Eric Anson1*
John Jeka2,3
- 1Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutes, Baltimore, MD, USA
- 2Department of Kinesiology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- 3Department of Bioengineering, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
Much is known about age-related anatomical changes in the vestibular system. Knowledge regarding how vestibular anatomical changes impact behavior for older adults continues to grow, in line with advancements in diagnostic testing. However, despite advancements in clinical diagnostics, much remains unknown about the functional impact that an aging vestibular system has on daily life activities such as standing and walking. Modern diagnostic tests are very good at characterizing neural activity of the isolated vestibular system, but the tests themselves are artificial and do not reflect the multisensory aspects of natural human behavior. Also, the majority of clinical diagnostic tests are passively applied because active behavior can enhance performance. In this perspective paper, we review anatomical and behavioral changes associated with an aging vestibular system and highlight several areas where a more functionally relevant perspective can be taken. For postural control, a multisensory perturbation approach could be used to bring balance rehabilitation into the arena of precision medicine. For walking and complex gaze stability, this may result in less physiologically specific impairments, but the trade-off would be a greater understanding of how the aging vestibular system truly impacts the daily life of older adults.
Aging and the Vestibular System
Many systems in the human body are adversely affected by the aging process, including the vestibular system. It has long been known that the number of vestibular hair cells is reduced in older adults compared to younger adults, independent of vestibular disease (1–4). The decline in hair cells is not uniform throughout the vestibular periphery. The saccule and utricle experience approximately a 25% reduction in hair cells, whereas semi-circular canals (SCCs) lose approximately 40% of their hair cells with age (5). Moreover, type I hair cells die off at a higher rate in the SCCs compared to the saccule and utricle, whereas type II hair cells experience similar rates of degeneration in the SCCs and otolith organs (3, 6–8). Utricular hair cells are more susceptible to age-related degeneration than saccular hair cells (3).
The size and number of neurons that make up the vestibular nucleus decrease by 3% each decade beginning around age 40 (9). The number of vestibular nerve fibers also declines with increasing age (10). Fewer vestibular sensory cells and neural pathways result in an age-related reduction in vestibular afferent signals to the central nervous system. There is also an associated reduction in the number of cerebellar Purkinje cells that contribute to modulation of vestibular afferents (11).
Paralleling the anatomical changes, most behavioral experiments have demonstrated a decline in functional vestibular tests [e.g., decreased vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) with increased age] (12–16). Fewer sensory cells in the SCCs result in a reduced capacity for detecting rotational head movements. In addition to reduced VOR gain, older adults also have shorter VOR time constants (12). Reduction in the vestibular time constant suggests the neural integrator as a potential site of age-related degeneration (13, 17). Dependence of the VOR on age appears to be variable as not all experiments demonstrate age-related decline in VOR gain (18, 19). VOR function measured by head impulse testing was impaired more often than otolith function based on vestibular-evoked myogenic potential (VEMP) testing for adults over 70 (20).
The functional consequence of fewer sensory cells in the otolith organs includes reduced sensitivity to gravity and linear acceleration (21, 22). Consistent with the decreased sensitivity of the saccule, older adults have smaller amplitude ocular and cervical VEMPs (23–27). Cervical VEMP response latencies are also longer and depend on a greater extent on stimulus volume to generate an effective response in older adults (27, 28). The optimal frequency for air conducted VEMPS also changes with increased age (25). Older adults display less ocular counter roll during slow roll tilt and also in response to galvanic vestibular stimulation consistent with reduced utricular responsiveness (29, 30). Linear VOR responses to fore-aft accelerations were smaller in older adults than in younger adults (31), demonstrating that the otolith responses to movement and to sound/vibration show a similar pattern of decline with age. The linear VOR has been implicated in anticipatory eye movements and a decline in otolith function may contribute to abnormal gaze stability during repetitive behaviors such as walking (32).
Functional Impact of the Aging Vestibular System
It has been estimated that 30–35% of older adults suffers from vestibular dysfunction (33, 34). The most common type of vestibular disorder in the elderly is benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) (35), likely due to fewer otoconia adhering to the saccule or utricle combined with alteration in calcium metabolism (22, 26, 36). Diagnosis of BPPV is based on stereotypical patterns of nystagmus and vertigo during positional testing, such as Hallpike–Dix testing (35, 37), supine head turns (38, 39), or deep head hanging (40). Routine medical screening for BPPV has been advocated for older adults due to the prevalence and ease of treatment (41).
Approximately one-third to one-half of the population over the age of 65 experiences an injurious fall annually (42, 43). Vestibular dysfunction results in balance impairments that frequently result in falls (44). Eighty percent of fallers in a recent study were found to have a vestibular impairment (45). Older adults experience more disequilibrium following nerve section associated with treatment of acoustic neuroma compared to younger adults (46). Persistent disequilibrium suggests that sensory reweighting may be more difficult with reduced vestibular input to the aging nervous system (47–49). Sensory reweighting involves prioritizing accurate and reliable sensory information over less reliable or less accurate sensory information for estimating body motion in space (50). Deviations in subjective visual vertical with age are consistent with reduced sensitivity of the otolith organs that lead to an increase in visual weighting to identify vertical (51, 52). Healthy older adults also demonstrate an increase in trunk sway velocity with age (53, 54). Older adults with abnormal utricular responses to whole body tilt have more variable medio-lateral sway relative to young adults, partly due to altered gravitational integration for postural control (29). Additionally, age-related changes in somatosensory function (reduced nerve conduction velocity), visual impairments, cognitive decline, and decreased strength may impact balance-related sensory integration for older adults who develop vestibular pathology (55–57).
