Customizing the Therapeutic Response of Signaling Networks to Promote Antitumor Responses by Drug Combinations

Drug resistance, de novo and acquired, pervades cellular signaling networks (SNs) from one signaling motif to another as a result of cancer progression and/or drug intervention. This resistance is one of the key determinants of efficacy in targeted anti-cancer drug therapy. Although poorly understood, drug resistance is already being addressed in combination therapy by selecting drug targets where SN sensitivity increases due to combination components or as a result of de novo or acquired mutations. Additionally, successive drug combinations have shown low resistance potential. To promote a rational, systematic development of combination therapies, it is necessary to establish the underlying mechanisms that drive the advantages of combination therapies, and design methods to determine drug targets for combination regimens. Based on a joint systems analysis of cellular SN response and its sensitivity to drug action and oncogenic mutations, we describe an in silico method to analyze the targets of drug combinations. Our method explores mechanisms of sensitizing the SN through a combination of two drugs targeting vertical signaling pathways. We propose a paradigm of SN response customization by one drug to both maximize the effect of another drug in combination and promote a robust therapeutic response against oncogenic mutations. The method was applied to customize the response of the ErbB/PI3K/PTEN/AKT pathway by combination of drugs targeting HER2 receptors and proteins in the down-stream pathway. The results of a computational experiment showed that the modification of the SN response from hyperbolic to smooth sigmoid response by manipulation of two drugs in combination leads to greater robustness in therapeutic response against oncogenic mutations determining cancer heterogeneity. The application of this method in drug combination co-development suggests a combined evaluation of inhibition effects together with the capability of drug combinations to suppress resistance mechanisms before they become clinically manifest.

Introduction

Anti-cancer combination therapies are an increasingly promising way to better treat patients, offering an increase in efficacy of drugs, and a means to overcome/avoid resistance to targeted drug therapy. An evidence base of successes of multidrug strategies in anti-cancer therapy is growing yearly, but typically the mechanism of synergy is not entirely understood. To promote a more directed and systematic development of combination therapies, it is necessary to clearly elucidate the underlying mechanisms that drive the advantages of drug combination effect. Exploration of these mechanisms can impact significantly on the determination and validation of advanced combination of targets in novel drug development strategies such as drug combination co-development (1) and drugdiagnostics co-development (2). With respect to a drug combination co-development strategy, novel compounds should be developed in a combinatorial context and not independently in order to gain those proven integrative benefits with respect to tumor growth inhibition, drug resistance, and toxicity. In the drug–diagnostic co-development model, the drug and the diagnostic assay are developed in conjunction. Companion diagnostic (CDx) assays as well as clinical trial strategies in the case of drug combination therapy should be adapted to multiple biomarkers and different drug combinations (2). Considering the risk of increasing toxicity by the use of drug combination therapy, the US food and drug administration (FDA) released drug co-development guidance, which proposed stringent regulatory recommendations for the use of combination strategies (1, 3). According to these recommendations, there should exist a strong biological rationale for the use of the combinations and proven significant advantages over the use of the drugs as individual agents.

Rational determination and validation of advanced targets for drug combination therapy are the main challenges for these strategies. The inherent complexities of signaling networks (SNs), including crosstalk logic and redundancy in their topology (4, 5) limit the relevance of genotype-based screening to identify and validate optimal drug combination targets among several hundred possible targets. In the face of these challenges, we need more sophisticated methods to design effective combination therapies (1).

Systems biology and computational bioinformatics may offer a key role in advancing drug combination co-development. These technologies are being developed to support rationalized screening of effective drug combinations, and to formulate quantitative criteria for drug combination target validation and specific properties of each drug in a combination context and in the face of different mutational statuses of different cancers (6–9). Such developments are motivated by the potential to reduce the size, duration, and cost of clinical trials as well as to accelerate regulatory approval. Our own studies to support drug combination co-development are described here. Our method is based on analysis of the response of a cellular SN to drug intervention, and its modification by drug combination to achieve high efficacy and reduce drug resistance potential. The approach developed here is founded on the two most attractive advantages of drug combination well established recently: (i) a drug combination suppresses de novo or acquired resistance to one of the drugs in the combination – a resistance suppression effect; and (ii) one drug in a combination sensitizes therapeutic response to a second drug – a sensitizing effect.

Resistance suppression effects arising from drug combination are used widely in clinics now, by manipulating pathway dynamics or by slowing down the cancer evolution. Some examples of pathway manipulations are summarized in Ref. (1) targeting different domains of the same protein with two drugs [for example, trastuzumab combined with pertuzumab for human epidermal growth factor receptor, HER2, in breast (10) and ovarian (11, 12) cancers]; horizontally targeting parallel signaling pathways [for example, combined MEK and PI3K/AKT inhibition (13, 14)], and vertically targeting up- and down-stream pathways in one SN [for example, targeting BRAF and MEK, HER2, and PI3K, PI3K/AKT and mTOR (15–17)]. An evolutionary approach (adaptive therapy) to treat drug resistance has been suggested, with the aim of lowering the cancer cell’s capacity to evolve resistance mechanisms through adaptive combination therapy in order to hinder the emergence of resistance types (18). Beyond these approaches, the combination of chemotherapy and molecular targeted therapy demonstrates a complementary mechanism of efficacy and may suggest a route for next-generation cancer therapy (10, 19, 20). For example, a clinical trial of HER2-positive breast cancer progression following HER2 inhibitor trastuzumab therapy showed that trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapeutic agent (capecitabine) was more effective than capecitabine alone. It would seem that trastuzumab sensitizes cell response to other drugs despite the fact that cells are refractory to trastuzumab and that there is therapeutic benefit to continue trastuzumab therapy in combination with other drugs beyond progression (21).

The sensitizing effects of drug combinations are well established in combined therapies targeting different pathways, such as the PI3K/PTEN/AKT and MAPK networks (13, 14); EGFR, DNA-damaging apoptotic signaling pathways (22) as well as in drug combinations inhibiting different nodes in the same pathway: PI3K/PTEN/AKT/mTOR (23–25), Ras/RAF/MEK/ERK (26, 27). However, there are longer-term implications arising from drug combinations since they may lead to different mutations and negatively impact resistance potential. For example, comparison of pre- and post-trastuzumab treatment of tissue samples in metastatic HER2-amplified breast cancer from patients progressing on trastuzumab allowed determination of mutations in PIK3CA and PTEN arising during treatment (4). A significant reduction, or full loss, of PTEN expression was observed in trastuzumab refractory metastatic tumors compared to the cohort untreated by trastuzumab. It was suggested that PTEN expression reduction was acquired as a result of trastuzumab therapy, leading itself to trastuzumab resistance (4). In contrast, treatment by everolimus, an mTOR inhibitor, did not increase mutational load in pre/post treatment samples of renal carcinomas (28). Moreover, this phenomenon is context specific: for example, abiraterone alone and given in combination with other drugs to control side effects contributes to resistance by activating mutations in the hormone receptor genes; however, a different combination including abiraterone was reported to delay drug resistance (29).

These examples highlight the complexities of combination drug therapy design, including the change in sensitivity to mutation and resistance potential through combination action, and the attending challenges associated with validation. To help overcome these complexities and challenges, we propose a method for the in vitro/in vivo/in silico validation of the targets of drug combinations and quantitative estimation of the perturbations induced by drugs in SNs. Our method is based on the study of drug response characteristics of (i) a SN and its modification by different oncogenic mutations and drug action; and (ii) perturbation of SN sensitivity to drug action induced by mutations. Using sensitivity analysis (SA) of this signaling response, we show that inhibition of various targets by the first drug significantly sensitizes SN response to both compensating mutations leading to resistance and the second drug in combination. We present a scheme for customizing the SN response through drug combination to enhance the robustness of the therapeutic response due to weakening of the drug-sensitizing effect to compensation mutations. To demonstrate the method and to study in detail the drug/mutation modification of SN response, we used the kinetic model of drug combination targeting HER2 receptors and vertical PI3K/PTEN/AKT signaling pathway (30–32).

Materials and Methods

The method is based on the analysis of input/output (I/O) responses of a cellular SN, R_SN = C_out (C_in, P_SN, D, t), which describes the relation between output signal C_out and input signal C_in (see scheme in Figure 1). R_SN depends on molecular parameters, P_SN, of the SN components: specifically, kinetic parameters of the proteins/receptors, K = k₁, …, k_n (dissociation constants, catalytic rates), and their expression levels, E = e₁, …, e_m. R_SN also depends on the concentrations of drugs, D, which inhibit proteins in the SN. Typically, R_SN is measured in experimental systems as the dose dependence of output signal on drug/ligand concentration at a defined time, t, following ligand/drug application in a cellular assay. The experimental dose dependence, R_SN = C_out (C_in, P_SN, D, t), on drug concentration allows the definition of the IC₅₀ of drug D₁, which strongly depends on the target of drug D₂, the concentration of this second drug, and the mutational status of the SN determined by parameters, P_SN.

FIGURE 1

Figure 1. Scheme of the method of customizing cellular signaling response by drug combination targeting upstream (drug D₁) and down-stream pathway (drug D₂). Plot sketches A, B, and C show responses, R_USP = C_out,USP (C_in,USP, D₁), R_DSP = C_out,DSP (C_in,DSP, D₂), and the whole SN R_SN = C_out (C_in, D₁, D₂), respectively. Examples of the responses of unmodified DSP (black line), modified by a mutation in the DSP (red lines) and modified by the second drug D₂ (blue lines) in the presence of the mutation. Input signal C_in inhibited by drug D₁ is shown by the dashed lines.

