neurons), their characteristic firing patterns and large apical dendritic trees, visible by fluorescence microscopy once filled with indicator. Whole-cell recording pipettes were 4–8 MΩ when filled with intracellular solution: 135 mM K-gluconate, 4 mM KCl, 10 mM HEPES, 10 mM Na₂-phosphocreatine, 4 mM Mg-ATP, 0.3 mM Na₂-GTP, 0.2% (w/v) biocytin, 10 μM Alexa 594, pH 7.3. Signals were recorded with an Axoclamp-2A amplifier (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA, USA), National Instruments A-to-D boards and Labview software written by Jack Waters (National Instruments, Austin, TX, USA).

Measurement and Control of Temperature

Artificial cerebrospinal fluid was warmed with a thermistor-based in-line solution heater, placed a few inches from the slice. The temperature of the solution was monitored upon entry to the perfusion chamber, a few millimeters from the slice, and maintained at 35–37°C by a feedback circuit and temperature controller (TC-324B; Warner Instruments, Hamden, CT, USA). Flow rate was ∼3–6 ml/min. The temperature of the ACSF under the objective was verified with a BAT-12 Microprobe Thermometer (Physitemp Instruments, Clifton, NJ, USA), using a small 24-gage polyurethane coated wire probe with polyester insulated thermocouple bead (IT-24P; maximum tip diameter 230 μm), which was placed under the microscope objective. The temperature of ACSF under the objective, measured using the IT-24P probe, was consistently no more than 0.5°C cooler than the temperature of the ACSF entering the perfusion chamber, measured by the TC-324B temperature controller.

Analysis

Analysis was performed using routines written by Jack Waters in IgorPro v6.0 (Wavemetrics, Lake Oswego, OR, USA). Physiological properties were measured in bridge mode, using 300 ms square current injections.

Spiking patterns were assessed where the neuron was given a suprathreshold 300 ms current injection at the soma which resulted in 4–7 spikes. A spiking pattern was defined as regular if all inter-spike intervals (ISIs) throughout the spike train were within 15% of the mean ISI. Where the ISIs fell outside of this range, the spiking pattern was described as bursting.

V–I relationships were derived from the steady-state voltage during 300 ms current steps and were fit with the following relationship (Waters and Helmchen, 2006):

ΔV = R_N,0ΔI+c_ARΔI²

where R_N is the resting input resistance (slope at I = 0) and c_AR is a quadratic coefficient which describes the curvature of the V–I relationship.

Voltage sag was estimated as the ratio of steady-state and peak voltages during the 300-ms current step (sag ratio). The membrane time constant was determined by fitting an exponential to the rising phase of the voltage response during the current step.

Action potential threshold was defined as the point at which the first temporal derivative of the voltage (dV/dt) first exceeded 50 mV/ms. Action potential amplitude was measured from threshold. Action potential half width was measured at half the amplitude. Action potential rise and decay times were measured as the time intervals between 10 and 90% of the voltage difference between threshold and peak. Rheobase was defined as the minimum amount of current required to evoke spiking.

Statistical comparisons were performed using the Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-ranks test or paired t-test in Graphpad Instat 3.06 (Graphpad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA).

Results

Reversible Change in Spiking Pattern with Temperature

We obtained whole-cell recordings from the somata of layer 5 pyramidal neurons in primary motor cortex in acute slices from adult mice. Perfusing ACSF was initially maintained at 36–37°C. At this temperature, all neurons displayed regular spiking patterns during depolarizing current injections (Figure 1; n = 10 neurons). A spiking pattern was defined as regular if ISIs throughout the spike train were within 15% of the mean ISI.