Reduced capabilities in the aging vestibular system may impair the ability to rapidly detect changes in head acceleration and may contribute to slower walking as a self-protective strategy to prevent falls in older adults. Falls are known to occur most frequently during walking or transitions from sitting/standing to walking when head acceleration is higher (58). Abnormal SCC function [based on clinical head impulse test (HIT)] has been associated with slower gait speed and increased odds of falling in adults over 70 years old (59). By contrast, individuals with acute unilateral vestibular disease do not show a strong or consistent relationship between trunk velocity while walking and VOR gain (60). These inconsistencies may represent functional distinctions between VOR and vestibulo-spinal pathways despite neural convergence in the vestibular nuclei (61). Walking leg movement and trunk sway may receive different vestibular modulation as has been demonstrated for vision (62). Increased variability of double support time during walking has recently been reported for older female fallers with asymmetric responses to the post head shaking nystagmus test (63). Saccular function has also been shown to contribute to age-related changes in gait speed in healthy older adults (64). Slower gait speed may be a compensation related to postural abnormalities during a task when the base of support is dynamically changing (65), or to impaired visual stability at faster head speeds (66), or both. Differences in sample size, age, and pathology of vestibular dysfunction limit comparisons between these studies and highlight the need for additional studies to better understand the causal link between walking difficulties and age-related decline in SCC and otolith function.
The vestibular system has been linked to visuospatial function (67, 68), and individuals with vestibular loss experience difficulties with spatial navigation (69). Accurate spatial navigation depends on having a stable egocentric reference frame, and the vestibular system has been proposed as a source for that reference (70). Older fallers made significantly larger errors when performing a triangle walking task blindfolded, demonstrating a reduced ability to accurately perform spatial path integration (71, 72). Older adults have greater difficulty integrating multisensory cues for navigation than younger adults (73). Older adults are more likely to experience cognitive decline, and vestibular dysfunction mediates the decline in cognition associated with increased age (74). It is not clear to what extent age-related decline in spatial navigation measured when blindfolded relates to goal-oriented walking since path direction is influenced by vision, vestibular, and proprioceptive input (75).
However, many older adults with degenerating vestibular systems do not report imbalance or dizziness (13). Symptom reports do not consistently relate to either physiological (i.e., VOR) or perceptual assessments of vestibular function such as dynamic visual acuity (76–80). Further complicating the mismatch between symptoms and physiology, older adults may have anxiety/depression/fear of falling that exacerbates or mimics symptoms from age-related vestibular dysfunction (81–84). Due to limitations in vestibular diagnostic testing, clinicians may not be able to detect residual vestibular function in older adults with vestibular loss confirmed by current diagnostic testing (20, 85). Among older adults with severe vestibular loss canal function was impaired in 100% of individuals, but approximately 60% of those individuals demonstrate some degree of preserved otolith function (86). However, canal function evaluated by HIT does not require complete absence of function in order to be identified as pathologic (87, 88); therefore, there may also be preserved canal function in adults with age-related decline in vestibular function based on HITs. In addition to partially preserved vestibular function, inconsistent subjective reports may also be due to anticipatory mechanisms (89, 90), changes in lifestyle behaviors (91), or changes in multisensory reweighting (92, 93).
Future Directions for Functional Vestibular Testing
Current vestibular assessments are very good at characterizing the reactivity of the peripheral vestibular sensory epithelium; however, they rely on artificial and unnatural stimuli to determine whether the vestibular system is working (79, 94, 95). The relevance of these artificial assessments to natural multisensory functional behavior is not always clear (96, 97). Even when there are associations between vestibular tests and functional activities, such as standing and walking, the direct causal link between walking and tests performed while sitting or lying down remains to be elucidated. Some tests such as calorics and clinical head impulse testing are very good at identifying abnormal vestibular function (88), but they may not be sensitive enough to identify slow decline in vestibular function associated with age (41). The range for clinically normal rotational VOR gain is 0.7–1.0, making it is unclear whether the measure of rotational VOR gain is adequate to capture age-related decline (14, 15, 98). Recently, more attention has been placed on corrective saccades resulting from head impulse testing as an additional method for identifying age-related change in vestibular-mediated gaze stability (99–101). Quantification of gaze stability based on compensatory saccades may prove to be more sensitive for identifying subtle age-related decline in vestibular function associated with aging. Since adaptive compensatory saccades contribute to gaze stability to a greater extent in response to vestibular pathology (102), new methods to quantify “global gaze stability” during natural behavior are needed that allow for multiple loci for neural control.