To analyze in detail the combination effect of two drugs at different mutations of the SN, we decompose the SN into up- and down-stream pathways that are the targets of drugs D₁ and D₂, respectively (see Figure 1). The response, R_SN, of the SN can be represented through the response R_USP of upstream pathway (USP) and the response, R_DSP of down-stream pathway (DSP) in the form, R_SN = R_DSP(R_USP), where R_USP = C_out,UPS(C_in ,P_USP, D₁, t) and R_DSP = C_out,DSP(C_in,DSP,P_DSP, D₂, t). In this formulation, we took into account equivalences of I/O signals: C_in,DSP = C_out,USP and C_{out_DSP} = C_out (see Figure 1). Theoretically, the I/O responses, R_SN, R_USP, and R_DSP, are readily calculated from the model of the SN. Experimentally, R_DSP can be extracted from two experimental dose dependencies: dose dependence of the whole SN, R_SN, and the receptor activation/inhibition dose dependence on activator/inhibitor concentration, R_USP, and represented in the form R_DSP = C_out(R_USP,P_DSP,D₂,t).

Input/output response R_DSP determines the output signal amplitude of the DSP depending on input signals, which is controlled by the first drug D₁, the molecular parameters, P_DSP, and the action of the second drug D₂. Analysis of R_DSP allows us to study the effect of mutations, i.e., changes in kinetic properties and expression levels of proteins, P_DSP, on the change in R_DSP and how these changes determine a transition from drug sensitivity to drug resistance. Plots A, B, and C (black lines) in Figure 1 show arbitrary responses, R_USP, R_DSP, and R_SN, corresponding to sensitivity of the SN to D₁. According to this type of smooth hyperbolic R_DSP, the output signal of the SN changes when the input signal changes under inhibitor D₁ (see black points in plots A, B, and C showing inhibited signal at drug concentration D₁ in Figure 1). The example of I/O response R_DSP modified by oncogenic mutations is shown in plot B in Figure 1 (red line). This type of switch-like R_DSP corresponds to resistance of the SN to drug D₁ because the output signal of the SN does not change when the input signal changes under the action of inhibitor D₁ (see red lines and points in plots B and C in Figure 1). Our method provides a means to search for the protein target for drug D₂ to modify the response, R_DSP, in such a way as to reach two complementary effects: first, an increase in inhibition effectiveness of drug D₁ (see, e.g., R_DSP modified by drug D₂ in plot B, blue line in Figure 1); and second, to ensure robustness of this inhibition effect against different mutations in DSP (see below). One example of such a modified R_DSP is shown by the blue line in plot B in Figure 1.

To evaluate the robustness of the response R_DSP, we supplemented the analysis of the shape of the response curve with the SA of the DSP to both external and internal perturbations: i.e., changes in input signal and alterations of kinetic parameters and expression level of the proteins involved, P_DSP. We define the relative sensitivity, S_DSP, of the DSP to the input signal as the relative change of output signal C_out,DSP in response to a relative change in input signal C_in,DSP, which can be written through changes in I/O responses, R_USP and R_DPS:

$S_{\text{DSP}}\left(C_{\text{in,DSP}},P_{\text{DSP}},D_2,t\right)=\frac{\mathrm{\Delta }{C}_{\text{out,DSP}}}{\mathrm{\Delta }{C}_{\text{in,DSP}}}=\frac{\mathrm{\Delta }{R}_{\text{DSP}}∕R_{\text{DSP}}}{\mathrm{\Delta }{R}_{\text{USP}}∕R_{\text{USP}}}.$ (1)

To analyze the sensitivity of the DSP response to different mutations causing changes in protein parameters (phosphorylation rate and expression level), we calculate an absolute value of relative sensitivity to changes in individual parameters p of proteins:

$S_{\text{DSP,p}}\left(C_{\text{in,DSP}},P_{\text{DSP}},D_2,t\right)=\left|\frac{\mathrm{\Delta }{R}_{\text{DSP}}∕R_{\text{DSP}}}{\mathrm{\Delta }p∕p}\right|.$ (2)

We base our local SA on the results of the application of SA to a study of the responses of various cellular signaling pathways to different mutations and drug actions. For the first time, the computational analysis of the change in sensitivity of SN depending on the protein expression level was carried out in the modeling of the apoptosis pathway (33). The SA revealed a sensitivity increase in the response of the apoptotic pathway to overexpression of Bcl-2 protein. It allowed prediction of selectivity of a Bcl-2 inhibitor for tumor cells with Bcl-2 overexpression against healthy cells with a normal level of Bcl-2. SA was first used to analyze the robustness of the MAPK cascade to oncogenic mutations in Ref. (34). The further application of the SA to an in silico study of the effects of the most frequent mutations in cancer (EGFR, Ras, BRaf) on the dynamics of MAPK response to receptors activation were analyzed in Refs. (35–39). An application of the SA to a study of SN response to drug action was first studied in Refs. (40, 41).

Sensitivity analysis of the I/O response allows us to: (i) determine the resistance potential of a single drug and drug combination to protein mutations in the DSP; and (ii) determine whether the DSP response to a specific drug combination is robust against various mutations in the DSP and suggest more robust combinations, which enhance the therapeutic effect in the face of mutations.

Results

Characterizing Signaling Network Response to Different Oncogenic Mutations

We illustrate this method by application to the analysis of the response of PI3K/PTEN/AKT signaling to a drug combination targeting the HER2 receptor and a protein in the DSP, PI3K, which were established to be promising drug targets in both mono- and combination therapy in different cancers (1, 15, 42). The aim of the analysis of known drugs and targets is to elucidate the mechanism underlying high efficacy of their combination against different oncogenic mutations in cancer (43, 44).

The analysis is based on the kinetic model of Ras/RAF/MEK/ERK and PI3K/PTEN/AKT signaling developed in Ref. (30). This model describes the response kinetics of the SN to heregulin (HRG)-induced HER3/HER2 receptor heterodimerization and the effect of HER2 inhibitor, pertuzumab (2C4 antibody), on ERK and AKT activation in the human ovarian carcinoma cell line PE04. The scheme of the PI3K/PTEN/AKT SN that corresponds to the SN undertaken here is shown in Figure 2. The ordinary differential equations (ODEs) of the model and set of the model parameters are given in the Supplementary Information. In the model, we neglected other ErbB receptor heterodimers because HER2/HER3 heterodimerization activation was found to be the most mitogenic signal and induces cellular growth in the PE04 cell line (45). The model of the SN including 56 ODEs, 58 reactions, and almost 100 parameters (kinetic constants and protein concentrations) was parameterized by experimental data on the phosphorylation kinetics of HER2, ERK, AKT, and PTEN in the absence and presence of pertuzumab (30). Considering incomplete identifiability of model parameters based on the limited set of experimental data used in model calibration, we validated the model on independent experimental data on the different combination effects of PTEN, PI3K, and HER2 inhibition on the ErbB/PI3K/PTEN/AKT pathway activation (30, 32, 40, 41, 46). Model validation evidenced a good account of sensitivity of the SN to single drug action (pertuzumab) and drug combinations targeting different nodes of the SN (pertuzumab and inhibitors of PI3K, PDK1, and PTEN) (32, 40, 41, 46).

FIGURE 2

Figure 2. Scheme of PI3K/PTEN/AKT signaling network activated by heterodimerization of HER2/HER3 receptors induced by heregulin (HRG) and inhibited by pertuzumab, 2C4. Decomposition of the signaling network to upstream pathway (receptor signaling pathway) and down-stream pathway (PI3K/PTEN/AKT network) is shown.

According to our method, we decomposed the ErbB/PI3K/PTEN/AKT network into two sub-networks: an upstream signaling system – the receptor system constituting HER2/HER3 receptor signaling (USP); and a down-stream pathway constituting PI3K/PTEN/AKT pathway (DSP). We used the phospho-heterodimer HER23 signal (pHER23) as the output signal of USP and input signal of the DSP (see Figure 2). The I/O response, R_USP, of USP was defined as the dependence of pHER23 concentration on the concentration of HER2 inhibitor, 2C4: R_HER = pHER23(HRG, P_USP, 2C4, t). The I/O response of DSP, R_AKT, is the dependence of pAKT on concentration of phospho-heterodimer HER3/HER2, pHER23: R_AKT = pAKT(pHER23, P_AKT, D₂, t). The input signal of PI3K/PTEN/AKT is the receptor phosphorylation signal, pHER23, which is changed in the calculation by varying the concentrations of the HER2 inhibitor, 2C4, in the physiological region from zero to saturated value, 1 μM (47). The dose dependence, R_AKT, was calculated at time t = 30 min after HRG and 2C4 addition that corresponds to saturation of pHER23 and pAKT signals both in modeling and experiment (30, 32).

To show how the I/O response R_AKT depends on mutations in the PI3K/PTEN/AKT pathway, we compared the theoretical response, R_AKT = pAKT(pHER23, P_AKT, D₂, t) for the unperturbed DSP (see black line in Figure 3A) with the response R_AKT modified by oncogenic mutations in the PI3K/PTEN/AKT pathway: PTEN loss (50 and 70%), variation of PI3K activity (Figure 3B), and 50% overexpression of AKT (see red lines in Figures 3A–C).

FIGURE 3

Figure 3. Input/output response of the PI3K/PTEN/AKT pathway R_AKT to pHER23 input signal and its modification by activation mutations of PTEN, PI3K, and AKT proteins and inhibition of PI3K by LY294002 inhibitor. (A) Modification of R_AKT by a change of initial concentration of PTEN: response curve at the reference concentration of PTEN₀ = 40 μM (line 1), 50% PTEN loss (line 2), 70% PTEN loss (line 3). Modification of R_AKT by PI3K inhibition: 0.3 μM LY294002 (line 4), 0.5 μM LY294002 (line 5), and 1 μM LY294002 (line 6). Modification of R_AKT by 50% PTEN loss and inhibition of PI3K by 3 μM LY294002 (line 7). Points a, b, c, d, and e correspond to saturated pAKT signal (pHER23 = 1), its inhibition by 100 nM 2C4 (pHER23 = 0.1), resistance to 2C4 at 50% PTEN loss (pHER23 = 0.1), combined inhibition by 2C4 and LY294002 in the absence and presence of 50% PTEN loss (pHER23 = 0.1), respectively. (B) Modification of R_AKT by a change of PI3K activities, k_PI3K: reference k_PI3K,0 (line 1), 0.5 k_PI3K,0 (line 2), 0.3 k_PI3K,0 (line 3), and 0.1 k_PI3K,0 (line 4). (C) Modification of R_AKT by 50% overexpression of AKT: reference concentration AKT₀ (line 1) and 1.5 AKT₀ (line 2). Modification of R_AKT by 1 μM LY294002 at reference concentration of AKT₀ (line 3) and 50% overexpression of AKT (line 4).