FIGURE 1

Figure 1. The spiking patterns of layer 5 pyramidal neurons change with temperature. Example spiking patterns for three pyramidal neurons. Each row is a series of recordings from a single neuron. Spiking was evoked with 300 ms constant current injections via the somatic recording pipette. Each neuron was cycled from physiological temperature (35–37°C; in red) to 25–26°C (in blue), back to 36–37°C (red), then again to 25–26°C (blue), and back (red). Dashed lines indicate 0 mV. (A) A neuron with strong bursting at 25–26°C. (B) A neuron that displayed both strong and weak burst spiking patterns at 25–26°C. This was the only neuron that showed weak and strong bursting patterns in subsequent cooling trials. This neuron was classified as strongly bursting at 25–26°C. (C) A neuron with weak bursting at 25–26°C.

The temperature of the ACSF was then permitted to decline, and this resulted in a change to a burst spiking pattern (Figures 1 and 2A). At 24–26°C, in all 10 neurons the first ISI (ISI_1–2) was invariably >>15% shorter than the mean, reflecting high-frequency firing during an initial burst of spikes (Figure 2B).

FIGURE 2

Figure 2. Spiking patterns and inter-spike intervals at low and physiological temperatures. (A) Summary of spiking patterns for 10 layer 5 pyramidal neurons at low and high temperatures. All neurons display regular spiking (R) at physiological temperatures and weak (W; gray) or strong (S; black) burst spiking at lower temperatures. (B) Inter-spike interval between the first and second spike (ISI_1–2) as a function of temperature for 10 pyramidal neurons. (C) Inter-spike interval between the third and fourth spike (ISI_3–4) as a function of temperature for 10 pyramidal neurons. These neurons fall into two groups: four with strong burst spiking patterns (black), in which ISI_3–4 is comparable to ISI_1–2, and six with weak burst spiking patterns (gray), in which ISI_3–4 is comparable at the two temperatures.

Like previous authors we distinguished between two burst spiking patterns: “intrinsic” or “strong” bursting, in which all spikes were clustered into brief, high-frequency bursts, each containing 2–5 spikes and separated by a prolonged hyperpolarization (Connors et al., 1982; Williams and Stuart, 1999); and weak bursting, in which an initial burst of 2–5 spikes at high frequency was followed by regular spiking (Williams and Stuart, 1999). At 24–26°C, four neurons adopted strong burst spiking patterns, with bursts of 2–4 spikes. In these neurons the inter-spike interval between third and fourth action potentials in the train (ISI_3–4) remained short (Figure 2C). The remaining six neurons fired in a weak bursting pattern at 24–26°C, with a single burst of 2–4 high-frequency spikes followed by a regular spiking pattern. During weak burst spiking ISI_3–4 was comparable to that during regular spiking at 36–37°C (Figure 2C).

Most neurons changed their spiking patterns with larger-amplitude current injections, as in previous publications (Agmon and Connors, 1989; Mason and Larkman, 1990; Williams and Stuart, 1999). During larger-amplitude current injections at 36–37°C, two neurons fired a doublet of high-frequency spikes before adopting a regular spiking pattern. The other eight neurons maintained a regular spiking pattern in response to current of all amplitudes. At 24–26°C, all neurons maintained bursting patterns in response to all current injections. During large current injections the strongly bursting neurons began with an initial burst of 2–4 spikes which was followed with regular spiking. In weakly bursting neurons, with increasing current the number of spikes in the initial burst increased to ≥4 spikes and the subsequent action potentials remained regularly spaced.

The transition from regular spiking to bursting was reversible and reproducible. Upon re-warming the slice, the neuron returned to a regular spiking pattern (Figure 1). Furthermore, a subsequent decline in temperature (to 24–26°C) and return to 36–37°C again resulted in a reversible transition to bursting and back to regular spiking (Figure 1).

Reversible Changes in other Intrinsic Properties

The action potential waveform also changed with temperature and spiking pattern. The amplitude and half width of the first action potential were greater and broader, respectively, during bursting at 24–26°C than at physiological temperature (Figures 3A,B; P < 0.05), whereas voltage threshold for the first spike was unchanged (Figures 3A,B; P > 0.05). During regular or weak burst spiking there was little change in action potential threshold, amplitude, or half width during the train of spikes. In contrast, threshold became more depolarized, amplitude was reduced, and spike became broader during a strong burst (Figures 3A,B).