Current clinical balance assessments cannot specifically identify change in vestibular function as the primary contribution to balance problems for older adults. Perturbation-based evaluation of balance and sensory weighting allows for balance testing to move beyond descriptions of sway to mechanistic identification of abnormal multisensory integration (50, 103). This type of balance assessment has the potential to move beyond the standard approach to clinical balance assessment for older adults and bring balance rehabilitation closer to precision medicine. Major limitations to implement this level of precision diagnostics for balance include the expense of equipment, space for equipment, technical skills to perform the experiment, and interpret the experimental results. Additionally, the time needed to conduct these experiments may be clinically prohibitive. Future work in this field should focus on adapting perturbation style laboratory techniques for identifying mechanistic contributions to balance impairments into clinical settings (104), as well as controlled trials designed to target impaired balance mechanisms with rehabilitation strategies using a precision medicine approach. Clinical adaptations could include the use of body worn inertial sensors and head-mounted displays for visual stimulation to reduce equipment cost and space (105, 106). Electrical vestibular stimulation and tendon vibration could provide specific stimulation (103), rather than relying on non-specific effects encountered with foam surfaces. Demonstrating that equivalent results can be obtained in a shorter, more clinically friendly time frame is necessary before widespread clinical acceptance of this technique. Furthermore, task-specific balance assessment should not be restricted to standing balance. Body worn inertial sensors and smartphone technology can and should be leveraged to identify functional balance impairments during tasks, such as walking, obstacle crossing, and stair negotiation (60, 107, 108).
The ability to see clearly during head/body movement is important for many daily tasks, such as shopping, obstacle avoidance and manipulation, determining location/navigation by reading signs, and driving. The primary purpose of the VOR is to stabilize gaze during locomotion (109, 110). Oscillopsia, the apparent “jumping of objects … due to bobbing up and down of the head” degrades visual acuity during head motion making faces or reading signs/labels difficult or impossible to recognize (111–113). Oscillopsia can lead to reduced quality of life through reduction in activity participation, elevated economic burden, and self-imposed limitations on driving (86, 114). In contrast to seated tests of gaze stability, walking gaze stability depends on multiple sensory systems (vision, vestibular, and proprioception) for coordination of ocular muscles with postural muscles that control movement of the head (115–118). Characterizing overall gaze stability during walking would provide greater insight into actual functional problems experienced by older adults with reduced vestibular function. Overall gaze stability, despite being less physiologically specific, during a more natural behavior such as walking would be more informative about the daily life impact that vestibular decline has on older adults. In order to be more patient focused, future studies should move beyond the laboratory to evaluate functional gaze stability in natural settings during typical daily tasks. This is particularly relevant for studies attempting to link head impulse assessment of VOR gain to gaze stability during walking as peak head velocity during walking often exceeds the peak velocity of a head impulse (119). Portable lightweight gaze analysis systems could be sent home to capture a “day in the life” of an older adult or individuals with vestibular dysfunction.
Despite associations between VEMP tests and functional behaviors such as gait speed, the directionality and causality of those links remain unclear. Functionally relevant methods to evaluate otolith contributions to vestibulo-spinal control during standing and walking are needed (120, 121). Including assessments when the postural control system is under real or apparent threat, for example at heights, will also be important as vestibulo-spinal gain and postural sway are different under those conditions (121–123). Treadmills paired with virtual reality or head-mounted displays should be leveraged to evaluate spatial navigation for older adults. Immersive technology will facilitate simultaneous measurement of balance and walking ability, gaze stability, and eye movement control, while also tasking aspects of cognition, fear/anxiety, and ability to navigate through space. As new methods are devised to probe functional vestibular behavior, they will need to incorporate physiologically relevant vestibular stimulation for the SCCs and otoliths while also capturing the multiple systems influenced by the vestibular system (119, 124). A comprehensive and integrative approach to the evaluation of vestibular function should concurrently address gaze stability and postural control during functionally relevant standing and walking tasks.
Author Contributions
EA and JJ conceived of the work. EA drafted the work. EA and JJ critically revised the work. EA and JJ approved the final version.
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Funding
Supported in part by NIDCD T32 DC000023.
References
1. Lopez I, Ishiyama G, Tang Y, Tokita J, Baloh RW, Ishiyama A. Regional estimates of hair cells and supporting cells in the human crista ampullaris. J Neurosci Res (2005) 82:421–31. doi:10.1002/jnr.20652
2. Rosenhall U, Rubin W. Degenerative changes in the human vestibular sensory epithelia. Acta Otoaryngol (1975) 79:67–80. doi:10.3109/00016487509124657
3. Gleeson M, Felix H. A comparative study of the effect of age on the human cochlear and vestibular neuroepithelia. Acta Otoaryngol Suppl (1987) 436:103–9. doi:10.3109/00016488709124982
4. Taylor RR, Jagger DJ, Saeed SR, Axon P, Donnelly N, Tysome J, et al. Characterizing human vestibular sensory epithelia for experimental studies: new hair bundles on old tissue and implications for therapeutic interventions in ageing. Neurobiol Aging (2015) 36:2068–84. doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2015.02.013
5. Matheson AJ, Darlington CL, Smith PF. Dizziness in the elderly and age-related degeneration of the vestibular system. NZ J Psychol (1999) 28:10–6.