Comparing the shapes of unmodified and modified responses curves R_AKT, we defined sensitive and resistance modes in the DSP. In sensitive mode, an increase in pHER23 signal causes a gradual increase in pAKT signal from 0 to its saturated value (black line in Figure 3A). In resistance mode, the R_AKT curve becomes steeper and transforms to a switch-like response curve at the activation mutations (red lines in Figures 3A,B). The pAKT output signal is unresponsive to input pHER23 signal controlled by D₁: e.g., pAKT signal does not change when pHER23 changes in the range from 0.04 to 1 at 70% PTEN loss and activated mutation in PI3K (see red lines 3 and 4 in Figures 3A,B, respectively). In the case of AKT overexpression, pAKT signal significantly exceeds the basal activation level of pAKT in the range of pHER23 signal from 0.04 to 1 (see red line in Figure 3C). This lack of AKT response to input signal at pathway modification by mutations corresponds to the resistance of pAKT signal to HER2 inhibition by pertuzumab. Amongst the modifications of response R_AKT shown in Figures 3A–C, the most pronounced transition from a graded to a steep switch-like shape was observed at PTEN loss. In the model, this effect is due to the post-translational regulation of PTEN activity by its phosphorylation (see Figure 2) leading to the additional loss of PTEN activity (31, 48).

Analysis of R_AKT shows how receptor inhibition of pHER23 signal by D₁ transforms the functioning state of the DSP from its normal function at saturated receptor signal (pHER23 = 1) to non-saturated inhibited signal at low pHER23 <0.3 (points a and b in Figure 3A, respectively). When the DSP functions in non-saturation mode, the inhibited input signal differs from that in (normal) saturation mode in both a decrease in pAKT signal and an increase in sensitivity of the DSP to both input signal pHER23 and mutations causing changes in kinetic parameters and expression level of the proteins involved. To study the second effect, we analyzed the behavior of sensitivities of the DSP S_DSP Eq. 1 and S_DSP,p Eq. 2 at different internal (mutations) and external (inhibition) modifications of the DSP.

The relative sensitivity of the PI3K/PTEN/AKT pathway is defined as the relative response (change) of the output signal of DSP, ΔpAKT, to a relative change in its input signal, ΔpHER23:

$S_{\text{AKT}}\left(p\text{HER}23,P_{\text{AKT}},D_2,t\right)=\frac{\mathrm{\Delta }p\text{AKT}∕p\text{AKT}}{\mathrm{\Delta }p\text{HER}23∕p\text{HER}23}.$ (3)

Sensitivity S_AKT (Eq. 3) was calculated at time t = 30 min after HRG and 2C4 addition that corresponds to the saturation of both pHER23 and pAKT signals. Information on S_AKT can be obtained based on an analysis of the tangent of the response curve R_AKT: the steeper the response behaviors, the more sensitive the system responses to the external signal. Commonly, sensitivity increases at low input signal and this corresponds in our case to receptor signal inhibition by the first drug (see Figure 3A). At high receptor signal, S_AKT decreases at saturated signal, pHER23 ≅ 1. We represent the theoretical sensitivity S_AKT (Eq. 3) as the upper heatmap in Figure 4 (columns 1–4) calculated at different perturbations of the DSP: (1) at the activation of DSP (pHER23 = 1); (2) at the presence of 100 nM 2C4 (pHER23 = 0.1); (3) 50% PTEN loss (pHER23 = 1); and (4) 50% PTEN loss with 100 nM 2C4 (pHER23 = 0.1). According to the shape change in response curve under these perturbations (see Figure 3A), the sensitivity S_AKT increases under 2C4 treatment in sensitive mode (compare columns 1 and 2) and decreases at 50% PTEN loss, corresponding to resistance mode (compare columns 1 with 3 and 4).

FIGURE 4

Figure 4. A change in sensitivities S_AKT and S_AKT,p following different perturbations in the PI3K/PTEN/AKT network. Heatmap of sensitivity S_AKT to pHER23 signal (upper heatmap) and sensitivity S_AKT,p to kinetic parameters (middle heatmap) and initial protein concentrations (lower heatmap) at normal functioning of the SN (column 1), in the presence of 100 nM 2C4 (column 2), and at 50% PTEN loss in the absence (column 3) and presence of 100 nM 2C4 (column 4). Columns 5–8 show S_ATP,p as per columns 1–4 in the presence of 3 μM LY294002. The relative change of the parameters in sensitivity analysis was 0.01% (see Eq. 4) and sensitivity values were taken at time t = 30 min after HRG and 2C4 addition.

We also observed that the sensitivity of the DSP S_AKT,p to protein parameters and expression level increases in the same region of pHER23 signal (40). Relative sensitivities S_AKT,p (Eq. 2) of the PI3K/PTEN/AKT pathway to a specific parameter p (including kinetic parameters and expression levels of the signaling proteins) were determined as follows:

$S_{\text{AKT,p}}\left(p\text{HER}23,P_{\text{AKT}},D_2,t\right)=\left|\frac{\mathrm{\Delta }p\text{AKT}∕p\text{AKT}}{\mathrm{\Delta }p∕p}\right|.$ (4)

To show how drug and protein mutations change sensitivity, S_AKT,p (Eq. 4), we calculated and compared S_AKT,p for kinetic parameters and initial concentrations of proteins involved in the PI3K/PTEN/AKT network under a normal functioning of the DPS and the mutations considered above. Figure 4 (middle and lower heatmaps, columns 1–4) shows S_STS,p calculated at: (1) HER23 activation by HRG (pHER23 = 1); (2) in the presence of HER2 inhibitor, 2C4, when pHER23 signal is 90% inhibited (pHER23 = 0.1); (3) at 50% PTEN loss (pHER23 = 1); and (4) at 50% PTEN loss in the presence of 2C4 (pHER23 = 0.1) (see columns 1–4 in Figure 4, respectively). Analysis of S_AKT,p at normal signaling in the PI3K/PTEN/AKT network (pHER23 = 1) revealed the most sensitive modules within this network (see column 1 in Figure 4). The results obtained in our model are in agreement with the results of local and global sensitivity analyses of other models of the PI3K/PTEN/AKT pathway (41, 49, 50).

We observed a two-to-four orders of magnitude increase in S_AKT,p in response to changes in the kinetic parameters and initial concentrations of the proteins at 90% inhibition of pHER23 signal by 100 nM 2C4 (compare columns 1 and 2 in Figure 4, lower heatmap). This increase correlates with an increase in sensitivity, S_AKT, at an inhibited signal of pHER23 (see upper heatmap in Figure 4). The increase in sensitivities S_AKT and S_STS,p at low pHER23 signals corresponds to the transition of the DSP from functioning in saturated mode (pHER23 ≅ 1) to functioning at HER2 inhibition (non-saturation). This correlation in the behavior of S_AKT and S_STS,p can be readily understood: sensitivity, S_AKT,p(pHER23, P_AKT), to a change in P_AKT varies in accordance with sensitivity S_AKT (pHER2, P_AKT) to a change in input signal, pHER23:

$\frac{\mathrm{\Delta }{S}_{\text{AKT}}\left(p\text{HER}23,P_{\text{AKT}}\right)}{\mathrm{\Delta }p}=\frac{\mathrm{\Delta }{S}_{\text{AKT,p}}\left(p\text{HER}23,P_{\text{AKT}}\right)}{\mathrm{\Delta }p\text{HER}23},$ (5)

where ΔS_AKT and ΔS_AKT,p denote sensitivity changes. Equation 5 can be derived from well-known equality of mixed derivatives for continuous function of many variables, turning to infinitesimal increments Δ in Eq. 5 – in our case for I/O response function pAKT(pHER23, P_AKT) depending on variables pHER23 and P_AKT taken at fixed time t.

We applied the results of this analysis to study the change in SN sensitivity to oncogenic mutations in the PI3K/PTEN/AKT pathway. Given an increase in sensitivity S_AKT,p to all the parameters and expression levels of the proteins of the DSP to external perturbation (+2C4) (see column 2 in Figure 4, lower heatmap), we calculated sensitivity S_AKT,p at internal perturbations: 50% PTEN loss (column 3 in Figure 4, lower heatmap), variation of PI3K catalytic rate, and 50% overexpression of AKT (data not shown). For all perturbations, we observed the same dramatic fall in sensitivity, S_STS,p, over almost all parameters and this drop in S_STS,p endows the DSP with insensitivity to any further changes in kinetic parameters of proteins and their abundances. The fall of S_STS,p correlates with the shape change of the response curve pAKT(pHER23, P_AKT) (red lines in Figure 3) and the loss of sensitivity S_AKT to input receptor signal pHER23 inhibited by 2C4. In contrast to a sensitive network, this insensitive DSP cannot be sensitized by drug D₁ inhibiting the input signal: the calculation of S_AKT,p at 100 nM 2C4 showed no change in sensitivity following 50% PTEN loss (see column 4, lower heatmap in Figure 4). Thus, drug D₁ (2C4) acts in very different ways on unmodified and modified DSPs: it sensitizes the unmodified network (sensitive mode), but does not change sensitivity and inhibition level in the mutated DSP. Further D₁, inhibiting the input signal, shifts the DSP to a state with more sensitivity to compensation mutations, which may in turn cause the restoration of the initially activated signal and also lower network sensitivities to other external and internal perturbations.