FIGURE 3

Figure 3. Effects on temperature on spike waveform and membrane parameters. (A) Spike threshold, amplitude and half width for the first four spikes during 300 ms constant current injection at 25–26°C (blue) and 36–37°C (red). Results were pooled separately for neurons that displayed strong bursting patterns at 25–26°C and weak bursting patterns at 25–26°C. Points represent the mean (±SEM) from four neurons with strong bursting patterns and six with weak bursting patterns at 25–26°C. (B) Example recording to illustrate the contrast in spike threshold, amplitude and half width for a single neuron at when displaying regular spiking at physiological temperature (red) and string bursting at lower temperature (blue). (C) Effects of temperature on resting membrane potential (V_rest), membrane sag, input resistance (R_N), membrane time constant (tau), anomalous rectification (c_AR) and rheobase. Each bar represents the mean ± SEM from 10 neurons.

There was no difference in resting membrane potential at physiological and lower temperatures (P > 0.05; Figure 3C). However, membrane sag increased ∼6% at 24–26°C (P < 0.05; Figure 3C). Resting input resistance and membrane time constant were both approximately doubled at 24–26°C (each P < 0.05; Figure 3C). Membrane rectification was increased to approximately three times the value at physiological temperature (P < 0.05; Figure 3C). Rheobase was approximately halved at 24–26°C (P < 0.05; Figure 3C).

Somatic Depolarization does not Mimic the Effect of Temperature on Spiking Pattern

Although the mean resting membrane potential did not change with temperature, in some neurons there was a reversible shift in resting membrane potential with temperature (Figure 4). In individual neurons, cooling to 24–26°C could cause depolarization of up to 10 mV and hyperpolarization of up to 9 mV. We therefore considered whether such a change in membrane potential could cause a switch in spiking pattern. To alter membrane potential, we injected positive and negative holding currents into six neurons, three of which fired strong bursts at 24–26°C and three of which fired weak bursts. The firing patterns of all six neurons remained unchanged (depolarizations of 10.7 ± 0.5 mV at 24–26°C and 8.7 ± 1.0 mV at 36–37°C; hyperpolarizations of 9.5 ± 0.5 mV at 24–26°C and 8.6 ± 0.9 mV at 36–37°C). Hence a shift in somatic membrane potential cannot account for the change in spiking pattern with temperature.

FIGURE 4

Figure 4. Spiking pattern unaltered by somatic depolarization or hyperpolarization. An example of an experiment to assess the effects of membrane potential on spiking pattern at physiological and lower temperatures. The neuron changes from regular spiking to strong burst spiking as a result of a decline in temperature from 37°C (red) to 25.5°C (blue). In this neuron the decline in temperature was accompanied by depolarization of the resting membrane potential from −65 to −57 mV. Somatic current injection was used to depolarize and hyperpolarize the membrane potential. At both temperatures the spiking pattern was unaffected by somatic current injection.

Discussion

We have shown that layer 5 neocortical pyramidal neurons in primary motor neocortical slices typically adopt a regular spiking pattern in response to constant somatic current injection at physiological temperatures, but spike in bursts at lower temperatures. Hence each individual layer 5 pyramidal neuron can adopt either spiking pattern in response to constant somatic current injection and even neurons which are able to spike in bursts may commonly display regular spiking patterns at physiological temperatures.

Temperature Sensitivity of Intrinsic Membrane Properties

Intrinsic membrane properties also changed with temperature: resting input resistance, membrane time constant, curvature of the I–V relationship all increased approximately two- to three-fold with the decline in temperature to 24–26°C. Similar effects have previously been observed in hippocampal and neocortical pyramidal neurons in slice preparations from various species, including an increase in input resistance of ∼50–100% over a similar temperature range to that studied here (Thompson et al., 1985; Shen and Schwartzkroin, 1988; Volgushev et al., 2000; Trevelyan and Jack, 2002; Lee et al., 2005).

