Nataša Debeljak
Peter Solár
Arthur J. Sytkowski- 1Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Biochemistry, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
- 2Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, Institute of Biology and Ecology, Faculty of Sciences, Pavol Jozef Šafárik University, Košice, Slovakia
- 3Oncology Therapeutic Area, Quintiles Transnational, Arlington, MA, USA
Until 1990, erythropoietin (EPO) was considered to have a single biological purpose and action, the stimulation of red blood cell growth and differentiation. Slowly, scientific and medical opinion evolved, beginning with the discovery of an effect on endothelial cell growth in vitro and the identification of EPO receptors (EPORs) on neuronal cells. We now know that EPO is a pleiotropic growth factor that exhibits an anti-apoptotic action on numerous cells and tissues, including malignant ones. In this article, we present a short discussion of EPO, receptors involved in EPO signal transduction, and their action on non-hematopoietic cells. This is followed by a more detailed presentation of both pre-clinical and clinical data that demonstrate EPO’s action on cancer cells, as well as tumor angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis. Clinical trials with reported adverse effects of chronic erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) treatment as well as clinical studies exploring the prognostic significance of EPO and EPOR expression in cancer patients are reviewed. Finally, we address the use of EPO and other ESAs in cancer patients.
Introduction
The presence of a circulating hemopoietic factor controlling the red blood cell (RBC) production was first suggested in 1906 (1). This humoral factor was experimentally confirmed almost half a decade later and the name erythropoietin was given (2). In 1977, the protein was isolated from human urine (3) enabling research toward cloning of the gene, its characterization, and in vitro expression (4, 5). Only 4 years later, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the first commercially available recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO), epoetin alfa, for the treatment of anemia associated with chronic kidney disease (CKD) (6). Later on, it was approved also for use in patients with other anemias including cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy (7). Thereafter, rHuEPO became a leading drug for treatment of anemia virtually abolishing the need for RBC transfusion in some types of anemia. As a result, since the 1990s, several new erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESA) have become available on the market or are under development [reviewed in Ref. (8)].
Erythropoietin (EPO) was first considered to have a single biological purpose and action – the stimulation of RBC growth and differentiation and, as such safe, for use in cancer patients. Slowly, scientific and medical opinion evolved, beginning with the discovery of an effect on endothelial cell growth in vitro (9) and the identification of EPO receptors (EPORs) on neuronal cells (10). We now know that EPO is a pleiotropic growth factor that exhibits an anti-apoptotic action on numerous cells and tissues, including malignant ones [reviewed in Ref. (11–13)]. In this article, we present a short discussion of EPO, its signaling, and its action on non-hematopoietic cells. This is followed by a more detailed presentation of both pre-clinical and clinical data that demonstrate EPO’s diverse actions on cancer cells as well as possible receptors involved in the response of cancer cells to EPO/ESA therapy. Finally, we review current recommendations for the use of rHuEPO and other ESAs as supportive therapy in cancer patients with anemia that often develops during the radio- or chemotherapy.
Erythropoietin
The human EPO gene spans over 3 kb and contains five exons encoding a 193 amino acid protein (4, 5). It is a single copy gene located on chromosome 7 at position 7q22 (14, 15). A single splice variant of EPO gene is known (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/2056). Gene expression is regulated by oxygen levels through hypoxia. Transcription factors involved are stimulatory HIF-2, HNF-4alpha and inhibitory GATA-2, NF-kappaB [reviewed in Ref. (16, 17)].
During post-translation modification, the N-terminal 27 amino acid signal peptide is cleaved and R166 removed resulting in a 165 amino acid mature protein (18). Urinary protein containing 166 amino acids has also been characterized (19). The single-chain protein is heavily glycosylated with a molecular weight ranging from 30 to 39 kDa. Three N-linked (N24, N38, and N83) and one O-linked (S126) oligosaccharide side chains represent 35–40% of the EPO molecular mass. Protein structure is stabilized with two intra-chain disulfide bridges between C7–C161 and C29–C33 (19, 20). N glycosylation does not affect hormone function in vitro but is essential for in vivo biological activity like biosynthesis, structural stability, secretion, plasma half-life, and clearance (21–23).
In adult human beings, the hormone is produced mainly by the renal cortex (24, 25), while in the developing fetus, the liver is the principal source (26). EPO is secreted into the bloodstream, circulates to the bone marrow, and binds to EPOR situated on the cell surface of erythroid progenitors promoting their survival, proliferation, and differentiation (27). EPO is also produced by numerous non-hematopoietic cells and may act in endocrine, autocrine, and paracrine manner (28).
Commercially available rHuEPO has the same 165 amino acid sequence as naturally occurring hormone (29). However, the level of glycosylation in rHuEPO depends on the expression system used (30). Glycosylation pattern can be analyzed by isoelectric focusing enabling, thus distinguishing endogenous EPO (eEPO) from rHuEPO (31). Also, urinary and serum EPO have some minor heterogeneity in glycosylation levels (32).
Erythropoietin Signal Transduction
In classical signal transduction in erythropoiesis, one EPO molecule binds to an EPOR homo-dimer leading to activation of the EPO-EPOR signaling cascade. EPO has two non-identical binding sites toward EPOR receptors, a high-affinity G151 (nano-molar) to the first, and a low-affinity R103 (micro-molar) interaction to the second receptor (33). Main signaling pathways activated by EPO are JAK2/STAT5 pathway, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) pathway, RAS/MAP kinase pathway, and protein kinase C (PKC) pathway (34) (Figure 1). The JAK2/STAT5 and RAS/MAP kinase (RAS-RAF-MEK-ERK) pathways are associated with hormone mitogenic action, while the PI3K pathway (PI3K-AKT) is related with anti-apoptotic activities (27).
Figure 1. Erythropoietin receptor and signaling pathways. The structure of the receptor dimer is outlined; docking sites for several intracellular proteins are marked with P and linked with black-dotted arrow to individual pathway components. Positive interactions are presented with full black arrows, negative with dotted red.
In non-hematopoietic tissue, some other receptor partners have been proposed, including the beta common receptor (βcR) (35) and the epinephrine B4 receptor (EPHB4) (36). The EPO molecule was indicated to bind to the hetero-dimmer EPOR-EPHB4 or hetero-trimmer EPOR-βcR-EPOR. Most probably, the high-affinity site is involved in binding to EPOR, while other receptor partners are bound with low affinity or an alternative site resulting in activation of different, tissue-protective part of EPO-EPOR signaling cascade.
Erythropoietin receptor
The human EPOR gene spans over 6 kb and contains 8 exons encoding a 508 amino acid protein (37). The gene is located on chromosome 19 at position 19p13.3-p13.2 (38, 39). Several EPOR splice variants are known such as non-coding RNA, functional transmembrane protein (EPOR-F), truncated protein (EPOR-T), and at least one soluble variant (EPOR-S) (40–42) (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/2057).
EPO receptor is a member of the type I cytokine receptor superfamily (43). During post-translation modification, the N-terminal 24-amino acid signal peptide is cleaved and the protein is modified by glycosylation, phosphorylation, and ubiquitination to a mature 66–105 kDa protein (38, 44, 45). Mature human receptor consists of extracellular, single transmembrane, and cytoplasmic regions (46) (Figure 1).
The majority of the EPOR is located on the cell surface of erythroid progenitors, erythroid burst-forming units (BFU-E), and erythroid colony-forming units (CFU-E) in the bone marrow. However, the EPOR is expressed by various other tissues such as brain, heart, liver, and others where it is involved in the tissue protection. As EPOR is present in various cancer cells, the use of rHuEPO in cancer patients may be problematic due to potential activation of EPO-EPOR signaling pathways resulting in tumor protection (anti-apoptotic action) or proliferation (mitogenic action).
Beta common receptor (βcR)
The human colony-stimulating factor 2 receptor, beta (CSF2RB) gene contains 14 exons and is located on chromosome 22 at position 22q13.1 (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/1439). CSF2RB gene encodes β-common receptor (βcR), a common beta chain subunit of the high-affinity receptor for interleukin 3 (IL3), interleukin 5 (IL5), and CSF2 (granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor).
The interaction of EPOR with the βcR was discovered and tissue protection may be signaling through a heteroreceptor complex involving EPOR and βcR (35). This signaling network is still not understood but may involve signal pathways different from those triggered by EPOR-EPOR (47–50). The tissue-protective effects of EPO could be mediated by an EPOR heteroreceptor dimer EPOR-βcR or trimmer EPOR-βcR-EPOR (Figure 2).
Figure 2. EPOR-βcR receptor complex. Proposed structures of tissue-protective complexes are presented: heterotrimer including βcR homodimer with EPOR and heterodimer βcR with EPOR. Adapted from Brines and Cerami (47).
Ephrin type-B receptor 4 (EPHB4)
The human Ephrin receptor B4 (EPHB4) gene contains 17 exons and is located on chromosome 7 at position 7q22 (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/2050). Ephrin receptors were named Eph after the EPO-producing hepatocellular carcinoma cell line from which its cDNA was isolated. They form the largest family of receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) family. About 16 ephrin receptor genes (EphA1-10, EphB1-6) have been identified in the vertebrate genome (51), 14 of which are present in human beings. Ephrin receptors and their ligands, the ephrins, mediate numerus developmental processes. The protein encoded by EPHB4 gene binds to ephrin-B2 ligand and plays an essential role in vascular development. EPHB4 was indicated also as survival factor in several cancers (52, 53).
European patent application [EP 2 492 355 A1 (36)] discloses a molecular composition(s) of a novel tissue-protective EPO-binding receptor protein complex, termed NEPOR. NEPOR represents a novel EPOR derived from a unique combination of EPOR heteroreceptor dimer EPOR-EPHB4, homoreceptor EPOR-EPOR, and EPHB4-EPHB4, and other components derived from ephrin biology (Figure 3).
Figure 3. EPOR-tissue-protective erythropoietin receptor (nepor receptor complex). Proposed structure of EPO interacting complexes are presented: homodimer EPHB4, homodimer EPOR, and heterodimer EPHB4 with EPOR. Adapted from Jackson (36).