Customizing Signaling Network Response through Drug Combination

Our analysis of the sensitivity of the PI3K/PTEN/AKT pathway showed that inhibition of input signal pHER23 sensitizes the response of the DSP to protein perturbations such as a change in protein expression level. Such perturbations can be also exerted by inhibition of protein phosphorylation activity. Here, we use the observed drug-induced sensitizing effect to enhance the action of the second drug D₂ targeting the DSP. Specifically, we considered PI3K inhibition by LY294002 and calculated the response of PI3K/PTEN/AKT pathway, R_AKT = pAKT(pHER23, P_AKT, D₂, t) to pHER23 signal at different concentrations of this inhibitor. Inhibition of PI3K modifies the response curve from hyperbolic to a smooth sigmoid form with high inhibition effect (see blue lines in Figures 3A,C). This modified response has a most pronounced inhibition effect of the second drug D₂ in the region of low pHER23 signal (0–0.2) where the sensitizing effect of drug D₁ is maximal (see black lines in Figures 3A,C and column 2 in Figure 4). This observation confirms that the effective and synergistic effect of the HER2 inhibitor (D₁) in combination with PI3K inhibitor (D₂) is due to a sensitizing effect of D₁ at low pHER23 signals. The key indicator of the synergistic effect of D₁ and D₂ is a change in the curvature of the response curve from convex to concave at low pHER23 signal (0.1–0.3). We assume that modification of the response curve defines the synergistic effect of HER2 and PI3K inhibitor combination (D₁ and D₂). Below, we show that this effect corresponds to a significant decrease of the IC₅₀ of pertuzumab in the presence of LY294002 (see Modification of the Dose Response and its Sensitivity by Drug Combination in the Presence of Mutations).

The additional benefit of this transformation of the response curve is an insensitivity of the modified response (smooth sigmoidal shape) to oncogenic mutations in the PI3K/PTEN/AKT pathway at low pHER23 signals. To show the acquired robustness of the network in the face of these mutations, we calculated the response, R_AKT = pAKT(pHER23, P_AKT), at 50% PTEN loss and AKT overexpression in the presence of 3 μM LY294002 (green lines in Figures 3A,C). As can be seen, PTEN loss and AKT overexpression did not change significantly the inhibited signal pAKT in the range of inhibited input signal, pHER23 < 0.3 (compare state d and e in Figure 3A and points on lines 3 and 4 at pHER23 = 0.1 in Figure 3C, respectively). Thus, in contrast to our results on resistance to 2C4 induced by PTEN loss and AKT overexpression, these abnormalities in the context of PI3K inhibition did not result in resistance to HER2 inhibition by 2C4. Note that the advantages of that drug combination vanish at higher signals pHER23 > 0.4 where mutations and protein overexpression significantly increase pAKT signal (see lines 6 and 7 in Figure 3A and lines 3 and 4 in Figure 3C). Therefore, the response is more robust than an unmodified hyperbolic one with respect to the activation of mutations in the PI3K/PTEN/AKT pathway at inhibited pHER23 signal (pHER23 < 0.3).

This advantage of a modified smooth sigmoidal response curve was confirmed by the calculation of sensitivities, S_AKT and S_AKT,p, carried out in the presence of PI3K inhibitor (columns 5–8 in Figure 4). As can be seen, at this modification, 90% inhibition of pHER23 by pertuzumab causes a decrease in sensitivities, S_AKT and S_AKT,p, in contrast to their increase at the pertuzumab treatment alone (compare columns 2 and 6 in Figure 4). A decrease in sensitivity S_AKT at low pHER23 concentrations (row 1 in column 6 in Figure 4) confers robustness of 90% pAKT inhibition in a wider range of inhibited pHER23 signal (up to 0.3; see lines 4–6 in Figure 3A and lines 3 and 4 in Figure 3C) than in the case of hyperbolic response in the absence of the second drug. A slight decrease in S_AKT,p in turn leads to less sensitivity to oncogenic mutations in the PI3K/PTEN/AKT pathway and suppression of drug resistance in contrast to the case of pertuzumab treatment alone. As can been seen from the I/O response curve, the robust inhibition of pAKT at low pHER23 signal is independent of the oncogenic mutations (mainly 50% PTEN loss and AKT overexpression) (compare points d and e in Figure 3A and points on lines 3 and 4 in Figure 3C at pHER23 = 0.1). Note this insensitivity to mutations at this drug combination vanishes at higher input signals pHER23 > 0.4, where mutations and protein overexpression significantly increase pAKT signal (see, e.g., pAKT values at pHER23 = 0.6 on lines 6 and 7 in Figure 3A and lines 3 and 4 in Figure 3C). Thus, the combination of HER2 inhibitor with PI3K inhibition endows the DSP with robustness against activation mutations in PI3K/PTEN/AKT pathway only at inhibited pHER23 signal in the range up to pHER23 = 0.3.

Note that in the model, drug D₂ causes an increase in the sensitivity S_AKT,p to the protein parameters in comparison with the unperturbed SN that can sensitize the DSP to compensatory mutations (see columns 1 and 5 in Figure 4). This discrepancy may be due to the fact that in the calculation we compared the sensitivity at inhibited (pHER23 = 0.1) and saturated (pHER23 = 1) pHER23 signals (points d and a in Figure 3A, respectively). Here we assumed that the activation growth factor signal (1 nM HRG) is saturated (point a in Figure 3A). However, if we assume ligand concentration to be lower than the saturation level (e.g., 0.6–0.8) (51) and compare the sensitivities at inhibited and this pHER23 signal, we find that drug D₂ does not change the sensitivity in comparison with the unperturbed DSP (data not shown).

Modification of the Dose Response and Its Sensitivity by Drug Combination in the Presence of Mutations

To show how the modifications of I/O response of the AKT subsystem, R_AKT, effect on the dose dependence of the whole ErbB/PI3K/PTEN/AKT network for drug D₁, we calculated pAKT and S_AKT,p dose dependencies for pertuzumab at different perturbations of the PI3K/PTEN/AKT subsystem discussed above (see solid and dashed lines in Figure 5, respectively). Specifically, we calculated sensitivity S_AKT,k31 to the rate constant of the reaction of PI3K binding with PIP2, k₃₁ (see Figure 2 and model description in Supplementary Information). The calculation for other parameters p was shown to effect the same results (as guaranteed by the general behavior of S_AKT,p for all p, according to the discussion of Eq. 5). In the case of an unperturbed DSP, sensitivity S_AKT,k31 increases by approximately 20 times (relative to its level in the absence of pertuzumab) and has a peak at 80% inhibition of pAKT (IC₈₀ for pertuzumab) (see black circle and square on the dashed and solid black lines at 100 nM pertuzumab in Figure 5, respectively). Key features of the dose dependence S_AKT,k31 calculated with the unperturbed PI3K/AKT module are the presence of maximum in the range of IC₈₀, a non-zero limit at high drug concentrations, and a limiting value at low drug concentration, which corresponds to the sensitivity of the signaling system in the absence of the drug (see heatmap in Figure 4). The detailed analysis of these features is given in Supplementary Information (see Figures S1 and S2 in Supplementary Material).

FIGURE 5

Figure 5. The dose dependences of pAKT inhibition (solid lines) and sensitivity S_AKT,k31(2C4,p) of the PI3K/PTEN/AKT network to the rate constant of the reaction of PI3K binding with PIP2, k₃₁ (dash lines) at different drug combinations. The dose dependencies of inhibition and sensitivity on pertuzumab concentration (black lines), at 50% PTEN loss (red lines), at 3 μM LY294002 (blue lines), at 50% PTEN loss and 3 μM LY294002 (green lines).

The calculation of the pAKT dose dependencies for pertuzumab in the presence of PI3K inhibitor showed the shift of the dose dependence curve to lower drug concentrations and a decrease of IC₅₀ for pertuzumab from 30 nM to 1 nM at an increase in LY294002 concentration up to 3 μM (see solid blue line in Figure 5 and Figure S2 in Supplementary Material). In contrast to dose dependence, calculation of relative sensitivity S_AKT,k31 revealed a complex behavior that only moves to low pertuzumab concentrations at increasing LY294002 concentration: the maximum near IC₈₀ disappears and sensitivity behavior becomes almost monotonically decreasing with a slight minimum (see Figure S2A in Supplementary Material). We assume that a shape change of S_AKT,k31 at the shift of the dose dependence is the manifestation of transformation of the DSP response curve (Figure 3A). Sensitivity S_AKT,k31 at 3 μM LY294002 does not have maximum at IC₈₀ and decreases from its initial value at low 2C4 concentration to approximately its limit value at high pertuzumab concentration (see blue circle and square on the dashed and solid blue lines, respectively at 6 nM pertuzumab in Figure 5). This dose dependence corresponds to the modified response curve (line 6 in Figure 3A). We predict a significant decrease of IC₅₀ for pertuzumab in the presence of 3 μM LY294002 due to the synergistic combination of these two drugs and explain this effect by modification of the response of PI3K/PTEN/AKT pathway at low input signals (line 6 in Figure 3A).

Calculation of absolute sensitivity, S_AKT,k31 (Eq. S2.1 in Supplementary Material), showed that it possesses similar features except for a zero limiting value at high drug concentration (see Figure S2B in Supplementary Material). Similarly, at 3 μM LY294002, absolute sensitivity loses its maximum in the range of IC₈₀ and monotonically decreases when drug concentration increases. We consider this transformation of sensitivity behavior as the results of modification of the DSP dose response from hyperbolic to smooth sigmoid shape (Figure 3). This transformation, and the range of second drug concentration where it occurs, can be used in optimization of drug composition to inhibit signaling, so avoiding a significant increase in sensitivity of the SNs to mutations. Below we consider one such optimization.