We observed no change in mean resting membrane potential in across the population of neurons examined, but there were substantial changes in resting membrane potentials of up to 10 mV in some neurons. Other authors also report a mixture of effects of temperature on resting membrane potential in both hippocampus and cortex, with some authors reporting significant (10–15 mV) depolarization following a reduction in temperature in both hippocampus and neocortex (Shen and Schwartzkroin, 1988; Volgushev et al., 2000; Trevelyan and Jack, 2002) and reporting no effect of temperature on resting membrane potential (Thompson et al., 1985; Lee et al., 2005).

Temperature and the Mechanism of Bursting in Layer 5 Pyramidal Neurons

Burst spiking in layer 5 neocortical pyramidal neurons results from the activation of sodium and calcium currents in the distal apical dendrite. Activation of these currents can generate a mixed sodium/calcium-based dendritic spike in the dendrite, which causes prolonged depolarization of the axon initial segment, resulting in a burst of spikes (Schiller et al., 1997; Schwindt and Crill, 1999; Williams and Stuart, 1999). Presumably increasing temperature limits activation of sodium and calcium currents in the distal dendrite or the ability of these currents to affect spiking. In this context it is interesting that the membrane time constant and input resistance of layer 5 neurons both approximately doubled when the temperature decreased to 24–26°C. An increase in membrane time constant might prolong the depolarization that results from activation of sodium and calcium currents. An increase in membrane resistance would increase the space constant of the dendrite, facilitating the spread of current from soma to dendrite and vice versa. A change in electrical coupling might account for the effects of temperature on spiking pattern, with the flow of electrical signals between soma and distal apical dendrite being inhibited at warmer temperatures.

Alternatively lower temperatures might favor bursting by causing depolarization of the distal apical dendrite, which pushes the dendrite toward the voltage threshold for a dendritic spike (Williams and Stuart, 1999; Larkum et al., 2001). In our experiments, depolarization of the neuron had no effect on the spiking pattern, but we depolarized the neuron by somatic current injection, which will have an extremely limited effect on the membrane potential in the distal dendrites (Williams and Mitchell, 2008).

Distinction between Regularly Spiking and Bursting Layer 5 Neurons

Many authors have investigated the spiking patterns of layer 5 pyramidal neurons and concluded that the population is mixed, with some neurons firing in bursts in response to constant current injection and some neurons adopting a regular spiking pattern (Connors et al., 1982; McCormick et al., 1985; Agmon and Connors, 1989; Chagnac-Amitai et al., 1990; Mason and Larkman, 1990; Schwindt and Crill, 1999; Williams and Stuart, 1999). Spiking patterns have been correlated to morphological characteristics, including the diameter of the apical dendritic trunk and size of the apical dendritic tree (Mason and Larkman, 1990). These studies suggest that bursting is an intrinsic property of a morphologically distinct subset of layer 5 pyramidal neurons. Here we show that individual layer 5 pyramidal neurons can adopt both spiking patterns.

The proportions of neurons that spike in bursting and with regular patterns differ between previous publications. For example, Chagnac-Amitai et al. (1990) reported that ∼50–60% of layer 5 pyramidal neurons in rat somatosensory cortex spike in bursts, whereas Schwindt and Crill (1999) reported a much lower proportion of bursting neurons (∼33%) in the same brain region. Some of the disparity in the literature might result from species or age differences or from slightly different classifications of bursting behavior. Selection bias might also contribute. For example, bursting neurons may have larger somata than regularly spiking layer 5 pyramidal neurons (Chagnac-Amitai et al., 1990; Larkman and Mason, 1990). Hence a bias toward larger somata might lead to a higher proportion of bursting neurons. We performed no morphological analyses in our study, but bursting occurred in all of our recordings, raising the possibility that the neurons included in our study may represent a subset of layer 5 pyramidal neurons.