Other partners
Interaction of EPOR with several receptors has been indicated. Some interactions were suggested only on the level of receptor expression correlation (54, 55), others on adverse tumor response to receptor-specific therapy (56, 57). The exact mechanisms of these correlations is not known yet but are being intensively studied.
Increased EPOR expression was related to a reduced response to tamoxifen treatment, an estrogen receptor (ER) specific inhibitor (56). Furthermore, EPOR receptor was shown to enhance ER activity and promote cell proliferation (58). Several correlations between EPOR, ER, and other steroid receptors expression have been described (54, 55, 59, 60).
The antagonistic effect of EPOR and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) co-expression on transtuzumab therapy, a HER2 inhibiting antibody has also been observed (57). The JAK2-mediated activation of SRC and inactivation of PTEN have been proposed as underlying mechanisms.
Action of EPO on Non-Hematopoietic Cells
EPO and its receptor have been identified in several non-hematopoietic cells and tissue types like central nervous system, heart, kidney, gastrointestinal system, reproductive tract, endothelium, and others [reviewed in Ref. (11, 12, 61)]. In these tissues, EPO was shown to be tissue protective in an anti-apoptotic and/or mitogenic manner. Several ongoing pre-clinical and clinical trials are exploring the potential use of rHuEPO and other ESAs, such as tissue-protective agents in the brain, heart, and wound healing [reviewed in Ref. (62, 63)].
Furthermore, EPORs have been found also on several types of tumors and malignant cells [reviewed in Ref. (64–67)] questioning the use of recombinant EPO in cancer patients (68). We will now focus on a review of various effects of EPO and its receptor on cancer cells, being an update of EPO research reviewed by Szenajch et al. (13).
EPO and Cancer Cells Response
The presence of functional EPOR was demonstrated in cancer stem cells (69–71). Different types of tumors as well as cell lines have been found to express EPOR mRNA transcripts, which might be translated into full-length EPOR as well as soluble or other truncated forms (40). In this regard, Um et al. (72) measured internalized 125I-EPO and found that just 50 high-affinity cell surface EPO binding sites were sufficient for EPO-mediated activation of intracellular signal transduction in SH-SY5Y and PC-12 cancer cells. EPOR expression has been demonstrated by flow cytometry using a specific EPOR antibody in a panel of 29 tumor cell lines, including 18 adherent cell lines (73).
Despite the fact that many tumor cells were confirmed to possess the EPOR, there is still some debate on stimulatory effects of EPO on these cells. On the one hand, there are papers pointing to the proliferative response of cancer cells after rHuEPO treatment (55, 74–82); on the other hand, some tumor cells, in spite of evidence of EPOR functionality (67, 81), did not exhibit a growth response (67, 83–86). Our previous studies revealed a weak surface EPOR signal in A2780 cells with most of EPOR found in the cytoplasm, more abundantly as an intracellular membrane-associated protein than a soluble one. Silencing EPOR expression resulted in reduced A2780 proliferation as well as a reduction in EPO-induced phosphorylation of ERK1/2 (81). Unlike hematopoietic cells, where EPO-EPOR signaling is associated with increased cell proliferation and/or survival, in tumor cells, the EPO-EPOR axis does not always lead to increased proliferation but might increase the resistance of cancer cells to different therapies. For more information about the role of EPO and its receptor in growth, survival, and therapeutic response of human cancer cells, see the critical review of Szenajch et al. (13), where all information based on published EPO papers through 2010 is well summarized.
Recently, the presence of EPOR signaling and EPO-induced cellular proliferation was confirmed in renal cancer cells (80, 82), head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (77), and cervical cancer cell lines (78), as well as glioma cells (87).
Erythropoietin-induced proliferation of cancer cells was associated with the activation of JAK2, JAK3, STAT3, and STAT5 but not JAK1 or STAT1 (78), AKT phosphorylation (77), ERK phosphorylation (87) with hTERT gene transcription by JAK2/STAT5/c-MYC, and hTERT protein phosphorylation by PI3K/AKT (88). Furthermore, the EPO-EPOR pathway stimulated the expression of cyclin D1 and inhibiting the expression of p21cip1 and p27kip1 through the phosphorylation of JAK2 and ERK1/2, led to a more rapid progression through renal cancer cell cycle (82). Interestingly, EPO or stem cell factor (SCF) alone produced a modest number of cervical cancer cell colonies, whereas the combination EPO/SCF induced a significantly more. Similarly, co-stimulation with EPO/SCF induced a significantly higher number of migrating cervical cancer cells than either cytokine alone. Concurrently, EPO induced a modest, transient activation of ERK1/2, whereas SCF and EPO/SCF prompted a strong, sustained phosphorylation of ERK1/2 (89).
Erythropoietin was also involved in cell growth, invasion, survival, and sensitivity to the multikinase inhibitor sunitinib and cisplatin in renal cancer cells (80) and in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (77), respectively. In vitro, EPO had a protective effect on radiation-treated MDA-MB-435 cells; however, EPO treatment alone or combined with chemotherapy or hypoxia did not influence cell survival. In vivo, EPO increased lung metastases in immunocompromised mice injected with MDA-MB-231 or MDA-MB-435 cells and treated with chemotherapy relative to mice treated with chemotherapy alone (90).
Very recently, Trošt et al. (55) confirmed the results of Arcasoy et al. (91) with positive response of breast cancer cells to EPO. Moreover, they demonstrated time- and concentration-dependent manner of EPO-induced MCF-7 proliferation and EGR1, FOS, and EPOR as transcription targets of the EPO-EPOR signaling loop (55). In this regard, Inbar et al. (92) discovered that EPO-driven EGR1 and c-FOS gene expression, as well as histone H4 acetylation in breast cancer cells were mediated via polyADP-ribosylation. EPO-induced breast cancer cell migration was blocked by the PARP inhibitor Veliparib (ABT-888), suggesting an essential role for polyADP-ribosylation in this process and suggesting a new cancer-associated anemia treatment modality with combined administration of EPO and PARP inhibitors (92).
Recent research revealed that EPO/EPOR contributes to the mechanism of trastuzumab resistance in breast cancer cell line SKBR3, and EPOR downregulation can reverse the resistance to trastuzumab. EPOR expression may be involved in tumor progression and proliferation in HER2-positive breast cancer (93). Indeed, EPO antagonized trastuzumab-induced therapeutic effects through JAK2-mediated activation of SRC and inactivation of PTEN protein, so combined therapy of HER2-positive cancer cells with EPO and trastuzumab reduced the response of these cells to trastuzumab both in vitro and in vivo. Furthermore, concurrent administration of EPO and trastuzumab correlated with shorter progression-free and overall survival in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (57). The mechanism of EPO-EPOR and HER2 co-regulation in breast cancer was confirmed by miR-125b, which is downregulated in metastatic breast cancers and a significant positive correlation between EPOR and HER2 levels that are both targets of miR-125b was demonstrated (94).
Because of adverse tumor response and/or poorer survival in ESA-treated cancer patients, studies of EPO effects on cancer stem cells was initiated. Cao et al. (69) found that glioma stem cells (GSC) express higher levels of EPOR than matched non-stem glioma cells. They targeted EPOR expression in GSG with shRNA and reduced growth, survival, and neurosphere formation capacity, so confirmed the role for EPOR in GSC maintenance. A small molecule inhibitor of STAT3 led to reduced GSG growth and survival. EPO-EPOR signaling was also critical for survival in vivo, as targeting EPOR expression decreased GSC tumorigenic potential (69). Furthermore, Todaro et al. (71) showed that breast cancer stem-like cells (BCSC) isolated from patient tumors express the EPOR and respond to EPO treatment with increased proliferation and self-renewal. Importantly, EPO stimulation increased BCSC survival and resistance to chemotherapeutic agents, probably by EPO-activated AKT and ERK pathways and promoted metastatic progression of tumor xenografts in the presence and in the absence of chemotherapy treatment. These results suggest that EPO acts directly on BCSC by activating specific survival pathways, resulting in BCSC protection from chemotherapy and enhanced tumor progression (71). Moreover, EPO/EPOR promoted tumorigenesis in genetically engineered mouse models of breast cancer by activating JAK/STAT signaling in breast tumor-initiating cells (TICs) and promoted its self-renewal. EPO gene expression correlated with shortened relapse-free survival and pharmacologic JAK2 inhibition revealed a synergistic effect with chemotherapy in tumor growth inhibition in vivo (70).
EPO and Tumor Angiogenesis and Lymphangiogenesis
In 1990, Anagnostou et al. (9) found that EPO enhances the proliferation and migration of human umbilical vein endothelial cells and bovine adrenal capillary endothelial cells (95, 96) and demonstrated the presence of EPOR mRNA in human umbilical vein endothelial cells, as well as strong positive EPOR protein staining of the vascular endothelium in vivo (97). The presence of EPOR was also shown by Yamaji et al. (98), who suggested that brain capillary endothelial cells express not only an authentic form of EPOR (EPOR-F) but also a soluble one (EPOR-S) and that EPO acts directly on brain capillary endothelial cells as a competence factor. EPO signaling as a mitogen of endothelial cells was conducted via tyrosine phosphorylation of proteins including phosphorylation of transcription factor STAT-5, which is similar to that occurring in erythroid cells (99). Moreover, experiments performed in cultured vascular cells demonstrated that EPO robustly induced phosphorylation of STAT-5 in HUVEC cells, but only very weakly in smooth muscle cells (100). Results of our group revealed that conditioned media of EPO treated A2780 cells under hypoxic conditions induced significant STAT-5 phosphorylation, as well as proliferation of HUVEC cells. A new finding is the fact that pro-stimulatory effect of hypoxic A2780 media was partly mediated by EPO. Furthermore, EPO increased secretion of IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12, IL-13, GM-CSF, and IFN γ by A2780 cells in hypoxic conditions (101).
An in vivo angiogenic potential of EPO was originally demonstrated by Yasuda et al. (102) who found that injection of EPO into the ovariectomized mouse uterine cavity promoted blood vessel formation of the endometrium. Similarly, Ribatti et al. (103) demonstrated that EPO induced a potent in vivo angiogenic response of the chick embryo chorioallantoic membrane. Furthermore, the role of EPO in physiological angiogenesis was described during wound healing and in the developing of mouse embryo (104, 105).