Transformation of the response of the DSP module leads to pAKT inhibition by two drugs to exceed 80% in the wide range of LY294002 concentrations (0.3–3 μM) at a significantly lower concentration of pertuzumab (6 nM) in comparison with pAKT inhibition by pertuzumab alone, 100 nM (see Figure 5; Figure S2 in Supplementary Material). This allows optimization of drug concentrations with respect to both inhibition of pAKT signal and sensitivity of the SN to mutations. Since these two characteristics are interlinked and change correlatively in the same region of the response curve (Figure 3A) and dose dependence (Figure 5), the problem of trade-off between them arises. It is possible to disentangle inhibition and sensitivity characteristics from each other by optimal manipulation of two drugs in the concentration range discussed above. One can establish two optimized conditions of drug combination action with high inhibition and low sensitivity. The first optimum condition is to decrease 2C4 concentration to maintain 80% inhibition of pAKT (IC₈₀ = 6 nM) with low sensitivity at 2–3 μM LY294002 (see blue square and circle on solid and dashed blue lines respectively in Figure 5 and lines 5 and 6 in Figure S2 in Supplementary Material). The second optimum is full inhibition of pAKT with 100 nM pertuzumab and a minimal increase (six times) of sensitivity at 3 μM LY294002 (see large blue square and circle on solid and dashed blue lines respectively in Figure 5).

To demonstrate the sensitivity to resistance transition in response to HER2 inhibition at PTEN loss, we calculated the dose dependences of pAKT and S_AKT,p at 50% PTEN loss (see red solid and dashed lines in Figure 5 and corresponding I/O response of the pAKT, line 2 in Figure 3A). PTEN loss leads to a 10-fold shift of pAKT dependence to a higher pertuzumab concentration, so causing resistance to HER2 inhibition in the range of physiological pertuzumab concentration (100 nM). In this region of drug concentration, both inhibition of pAKT and sensitivity S_AKT,p are approximately zero (see red square and circle on solid and dashed red lines in Figure 5, respectively). Sensitivity to HER2 inhibition is restored through modification of the network by PI3K inhibitor, LY294002. This modification causes approximately full inhibition of pAKT (green square on green solid line in Figure 5) while sensitivity S_AKT,p (green circle on green dashed line in Figure 5) is at approximately the same level as for normal PTEN concentration.

Joint analysis of the I/O response of the PI3K/PTEN/AKT pathway and pAKT dose dependence for pertuzumab (drug D₁) revealed a trade-off between inhibition and sensitivity, which can be formulated as follows. If the concentration of drug D₁ is high (low pHER23 signal), pAKT inhibition is strong and sensitivity to protein parameters is low: this is of a benefit with respect to signal inhibition and suppression of compensatory mutations. If the concentration of D₁ is low (high pHER23 signal), pAKT concentration increases while sensitivity decreases, which gives advantages with respect to mutation suppression but leads to a decrease in inhibition effect of the drug, D₁. If the concentration of drug D₁ is in the region of its IC₅₀, sensitivity increases which affords the use of the second drug more effectively (drug-sensitizing effect), and a disadvantage with respect to increasing sensitivity of the SN to compensation mutations. This analysis showed the inhibition-sensitivity trade-off decision can be optimized by customizing the I/O response of the SN through manipulation of the concentrations of the two drugs. Optimization of drug concentration allows the separation of the regions with high inhibition and high sensitivity, which overlap each other in single drug treatment.

Discussion

We have shown that the sensitivity of the SN to drug action is attended by an increase in sensitivity S_DSP,p of the DSP to the kinetic parameters and expression levels of the proteins involved in this pathway. As a result, the DSP is sensitized by drug action and may be more fragile with respect to mutations, which change protein kinetic properties (catalytic or/and dissociation constants) and their expression level (overexpression or suppression of gene expression). In particular, an increasing sensitivity may result in an adverse effect of inhibitor action since a high sensitivity endows the SN with fragility with respect to mutations that can compensate for the intended inhibitor effect by restoring a high output signal as well as initial low sensitivity of the SN to external perturbations. It follows that increasing SN sensitivity can be one of the causes of resistance potential to drug action. We suggest that this effect should be taken into account at drug target validation, and the drug resistance potential linked with this sensitizing effect should be evaluated in drug combination co-development. We present a method to design drug combination strategies that modify the I/O response of the SN to minimize any drug-sensitizing effect, enhance robustness of drug inhibition effect, and improve drug resistance potential by vertically targeting the SN.

The method is based on the modularity approach to analyzing the efficacy of combination therapy developed by Fitzgerald et al. (52). According to this approach, we divide the signaling system into up- and down-stream pathways, which are the targets of the first and second drugs, respectively (see scheme in Figure 1). In this work, we focused on the I/O response characteristics of the down-stream pathways, DSP, which is a signal transduction module in the whole signaling pathway. As shown in Ref. (52), the effect of drug combination significantly depends on the I/O response properties of the receptor systems, and mainly receptor expression level, that shifts the IC₅₀ concentration of drug, D₁. To exclude the effects determined by the I/O response properties of the receptor system, we considered only the output signal of the USP which is varied from zero to a saturated level. In this modularity approach, the effect of drug D₁ defines only the input signal for the I/O response curve of the DSP (see Figures 1 and 3A). We expanded this approach developed by Fitzgerald et al. (52) to investigate the modification of the I/O response of the down-stream pathways as a result of external and internal perturbations such as inhibition of signaling proteins and protein mutations. The analysis of the responsiveness of the whole system to the first drug was shown to depend significantly on the I/O response characteristic of the down-stream signaling module. We suggest that the response curve, R_DSP, can be considered as a biomarker (characteristic signature) of a particular cancer signaling pathways (e.g., MAPK, PI3K/AKT, Wnt, and others (53) in specific cancer cell lines. To illustrate this, we have extracted the I/O response R_DSP of the PI3K/PTEN/AKT and MAPK pathways for different cancer cell lines using experimental data on the dose dependence of receptor activation (EGFR and PDGFR) and output signal (pAKT and pERK) on ligand concentrations (EGF and PDGF) (49, 54, 55). The characteristic I/O response curves obtained for different activating input signals in various cell lines are shown in Figure 6. The experimental data on I/O responses were fitted by the Hill function with a Hill constant, n, which characterizes that response as switch-like (higher n) or more graded (lower n). As shown, AKT responses are more varied compared with the more conserved set of ERK responses that are typically switch-like (n = 2.65–12.8). pAKT responses range from switch-like for HBL and AU565 cells (Figures 6A,B) to graded hyperbolic for T47 and PE04 cells (Figures 6C,E,F) and smooth sigmoidal for MCF7 cells (Figure 6D) responses. We assume that such variety in the responses of the PI3K/PTEN/AKT pathway results from a variation in the internal parameters of the networks caused by mutations and different expression levels of signaling proteins. We suggest that I/O responses can be considered as a biomarker of mutation and protein expression status of specific cancer cells.

FIGURE 6

Figure 6. Input/output responses of PI3K/AKT and MAPK pathways to the activation of growth factor receptors in different cells. The dependences of pAKT and pERK on the activation level of ErbB1 receptors in HBL100 (A), AU565 (B), T47 (C) cells; on the level of HER2 receptors in MCF7 (D) and PE04 (E) cells; and platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGF) in NIH 3T3 fibroblasts (F). Data on I/O response were extracted from experimental dose dependences [(A–C) (49), (D) (54), and (F) (55)] and normalized at maximal values of input/output signals. pAKT, pERK dose dependencies for PE04 cells (E) are theoretical data (40) (black lines). Experimental data were fitted by Hill function: y = xⁿ/(xⁿ + Kⁿ) with Hill constant, n, and half-maximum constant, K, which are given in Figures. Hill function is depicted by red lines for pAKT and blue lines for pERK. Experimental data were kindly allowed to be used by PK Sorger (A–C), M Hatakeyama (D), and JM Haugh (E).

The in silico analysis of the I/O response of the PI3K/PTEN/AKT pathway confirmed that the SN can possess a smooth hyperbolic response, which corresponds to the sensitivity mode in signal transduction, and this response can be transformed into a switch-like response by changing protein parameters, which corresponds to activating mutations of the proteins involved (PTEN, PI3K, and AKT). This transformation relates to the transition from sensitivity to resistance of the SN to drug inhibiting receptor signals (32). Joint analysis of the I/O response of the PI3K/PTEN/AKT pathway and its sensitivity showed that these two key characteristics of the cellular SN are interconnected and they both significantly depend on the protein parameters and their expression levels. We observed from in silico experiments that perturbations of protein parameters corresponding either to 50% decreases in PTEN concentration (PTEN loss), PI3K activation mutation, or AKT overexpression significantly changes in the I/O response of the PI3K/PTEN/AKT pathway and its sensitivity. The transformation of the I/O response from smooth hyperbolic to switch-like at PTEN loss significantly endows the SN with hypersensitivity (56) that is assumed to be typical for the signaling cascade in cells at decreasing phosphatase activity (38). The steep switch response observed at PTEN loss is assumed to be due to a post-translational regulation of PTEN activity by its phosphorylation leading to the additional loss of PTEN activity (31, 48) considered in our model.

We showed that PTEN loss, or PIK3CA activation mutation, AKT and PI3K overexpression (40) decreased sensitivity S_AKT,p by four to six orders of magnitude for all protein parameters and this corresponds to the transformation of the I/O response from smooth hyperbolic to switch-like. At this mutation, the PI3K/PTEN/AKT pathway acquires insensitivity to further perturbation of the SN: it becomes robust in the face of both external perturbations (inhibition of input signal) and internal aberrations (mutations). PTEN loss leads to resistance to drug action (resistance to HER2 inhibition) and causes robust activation of the AKT output signal (57). Note that the observed decrease in sensitivity of the SN at either PTEN loss or PI3K aberration suggests that PTEN loss and PIK3CA mutation are mutually exclusive. Clinical study of oncogenic mutations in the PI3K/PTEN/AKT pathway reported both the data on mutually exclusive of PTEN loss and PIK3CA mutation in human breast (58) and gastric (59) carcinomas and frequently concordant in breast cancer (43, 44). As both mutations activate AKT and each decreases sensitivity of the DSP to another mutation, our finding suggests either redundancy in mutations, the need for two alterations in the single module to activate AKT, or that PTEN loss and PIK3CA mutation contribute differently to carcinogenesis (60).