6. Anniko M. The aging vestibular hair cell. Am J Otolaryngol (1983) 4:151–60. doi:10.1016/S0196-0709(83)80037-4
7. Rosenhall U. Degenerative patterns in the aging human vestibular neuro-epithelia. Acta Otolaryngol (1973) 76:208–20. doi:10.3109/00016487309121501
8. Rauch SD, Velazquez-Villaseñor L, Dimitri PS, Merchant SN. Decreasing hair cell counts in aging humans. Ann N Y Acad Sci (2001) 942:220–7. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2001.tb03748.x
9. Lopez I, Honrubia V, Baloh RW. Aging and the human vestibular nucleus. J Vestib Res (1997) 7:77–85. doi:10.1016/S0957-4271(96)00137-1
10. Park JJ, Tang Y, Lopez I, Ishiyama A. Age-related change in the number of neurons in the human vestibular ganglion. J Comp Neurol (2001) 431:437–43. doi:10.1002/1096-9861(20010319)431:4<437::AID-CNE1081>3.0.CO;2-P
11. Andersen BB, Gundersen HJG, Pakkenberg B. Aging of the human cerebellum: a stereological study. J Comp Neurol (2003) 466:356–65. doi:10.1002/cne.10884
12. Baloh RW, Jacobson KM, Socotch TM. The effect of aging on visual-vestibuloocular responses. Exp Brain Res (1993) 95:509–16. doi:10.1007/BF00227144
13. Baloh RW, Enrietto J, Jacobson KM, Lin A. Age-related changes in vestibular function: a longitudinal study. Ann N Y Acad Sci (2001) 942:210–9. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2001.tb03747.x
14. Li C, Layman AJ, Geary R, Anson E, Carey JP, Ferrucci L, et al. Epidemiology of vestibulo-ocular reflex function: data from the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging. Otol Neurotol (2015) 36:267–72. doi:10.1097/MAO.0000000000000610
15. McGarvie LA, MacDougall HG, Halmagyi GM, Burgess AM, Weber KP, Curthoys IS. The video head impulse test (vHIT) of semicircular canal function – age-dependent normative values of VOR gain in healthy subjects. Front Neurol (2015) 6:1–11. doi:10.3389/fneur.2015.00154
16. Mossman B, Mossman S, Purdie G, Schneider E. Age dependent normal horizontal VOR gain of head impulse test as measured with video-oculography. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg (2015) 44:29. doi:10.1186/s40463-015-0081-7
17. Enrietto JA, Jacobson KM, Baloh RW. Aging effects on auditory and vestibular responses: a longitudinal study. Am J Otolaryngol (1999) 20:371–8. doi:10.1016/S0196-0709(99)90076-5
18. Furman JM, Redfern MS. Effect of aging on the otolith-ocular reflex. J Vestib Res (2001) 11(2):91–103.
19. Maes L, Dhooge I, D’Haenens W, Bockstael A, Keppler H, Philips B, et al. The effect of age on the sinusoidal harmonic acceleration test, pseudorandom rotation test, velocity step test, caloric test, and vestibular-evoked myogenic potential test. Ear Hear (2010) 31:84–94. doi:10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181b9640e
20. Agrawal Y, Zuniga MG, Davalos-Bichara M, Schubert MC, Walston JD, Hughes J, et al. Decline in semicircular canal and otolith function with age. Otol Neurotol (2012) 33:832–9. doi:10.1097/MAO.0b013e3182545061
21. Walther LE, Westhofen M. Presbyvertigo-aging of otoconia and vestibular sensory cells. J Vestib Res (2007) 17(2–3):89–92.
22. Igarashi M, Saito R, Mizukoshi K, Alford BR. Otoconia in young and elderly persons: a temporal bone study. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl (1993) 504:26–9. doi:10.3109/00016489309128117
23. Akin FW, Murnane OD, Tampas JW, Clinard CG. The effect of age on the vestibular evoked myogenic potential and sternocleidomastoid muscle tonic electromyogram level. Ear Hear (2011) 32:617–22. doi:10.1097/AUD.0b013e318213488e
24. Li C, Layman AJ, Carey JP, Agrawal Y. Epidemiology of vestibular evoked myogenic potentials: data from the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging. Clin Neurophysiol (2015) 126:2207–15. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2015.01.008
25. Piker EG, Jacobson GP, Burkard RF, McCaslin DL, Hood LJ. Effects of age on the tuning of the cVEMP and oVEMP. Ear Hear (2013) 34:e65–73. doi:10.1097/AUD.0b013e31828fc9f2
26. Ishiyama G. Imbalance and vertigo: the aging human vestibular periphery. Semin Neurol (2009) 29:491–9. doi:10.1055/s-0029-1241039
27. Welgampola MS, Colebatch JG. Vestibulocollic reflexes: normal values and the effect of age. Clin Neurophysiol (2001) 112:1971–9. doi:10.1016/S1388-2457(01)00645-9
28. Maleki M, Jafari Z, Zarrinkoob H, Akbarzadeh Baghban A. Effect of aging on saccular function. Med J Islam Repub Iran (2014) 28:117.