The study of Yasuda et al. (106) revealed that normal human cervix and endometrium, as well as ovary malignant tumors of female reproductive organs produce EPO and EPOR, and that the tumor cells themselves and capillary endothelial cells are sites responsive to the EPO signal. Yasuda et al. (107) proposed the presence of a paracrine or autocrine EPO-EPOR loop and its contribution to tumorigenesis in female reproductive organs based on the mitogenic action of EPO as well as on the finding that injection of soluble EPOR (EPOR-S) or EPO-monoclonal antibody into blocks of tumor specimens was followed by apoptosis of tumor cells and endothelial cells. Although some studies have not confirmed a direct stimulatory effect of EPO on tumor cells, there is ample evidence of this effect on endothelial cell proliferation and/or angiogenesis of tumors. In this regard, EPO xinduced angiogenesis in chemically induced murine hepatic tumors (108) and accelerated the growth of EPOR negative Lewis lung carcinoma cells by promoting tumor angiogenesis in vivo (109).
Interestingly, an EPO analog stimulated neovascularization in colorectal liver metastases of hepatectomized and non-hepatectomized mice (110). Moreover, Nico et al. (111) demonstrated that EPO secreted by glioma tumor cells affected glioma vascular endothelial cells and promoted angiogenesis in a paracrine manner. Specificity of the EPO effect was shown through an anti-EPO antibody, which was able to significantly inhibit the angiogenesis response. Despite the absence of melanoma growth stimulation in vivo, EPO increased vascular size in the xenografts. Indeed, EPO-induced angiogenesis in Matrigel plug assays, and neutralization of EPO secreted by melanoma cells resulted in decreased angiogenesis, which supports the role of EPO/EPOR in melanoma progression via angiogenesis stimulation (112). Even more interestingly, EPO accelerated the tumor growth of MMQ pituitary adenoma xenografts lacking EPOR via enhancement of angiogenesis in vivo, without a direct EPO effect on MMQ cells in vitro. EPO administration increased phosphorylation of JAK2, STAT3, and VEGF expression in HUVEC cells in vitro and in MMQ cell xenografts in vivo (113). The authors suggest that EPO administration may promote the growth of pituitary adenomas by enhancing angiogenesis through EPO-JAK2-STAT3-VEGF signaling pathway and should be used with caution in anemia patients bearing pituitary adenoma due to its potential deleterious effects (113). On the contrary, very recently Pascual et al. (114) found that preoperative administration of EPO stimulates tumor recurrence in an animal model of colon cancer, but no evidence of increased angiogenesis or enhanced-cell proliferation as possible mechanisms of EPO-induced recurrence was seen. Importantly, EPO/EPOR levels correlated well with angiogenesis and progression of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, neuroblastoma, squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue, melanoma, and gastric adenocarcinoma (115–120).
The lymph node as a new target of EPO was presented by Lee et al. (121) They showed that EPO can stimulate both lymph node lymphangiogenesis and nodal metastasis by increased migration, capillary-like tube formation, and dose- and time-dependent proliferation of human lymphatic endothelial cells in tumor-bearing animals. Intraperitoneal administration of EPO induced AKT and ERK1/2 signalization followed by peritoneal lymphangiogenesis stimulation. Furthermore, systemic treatment of EPO increased infiltration of CD11b(+) macrophages in tumor-draining lymph nodes and increased VEGF-C expression in lymph node-derived CD11b(+) macrophages, as well as in bone marrow-derived macrophages in a dose- and time-dependent manner (121).
According to McKinney and Arcasoy (122), there are two potential mechanisms by which rHuEPO therapy may promote tumor progression and reduce survival in some cancer patients: (1) rHuEPO therapy may exert local effects in tumors, acting directly on tumor cells or other cell types in the tumor microenvironment, such as the vascular endothelium and tumor-associated macrophages or (2) rHuEPO may cause systemic effects that indirectly alter tumor biology in an unfavorable manner or directly give rise to specific systemic toxicities that impair survival. In this regard, elevated hemoglobin, increased viscosity, platelet activation, endothelial progenitor mobilization, immunomodulatory effects, and others could play significant roles. We add a third potential mechanism and this is direct effect of EPO on cancer stem and/or TICs, which could explain enhanced tumor progression and poor survival of some cancer patients treated with EPO.
EPO (ESA) and Clinical Studies
Several clinical trials have addressed the effects of one of the EPO/ESA treatments on disease control in cancer patients on co-temporal anti-cancer therapy, such as chemotherapy, radiotherapy, neoadjuvant therapy, and surgery. Such EPO/ESA treatments are long termed and rarely single dosed. The review of clinical trials performed between 2009 and 2014 is presented in Table 1, being an update of review by Szenajch et al. (13). Some of the studies indicate a negative outcome (marked in gray). Most of the reported negative effects are due to increased thrombotic events, a complication driven by an increased number of RBC (123–134). However, some of the studies also indicate a reduced recurrence free survival and overall survival (128, 129, 135–137). Negative effects on overall survival were already shown previously by several studies, reviewed by Szenajch et al. (13).
Table 1. Clinical trials with reported effects of ESA in cancer patients performed between 2009 and 2014.
Clinical studies exploring the prognostic significance of EPO and EPOR expression in cancer patients have also been explored and are listed in Table 2. Several studies indicated increased EPO expression as prognostic factor for reduced overall survival (120, 177) or vice versa, no EPO expression as prognostic factor for increased overall survival (178, 179). Furthermore, increased EPOR expression was identified as prognostic factor for reduced overall survival, more aggressive tumor behavior, and progression-free survival (57, 73, 120, 180–182). Increased EPOR expression was also linked to reduced response to anti-cancer treatment (56, 57). While no or reduced EPOR expression was identified as prognostic factor for increased overall survival (178) and in contrast, also to increased cancer recurrence rate (183). Most of these studies did not characterize the subtype of EPOR isoforms, which is crucial for interpretation of the data, as indicated by Küster et al. (183).
Table 2. Clinical studies exploring prognostic significance of EPO and EPOR expression in cancer patients.
Based on discussed clinical studies, the adverse effect of EPO/ESA in cancer patients during anti-cancer therapy could be related to chronic EPO treatment. Such EPO/ESA treatments are long termed and rarely single dosed. We suggest that the concurrent use of long-termed EPO/ESA and anti-cancer treatment is the main reason for EPO/ESA negative effects on response to anti-cancer therapy, overall survival, and disease recurrence. The mechanisms are still not well understood and more profound molecular and biochemical characterization is needed; however, they may be linked to one of the EPO/ESA mechanisms indicated in the previous chapter. EPOR, βcR, and EPHB4 were previously shown to be expressed in various tumors. We do speculate that one of these receptors and/or possible analogs of these receptors may be involved in the response of cancer cells to EPO/ESA therapy.
Conclusion
A plethora of scientific evidence demonstrates a growth-promoting, anti-apoptotic action of EPO and other ESAs on non-hematopoietic cells, both normal and malignant, and this is supported by numerous clinical observations showing adverse effects of EPO administration on the clinical management of tumor growth and progression. As anticipated just a few years ago (28), physicians who care for anemic cancer patients have been facing a dilemma, whether to treat the anemic patient with an ESA, thereby potentially increasing the risk of worsening the malignancy, or to withhold ESA treatment, with resultant patient fatigue, reduced physical activity, increased hypoxic stress, and reliance on transfusion therapy. Primary tumors are not yet EPOR typed (like breast cancers are assessed for ER/PR expression) though this idea should be considered. There has been much discussion of EPO use in cancer patients, and several professional and regulatory organizations and authorities have issued various guidances. Perhaps, the following “rule” used by several clinicians interviewed by one of the authors should be considered. If the cancer patient is being treated with curative intent, avoid the use of ESAs. If the treatment plan is more conservative or palliative, consider ESAs for anemia treatment, but proceed with great caution.
Author Contributions
Nataša Debeljak outlined the work. All authors designed and drafted the work. Arthur J. Sytkowski critically revised the work. All authors approved final version of the work and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work.
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Acknowledgments
Nataša Debeljak was supported by the J3-0124 grant to ND and P1-0104 to Radovan Komel, both from the Slovenian Research Agency. Peter Solár was partly supported by Scientific Grant Agency of the Ministry of Education of the Slovak Republic under contract no. VEGA 1/0733/12. Arthur J. Sytkowski acknowledges the support of Quintiles Transnational where he is an executive director, hematology and oncology, in the Therapeutic Delivery Unit. The authors thank Klemen Španinger for contribution of Figure 1.
References
1. Carnot P, Deflandre C. Sur l’activité hémopoiétique du sérum au cours de la régénération du sang. C R Acad Sci Paris (1906) 143:384–435.
3. Miyake T, Kung CK, Goldwasser E. Purification of human erythropoietin. J Biol Chem (1977) 252(15):5558–64.
4. Jacobs K, Shoemaker C, Rudersdorf R, Neill SD, Kaufman RJ, Mufson A, et al. Isolation and characterization of genomic and cDNA clones of human erythropoietin. Nature (1985) 313(6005):806–10. doi: 10.1038/313806a0
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
5. Lin FK, Suggs S, Lin CH, Browne JK, Smalling R, Egrie JC, et al. Cloning and expression of the human erythropoietin gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (1985) 82(22):7580–4. doi:10.1073/pnas.82.22.7580
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
6. Eschbach JW, Egrie JC, Downing MR, Browne JK, Adamson JW. Correction of the anemia of end-stage renal disease with recombinant human erythropoietin. Results of a combined phase I and II clinical trial. N Engl J Med (1987) 316(2):73–8. doi:10.1056/NEJM198701083160203
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
7. Glaspy J, Bukowski R, Steinberg D, Taylor C, Tchekmedyian S, Vadhan-Raj S. Impact of therapy with epoetin alfa on clinical outcomes in patients with nonmyeloid malignancies during cancer chemotherapy in community oncology practice Procrit Study Group. J Clin Oncol (1997) 15(3):1218–34.