Combining analysis of the I/O response with SA, we showed that a hyperbolic response in sensitivity mode is robust at high input (saturated receptor signals) and loses its robustness against activation mutations of the proteins at low pHER23 signals. Importantly, the I/O response can be modified through drug combination action, here through customization of the I/O response of the DSP by drug D₂ to reach high robustness of the inhibition response to drug D₁ against oncogenic protein mutations in the pathway, leading to the transformation of a hyperbolic response to a graded sigmoidal response curve (see blue lines in Figure 3A). The first benefit of that modification is an effective inhibition of output signal, pAKT. The most pronounced inhibition effect of the second drug is at low pHER23 region (0–0.2), where the sensitizing effect by the first drug, pertuzumab, is at a maximum. We exploit a synergistic interaction between these two drugs, specifically the sensitizing effect of one drug on the action of another. A second benefit of that modification is a decrease in the sensitivity of this response in the range of low pHER23 signal (0–0.2) (see blue lines in Figure 3A). We hypothesized that the modified response is more robust against oncogenic mutation than the hyperbolic type of the response. To check this, we carried out robustness screening of this response with respect to the following aberrations in the PI3K/PTEN/AKT pathway: PTEN loss, activation mutation of PI3K, and overexpression of AKT. In all these cases we observed effective inhibition of pAKT and so a high degree of robustness in the modified response to common oncogenic mutations in the PI3K/PTEN/AKT pathway (see green lines in Figures 3A,C). We showed that a hyperbolic response is more adapted to signal discrimination and signal transaction while a modified graded sigmoidal response close to linear response is more adapted to therapeutic inhibition of signaling pathway activated by oncogenic mutations.

Note, a similar transformation from hyperbole to switch-like response was observed in silico and in vitro experiments in Raf/MEK/ERK pathway as a result of deletion of negative feedbacks from ppERK to Son of Sevenless protein (SOS) and Raf (26). This finding and other theoretical and experimental studies show that multiple feedback and gene regulation can significantly control drug efficacy (4, 5, 52). An extension of the modularity approach used in our work should be performed to explore the consequences of feedback and gene regulation networks, which control the robustness of SNs in normal and malignant conditions (61, 62). For example, to develop more reliable model of SN response to drug combination, it is necessary to take into account the negative feedback in the PI3K/PTEN/AKT pathway which includes phosphorylation (inactivation) of GSK3β by pAKT which phosphorylates (inactivates) PTEN, and therefore increases AKT phosphorylation (31).

As discussed in the Section “Introduction,” many experiments and clinical trials confirm the suppression of drug resistance and the robustness response of drug combinations acting on the vertical signaling pathways in different cancers. For example, complementary inhibition of the vertical targets in the PI3K/PTEN/AKT/mTOR pathway restores the inhibition effect of trastuzumab and pertuzumab (15, 17). Moreover, the experimental study of the combination of PI3K inhibition (GDC-0941) with HER2 inhibitors (trastuzumab, pertuzumab) showed that the high efficacy of this combination therapy is a general effect for different breast cancer cell lines despite the fact that different cell lines have different susceptibilities/resistance to each drug separately (42).

Our in silico experiments indicate that anti-cancer response robustness to drug action emerges due to a smooth sigmoid response of the SN when modified by drug combination. Experimentally, the robustness of the modified response to a change in expression level of signaling proteins can be measured in RNA interference (RNAi) screening with respect to repression of protein expression. RNAi screening has been applied successfully to a study of resistance mechanisms and development of effective combination therapy by determining drug targets (60, 63), and allows estimation of the robustness of the therapeutic response to the perturbations in expression of the proteins (isomers or catalytic/regulatory protein subunits) surrounding drug targets in a SN (both vertical and horizontal targeted pathways). Robustness screening with respect to overexpression of the proteins surrounding targeted proteins can be measured using isogenic cell clones customized to genomic status involved in screening (64). Most critical experimental validations are assumed to be carried out with heterogeneous tumor samples. Here we suggest that designing into a combination therapy regime, an unchanged landscape of sensitivity across a mutation spectrum, such as that shown in heatmap in Figure 4 (columns 5, 6, and 8), may slow down the evolution of subpopulations of cancer cells under a selection pressure of drug therapy and suppresses the development of drug-resistant clones (28, 65). Further, effecting this slowing down in resistance evolution may require a longer-term engineered drug combination regime that accounts for a drift in cell signaling behavior over many cellular generations.

The method of investigation of the I/O response of the SN modules developed here can be considered as a supplementary tool for the analysis of the dose dependence for drug D₁ and the mechanism of IC₅₀ changes at oncogenic mutations and combination therapy. To show the link between response dynamics properties of the PI3K/PTEN/AKT pathway and the dose response of the whole SN, we calculated the dose dependence of pAKT on concentration of pertuzumab (drug D₁): R_SN = C_out (C_in, D, P_SN, t), and showed how the modification of the DSP response by mutations and drugs changes IC₅₀ for pertuzumab (Figure 5). In the calculation, we observed a decrease of IC₅₀ for pertuzumab in the presence of PI3K inhibitor, LY294002, suggesting lower concentrations to be effective. These results supplement the analysis of the drug-induced shift in dose dependence and the synergetic effect of two drugs targeting vertical pathways discussed by Fitzgerald et al. (52). Additionally, we showed that drug-induced sensitivity to the second drug modify both response curve and dose dependence for the first drug that significantly enhances synergetic effect of two drugs in combination.

We showed that the sensitivity of the DSP without customization increases significantly in the range of IC₈₀ of pertuzumab (see solid and dashed black lines in Figure 5). The simplest way to reach the goal of high inhibition and low sensitivity is to increase the drug concentration and go far beyond the range of maximal sensitivity (>1 μM pertuzumab, Figure 5). In practice, this is often not a realistic solution for toxicity reasons, although there is evidence that drug concentrations that are twice the IC₅₀ can suppress acquired resistance due to mutations following drug therapy (29). A more realistic approach is to customize the network response to inhibition through combination therapy, manipulating the inhibition and sensitivity dose dependencies through the action of the second drug, which modifies the I/O response of the DSP. Additionally, our calculation showed that a significantly lower IC₅₀ for pertuzumab in combination with the PI3K inhibitor can be a basis for decreasing a dose of drug D₁ to reduce its toxicity.

We applied the method to two well-known targets and drugs and investigated the mechanism of their effectiveness. We demonstrated that the drug-induced sensitivity of the DSP to changes in protein parameters and their expression levels has the potential to sensitize this pathway to mutations that compensate for drug action, i.e., low output signal at inhibited input signal. Moreover, such mutations can effect a decrease in sensitivity of the DSP to further external and internal perturbations leading to an increase in DSP robustness. It is thus possible that drug action may significantly perturb DSP functioning, stimulating the activation of compensatory response mechanisms in the cell.

We then demonstrated a method of minimizing the drug-sensitizing effect while maintaining the intended effect of drug action by customizing the I/O response of the DSP response. The goal of this customization was to reach a high inhibition of input signal without sensitizing the SN to mutations leading to an increased potential for resistance, specifically PTEN loss and AKT overexpression. Our focus was the modification of the I/O response of the PI3K/PTEN/AKT pathway to inhibition of pHER2 by pertuzumab.

These results suggest that the I/O response of signaling modules can be used as biomarker to select advantaged drug targets for mono- and combination therapy. To illustrate this concept, we considered different strategies of drug selection depending on the response of the PI3K/PTEN/AKT signaling module of the different cells represented in Figure 6. We assume that in the case of switch-like response with low threshold of activation (low parameter K) such as represented in Figure 6A (HBL cells) and Figure 6B (AU565 cells), a rational strategy is to use drug combination in which one drug targets the DSP and modifies the response curve to more graded or sigmoid form while another drug in combination inhibits input and output signals according to that modified response curve. In the case of responses of smooth hyperbolic type like represented in Figure 6C (T47), Figure 6E (PE04), and Figure 6F (NIH 3T3), the drug targeting USP effectively inhibits pAKT in the 80–90% range of inhibited receptor signal but sensitizes down-stream module to compensation mutations. To avoid the latter effect, we suggest modifying the response of the down-stream module to a smooth sigmoid curve by a second drug targeting the DSP. The I/O smooth sigmoid response of the type given in Figure 6D (MCF7) is assumed to endow the signaling module with high sensitivity to the drug inhibiting its input signal and low sensitivity to compensatory mutations. In this case, inhibition of the USP by one drug is effective with respect to both signal inhibition and sensitivity suppression. The use of the second drug targeting down-stream pathway is redundant from the viewpoint of the response modification and toxicity. These analyses indicate the strategy of drug–diagnostic co-development (2, 66) when drug therapies (mono- or combination) are selected based on the integrative biomarker corresponding to the I/O response of signaling modules. Stratification of patients according to different I/O response curves can help identify patients who are most likely to benefit from selected therapy. Constant monitoring of the transformation of the I/O response curve during treatment can indicate at compensatory gene regulation (12, 45, 67, 68) and acquired mutations as a result of the selected therapy and so can serve as a guide for changing therapeutic regime. The obtained results showed that it is desirable to introduce an additional characteristic of drugs to support this strategy – drug-induced sensitivity of the SN or resistance potential of drugs, which significantly depends on the I/O response of targeted SN.

The joint analysis, the I/O response of the PI3K/PTEN/AKT pathway, and pAKT dose response for pertuzumab revealed the challenge of the trade-off between high sensitivity to drug action and oncogenic mutations. The proposed method of modification of the I/O response of the PI3K/PTEN/AKT pathway and manipulating separately by the inhibition and sensitivity dose dependencies through action of a second drug resolved this problem partially. Despite PI3K inhibition causing the loss of relative sensitivity at different perturbations (pHER2 inhibition and the different mutations in PI3K/PTEN/AKT pathway), it increased the overall level of sensitivity of the DSP to protein parameters that is assumed to sensitize the SN to the compensation mutations (compare columns 1 and 5 in Figure 4). To further optimize this trade-off at the combination design stage, we propose that other means of customizing the I/O response to improve drug resistance potential are needed, e.g., by using the methods and results of synthetic biology in signaling pathway engineering to customize their I/O responses (69–71). For example, using some modulators it is possible to alter/reshape dose dependence from a graded to a sharply sensitive, switch-like response and a time dependence from sustained to pulse or delayed responses in MAPK pathway signaling (71). It has been shown that modification of cellular response obtained by genetic engineering can also be reached through drug action. For example, cellular responses were engineered by dynamic rewiring of SN topology (22, 72) and controlling negative feedback circuits in SN by drug combination (26). Ultimately the application of this arsenal of engineering methods in network and synthetic biology, underpinned by integrative systems biology, can be a powerful tool for adaptation of signaling response to effective combination therapy and rational drug combinations co-development.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by grants from Breakthrough Breast Cancer and Scottish Funding Council (SRDG), and personal support to Alexey Goltsov from Scottish Informatics and Computer Science Alliance (SICSA) and to James Bown from The Northwood Trust. We also acknowledge the Reviewers for detailed analysis of the method proposed and valuable comments.