29. Serrador JM, Lipsitz LA, Gopalakrishnan GS, Black FO, Wood SJ. Loss of otolith function with age is associated with increased postural sway measures. Neurosci Lett (2009) 465:10–5. doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2009.08.057
30. Jahn K, Naessl A, Schneider E, Strupp M, Brandt T, Dieterich M. Inverse U-shaped curve for age dependency of torsional eye movement responses to galvanic vestibular stimulation. Brain (2003) 126:1579–89. doi:10.1093/brain/awg163
31. Tian J, Mokuno E, Demer JL. Vestibulo-ocular reflex to transient surge translation: complex geometric response ablated by normal aging. J Neurophysiol (2006) 95:2042–54. doi:10.1152/jn.00635.2005
32. Schneider R, Walker MF. Amplitude and frequency prediction in the translational vestibulo-ocular reflex. J Vestib Res (2014) 24:357–64. doi:10.3233/VES-140528
33. Agrawal Y, Carey JP, Della Santina CC, Schubert MC, Minor LB. Disorders of balance and vestibular function in US adults: data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2001-2004. Arch Intern Med (2009) 169:938–44. doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2009.66
34. Neuhauser HK, Radtke A, von Brevern M, Lezius F, Feldmann M, Lempert T. Burden of dizziness and vertigo in the community. Arch Intern Med (2008) 168:2118–24. doi:10.1001/archinte.168.19.2118
35. von Brevern M. Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo. Semin Neurol (2013) 33:204–11. doi:10.1055/s-0033-1354590
36. Otsuka K, Suzuki M, Furuya M. Model experiment of benign paroxysmal positional vertigo mechanism using the whole membranous labyrinth. Acta Otolaryngol (2003) 123:515–8. doi:10.1080/0036554021000028094
37. Dix MR, Hallpike CS. The pathology symptomatology and diagnosis of certain common disorders of the vestibular system. Proc R Soc Med (1952) 45:341–54.
38. Fife TD. Recognition and management of horizontal canal benign positional vertigo. Am J Otol (1998) 19:345–51.
39. Parnes LS, Agrawal SK, Atlas J. Diagnosis and management of benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV). CMAJ (2003) 169(7):681–93.
40. Yacovino DA, Hain TC, Gualtieri F. New therapeutic maneuver for anterior canal benign paroxysmal positional vertigo. J Neurol (2009) 256:1851–5. doi:10.1007/s00415-009-5208-1
41. Furman JM, Raz Y, Whitney SL. Geriatric vestibulopathy assessment and management. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg (2010) 18:386–91. doi:10.1097/MOO.0b013e32833ce5a6
42. Stevens JA, Mack KA, Paulozzi LJ, Ballesteros MF. Self-reported falls and fall-related injuries among persons aged >or=65 years – United States, 2006. J Safety Res (2008) 39:345–9. doi:10.1016/j.jsr.2008.05.002
43. Alamgir H, Muazzam S, Nasrullah M. Unintentional falls mortality among elderly in the United States: time for action. Injury (2012) 43:2065–71. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2011.12.001
44. Jáuregui-Renaud K, Gutierrez-Marquez A, Viveros-Rentería L, Ramos-Toledo V, Gómez-Alvarez F. Neurotology symptoms at referral to vestibular evaluation. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg (2013) 42:55. doi:10.1186/1916-0216-42-55
45. Liston MB, Bamiou D-E, Martin F, Hopper A, Koohi N, Luxon L, et al. Peripheral vestibular dysfunction is prevalent in older adults experiencing multiple non-syncopal falls versus age-matched non-fallers: a pilot study. Age Ageing (2014) 43:38–43. doi:10.1093/ageing/aft129
46. Driscoll CL, Lynn SG, Harner SG, Beatty CW, Atkinson EJ. Preoperative identification of patients at risk of developing persistent dysequilibrium after acoustic neuroma removal. Am J Otol (1998) 19:491–5.
47. Guerraz M, Yardley L, Bertholon P, Pollak L, Rudge P, Gresty MA, et al. Visual vertigo: symptom assessment, spatial orientation and postural control. Brain (2001) 124:1646–56. doi:10.1093/brain/124.8.1646
48. Borel L, Harlay F, Magnan J, Chays A, Lacour M. Deficits and recovery of head and trunk orientation and stabilization after unilateral vestibular loss. Brain (2002) 125:880–94. doi:10.1093/brain/awf085
49. Assländer L, Hettich G, Mergner T. Visual contribution to human standing balance during support surface tilts. Hum Mov Sci (2015) 41:147–64. doi:10.1016/j.humov.2015.02.010
50. Peterka RA. Sensorimotor integration in human postural control. J Neurophysiol (2002) 88(3):1097–118. doi:10.1152/jn.00605.2001
51. Kobayashi H, Hayashi Y, Higashino K, Saito A, Kunihiro T, Kanzaki J, et al. Dynamic and static subjective visual vertical with aging. Auris Nasus Larynx (2002) 29:325–8. doi:10.1016/S0385-8146(02)00058-5
52. Sun DQ, Zuniga MG, Davalos-Bichara M, Carey JP, Agrawal Y. Evaluation of a bedside test of utricular function – the bucket test – in older individuals. Acta Otolaryngol (2014) 134:382–9. doi:10.3109/00016489.2013.867456
53. Gill J, Allum JH, Carpenter MG, Held-Ziolkowska M, Adkin AL, Honegger F, et al. Trunk sway measures of postural stability during clinical balance tests: effects of age. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci (2001) 56:M438–47. doi:10.1093/gerona/56.7.M438
54. Hegeman J, Shapkova EY, Honegger F, Allum JHJ. Effect of age and height on trunk sway during stance and gait. J Vestib Res (2007) 17(2–3):75–87.