8. Debeljak N, Sytkowski AJ. Erythropoietin and erythropoiesis stimulating agents. Drug Test Anal (2012) 4(11):805–12. doi:10.1002/dta.1341
9. Anagnostou A, Lee ES, Kessimian N, Levinson R, Steiner M. Erythropoietin has a mitogenic and positive chemotactic effect on endothelial cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (1990) 87(15):5978–82. doi:10.1073/pnas.87.15.5978
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
10. Digicaylioglu M, Bichet S, Marti HH, Wenger RH, Rivas LA, Bauer C, et al. Localization of specific erythropoietin binding sites in defined areas of the mouse brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (1995) 92(9):3717–20. doi:10.1073/pnas.92.9.3717
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
11. Jelkmann W, Wagner K. Beneficial and ominous aspects of the pleiotropic action of erythropoietin. Ann Hematol (2004) 83(11):673–86. doi:10.1007/s00277-004-0911-6
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
12. Maiese K, Li F, Chong ZZ. New avenues of exploration for erythropoietin. JAMA (2005) 293(1):90–5. doi:10.1001/jama.293.1.90
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
13. Szenajch J, Wcislo G, Jeong JY, Szczylik C, Feldman L. The role of erythropoietin and its receptor in growth, survival and therapeutic response of human tumor cells from clinic to bench – a critical review. Biochim Biophys Acta (2010) 1806(1):82–95. doi:10.1016/j.bbcan.2010.04.002
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
14. Powell JS, Berkner KL, Lebo RV, Adamson JW. Human erythropoietin gene: high level expression in stably transfected mammalian cells and chromosome localization. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (1986) 83(17):6465–9. doi:10.1073/pnas.83.17.6465
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
15. Watkins PC, Eddy R, Hoffman N, Stanislovitis P, Beck AK, Galli J, et al. Regional assignment of the erythropoietin gene to human chromosome region 7pter–q22. Cytogenet Cell Genet (1986) 42(4):214–8. doi:10.1159/000132281
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
16. Jelkmann W. Control of erythropoietin gene expression and its use in medicine. Methods Enzymol (2007) 435:179–97. doi:10.1016/S0076-6879(07)35010-6
17. Stockmann C, Fandrey J. Hypoxia-induced erythropoietin production: a paradigm for oxygen-regulated gene expression. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol (2006) 33(10):968–79. doi:10.1111/j.1440-1681.2006.04474.x
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
18. Rahbek-Nielsen H, Roepstorff P, Reischl H, Wozny M, Koll H, Haselbeck A. Glycopeptide profiling of human urinary erythropoietin by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry. J Mass Spectrom (1997) 32(9):948–58. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1096-9888(199709)32:9<948::AID-JMS551>3.0.CO;2-C
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
19. Lai PH, Everett R, Wang FF, Arakawa T, Goldwasser E. Structural characterization of human erythropoietin. J Biol Chem (1986) 261(7):3116–21.
20. Romanowski RR, Sytkowski AJ. The molecular structure of human erythropoietin. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am (1994) 8(5):885–94.
21. Delorme E, Lorenzini T, Giffin J, Martin F, Jacobsen F, Boone T, et al. Role of glycosylation on the secretion and biological activity of erythropoietin. Biochemistry (1992) 31(41):9871–6. doi:10.1021/bi00156a003
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
22. Dube S, Fisher JW, Powell JS. Glycosylation at specific sites of erythropoietin is essential for biosynthesis, secretion, and biological function. J Biol Chem (1988) 263(33):17516–21.
23. Sytkowski AJ, Feldman L, Zurbuch DJ. Biological activity and structural stability of N-deglycosylated recombinant human erythropoietin. Biochem Biophys Res Commun (1991) 176(2):698–704. doi:10.1016/S0006-291X(05)80240-2
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
24. Bachmann S, Le Hir M, Eckardt KU. Co-localization of erythropoietin mRNA and ecto-5’-nucleotidase immunoreactivity in peritubular cells of rat renal cortex indicates that fibroblasts produce erythropoietin. J Histochem Cytochem (1993) 41(3):335–41. doi:10.1177/41.3.8429197
25. Maxwell PH, Ferguson DJ, Nicholls LG, Iredale JP, Pugh CW, Johnson MH, et al. Sites of erythropoietin production. Kidney Int (1997) 51(2):393–401. doi:10.1038/ki.1997.52
26. Juul SE, Yachnis AT, Christensen RD. Tissue distribution of erythropoietin and erythropoietin receptor in the developing human fetus. Early Hum Dev (1998) 52(3):235–49. doi:10.1016/S0378-3782(98)00030-9
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
28. Sytkowski AJ. Does erythropoietin have a dark side? Epo signaling and cancer cells. Sci STKE (2007) 2007(395):e38. doi:10.1126/stke.3952007pe38
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
29. Recny MA, Scoble HA, Kim Y. Structural characterization of natural human urinary and recombinant DNA-derived erythropoietin. Identification of des-arginine 166 erythropoietin. J Biol Chem (1987) 262(35):17156–63.
30. Spaninger K, Borštnar S, Matos E, Možina B, Sytkowski AJ, Komel R, et al. Report on isoelectric focusing trial of erythropoietin profiling in two cancer patients during chemotherapy and darbepoetin treatment. Acta Chim Slov (2011) 58(1):139–43.
31. Lasne F, Martin L, Crepin N, de Ceaurriz J. Detection of isoelectric profiles of erythropoietin in urine: differentiation of natural and administered recombinant hormones. Anal Biochem (2002) 311(2):119–26. doi:10.1016/S0003-2697(02)00407-4
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
32. Lasne F, Thioulouse J, Martin L, de Ceaurriz J. Detection of recombinant human erythropoietin in urine for doping analysis: interpretation of isoelectric profiles by discriminant analysis. Electrophoresis (2007) 28(12):1875–81. doi:10.1002/elps.200600363
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
33. Philo JS, Aoki KH, Arakawa T, Narhi LO, Wen J. Dimerization of the extracellular domain of the erythropoietin (EPO) receptor by EPO: one high-affinity and one low-affinity interaction. Biochemistry (1996) 35(5):1681–91. doi:10.1021/bi9524272
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
34. N Debeljak AJ Sytkowski. EpoR: Basic Sequence: Mouse. UCSD Nature Molecule Pages. (2007). doi:10.1038/mp.a000863.01
35. Brines M, Grasso G, Fiordaliso F, Sfacteria A, Ghezzi P, Fratelli M, et al. Erythropoietin mediates tissue protection through an erythropoietin and common beta-subunit heteroreceptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (2004) 101(41):14907–12. doi:10.1073/pnas.0406491101
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
36. Jackson DB, Stein M, Voss H, Brock S. Tissue protective erythropoietin receptor (nepor) and methods of use. European Patent Application EP 2 492 355 A1 (2012).
37. Penny LA, Forget BG. Genomic organization of the human erythropoietin receptor gene. Genomics (1991) 11(4):974–80. doi:10.1016/0888-7543(91)90022-7
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
38. Jones SS, D’Andrea AD, Haines LL, Wong GG. Human erythropoietin receptor: cloning, expression, and biologic characterization. Blood (1990) 76(1):31–5.
39. Winkelmann JC, Penny LA, Deaven LL, Forget BG, Jenkins RB. The gene for the human erythropoietin receptor: analysis of the coding sequence and assignment to chromosome 19p. Blood (1990) 76(1):24–30.
40. Arcasoy MO, Jiang X, Haroon ZA. Expression of erythropoietin receptor splice variants in human cancer. Biochem Biophys Res Commun (2003) 307(4):999–1007. doi:10.1016/S0006-291X(03)01303-2
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
41. Harris KW, Winkelmann JC. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay detects a potential soluble form of the erythropoietin receptor in human plasma. Am J Hematol (1996) 52(1):8–13. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1096-8652(199605)52:1<8::AID-AJH2>3.3.CO;2-O
42. Sinclair AM, Todd MD, Forsythe K, Knox SJ, Elliott S, Begley CG. Expression and function of erythropoietin receptors in tumors: implications for the use of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in cancer patients. Cancer (2007) 110(3):477–88. doi:10.1002/cncr.22832
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
43. Bazan JF. Haemopoietic receptors and helical cytokines. Immunol Today (1990) 11(10):350–4. doi:10.1016/0167-5699(90)90139-Z
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
44. Bailey SC, Feldman L, Romanowski RR, Davis KL, Sytkowski AJ. Antipeptide antibodies as probes of the recombinant and endogenous murine erythropoietin receptors. Exp Hematol (1993) 21(12):1535–43.
45. Hosoi S, Miyaji H, Satoh M, Kurimoto T, Mihara A, Fujiyoshi N, et al. Optimization of cell culture conditions for production of biologically active proteins. Cytotechnology (1991) 5(Suppl 2):17–34. doi:10.1007/BF00573878
46. McCaffery PJ, Fraser JK, Lin FK, Berridge MV. Subunit structure of the erythropoietin receptor. J Biol Chem (1989) 264(18):10507–12.