The temperature–sensitivity of spiking patterns observed here might help explain the disparity in the proportion of neurons classified as bursting by different authors. In these previous reports, recordings were obtained from slices maintained over a narrow range of temperatures: 32°C (Agmon and Connors, 1989), 33°C (Schwindt and Crill, 1999), 35°C (Chagnac-Amitai et al., 1990), 34–36°C (Williams and Stuart, 1999), 37°C (Connors et al., 1982), temperature not stated (McCormick et al., 1985; Mason and Larkman, 1990). The method and accuracy of temperature measurements are rarely stated in these or other slice physiology studies and even small inaccuracies of a few degrees Celsius might alter the proportion of layer 5 neurons that spike in bursts. Hence in addition to a possible selection bias, here we add temperature as another factor that might have influenced the proportion of bursting neurons in this and previous studies, as relatively subtle differences in temperature could readily account for much of the variability between studies.

The idea that a single layer 5 pyramidal neuron can change its spiking pattern is not new. For example, current injection into the proximal apical dendrite favors burst spiking by enhancing the interaction between soma and distal apical dendrite and this has led to the suggestion that synaptic activity in the proximal apical dendritic tree can control the neuron’s spiking pattern (Larkum et al., 2001). It has also been suggested that individual layer 5 pyramidal neurons may switch between regular and burst spiking patterns in vivo, again depending on the patterns of ongoing synaptic activation (Steriade, 2004). Here we show that the spiking patterns of layer 5 pyramidal neurons are even more flexible than previously thought: even in the absence of synaptic activity pyramidal neurons can adopt different spiking patterns in response to the same stimulus.

Layer 5 Pyramidal Neurons as Cellular Coincidence Detectors

Layer 5 pyramidal neurons can act as cellular coincidence detectors, detecting, and responding to coincident activity in deep and superficial layers of the neocortex (Larkum et al., 1999). Burst spiking is central to this role. At physiological temperatures, layer 5 pyramidal neurons adopt regular spiking patterns in response to synaptic activity in their proximal dendrites, which reside in deep layers of the neocortex. Coincident activation of the distal apical dendrite, in superficial layers of the neocortex, may generate a burst of spikes (Larkum et al., 1999). We have shown that layer 5 pyramidal neurons spike in bursts in response to somatic input alone at 24–26°C. Presumably under these conditions this form of coincidence detection is lost. Since cellular coincidence detection is probably a fundamental function and perhaps the principal task of these neurons, our results suggest that layer 5 pyramidal neurons are incapable of performing one of their most important physiological functions at sub-physiological temperatures.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

We thank Becky Imhoff for technical assistance and Abigail Kalmbach for discussions and Charles Anderson, Abigail Kalmbach, Taro Kiritani, and Patrick Sheets critical reading of the manuscript. We thank the National Institute of Mental Health (5T32MH067564-08 and 5R21MH085117-02) and the Brain Research Foundation (BRF SG 2010-13) for funding.

References

Agmon, A., and Connors, B. W. (1989). Repetitive burst-firing neurons in the deep layers of mouse somatosensory cortex. Neurosci. Lett. 99, 137–141.

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text

Chagnac-Amitai, Y., Luhmann, H. J., and Prince, D. A. (1990). Burst generating and regular spiking layer 5 pyramidal neurons of rat neocortex have different morphological features. J. Comp. Neurol. 296, 598–613.

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text

Connors, B. W., Gutnick, M. J., and Prince, D. A. (1982). Electrophysiological properties of neocortical neurons in vitro. J. Neurophysiol. 48, 1302–1320.