55. Deveze A, Bernard-Demanze L, Xavier F, Lavieille J-P, Elziere M. Vestibular compensation and vestibular rehabilitation. Current concepts and new trends. Neurophysiol Clin (2014) 44:49–57. doi:10.1016/j.neucli.2013.10.138
56. Redfern MS, Jennings JR, Martin C, Furman JM. Attention influences sensory integration for postural control in older adults. Gait Posture (2001) 14:211–6. doi:10.1016/S0966-6362(01)00144-8
57. Iwasaki S, Yamasoba T. Dizziness and imbalance in the elderly: age-related decline in the vestibular system. Aging Dis (2015) 6:38–47. doi:10.14336/AD.2014.0128
58. Robinovitch SN, Feldman F, Yang Y, Schonnop R, Leung PM, Sarraf T, et al. Video capture of the circumstances of falls in elderly people residing in long-term care: an observational study. Lancet (2013) 381:47–54. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61263-X
59. Agrawal Y, Davalos-Bichara M, Zuniga MG, Carey JP. Head impulse test abnormalities and influence on gait speed and falls in older individuals. Otol Neurotol (2013) 34:1729–35. doi:10.1097/MAO.0b013e318295313c
60. Allum JHJ, Honegger F. Relation between head impulse tests, rotating chair tests, and stance and gait posturography after an acute unilateral peripheral vestibular deficit. Otol Neurotol (2013) 34:980–9. doi:10.1097/MAO.0b013e31829ce5ec
61. Carriot J, Jamali M, Brooks JX, Cullen KE. Integration of canal and otolith inputs by central vestibular neurons is subadditive for both active and passive self-motion: implication for perception. J Neurosci (2015) 35:3555–65. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3540-14.2015
62. Logan D, Ivanenko YP, Kiemel T, Cappellini G, Sylos-Labini F, Lacquaniti F, et al. Function dictates the phase dependence of vision during human locomotion. J Neurophysiol (2014) 112:165–80. doi:10.1152/jn.01062.2012
63. Larsson J, Ekvall Hansson E, Miller M. Increased double support variability in elderly female fallers with vestibular asymmetry. Gait Posture (2015) 41:820–4. doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2015.02.019
64. Layman AJ, Li C, Simonsick E, Ferrucci L, Carey JP, Agrawal Y. Association between saccular function and gait speed: data from the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging. Otol Neurotol (2015) 36:260–6. doi:10.1097/MAO.0000000000000544
65. Novak AC, Deshpande N. Effects of aging on whole body and segmental control while obstacle crossing under impaired sensory conditions. Hum Mov Sci (2014) 35:121–30. doi:10.1016/j.humov.2014.03.009
66. Honaker JA, Shepard NT. Age effect on the gaze stabilization test. J Vestib Res (2010) 20(5):357–62. doi:10.3233/VES-2010-0365
67. Yoder RM, Taube JS. The vestibular contribution to the head direction signal and navigation. Front Integr Neurosci (2014) 8:1–13. doi:10.3389/fnint.2014.00032
68. Bigelow RT, Semenov YR, Trevino C, Ferrucci L, Resnick SM, Simonsick EM, et al. Association between visuospatial ability and vestibular function in the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging. J Am Geriatr Soc (2015) 63:1837–44. doi:10.1111/jgs.13609
69. Jandl NM, Sprenger A, Wojak JF, Göttlich M, Münte TF, Krämer UM, et al. Dissociable cerebellar activity during spatial navigation and visual memory in bilateral vestibular failure. Neuroscience (2015) 305:257–67. doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2015.07.089
70. Cohen HS. Vestibular disorders and impaired path integration along a linear trajectory. J Vestib Res (2000) 10(1):7–15.
71. Barrett MM, Doheny EP, Setti A, Maguinness C, Foran TG, Kenny RA, et al. Reduced vision selectively impairs spatial updating in fall-prone older adults. Multisens Res (2013) 26:69–94. doi:10.1163/22134808-00002412
72. Adamo DE, Briceño EM, Sindone JA, Alexander NB, Moffat SD. Age differences in virtual environment and real world path integration. Front Aging Neurosci (2012) 4:26. doi:10.3389/fnagi.2012.00026
73. Bates SL, Wolbers T. How cognitive aging affects multisensory integration of navigational cues. Neurobiol Aging (2014) 35:2761–9. doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2014.04.003
74. Semenov YR, Bigelow RT, Xue Q-L, Lac SD, Agrawal Y. Association between vestibular and cognitive function in U.S. adults: data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci (2015). doi:10.1093/gerona/glv069
75. Rossignol S, Dubuc R, Gossard J-P. Dynamic sensorimotor interactions in locomotion. Physiol Rev (2006) 86:89–154. doi:10.1152/physrev.00028.2005
76. Bhansali SA, Stockwell CW, Bojrab DI. Oscilopsia in patients with loss of vestibular function. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg (1993) 109:120–5.