47. Brines M, Cerami A. Emerging biological roles for erythropoietin in the nervous system. Nat Rev Neurosci (2005) 6(6):484–94. doi:10.1038/nrn1687
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
48. Brines M, Cerami A. The receptor that tames the innate immune response. Mol Med (2012) 18:486–96. doi:10.2119/molmed.2011.00414
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
49. Brines M, Patel NS, Villa P, Brines C, Mennini T, De Paola M, et al. Nonerythropoietic, tissue-protective peptides derived from the tertiary structure of erythropoietin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (2008) 105(31):10925–30. doi:10.1073/pnas.0805594105
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
50. Ghezzi P, Brines M. Erythropoietin as an antiapoptotic, tissue-protective cytokine. Cell Death Differ (2004) 11(Suppl 1):S37–44. doi:10.1038/sj.cdd.4401450
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
51. Pasquale EB. Eph receptor signalling casts a wide net on cell behaviour. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol (2005) 6(6):462–75. doi:10.1038/nrm1690
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
52. Kumar SR, Singh J, Xia G, Krasnoperov V, Hassanieh L, Ley EJ, et al. Receptor tyrosine kinase EphB4 is a survival factor in breast cancer. Am J Pathol (2006) 169(1):279–93. doi:10.2353/ajpath.2006.050889
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
53. Noren NK, Pasquale EB. Paradoxes of the EphB4 receptor in cancer. Cancer Res (2007) 67(9):3994–7. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-0525
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
54. Pelekanou V, Kampa M, Kafousi M, Dambaki K, Darivianaki K, Vrekoussis T, et al. Erythropoietin and its receptor in breast cancer: correlation with steroid receptors and outcome. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev (2007) 16(10):2016–23. doi:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-1023
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
55. Trošt N, Hevir N, Rižner TL, Debeljak N. Correlation between erythropoietin receptor(s) and estrogen and progesterone receptor expression in different breast cancer cell lines. Int J Mol Med (2013) 31(3):717–25. doi:10.3892/ijmm.2013.1231
56. Larsson AM, Jirström K, Fredlund E, Nilsson S, Rydén L, Landberg G, et al. Erythropoietin receptor expression and correlation to tamoxifen response and prognosis in breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res (2009) 15(17):5552–9. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-3014
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
57. Liang K, Esteva FJ, Albarracin C, Stemke-Hale K, Lu Y, Bianchini G, et al. Recombinant human erythropoietin antagonizes trastuzumab treatment of breast cancer cells via Jak2-mediated Src activation and PTEN inactivation. Cancer Cell (2010) 18(5):423–35. doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2010.10.025
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
58. Reinbothe S, Larsson AM, Vaapil M, Wigerup C, Sun J, Jögi A, et al. EPO-independent functional EPO receptor in breast cancer enhances estrogen receptor activity and promotes cell proliferation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun (2014) 445(1):163–9. doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2014.01.165
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
59. Pelekanou V, Notas G, Sanidas E, Tsapis A, Castanas E, Kampa M. Testosterone membrane-initiated action in breast cancer cells: interaction with the androgen signaling pathway and EPOR. Mol Oncol (2010) 4(2):135–49. doi:10.1016/j.molonc.2010.01.004
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
60. Notas G, Kampa M, Pelekanou V, Castanas E. Interplay of estrogen receptors and GPR30 for the regulation of early membrane initiated transcriptional effects: a pharmacological approach. Steroids (2012) 77(10):943–50. doi:10.1016/j.steroids.2011.11.005
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
61. Arcasoy MO. The non-haematopoietic biological effects of erythropoietin. Br J Haematol (2008) 141(1):14–31. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2141.2008.07014.x
62. Mastromarino V, Musumeci MB, Conti E, Tocci G, Volpe M. Erythropoietin in cardiac disease: effective or harmful? J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown) (2013) 14(12):870–8. doi:10.2459/JCM.0b013e328362c6ae
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
63. Sorg H, Harder Y, Krueger C, Reimers K, Vogt PM. The nonhematopoietic effects of erythropoietin in skin regeneration and repair: from basic research to clinical use. Med Res Rev (2013) 33(3):637–64. doi:10.1002/med.21259
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
64. Farrell F, Lee A. The erythropoietin receptor and its expression in tumor cells and other tissues. Oncologist (2004) 9(Suppl 5):18–30. doi:10.1634/theoncologist.9-90005-18
65. Hardee ME, Arcasoy MO, Blackwell KL, Kirkpatrick JP, Dewhirst MW. Erythropoietin biology in cancer. Clin Cancer Res (2006) 12(2):332–9. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-1771
66. Udupa KB. Functional significance of erythropoietin receptor on tumor cells. World J Gastroenterol (2006) 12(46):7460–2. doi:10.3748/wjg.v12.i46.7460
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
67. Jeong JY, Feldman L, Solar P, Szenajch J, Sytkowski AJ. Characterization of erythropoietin receptor and erythropoietin expression and function in human ovarian cancer cells. Int J Cancer (2008) 122(2):274–80. doi:10.1002/ijc.23068
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
68. Osterborg A, Aapro M, Cornes P, Haselbeck A, Hayward CR, Jelkmann W. Preclinical studies of erythropoietin receptor expression in tumour cells: impact on clinical use of erythropoietic proteins to correct cancer-related anaemia. Eur J Cancer (2007) 43(3):510–9. doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2006.10.012
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
69. Cao Y, Lathia JD, Eyler CE, Wu Q, Li Z, Wang H, et al. Erythropoietin receptor signaling through STAT3 is required for glioma stem cell maintenance. Genes Cancer (2010) 1(1):50–61. doi:10.1177/1947601909356352
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
70. Zhou B, Damrauer JS, Bailey ST, Hadzic T, Jeong Y, Clark K, et al. Erythropoietin promotes breast tumorigenesis through tumor-initiating cell self-renewal. J Clin Invest (2014) 124(2):553–63. doi:10.1172/JCI69804
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
71. Todaro M, Turdo A, Bartucci M, Iovino F, Dattilo R, Biffoni M, et al. Erythropoietin activates cell survival pathways in breast cancer stem-like cells to protect them from chemotherapy. Cancer Res (2013) 73(21):6393–400. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-0248
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
72. Um M, Gross AW, Lodish HF. A “classical” homodimeric erythropoietin receptor is essential for the antiapoptotic effects of erythropoietin on differentiated neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y and pheochromocytoma PC-12 cells. Cell Signal (2007) 19(3):634–45. doi:10.1016/j.cellsig.2006.08.014
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
73. Miller CP, Lowe KA, Valliant-Saunders K, Kaiser JF, Mattern D, Urban N, et al. Evaluating erythropoietin-associated tumor progression using archival tissues from a phase III clinical trial. Stem Cells (2009) 27(9):2353–61. doi:10.1002/stem.156
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
74. Feldman L, Wang Y, Rhim JS, Bhattacharya N, Loda M, Sytkowski AJ. Erythropoietin stimulates growth and STAT5 phosphorylation in human prostate epithelial and prostate cancer cells. Prostate (2006) 66(2):135–45. doi:10.1002/pros.20310
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
75. Lai SY, Childs EE, Xi S, Coppelli FM, Gooding WE, Wells A, et al. Erythropoietin-mediated activation of JAK-STAT signaling contributes to cellular invasion in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Oncogene (2005) 24(27):4442–9. doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1208635
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
76. Westenfelder C, Baranowski RL. Erythropoietin stimulates proliferation of human renal carcinoma cells. Kidney Int (2000) 58(2):647–57. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1755.2000.00211.x
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
77. Abhold E, Rahimy E, Wang-Rodriguez J, Blair KJ, Yu MA, Brumund KT, et al. Recombinant human erythropoietin promotes the acquisition of a malignant phenotype in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cell lines in vitro. BMC Res Notes (2011) 4:553. doi:10.1186/1756-0500-4-553
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
78. Lopez TV, Lappin TR, Maxwell P, Shi Z, Lopez-Marure R, Aguilar C, et al. Autocrine/paracrine erythropoietin signalling promotes JAK/STAT-dependent proliferation of human cervical cancer cells. Int J Cancer (2011) 129(11):2566–76. doi:10.1002/ijc.25935
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
79. Jeong JY, Hoxhaj G, Socha AL, Sytkowski AJ, Feldman L. An erythropoietin autocrine/paracrine axis modulates the growth and survival of human prostate cancer cells. Mol Cancer Res (2009) 7(7):1150–7. doi:10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-08-0243
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
80. Wu P, Zhang N, Wang X, Zhang C, Li T, Ning X, et al. The erythropoietin/erythropoietin receptor signaling pathway promotes growth and invasion abilities in human renal carcinoma cells. PLoS One (2012) 7(9):e45122. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0045122
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
81. Solár P, Hrcková G, Varinská L, Solárová Z, Kriška J, Uhrínová I, et al. Location and the functionality of erythropoietin receptor(s) in A2780 cells. Oncol Rep (2012) 28(1):141–6. doi:10.3892/or.2012.1795
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
82. Miyake M, Goodison S, Lawton A, Zhang G, Gomes-Giacoia E, Rosser CJ. Erythropoietin is a JAK2 and ERK1/2 effector that can promote renal tumor cell proliferation under hypoxic conditions. J Hematol Oncol (2013) 6:65. doi:10.1186/1756-8722-6-65
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
83. Paragh G, Kumar SM, Rakosy Z, Choi SC, Xu X, Acs G. RNA interference-mediated inhibition of erythropoietin receptor expression suppresses tumor growth and invasiveness in A2780 human ovarian carcinoma cells. Am J Pathol (2009) 174(4):1504–14. doi:10.2353/ajpath.2009.080592
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
84. Selzer E, Wacheck V, Kodym R, Schlagbauer-Wadl H, Schlegel W, Pehamberger H, et al. Erythropoietin receptor expression in human melanoma cells. Melanoma Res (2000) 10(5):421–6. doi:10.1097/00008390-200010000-00003
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
85. Shiozawa Y, McGee S, Pienta MJ, McGregor N, Jung Y, Yumoto K, et al. Erythropoietin supports the survival of prostate cancer, but not growth and bone metastasis. J Cell Biochem (2013) 114(11):2471–8. doi:10.1002/jcb.24592
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
86. Swift S, Ellison AR, Kassner P, McCaffery I, Rossi J, Sinclair AM, et al. Absence of functional EpoR expression in human tumor cell lines. Blood (2010) 115(21):4254–63. doi:10.1182/blood-2009-10-248674
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
87. Pérès EA, Valable S, Guillamo JS, Marteau L, Bernaudin JF, Roussel S, et al. Targeting the erythropoietin receptor on glioma cells reduces tumour growth. Exp Cell Res (2011) 317(16):2321–32. doi:10.1016/j.yexcr.2011.06.011
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
88. Akiyama M, Kawano T, Mikami-Terao Y, Agawa-Ohta M, Yamada O, Ida H, et al. Erythropoietin activates telomerase through transcriptional and posttranscriptional regulation in human erythroleukemic JAS-REN-A cells. Leuk Res (2011) 35(3):416–8. doi:10.1016/j.leukres.2010.11.002