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text

Larkman, A., and Mason, A. (1990). Correlations between morphology and electrophysiology of pyramidal neurons in slices of rat visual cortex. I. Establishment of cell classes. J. Neurosci. 10, 1407–1414.

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text

Larkum, M. E., and Zhu, J. J. (2002). Signaling of layer 1 and whisker-evoked Ca2⁺ and Na⁺ action potentials in distal and terminal dendrites of rat neocortical pyramidal neurons in vitro and in vivo. J. Neurosci. 22, 6991–7005.

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text

Larkum, M. E., Zhu, J. J., and Sakmann, B. (1999). A new cellular mechanism for coupling inputs arriving at different cortical layers. Nature 398, 338–341.

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

Larkum, M. E., Zhu, J. J., and Sakmann, B. (2001). Dendritic mechanisms underlying the coupling of the dendritic with the axonal action potential initiation zone of adult rat layer 5 pyramidal neurons. J. Physiol. 533.2, 447–466.

Lee, J. C. F., Callaway, J. C., and Foehring, R. C. (2005). Effects of temperature on calcium transients and Ca2⁺-dependent after hyperpolarizations in neocortical pyramidal neurons. J. Neurophysiol. 93, 2012–2020.

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

Lisman, J. E. (1997). Bursts as a unit of neural information: making unreliable synapses reliable. Trends Neurosci. 20, 38–43.

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

Mason, A., and Larkman, A. (1990). Correlations between morphology and electrophysiology of pyramidal neurons in slices of rat visual cortex II. Electrophysiology. J. Neurosci. 70, 1415–1428.

McCormick, D. A., Connors, B. W., Lighthall, J. W., and Prince, D. A. (1985). Comparative electrophysiology of pyramidal and sparsely spiny stellate neurons of the neocortex. J. Neurophysiol. 54, 782–806.

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text

Schiller, J., Schiller, Y., Stuart, G., and Sakmann, B. (1997). Calcium action potentials restricted to distal apical dendrites of rat neocortical pyramidal neurons. J. Physiol. 505.3, 605–616.

Schwindt, P., and Crill, W. (1999). Mechanisms underlying burst and regular spiking evoked by dendritic depolarization in layer 5 cortical pyramidal neurons. J. Neurophysiol. 81, 1341–1354.

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text

Shen, K., and Schwartzkroin, P. A. (1988). Effects of temperature alterations on population and cellular activities in hippocampal slices from mature and immature rabbit. Brain Res. 475, 305–316.

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

Silva, L. R., Amitai, Y., and Connors, B. W. (1991). Intrinsic oscillations of neocortex generated by layer 5 pyramidal neurons. Science 251, 432–435.

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

Steriade, M. (2004). Neocortical cell classes are flexible entities. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 5, 121–134.

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text

Thompson, S. M., Masukawa, L. M., and Prince, D. A. (1985). Temperature dependence of intrinsic membrane properties and synaptic potentials in hippocampal CA1 neurons in vitro. J. Neurosci. 5, 817–824.

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text

Trevelyan, A. J., and Jack, J. (2002). Detailed passive cable models of layer 2/3 pyramidal cells in rat visual cortex at different temperatures. J. Physiol. 539.2, 623–636.

Volgushev, M., Vidyasagar, T. R., Chistiakova, M., Yousef, T., and Eysel, U. T. (2000). Membrane properties and spike generation in rat visual cortical cells during reversible cooling. J. Physiol. 522.1, 59–76.

Waters, J., and Helmchen, F. (2006). Background synaptic activity is sparse in neocortex. J. Neurosci. 26, 8267–8277.

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

Williams, S. R., and Mitchell, S. J. (2008). Direct measurement of somatic voltage clamp errors in central neurons. Nat. Neurosci. 7, 790–798.

Williams, S. R., and Stuart, G. J. (1999). Mechanisms and consequences of action potential burst firing in rat neocortical pyramidal neurons. J. Physiol. 521.2, 467–482.