77. McGath JH, Barber HO, Stoyanoff S. Bilateral vestibular loss and oscillopsia. J Otolaryngol (1989) 18:218–21.
78. Schubert MC, Herdman SJ, Tusa RJ. Vertical dynamic visual acuity in normal subjects and patients with vestibular hypofunction. Otol Neurotol (2002) 23:372–7. doi:10.1097/00129492-200205000-00025
79. Badaracco C, Labini FS, Meli A, Tufarelli D. Oscillopsia in labyrinthine defective patients: comparison of objective and subjective measures. Am J Otolaryngol Neck Med Surg (2010) 31:399–403. doi:10.1016/j.amjoto.2009.06.002
80. Guinand N, Pijnenburg M, Janssen M, Kingma H. Visual acuity while walking and oscillopsia severity in healthy subjects and patients with unilateral and bilateral vestibular function loss. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg (2012) 138:301–6. doi:10.1001/archoto.2012.4
81. Marchetti GF, Whitney SL, Redfern MS, Furman JM. Factors associated with balance confidence in older adults with health conditions affecting the balance and vestibular system. Arch Phys Med Rehabil (2011) 92:1884–91. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2011.06.015
82. Hong SM, Kim B-G, Lee BC, Park S-K, Hong SK, Lee H-J, et al. Analysis of psychological distress after management of dizziness in old patients: multicenter study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol (2012) 269:39–43. doi:10.1007/s00405-011-1591-1
83. Zur O, Schoen G, Dickstein R, Feldman J, Berner Y, Dannenbaum E, et al. Anxiety among individuals with visual vertigo and vestibulopathy. Disabil Rehabil (2015) 37:2197–202. doi:10.3109/09638288.2014.1002577
84. Jacobson GP, Piker EG, Watford KE, Gruenwald J, Wanna GB, Rivas A. Concordance and discordance in patient and provider perceptions of dizziness. Am J Otolaryngol (2014) 35:779–83. doi:10.1016/j.amjoto.2014.05.003
85. Brantberg K, Löfqvist L. Preserved vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (VEMP) in some patients with walking-induced oscillopsia due to bilateral vestibulopathy. J Vestib Res (2007) 17(1):33–8.
86. Agrawal Y, Ward BK, Minor LB. Vestibular dysfunction: prevalence, impact and need for targeted treatment. J Vestib Res (2013) 23:113–7. doi:10.3233/VES-130498.Vestibular
87. Perez N, Rama-Lopez J. Head-impulse and caloric tests in patients with dizziness. Otol Neurotol (2003) 24:913–7. doi:10.1097/00129492-200311000-00016
88. Cohen HS, Sangi-Haghpeykar H, Ricci NA, Kampangkaew J, Williamson RA. Utility of stepping, walking, and head impulses for screening patients for vestibular impairments. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg (2014) 151:131–6. doi:10.1177/0194599814527724
89. Schubert MC, Zee DS. Saccade and vestibular ocular motor adaptation. Restor Neurol Neurosci (2010) 28:9–18. doi:10.3233/RNN-2010-0523.Saccade
90. Lehnen N, Ulrich B, Glasauer S. Head-free gaze control in humans with chronic loss of vestibular function. Ann N Y Acad Sci (2009) 1164:409–12. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.03774.x
91. Ward BK, Agrawal Y, Hoffman HJ, Carey JP, Della Santina CC. Prevalence and impact of bilateral vestibular hypofunction: results from the 2008 US National Health Interview Survey. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg (2013) 139:803–10. doi:10.1001/jamaoto.2013.3913
92. Jeka JJ, Allison LK, Kiemel T. The dynamics of visual reweighting in healthy and fall-prone older adults. J Mot Behav (2010) 42:197–208. doi:10.1080/00222895.2010.481693
93. Franz JR, Francis CA, Allen MS, O’Connor SM, Thelen DG. Advanced age brings a greater reliance on visual feedback to maintain balance during walking. Hum Mov Sci (2015) 40:381–92. doi:10.1016/j.humov.2015.01.012
94. Demer JL, Crane BT. Ocular compensation due to labyrinthine input during natural motion. Ann N Y Acad Sci (2001) 942:148–61. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2001.tb03742.x
95. Robinson DA. The oculomotor control system: a review. Proc IEEE (1968) 56:1032–49. doi:10.1109/PROC.1968.6455
96. Grossman GE, Leigh RJ. Instability of gaze during walking in patients with deficient vestibular function. Ann Neurol (1990) 27:528–32. doi:10.1002/ana.410270512
97. Dowiasch S, Marx S, Einhäuser W, Bremmer F. Effects of aging on eye movements in the real world. Front Hum Neurosci (2015) 9:46. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2015.00046
98. MacDougall HG, McGarvie LA, Halmagyi GM, Curthoys IS, Weber KP. The video head impulse test (vHIT) detects vertical semicircular canal dysfunction. PLoS One (2013) 8:e61488. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0061488
99. Yang C, Lee JY, Kang BC, Lee HS, Yoo MH, Park HJ. Quantitative analysis of gains and catch-up saccades of video-head impulse testing by age in normal subjects. Clin Otolaryngol (2015). doi:10.1111/coa.12558
100. Perez-Fernandez N, Eza-Nuñez P. Normal gain of VOR with refixation saccades in patients with unilateral vestibulopathy. J Int Adv Otol (2015) 11:133–7. doi:10.5152/iao.2015.1087
101. Matiño-Soler E, Esteller-More E, Martin-Sanchez J-C, Martinez-Sanchez J-M, Perez-Fernandez N. Normative data on angular vestibulo-ocular responses in the yaw axis measured using the video head impulse test. Otol Neurotol (2015) 36:466–71. doi:10.1097/MAO.0000000000000661