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
89. Aguilar C, Aguilar C, Lopez-Marure R, Jiménez-Sánchez A, Rocha-Zavaleta L. Co-stimulation with stem cell factor and erythropoietin enhances migration of c-Kit expressing cervical cancer cells through the sustained activation of ERK1/2. Mol Med Rep (2014) 9(5):1895–902. doi:10.3892/mmr.2014.2044
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
90. Hedley BD, Chu JE, Ormond DG, Beausoleil MS, Boasie A, Allan AL, et al. Recombinant human erythropoietin in combination with chemotherapy increases breast cancer metastasis in preclinical mouse models. Clin Cancer Res (2011) 17(19):6151–62. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-3298
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
91. Arcasoy MO, Amin K, Karayal AF, Chou SC, Raleigh JA, Varia MA, et al. Functional significance of erythropoietin receptor expression in breast cancer. Lab Invest (2002) 82(7):911–8. doi:10.1097/01.LAB.0000020415.72863.40
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
92. Inbar D, Cohen-Armon M, Neumann D. Erythropoietin-driven signalling and cell migration mediated by polyADP-ribosylation. Br J Cancer (2012) 107(8):1317–26. doi:10.1038/bjc.2012.395
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
93. Zhang C, Duan X, Xu L, Ye J, Zhao J, Liu Y. Erythropoietin receptor expression and its relationship with trastuzumab response and resistance in HER2-positive breast cancer cells. Breast Cancer Res Treat (2012) 136(3):739–48. doi:10.1007/s10549-012-2316-x
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
94. Ferracin M, Bassi C, Pedriali M, Pagotto S, D’Abundo L, Zagatti B, et al. miR-125b targets erythropoietin and its receptor and their expression correlates with metastatic potential and ERBB2/HER2 expression. Mol Cancer (2013) 12(1):130. doi:10.1186/1476-4598-12-130
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
95. Carlini RG, Dusso AS, Obialo CI, Alvarez UM, Rothstein M. Recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) increases endothelin-1 release by endothelial cells. Kidney Int (1993) 43(5):1010–4. doi:10.1038/ki.1993.142
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
96. Carlini RG, Reyes AA, Rothstein M. Recombinant human erythropoietin stimulates angiogenesis in vitro. Kidney Int (1995) 47(3):740–5. doi:10.1038/ki.1995.113
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
97. Anagnostou A, Liu Z, Steiner M, Chin K, Lee ES, Kessimian N, et al. Erythropoietin receptor mRNA expression in human endothelial cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (1994) 91(9):3974–8. doi:10.1073/pnas.91.9.3974
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
98. Yamaji R, Okada T, Moriya M, Naito M, Tsuruo T, Miyatake K, et al. Brain capillary endothelial cells express two forms of erythropoietin receptor mRNA. Eur J Biochem (1996) 239(2):494–500. doi:10.1111/j.1432-1033.1996.0494u.x
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
99. Haller H, Christel C, Dannenberg L, Thiele P, Lindschau C, Luft FC. Signal transduction of erythropoietin in endothelial cells. Kidney Int (1996) 50(2):481–8. doi:10.1038/ki.1996.339
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
100. Janmaat ML, Heerkens JL, de Bruin AM, Klous A, de Waard V, de Vries CJ. Erythropoietin accelerates smooth muscle cell-rich vascular lesion formation in mice through endothelial cell activation involving enhanced PDGF-BB release. Blood (2010) 115(7):1453–60. doi:10.1182/blood-2009-07-230870
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
101. Kriška J, Solár P, Varinská L, Solárová Z, Kimáková P, Mojžiš J, et al. Human erythropoietin increases the pro-angiogenic potential of A2780 ovarian adenocarcinoma cells under hypoxic conditions. Oncol Rep (2013) 30(3):1455–62. doi:10.3892/or.2013.2566
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
102. Yasuda Y, Masuda S, Chikuma M, Inoue K, Nagao M, Sasaki R. Estrogen-dependent production of erythropoietin in uterus and its implication in uterine angiogenesis. J Biol Chem (1998) 273(39):25381–7. doi:10.1074/jbc.273.39.25381
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
103. Ribatti D, Presta M, Vacca A, Ria R, Giuliani R, Dell’Era P, et al. Human erythropoietin induces a pro-angiogenic phenotype in cultured endothelial cells and stimulates neovascularization in vivo. Blood (1999) 93(8):2627–36.
104. Haroon ZA, Amin K, Jiang X, Arcasoy MO. A novel role for erythropoietin during fibrin-induced wound-healing response. Am J Pathol (2003) 163(3):993–1000. doi:10.1016/S0002-9440(10)63459-1
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
105. Kertesz N, Wu J, Chen TH, Sucov HM, Wu H. The role of erythropoietin in regulating angiogenesis. Dev Biol (2004) 276(1):101–10. doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2004.08.025
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
106. Yasuda Y, Fujita Y, Musha T, Tanaka H, Shiokawa S, Nakamatsu K, et al. Expression of erythropoietin in human female reproductive organs. Ital J Anat Embryol (2001) 106(2 Suppl 2):215–22.
107. Yasuda Y, Fujita Y, Masuda S, Musha T, Ueda K, Tanaka H, et al. Erythropoietin is involved in growth and angiogenesis in malignant tumours of female reproductive organs. Carcinogenesis (2002) 23(11):1797–805. doi:10.1093/carcin/23.11.1797
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
108. Nakamatsu K, Nishimura Y, Suzuki M, Kanamori S, Maenishi O, Yasuda Y. Erythropoietin/erythropoietin-receptor system as an angiogenic factor in chemically induced murine hepatic tumors. Int J Clin Oncol (2004) 9(3):184–8. doi:10.1007/s10147-004-0399-z
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
109. Okazaki T, Ebihara S, Asada M, Yamanda S, Niu K, Arai H. Erythropoietin promotes the growth of tumors lacking its receptor and decreases survival of tumor-bearing mice by enhancing angiogenesis. Neoplasia (2008) 10(9):932–9.
110. Rupertus K, Senger S, Menger MD, Schilling MK, Kollmar O. Darbepoetin-alpha promotes neovascularization and cell proliferation in established colorectal liver metastases. J Surg Res (2012) 176(2):517–23. doi:10.1016/j.jss.2011.09.062
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
111. Nico B, Annese T, Guidolin D, Finato N, Crivellato E, Ribatti D. Epo is involved in angiogenesis in human glioma. J Neurooncol (2011) 102(1):51–8. doi:10.1007/s11060-010-0294-6
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
112. Kumar SM, Zhang G, Bastian BC, Arcasoy MO, Karande P, Pushparajan A, et al. Erythropoietin receptor contributes to melanoma cell survival in vivo. Oncogene (2012) 31(13):1649–60. doi:10.1038/onc.2011.366
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
113. Yang J, Xiao Z, Li T, Gu X, Fan B. Erythropoietin promotes the growth of pituitary adenomas by enhancing angiogenesis. Int J Oncol (2012) 40(4):1230–7. doi:10.3892/ijo.2011.1261
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
114. Pascual M, Bohle B, Alonso S, Mayol X, Salvans S, Grande L, et al. Preoperative administration of erythropoietin stimulates tumor recurrence after surgical excision of colon cancer in mice by a vascular endothelial growth factor-independent mechanism. J Surg Res (2013) 183(1):270–7. doi:10.1016/j.jss.2012.12.041
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
115. Ribatti D. Erythropoietin and tumor angiogenesis. Stem Cells Dev (2010) 19(1):1–4. doi:10.1089/scd.2009.0402
116. Ribatti D, Marzullo A, Gentile A, Longo V, Nico B, Vacca A, et al. Erythropoietin/erythropoietin-receptor system is involved in angiogenesis in human hepatocellular carcinoma. Histopathology (2007) 50(5):591–6. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2559.2007.02654.x
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
117. Ribatti D, Nico B, Perra MT, Longo V, Maxia C, Annese T, et al. Erythropoietin is involved in angiogenesis in human primary melanoma. Int J Exp Pathol (2010) 91(6):495–9. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2613.2010.00731.x
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
118. Ribatti D, Poliani PL, Longo V, Mangieri D, Nico B, Vacca A. Erythropoietin/erythropoietin receptor system is involved in angiogenesis in human neuroblastoma. Histopathology (2007) 50(5):636–41. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2559.2007.02654.x
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
119. Li HG, Li JS, Chen WL, Wang L, Wu DH, Lin ZY. Prognostic significance of erythropoietin and erythropoietin receptor in tongue squamous cell carcinoma. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg (2009) 47(6):470–5. doi:10.1016/j.bjoms.2009.06.001
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
120. Wang L, Li HG, Xia ZS, Wen JM, Lv J. Prognostic significance of erythropoietin and erythropoietin receptor in gastric adenocarcinoma. World J Gastroenterol (2011) 17(34):3933–40. doi:10.3748/wjg.v17.i34.3933
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
121. Lee AS, Kim DH, Lee JE, Jung YJ, Kang KP, Lee S, et al. Erythropoietin induces lymph node lymphangiogenesis and lymph node tumor metastasis. Cancer Res (2011) 71(13):4506–17. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-3787
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
122. McKinney M, Arcasoy MO. Erythropoietin for oncology supportive care. Exp Cell Res (2011) 317(9):1246–54. doi:10.1016/j.yexcr.2011.03.003
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
123. Moebus V, Jackisch C, Schneeweiss A, Huober J, Lueck HJ, du Bois A, et al. Adding epoetin alfa to intense dose-dense adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer: randomized clinical trial. J Natl Cancer Inst (2013) 105(14):1018–26. doi:10.1093/jnci/djt145
124. Tonia T, Mettler A, Robert N, Schwarzer G, Seidenfeld J, Weingart O, et al. Erythropoietin or darbepoetin for patients with cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2012) 12:CD003407. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD003407.pub5
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
125. Canon JL, Vansteenkiste J, Hedenus M, Gascon P, Bokemeyer C, Ludwig H, et al. Transfusion risk in cancer patients with chemotherapy-induced anemia when initiating darbepoetin alfa therapy at a baseline hemoglobin level of <9 g/dL versus 9 to <10 g/dL versus >/= 10 g/dL: an exploratory analysis of a phase 3 trial. Med Oncol (2012) 29(3):2291–9. doi:10.1007/s12032-011-0103-x
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
126. Bustos A, Álvarez R, Aramburo PM, Carabantes F, Díaz N, Florián J, et al. Evaluation of clinical use and effectiveness of darbepoetin alfa in cancer patients with chemotherapy-induced anemia. Curr Med Res Opin (2012) 28(1):57–67. doi:10.1185/03007995.2011.639352
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
127. Fujisaka Y, Sugiyama T, Saito H, Nagase S, Kudoh S, Endo M, et al. Randomised, phase III trial of epoetin-beta to treat chemotherapy-induced anaemia according to the EU regulation. Br J Cancer (2011) 105(9):1267–72. doi:10.1038/bjc.2011.395
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
128. Untch M, Fasching PA, Konecny GE, von Koch F, Conrad U, Fett W, et al. PREPARE trial: a randomized phase III trial comparing preoperative, dose-dense, dose-intensified chemotherapy with epirubicin, paclitaxel and CMF versus a standard-dosed epirubicin/cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel ± darbepoetin alfa in primary breast cancer – results at the time of surgery. Ann Oncol (2011) 22(9):1988–98. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdq709
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