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at http://www.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fonc.2014.00013/abstract

References

1. Yap TA, Omlin A, de Bono JS. Development of therapeutic combinations targeting major cancer signaling pathways. J Clin Oncol (2013) 31:1592–605. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.37.6418

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

2. Jørgensen JT. Companion diagnostics in oncology – current status and future aspects. Oncology (2013) 85:59–68. doi:10.1159/000353454

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

3. US Food and Drug Administration. New Guidance for Industry: Codevelopment of Two or More Unmarketed Investigational Drugs for Use in Combination. Available from: http://www.fda.gov/ForConsumers/ByAudience/ForPatientAdvocates/ucm237264.htm

4. Chandarlapaty S. Negative feedback and adaptive resistance to the targeted therapy of cancer. Cancer Discov (2012) 2:311–9. doi:10.1158/2159-8290.CD-12-0018

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

5. Carracedo A, Pandolfi PP. The PTEN-PI3K pathway: of feedbacks and cross-talks. Oncogene (2008) 27:5527–41. doi:10.1038/onc.2008.247

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

6. Azmi AS, Wang Z, Philip PA, Mohammad RM, Sarkar FH. Proof of concept: network and systems biology approaches aid in the discovery of potent anticancer drug combinations. Mol Cancer Ther (2010) 9:3137–44. doi:10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-10-0642

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

7. Boran AD, Iyengar R. Systems approaches to polypharmacology and drug discovery. Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel (2010) 13:297–309.

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text

8. Nelander S, Wang W, Nilsson B, She Q-B, Pratilas C, Rosen N, et al. Models from experiments: combinatorial drug perturbations of cancer cells. Mol Syst Biol (2008) 4:216. doi:10.1038/msb.2008.53

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

9. Tang J, Karhinen L, Xu T, Szwajda A, Yadav B, Wennerberg K, et al. Target inhibition networks: predicting selective combinations of druggable targets to block cancer survival pathways. Roth FP, editor. PLoS Comput Biol (2013) 9:e1003226. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003226

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

10. Baselga J, Cortés J, Kim S-B, Im S-A, Hegg R, Im Y-H, et al. Pertuzumab plus trastuzumab plus docetaxel for metastatic breast cancer. N Engl J Med (2012) 366:109–19. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1113216

CrossRef Full Text

11. Faratian D, Zweemer AJM, Nagumo Y, Sims AH, Muir M, Dodds M, et al. Trastuzumab and pertuzumab produce changes in morphology and estrogen receptor signaling in ovarian cancer xenografts revealing new treatment strategies. Clin Cancer Res (2011) 17:4451–61. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-2461

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

12. Sims AH, Zweemer AJM, Nagumo Y, Faratian D, Muir M, Dodds M, et al. Defining the molecular response to trastuzumab, pertuzumab and combination therapy in ovarian cancer. Br J Cancer (2012) 106:1779–89. doi:10.1038/bjc.2012.176

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

13. Hoeflich KP, Merchant M, Orr C, Chan J, Den Otter D, Berry L, et al. Intermittent administration of MEK inhibitor GDC-0973 plus PI3K inhibitor GDC-0941 triggers robust apoptosis and tumor growth inhibition. Cancer Res (2012) 72:210–9. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-1515

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

14. Haagensen EJ, Kyle S, Beale GS, Maxwell RJ, Newell DR. The synergistic interaction of MEK and PI3K inhibitors is modulated by mTOR inhibition. Br J Cancer (2012) 106:1386–94. doi:10.1038/bjc.2012.70

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

15. Sharial M, Crown J, Hennessy BT. Overcoming resistance and restoring sensitivity to HER2-targeted therapies in breast cancer. Ann Oncol (2012) 23:3007–16. doi:10.1093/annonc/mds200

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

16. Zheng J, Hudder A, Zukowski K, Novak RF. Rapamycin sensitizes Akt inhibition in malignant human breast epithelial cells. Cancer Lett (2010) 296:74–87. doi:10.1016/j.canlet.2010.03.018

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

17. Morrow PK, Wulf GM, Ensor J, Booser DJ, Moore JA, Flores PR, et al. Phase I/II study of trastuzumab in combination with everolimus (RAD001) in patients with HER2-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer who progressed on trastuzumab-based therapy. J Clin Oncol (2011) 29:3126–32. doi:10.1200/JCO.2010.32.2321

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

18. Gillies RJ, Verduzco D, Gatenby RA. Evolutionary dynamics of carcinogenesis and why targeted therapy does not work. Nat Rev Cancer (2012) 12:487–93. doi:10.1038/nrc3298

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

19. Masui K, Gini B, Wykosky J, Zanca C, Mischel PS, Furnari FB, et al. A tale of two approaches: complementary mechanisms of cytotoxic and targeted therapy resistance may inform next-generation cancer treatments. Carcinogenesis (2013) 34:725–38. doi:10.1093/carcin/bgt086

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

20. Cesca M, Bizzaro F, Zucchetti M, Giavazzi R. Tumor delivery of chemotherapy combined with inhibitors of angiogenesis and vascular targeting agents. Front Oncol (2013) 3:259. doi:10.3389/fonc.2013.00259

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

21. von Minckwitz G, du Bois A, Schmidt M, Maass N, Cufer T, de Jongh FE, et al. Trastuzumab beyond progression in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive advanced breast cancer: a German breast group 26/breast international group 03-05 study. J Clin Oncol (2009) 27:1999–2006. doi:10.1200/JCO.2008.19.6618

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

22. Lee MJ, Ye AS, Gardino AK, Heijink AM, Sorger PK, MacBeath G, et al. Sequential application of anticancer drugs enhances cell death by rewiring apoptotic signaling networks. Cell (2012) 149:780–94. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2012.03.031

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

23. Wallin JJ, Edgar KA, Guan J, Berry M, Prior WW, Lee L, et al. GDC-0980 is a novel class I PI3K/mTOR kinase inhibitor with robust activity in cancer models driven by the PI3K pathway. Mol Cancer Ther (2011) 10:2426–36. doi:10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-11-0446

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

24. Nahta R, O’Regan RM. Evolving strategies for overcoming resistance to HER2-directed therapy: targeting the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway. Clin Breast Cancer (2010) 10(Suppl 3):S72–8. doi:10.3816/CBC.2010.s.015

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

25. Junttila TT, Akita RW, Parsons K, Fields C, Lewis Phillips GD, Friedman LS, et al. Ligand-independent HER2/HER3/PI3K complex is disrupted by trastuzumab and is effectively inhibited by the PI3K inhibitor GDC-0941. Cancer Cell (2009) 15:429–40. doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2009.03.020

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

26. Sturm OE, Orton R, Grindlay J, Birtwistle M, Vyshemirsky V, Gilbert D, et al. The mammalian MAPK/ERK pathway exhibits properties of a negative feedback amplifier. Sci Signal (2010) 3:ra90. doi:10.1126/scisignal.2001212

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

27. Flaherty KT, Infante JR, Daud A, Gonzalez R, Kefford RF, Sosman J, et al. Combined BRAF and MEK inhibition in melanoma with BRAF V600 mutations. N Engl J Med (2012) 367:1694–703. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1210093

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

28. Gerlinger M, Rowan AJ, Horswell S, Larkin J, Endesfelder D, Gronroos E, et al. Intratumor heterogeneity and branched evolution revealed by multiregion sequencing. N Engl J Med (2012) 366:883–92. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1113205

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

29. Richards J, Lim AC, Hay CW, Taylor AE, Wingate A, Nowakowska K, et al. Interactions of abiraterone, eplerenone, and prednisolone with wild-type and mutant androgen receptor: a rationale for increasing abiraterone exposure or combining with MDV3100. Cancer Res (2012) 72:2176–82. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-3980

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

30. Faratian D, Goltsov A, Lebedeva G, Sorokin A, Moodie S, Mullen P, et al. Systems biology reveals new strategies for personalizing cancer medicine and confirms the role of PTEN in resistance to trastuzumab. Cancer Res (2009) 69:6713–20. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-0777

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

31. Goltsov A, Deeni Y, Khalil H, Idowu M, Kyriakidis S, Goltsov G, et al. Role of post-translational regulation of PTEN activity in cancer cell addiction to heterozygous PTEN mutations. In: Xu K, editor. PTEN Structure, Mechanism of Action, Role Cell Signalling and Regulation. Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers (2013). p. 173–210.

32. Goltsov A, Faratian D, Langdon SP, Bown J, Goryanin I, Harrison DJ. Compensatory effects in the PI3K/PTEN/AKT signaling network following receptor tyrosine kinase inhibition. Cell Signal (2011) 23:407–16. doi:10.1016/j.cellsig.2010.10.011

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

33. Hua F, Cornejo MG, Cardone MH, Stokes CL, Lauffenburger DA. Effects of Bcl-2 levels on Fas signaling-induced caspase-3 activation: molecular genetic tests of computational model predictions. J Immunol (2005) 175:985–95.