102. Mantokoudis G, Schubert MC, Tehrani ASS, Wong AL, Agrawal Y. Early adaptation and compensation of clinical vestibular responses after unilateral vestibular deafferentation surgery. Otol Neurotol (2014) 35:148–54. doi:10.1097/MAO.0b013e3182956196
103. Hwang S, Agada P, Kiemel T, Jeka JJ. Dynamic reweighting of three modalities for sensor fusion. PLoS One (2014) 9:1–8. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0088132
104. Engelhart D, Pasma JH, Schouten AC, Meskers CGM, Maier AB, Mergner T, et al. Impaired standing balance in elderly: a new engineering method helps to unravel causes and effects. J Am Med Dir Assoc (2014) 15:.e1–6. doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2013.09.009
105. Alahmari KA, Marchetti GF, Sparto PJ, Furman JM, Whitney SL. Estimating postural control with the balance rehabilitation unit: measurement consistency, accuracy, validity, and comparison with dynamic posturography. Arch Phys Med Rehabil (2014) 95:65–73. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2013.09.011
106. Allum JHJ, Adkin AL. Improvements in trunk sway observed for stance and gait tasks during recovery from an acute unilateral peripheral vestibular deficit. Audiol Neurootol (2003) 8:286–302. doi:10.1159/000071999
107. Salarian A, Horak FB, Zampieri C, Carlson-Kuhta P, Nutt JG, Aminian K. iTUG, a sensitive and reliable measure of mobility. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng (2010) 18:303–10. doi:10.1109/TNSRE.2010.2047606
108. Mellone S, Tacconi C, Chiari L. Validity of a smartphone-based instrumented timed up and go. Gait Posture (2012) 36:163–5. doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2012.02.006
109. Grossman GE, Leigh RJ, Bruce EN, Huebner WP, Lanska DJ. Performance of the human vestibuloocular reflex during locomotion. J Neurophysiol (1989) 62:264–72.
110. Leigh RJ, Brandt T. A reevaluation of the vestibulo-ocular reflex: new ideas of its purpose, properties, neural substrate, and disorders. Neurology (1993) 43:1288–95. doi:10.1212/WNL.43.7.1288
111. Crawford J. Living without a balancing mechanism. Br J Ophthalmol (1964) 48:357–60. doi:10.1136/bjo.48.7.357
112. Ford FR, Walsh FB. Clinical observations upon the importance of the vestibular reflexes in ocular movements. Bull Johns Hopkins Hosp (1936) 58:80–8.
113. Wist ER, Brandt T, Krafczyk S. Oscillopsia and retinal slip evidence supporting a clinical test. Brain (1983) 106:153–68. doi:10.1093/brain/106.1.153
114. Sun DQ, Ward BK, Semenov YR, Carey JP, Della Santina CC. Bilateral vestibular deficiency: quality of life and economic implications. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg (2014) 140:527–34. doi:10.1001/jamaoto.2014.490
115. DellaSantina CC, Cremer PD, Carey JP, Minor LB. Comparison of head thrust test with head autorotation test reveals that the vestibulo-ocular reflex is enhanced during voluntary head movements. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg (2002) 128:1044–54. doi:10.1001/archotol.128.9.1044
116. Demer JL. Evaluation of vestibular and visual oculomotor function. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg (1995) 112:16–35. doi:10.1016/S0194-5998(95)70301-2
117. Pozzo T, Berthoz A, Lefort L, Vitte E. Head stabilization during various locomotor tasks in humans. II. Patients with bilateral peripheral vestibular deficits. Exp Brain Res (1991) 85:208–17. doi:10.1007/BF00230002
118. Herdman SJ, Hall CD, Schubert MC, Das VE, Tusa RJ. Recovery of dynamic visual acuity in bilateral vestibular hypofunction. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg (2007) 133:383–9. doi:10.1001/archotol.133.4.383
119. Allum JHJ. Recovery of vestibular ocular reflex function and balance control after a unilateral peripheral vestibular deficit. Front Neurol (2012) 3:83. doi:10.3389/fneur.2012.00083
120. Laube R, Govender S, Colebatch JG. Vestibular-dependent spinal reflexes evoked by brief lateral accelerations of the heads of standing subjects. J Appl Physiol (2012) 112:1906–14. doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00007.2012
121. Naranjo EN, Allum JHJ, Inglis JT, Carpenter MG. Increased gain of vestibulospinal potentials evoked in neck and leg muscles when standing under height-induced postural threat. Neuroscience (2015) 293:45–54. doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2015.02.026
122. Wuehr M, Kugler G, Schniepp R, Eckl M, Pradhan C, Jahn K, et al. Balance control and anti-gravity muscle activity during the experience of fear at heights. Physiol Rep (2014) 2:e00232. doi:10.1002/phy2.232
123. Kugler G, Huppert D, Schneider E, Brandt T. Fear of heights freezes gaze to the horizon. J Vestib Res (2014) 24:433–41. doi:10.3233/VES-140529
Keywords: aging, vestibular, VOR, balance, walking, functional testing
Citation: Anson E and Jeka J (2016) Perspectives on Aging Vestibular Function. Front. Neurol. 6:269. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2015.00269
Received: 01 November 2015; Accepted: 14 December 2015;
Published: 06 January 2016
Edited by:
Susan J. Herdman, Emory University, USAReviewed by:
Jennifer Christy, University of Alabama at Birmingham, USAJohn Allum, University Hospital Basel, Switzerland
Copyright: © 2016 Anson and Jeka. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Eric Anson, eanson1@jhmi.edu