129. Untch M, von Minckwitz G, Konecny GE, Conrad U, Fett W, Kurzeder C, et al. PREPARE trial: a randomized phase III trial comparing preoperative, dose-dense, dose-intensified chemotherapy with epirubicin, paclitaxel, and CMF versus a standard-dosed epirubicin-cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel with or without darbepoetin alfa in primary breast cancer – outcome on prognosis. Ann Oncol (2011) 22(9):1999–2006. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdq713
130. Villegas A, Arrizabalaga B, Fernández-Lago C, Castro M, Mayans JR, González-Porras JR, et al. Darbepoetin alfa for anemia in patients with low or intermediate-1 risk myelodysplastic syndromes and positive predictive factors of response. Curr Med Res Opin (2011) 27(5):951–60. doi:10.1185/03007995.2011.561834
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
131. Chavez-MacGregor M, Zhao H, Fang S, Srokowski TP, Hortobagyi GN, Giordano SH. Complications associated with erythropoietin-stimulating agents in patients with metastatic breast cancer: a Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare study. Cancer (2011) 117(16):3641–9. doi:10.1002/cncr.25972
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
132. Roddy JV, Partridge SM, Rockey ML, Pruemer JM, Guo JJ, Desai SJ, et al. Thromboembolic events in patients with colorectal cancer receiving the combination of bevacizumab-based chemotherapy and erythropoietin stimulating agents. Am J Clin Oncol (2010) 33(1):36–42. doi:10.1097/COC.0b013e31819cccaf
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
133. Aapro M, Van Erps J, MacDonald K, Soubeyran P, Muenzberg M, Turner M, et al. Managing cancer-related anaemia in congruence with the EORTC guidelines is an independent predictor of haemoglobin outcome: initial evidence from the RESPOND study. Eur J Cancer (2009) 45(1):8–11. doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2008.09.036
134. Aapro M, Osterwalder B, Scherhag A, Burger HU. Epoetin-beta treatment in patients with cancer chemotherapy-induced anaemia: the impact of initial haemoglobin and target haemoglobin levels on survival, tumour progression and thromboembolic events. Br J Cancer (2009) 101(12):1961–71. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6605255
135. Gascon P, Pirker R, Del Mastro L, Durrwell L. Effects of CERA (continuous erythropoietin receptor activator) in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving chemotherapy: results of a phase II study. Ann Oncol (2010) 21(10):2029–39. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdq073
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
136. Bohlius J, Schmidlin K, Brillant C, Schwarzer G, Trelle S, Seidenfeld J, et al. Recombinant human erythropoiesis-stimulating agents and mortality in patients with cancer: a meta-analysis of randomised trials. Lancet (2009) 373(9674):1532–42. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60502-X
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
137. Lambin P, Ramaekers BL, van Mastrigt GA, Van den Ende P, de Jong J, De Ruysscher DK, et al. Erythropoietin as an adjuvant treatment with (chemo) radiation therapy for head and neck cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2009) 138(3):CD006158. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD006158.pub2
138. Mäenpää J, Puistola U, Riska H, Sintonen H, Saarni O, Juvonen E, et al. Impact of epoetin-beta on anemia and health-related quality of life in cancer patients: a prospective observational study using the generic 15D instrument. Anticancer Res (2014) 34(5):2325–9.
139. Thomaidis T, Weinmann A, Sprinzl M, Kanzler S, Raedle J, Ebert M, et al. Erythropoietin treatment in chemotherapy-induced anemia in previously untreated advanced esophagogastric cancer patients. Int J Clin Oncol (2014) 19(2):288–96. doi:10.1007/s10147-013-0544-7
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
140. Weber B, Largillier R, Ray-Coquard I, Yazbek G, Meunier J, Alexandre J, et al. A potentially neuroprotective role for erythropoietin with paclitaxel treatment in ovarian cancer patients: a prospective phase II GINECO trial. Support Care Cancer (2013) 21(7):1947–54. doi:10.1007/s00520-013-1748-0
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
141. Ohashi Y, Uemura Y, Fujisaka Y, Sugiyama T, Ohmatsu H, Katsumata N, et al. Meta-analysis of epoetin beta and darbepoetin alfa treatment for chemotherapy-induced anemia and mortality: individual patient data from Japanese randomized, placebo-controlled trials. Cancer Sci (2013) 104(4):481–5. doi:10.1111/cas.12105
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
142. Michallet M, Goldet K, Sobh M, Morisset S, Chelghoum Y, Thomas X, et al. Prospective study of erythropoietin use on quality of life and cost effectiveness in acute myeloid leukemia and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation patients. Cancer (2013) 119(1):107–14. doi:10.1002/cncr.27686
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
143. Stehman FB, Brady MF, Thigpen JT, Rossi EC, Burger RA. Cytokine use and survival in the first-line treatment of ovarian cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. Gynecol Oncol (2012) 127(3):495–501. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.09.002
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
144. Aerts JG, Swieboda-Sadlej A, Karanikiotis C, Labourey JL, Galid A, Wheeler T, et al. Use of darbepoetin alfa in European clinical practice for the management of chemotherapy-induced anaemia in four tumour types: final data from the CHOICE study. Curr Med Res Opin (2012) 28(7):1089–99. doi:10.1185/03007995.2012.698602
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
145. Van Belle S, Karanikiotis C, Labourey JL, Galid A, Wheeler T, Pujol B. Current practice of darbepoetin alfa in the management of haemoglobin levels in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy – data from the CHOICE study. Curr Med Res Opin (2011) 27(5):987–94. doi:10.1185/03007995.2011.562493
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
146. Van Belle S, Swieboda-Sadlej A, Karanikiotis C, Labourey JL, Galid A, Wheeler T, et al. A final analysis from the CHOICE study examining darbepoetin alfa use for chemotherapy-induced anaemia in current European clinical practice. Curr Med Res Opin (2012) 28(7):1079–87. doi:10.1185/03007995.2012.698601
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
147. Kerkhofs L, Boschetti G, Lugini A, Stanculeanu DL, Palomo AG. Use of biosimilar epoetin to increase hemoglobin levels in patients with chemotherapy-induced anemia: real-life clinical experience. Future Oncol (2012) 8(6):751–6. doi:10.2217/fon.12.39
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
148. Cabanillas ME, Kantarjian H, Thomas DA, Mattiuzzi GN, Rytting ME, Bruera E, et al. Epoetin alpha decreases the number of erythrocyte transfusions in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia, lymphoblastic lymphoma, and Burkitt leukemia/lymphoma: results of a randomized clinical trial. Cancer (2012) 118(3):848–55. doi:10.1002/cncr.26341
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
149. Cantrell LA, Westin SN, Van Le L. The use of recombinant erythropoietin for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced anemia in patients with ovarian cancer does not affect progression-free or overall survival. Cancer (2011) 117(6):1220–6. doi:10.1002/cncr.25590
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
150. Blohmer JU, Paepke S, Sehouli J, Boehmer D, Kolben M, Würschmidt F, et al. Randomized phase III trial of sequential adjuvant chemoradiotherapy with or without erythropoietin alfa in patients with high-risk cervical cancer: results of the NOGGO-AGO intergroup study. J Clin Oncol (2011) 29(28):3791–7. doi:10.1200/JCO.2010.30.4899
151. Nagel S, Kellner O, Engel-Riedel W, Guetz S, Schumann C, Gieseler F, et al. Addition of darbepoetin alfa to dose-dense chemotherapy: results from a randomized phase II trial in small-cell lung cancer patients receiving carboplatin plus etoposide. Clin Lung Cancer (2011) 12(1):62–9. doi:10.3816/CLC.2011.n.009
152. Eisterer W, Hussl C, Erb H, Haslbauer F, Sormann S, Braun S, et al. RETRA: evaluating the transfusion rate with darbepoetin alfa 500 microg every 3 weeks in anaemic cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. Curr Med Res Opin (2011) 27(2):355–63. doi:10.1185/03007995.2010.542134
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
153. Djavan B, Laze J, Eckersberger E, Finkelstein J, Agalliu I, Lepor H. The short-term use of erythropoetin-stimulating agents: impact on the biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer. BJU Int (2011) 108(10):1582–7. doi:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10173.x
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
154. Rørth M, Madsen KR, Burmølle SH, Midtgaard J, Andersen C, Nielsen B, et al. Effects of darbepoetin alfa with exercise in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy: an explorative study. Scand J Med Sci Sports (2011) 21(3):369–77. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0838.2009.01066.x
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
155. Tjulandin SA, Bias P, Elsässer R, Gertz B, Kohler E, Buchner A. Epoetin theta with a new dosing schedule in anaemic cancer patients receiving nonplatinum-based chemotherapy: a randomised controlled trial. Arch Drug Inf (2011) 4(3):33–41. doi:10.1111/j.1753-5174.2011.00035.x
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
156. Esquerdo G, Llorca C, Cervera JM, Orts D, Juárez A, Carrato A. Effectiveness of darbepoetin alfa in a cohort of oncology patients with chemotherapy-induced anaemia. Relationship between variation in three fatigue-specific quality of life questionnaire scores and change in haemoglobin level. Clin Transl Oncol (2011) 13(5):341–7. doi:10.1007/s12094-011-0664-3
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
157. Gómez A, Salgado M, Valladares-Ayerbes M, Jorge M, Carballo A, Candamio S, et al. Efficacy of epoetin-beta 30,000 IU/week in correcting anaemia in patients with gastrointestinal tumours subjected to concomitant chemoradiotherapy. Clin Transl Oncol (2010) 12(12):843–8. doi:10.1007/s12094-010-0607-4
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
158. Gomez-Alamillo C, Fernández-Fresnedo G, Ortega F, Campistol JM, Gentil MA, Arias M, et al. Erythropoietin resistance as surrogate marker of graft and patient survival in renal transplantation: 3-year prospective multicenter study. Transplant Proc (2010) 42(8):2935–7. doi:10.1016/j.transproceed.2010.07.043
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
159. Schwartzberg L, Burkes R, Mirtsching B, Rearden T, Silberstein P, Yee L, et al. Comparison of darbepoetin alfa dosed weekly (QW) vs. extended dosing schedule (EDS) in the treatment of anemia in patients receiving multicycle chemotherapy in a randomized, phase 2, open-label trial. BMC Cancer (2010) 10:581. doi:10.1186/1471-2407-10-581
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
160. Ray-Coquard I, Laplaige P, Vey N, Asselain B, Urbieta M. A prospective, observational study describing the haematological response in patients undergoing chemotherapy treated by tri-weekly darbepoetin alfa for anaemia. Curr Med Res Opin (2010) 26(11):2653–60. doi:10.1185/03007995.2010.526099
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
161. Pronzato P, Cortesi E, van der Rijt CC, Bols A, Moreno-Nogueira JA, de Oliveira CF, et al. Epoetin alfa improves anemia and anemia-related, patient-reported outcomes in patients with breast cancer receiving myelotoxic chemotherapy: results of a European, multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Oncologist (2010) 15(9):935–43. doi:10.1634/theoncologist.2009-0279
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
162. Vargas A, Mendoza I, Uranga R, González A, Martínez L, Caballero I, et al. Efficacy and safety of iorEPOCIM for chemotherapy- or radiotherapy-induced anemia in pediatric cancer patients. MEDICC Rev (2010) 12(3):27–31.