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text

34. Wolf J, Dronov S, Tobin F, Goryanin I. The impact of the regulatory design on the response of epidermal growth factor receptor-mediated signal transduction towards oncogenic mutations. FEBS J (2007) 274:5505–17. doi:10.1111/j.1742-4658.2007.06066.x

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

35. Orton RJ, Adriaens ME, Gormand A, Sturm OE, Kolch W, Gilbert DR. Computational modelling of cancerous mutations in the EGFR/ERK signalling pathway. BMC Syst Biol (2009) 3:100. doi:10.1186/1752-0509-3-100

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

36. Yoon J, Deisboeck TS. Investigating differential dynamics of the MAPK signaling cascade using a multi-parametric global sensitivity analysis. PLoS One (2009) 4:e4560. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0004560

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

37. Dana S, Nakakuki T, Hatakeyama M, Kimura S, Raha S. Computation of restoration of ligand response in the random kinetics of a prostate cancer cell signaling pathway. Comput Methods Programs Biomed (2011) 101:1–22. doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2010.04.001

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

38. Nguyen LK, Matallanas D, Croucher DR, von Kriegsheim A, Kholodenko BN. Signalling by protein phosphatases and drug development: a systems-centred view. FEBS J (2013) 280:751–65. doi:10.1111/j.1742-4658.2012.08522.x

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

39. Zou X, Liu M, Pan Z. Robustness analysis of EGFR signaling network with a multi-objective evolutionary algorithm. Biosystems (2008) 91:245–61. doi:10.1016/j.biosystems.2007.10.001

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

40. Goltsov A, Faratian D, Langdon SP, Mullen P, Harrison DJ, Bown J. Features of the reversible sensitivity-resistance transition in PI3K/PTEN/AKT signalling network after HER2 inhibition. Cell Signal (2012) 24:493–504. doi:10.1016/j.cellsig.2011.09.030

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

41. Lebedeva G, Sorokin A, Faratian D, Mullen P, Goltsov A, Langdon SP, et al. Model-based global sensitivity analysis as applied to identification of anti-cancer drug targets and biomarkers of drug resistance in the ErbB2/3 network. Eur J Pharm Sci (2012) 46:244–58. doi:10.1016/j.ejps.2011.10.026

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

42. Yao E, Zhou W, Lee-Hoeflich ST, Truong T, Haverty PM, Eastham-Anderson J, et al. Suppression of HER2/HER3-mediated growth of breast cancer cells with combinations of GDC-0941 PI3K inhibitor, trastuzumab, and pertuzumab. Clin Cancer Res (2009) 15:4147–56. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-2814

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

43. Stemke-Hale K, Gonzalez-Angulo AM, Lluch A, Neve RM, Kuo W-L, Davies M, et al. An integrative genomic and proteomic analysis of PIK3CA, PTEN, and AKT mutations in breast cancer. Cancer Res (2008) 68:6084–91. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-6854

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

44. Cheung LWT, Hennessy BT, Li J, Yu S, Myers AP, Djordjevic B, et al. High frequency of PIK3R1 and PIK3R2 mutations in endometrial cancer elucidates a novel mechanism for regulation of PTEN protein stability. Cancer Discov (2011) 1:170–85. doi:10.1158/2159-8290.CD-11-0039

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

45. Nagumo Y, Faratian D, Mullen P, Harrison DJ, Hasmann M, Langdon SP. Modulation of HER3 is a marker of dynamic cell signaling in ovarian cancer: implications for pertuzumab sensitivity. Mol Cancer Res (2009) 7:1563–71. doi:10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-09-0101

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

46. Hu H, Goltsov A, Bown JL, Sims AH, Langdon SP, Harrison DJ, et al. Feedforward and feedback regulation of the MAPK and PI3K oscillatory circuit in breast cancer. Cell Signal (2013) 25:26–32. doi:10.1016/j.cellsig.2012.09.014

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

47. Franklin MC, Carey KD, Vajdos FF, Leahy DJ, de Vos AM, Sliwkowski MX. Insights into ErbB signaling from the structure of the ErbB2-pertuzumab complex. Cancer Cell (2004) 5:317–28. doi:10.1016/S1535-6108(04)00083-2

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

48. Leslie NR, Foti M. Non-genomic loss of PTEN function in cancer: not in my genes. Trends Pharmacol Sci (2011) 32:131–40. doi:10.1016/j.tips.2010.12.005

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

49. Chen WW, Schoeberl B, Jasper PJ, Niepel M, Nielsen UB, Lauffenburger DA, et al. Input-output behavior of ErbB signaling pathways as revealed by a mass action model trained against dynamic data. Mol Syst Biol (2009) 5:239. doi:10.1038/msb.2008.74

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

50. Schoeberl B, Pace EA, Fitzgerald JB, Harms BD, Xu L, Nie L, et al. Therapeutically targeting ErbB3: a key node in ligand-induced activation of the ErbB receptor-PI3K axis. Sci Signal (2009) 2:ra31. doi:10.1126/scisignal.2000352

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

51. Stoica GE, Franke TF, Wellstein A, Morgan E, Czubayko F, List H-J, et al. Heregulin-beta1 regulates the estrogen receptor-alpha gene expression and activity via the ErbB2/PI 3-K/Akt pathway. Oncogene (2003) 22:2073–87. doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1206769

CrossRef Full Text

52. Fitzgerald JB, Schoeberl B, Nielsen UB, Sorger PK. Systems biology and combination therapy in the quest for clinical efficacy. Nat Chem Biol (2006) 2:458–66. doi:10.1038/nchembio817

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

53. Kessler T, Hache H, Wierling C. Integrative analysis of cancer-related signaling pathways. Front Physiol (2013) 4:124. doi:10.3389/fphys.2013.00124

CrossRef Full Text

54. Nagashima T, Shimodaira H, Ide K, Nakakuki T, Tani Y, Takahashi K, et al. Quantitative transcriptional control of ErbB receptor signaling undergoes graded to biphasic response for cell differentiation. J Biol Chem (2007) 282:4045–56. doi:10.1074/jbc.M608653200

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

55. Park CS, Schneider IC, Haugh JM. Kinetic analysis of platelet-derived growth factor receptor/phosphoinositide 3-kinase/Akt signaling in fibroblasts. J Biol Chem (2003) 278:37064–72. doi:10.1074/jbc.M304968200

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

56. Goldbeter A, Koshland DE. An amplified sensitivity arising from covalent modification in biological systems. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (1981) 78:6840–4. doi:10.1073/pnas.78.11.6840

CrossRef Full Text

57. Marty B, Maire V, Gravier E, Rigaill G, Vincent-Salomon A, Kappler M, et al. Frequent PTEN genomic alterations and activated phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase pathway in basal-like breast cancer cells. Breast Cancer Res (2008) 10:R101. doi:10.1186/bcr2204

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

58. Saal LH, Holm K, Maurer M, Memeo L, Su T, Wang X, et al. PIK3CA mutations correlate with hormone receptors, node metastasis, and ERBB2, and are mutually exclusive with PTEN loss in human breast carcinoma. Cancer Res (2005) 65:2554–9. doi:10.1158/0008-5472-CAN-04-3913

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

59. Byun D-S, Cho K, Ryu B-K, Lee M-G, Park J-I, Chae K-S, et al. Frequent monoallelic deletion of PTEN and its reciprocal association with PIK3CA amplification in gastric carcinoma. Int J Cancer (2003) 104:318–27. doi:10.1002/ijc.10962

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

60. Berns K, Bernards R. Understanding resistance to targeted cancer drugs through loss of function genetic screens. Drug Resist Updat (2012) 15:268–75. doi:10.1016/j.drup.2012.10.002

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

61. Kitano H. Cancer as a robust system: implications for anticancer therapy. Nat Rev Cancer (2004) 4:227–35. doi:10.1038/nrc1300

CrossRef Full Text

62. Stelling J, Sauer U, Szallasi Z, Doyle FJ, Doyle J. Robustness of cellular functions. Cell (2004) 118:675–85. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2004.09.008

CrossRef Full Text

63. Lee AJX, Swanton C. Tumour heterogeneity and drug resistance: personalising cancer medicine through functional genomics. Biochem Pharmacol (2012) 83:1013–20. doi:10.1016/j.bcp.2011.12.008

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

64. Hengel SM, Murray E, Langdon S, Hayward L, O’Donoghue J, Panchaud A, et al. Data-independent proteomic screen identifies novel tamoxifen agonist that mediates drug resistance. J Proteome Res (2011) 10:4567–78. doi:10.1021/pr2004117

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

65. Cooke SL, Ng CKY, Melnyk N, Garcia MJ, Hardcastle T, Temple J, et al. Genomic analysis of genetic heterogeneity and evolution in high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma. Oncogene (2010) 29:4905–13. doi:10.1038/onc.2010.245

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

66. Simon R. Drug-diagnostics co-development in oncology. Front Oncol (2013) 3:315. doi:10.3389/fonc.2013.00315

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

67. Chakrabarty A, Sánchez V, Kuba MG, Rinehart C, Arteaga CL. Feedback upregulation of HER3 (ErbB3) expression and activity attenuates antitumor effect of PI3K inhibitors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (2012) 109:2718–23. doi:10.1073/pnas.1018001108

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

68. Narayan M, Wilken JA, Harris LN, Baron AT, Kimbler KD, Maihle NJ. Trastuzumab-induced HER reprogramming in “resistant” breast carcinoma cells. Cancer Res (2009) 69:2191–4. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-1056

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

69. Pryciak PM. Systems biology. Customized signaling circuits. Science (2008) 319:1489–90. doi:10.1126/science.1156414

CrossRef Full Text

70. Brandman O, Meyer T. Feedback loops shape cellular signals in space and time. Science (2008) 322:390–5. doi:10.1126/science.1160617

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

71. Bashor CJ, Helman NC, Yan S, Lim WA. Using engineered scaffold interactions to reshape MAP kinase pathway signaling dynamics. Science (2008) 319:1539–43. doi:10.1126/science.1151153

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

72. Behar M, Barken D, Werner SL, Hoffmann A. The dynamics of signaling as a pharmacological target. Cell (2013) 155:448–61. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2013.09.018

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text