163. Auerbach M, Silberstein PT, Webb RT, Averyanova S, Ciuleanu TE, Shao J, et al. Darbepoetin alfa 300 or 500 mug once every 3 weeks with or without intravenous iron in patients with chemotherapy-induced anemia. Am J Hematol (2010) 85(9):655–63. doi:10.1002/ajh.21779
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
164. Maccio A, Madeddu C, Gramignano G, Mulas C, Sanna E, Mantovani G, et al. Efficacy and safety of oral lactoferrin supplementation in combination with rHuEPO-beta for the treatment of anemia in advanced cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy: open-label, randomized controlled study. Oncologist (2010) 15(8):894–902. doi:10.1634/theoncologist.2010-0020
165. Ichinose Y, Seto T, Nishiwaki Y, Ohe Y, Yamada Y, Takeda K, et al. Randomized phase 2 dose-finding study of weekly administration of darbepoetin alpha in anemic patients with lung or ovarian cancer receiving multicycle platinum-containing chemotherapy. Jpn J Clin Oncol (2010) 40(6):521–9. doi:10.1093/jjco/hyq017
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
166. Engert A, Josting A, Haverkamp H, Villalobos M, Lohri A, Sökler M, et al. Epoetin alfa in patients with advanced-stage Hodgkin’s lymphoma: results of the randomized placebo-controlled GHSG HD15EPO trial. J Clin Oncol (2010) 28(13):2239–45. doi:10.1200/JCO.2009.25.1835
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
167. Muravyov AV, Cheporov SV, Kislov NV, Bulaeva SV, Maimistova AA. Comparative efficiency and hemorheological consequences of hemotransfusion and epoetin therapy in anemic cancer patients. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc (2010) 44(2):115–23. doi:10.3233/CH-2010-1259
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
168. Stull DE, Vernon MK, Legg JC, Viswanathan HN, Fairclough D, Revicki DA. Use of latent growth curve models for assessing the effects of darbepoetin alfa on hemoglobin and fatigue. Contemp Clin Trials (2010) 31(2):172–9. doi:10.1016/j.cct.2009.12.006
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
169. Tjulandin SA, Bias P, Elsässer R, Gertz B, Kohler E, Buchner A. Epoetin theta in anaemic cancer patients receiving platinum-based chemotherapy: a randomised controlled trial. Arch Drug Inf (2010) 3(3):45–53. doi:10.1111/j.1753-5174.2010.00030.x
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
170. Hoskin PJ, Robinson M, Slevin N, Morgan D, Harrington K, Gaffney C. Effect of epoetin alfa on survival and cancer treatment-related anemia and fatigue in patients receiving radical radiotherapy with curative intent for head and neck cancer. J Clin Oncol (2009) 27(34):5751–6. doi:10.1200/JCO.2009.22.3693
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
171. Vansteenkiste J, Dooms C, De Leyn P. The multidisciplinarity of stage III non-small cell lung cancer. Eur J Cancer (2009) 45(Suppl 1):92–105. doi:10.1016/S0959-8049(09)70021-8
172. Grobmyer SR, Hemming AW, Harris N, Behrns K, Logan H, Kim RD, et al. A pilot prospective randomized trial of postoperative epoetin alfa in patients undergoing major operation for upper gastrointestinal malignancy. Am J Clin Oncol (2009) 32(6):570–3. doi:10.1097/COC.0b013e31819790a8
173. Hernandez E, Ganly P, Charu V, Dibenedetto J, Tomita D, Lillie T, et al. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of every-3-week darbepoetin alfa 300 micrograms for treatment of chemotherapy-induced anemia. Curr Med Res Opin (2009) 25(9):2109–20. doi:10.1185/03007990903084164
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
174. Greenberg PL, Sun Z, Miller KB, Bennett JM, Tallman MS, Dewald G, et al. Treatment of myelodysplastic syndrome patients with erythropoietin with or without granulocyte colony-stimulating factor: results of a prospective randomized phase 3 trial by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (E1996). Blood (2009) 114(12):2393–400. doi:10.1182/blood-2009-03-211797
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
175. Repetto LCIPOMO Investigators. Incidence and clinical impact of chemotherapy induced myelotoxicity in cancer patients: an observational retrospective survey. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol (2009) 72(2):170–9. doi:10.1016/j.critrevonc.2009.03.004
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
176. Tzekova V, Mihaylov G, Elezovic I, Koytchev R, Epoetin Zeta Oncology Study Group. Therapeutic effects of epoetin zeta in the treatment of chemotherapy-induced anaemia. Curr Med Res Opin (2009) 25(7):1689–97. doi:10.1185/03007990903050876
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
177. Welsch T, Zschäbitz S, Becker V, Giese T, Bergmann F, Hinz U, et al. Prognostic significance of erythropoietin in pancreatic adenocarcinoma. PLoS One (2011) 6(8):e23151. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0023151
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
178. Seibold ND, Schild SE, Gebhard MP, Noack F, Schröder U, Rades D. Prognosis of patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Impact of tumor cell expression of EPO and EPO-R. Strahlenther Onkol (2013) 189(7):559–65. doi:10.1007/s00066-013-0320-7
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
179. Rades D, Setter C, Dahl O, Schild SE, Noack F. Prognostic impact of erythropoietin expression and erythropoietin receptor expression on locoregional control and survival of patients irradiated for stage II/III non-small-cell lung cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys (2011) 80(2):499–505. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.02.003
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
180. Lin YT, Chuang HC, Chen CH, Armas GL, Chen HK, Fang FM, et al. Clinical significance of erythropoietin receptor expression in oral squamous cell carcinoma. BMC Cancer (2012) 12:194. doi:10.1186/1471-2407-12-194
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
181. Volgger B, Kurz K, Zöschg K, Theurl I, Ciresa-König A, Marth C, et al. Importance of erythropoetin receptor expression in tumour tissue for the clinical course of breast cancer. Anticancer Res (2010) 30(9):3721–6.
182. Giatromanolaki A, Fiska A, Pitsiava D, Kartalis G, Koukourakis MI, Sivridis E. Erythropoietin receptors in endometrial carcinoma as related to HIF1{alpha} and VEGF expression. In vivo (2009) 23(5):699–703.
183. Küster O, Simon P, Mittelbronn M, Tabatabai G, Hermann C, Strik H, et al. Erythropoietin receptor is expressed in meningiomas and lower levels are associated with tumour recurrence. Neuropathol Applied Neurobiol (2009) 35(6):555–65. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2990.2009.01021.x
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
184. Gombos Z, Danihel L, Repiska V, Acs G, Furth E. Expression of erythropoietin and its receptor increases in colonic neoplastic progression: the role of hypoxia in tumorigenesis. Indian J Pathol Microbiol (2011) 54(2):273–8. doi:10.4103/0377-4929.81591
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
185. Beschorner R, Psaras T, Meyermann R, Bremer J, Schmidt T, Mittelbronn M, et al. Erythropoietin receptor expression in normal and neoplastic choroid plexus. Clin Neuropathol (2011) 30(1):33–40. doi:10.5414/NPP30033
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
186. Xu C, Zhou T, He M, Sun Y. Differential up-regulation of erythropoietin and its receptor in benign and malignant prostatic tissue. Urol Oncol (2010) 28(3):314–9. doi:10.1016/j.urolonc.2008.09.023
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
187. Mirmohammadsadegh A, Marini A, Gustrau A, Delia D, Nambiar S, Hassan M, et al. Role of erythropoietin receptor expression in malignant melanoma. J Invest Dermatol (2010) 130(1):201–10. doi:10.1038/jid.2009.162
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Keywords: erythropoietin, erythropoietin receptor, receptor partners, cancer, cell response, angiogenesis, clinical trials
Citation: Debeljak N, Solár P and Sytkowski AJ (2014) Erythropoietin and cancer: the unintended consequences of anemia correction. Front. Immunol. 5:563. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2014.00563
Received: 31 July 2014; Accepted: 22 October 2014;
Published online: 11 November 2014.
Edited by:
Pietro Ghezzi, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, UKReviewed by:
Ralf Schindler, Charité, GermanyDomenico Ribatti, University of Bari Medical School, Italy
Chris Thiemermann, Queen Mary University of London, UK
Copyright: © 2014 Debeljak, Solár and Sytkowski. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Nataša Debeljak, Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Biochemistry, University of Ljubljana, Vrazov trg 2, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia e-mail: natasa.debeljak@mf.uni-lj.si