Impact Factor 6.429

The 5th most cited journal in Immunology

Review ARTICLE

Front. Immunol., 30 June 2017 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2017.00772

Non-Steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs As Host-Directed Therapy for Tuberculosis: A Systematic Review

imageVera M. Kroesen1,2, imageMatthias I. Gröschel3,4, imageNeil Martinson5, imageAlimuddin Zumla6,7,8†, imageMarkus Maeurer9†, imageTjip S. van der Werf3,4 and imageCristina Vilaplana2,10*
  • 1Carl-von-Ossietzky University Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany
  • 2Experimental Tuberculosis Unit (UTE), Fundació Institut Germans Trias i Pujol (IGTP), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Badalona, Catalonia, Spain
  • 3Department of Pulmonary Diseases & Tuberculosis and Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherland
  • 4Department of Infectious Diseases, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherland
  • 5Perinatal HIV Research Unit, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
  • 6Division of Infection and Immunity, University College London (UCL), London, United Kingdom
  • 7National Institute of Health Research’s Biomedical Research Centre, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
  • 8Department of Microbiology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
  • 9Division of Therapeutic Immunology, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
  • 10Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Madrid, Spain

Lengthy, antimicrobial therapy targeting the pathogen is the mainstay of conventional tuberculosis treatment, complicated by emerging drug resistances. Host-directed therapies, including non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), in contrast, target host factors to mitigate disease severity. In the present Systematic Review, we investigate whether NSAIDs display any effects as therapy of TB and discuss possible mechanisms of action of NSAIDs as adjunctive therapy of TB. Ten studies, seven preclinical studies in mice and three clinical trials, were included and systematically reviewed. Our results point toward a beneficial effect of NSAIDs as adjunct to current TB therapy regimens, mediated by decreased lung pathology balancing host-immune reaction. The determination of the best timing for their administration in order to obtain the potential beneficial effects needs further investigation. Even if the preclinical evidence requires clinical evaluation, NSAIDs might represent a potential safe, simple, and cheap improvement in therapy of TB.

Introduction

Tuberculosis (TB) is a chronic infectious disease caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) causing a wide spectrum of disease in humans (1). The current approach to treat TB entails antimicrobial drugs that target mycobacteria (2). Drugs to target host immune function rather than focusing on the bacteria have been proposed as adjuvants to classic antimicrobial treatment, with the advantage of not selecting TB drug resistance (3). The wide range of these host-directed therapies (HDTs)—including NSAIDs (4)—act on host immune effectors to achieve decrease in host-destructive pathology; potentially leading to clinical improvement, decreased morbidity, and mortality. Pathologic immune reactions in the host, such as insufficient or excessive inflammatory response leading to severe tissue damage are considered a major cause of failure of current TB treatment (5).

Neutrophils represent a protective immune response in early infection through secretion of oxidizing and hydrolytic agents targeted at the bacteria (6). While this neutrophil-dominated inflammation is beneficial in the acute infection, it can be detrimental in the context of chronic infection (6). Excessively aggressive immune response in active, chronic TB disease destroys host tissue leading to necrosis and cavitation, facilitating spread of the bacilli (7). Attenuating excessive host inflammatory response in active TB might thus be beneficial during treatment and for disease outcome (6). NSAIDs, based on their anti-inflammatory effect, could act on attenuating excessive (neutrophil-mediated) inflammation in active TB disease (4, 6, 8).

The aim of this review was to investigate whether NSAIDs are a useful HDT candidate for TB. With this purpose, we systematically reviewed the published manuscripts on the preclinical and clinical effects of NSAIDs when used as therapy of TB, alone or in combination with commonly used anti-TB drugs or BCG vaccination.

Methods

We used the 2009 PRISMA guidelines to systematically review PubMed for studies published until January 2017 that evaluate NSAIDs as therapy of TB. The following search terms were used: “tuberculosis” OR “mycobacterium tuberculosis” combined with drug names of the NSAID group: ((tuberculosis OR (mycobacterium tuberculosis)) AND (ibuprofen OR aspirin OR naproxen OR etoricoxib OR indomethacin OR meloxicam OR celecoxib OR diclofenac (DCL) OR oxyphenbutazone OR carprofen) NOT “review” [publication type]).

Two investigators independently reviewed the title and abstract of all identified publications for relevance. Studies were deemed relevant when they met the following criteria: clinical or animal studies, English language, published on Pubmed from 1950 through January 2017, study subjects are TB patients (sensitive and resistant, pulmonary and extra-pulmonary), who received a drug from the NSAID-group. We excluded in vitro, open-label, and self-reporting studies as well as Case Reports. The reference list of included publications was furthermore screened for relevant publications. Disagreements between investigators were resolved by discussion. The full text of the included studies was reviewed for relevant information to answer the question whether NSAIDs as HDTs are beneficial during TB treatment. Information was systematically collected according to predetermined criteria, i.e., drug, study, experimental approach, TB patients/mouse strain, sample size, intervention, and outcome.

Two investigators independently reviewed the full text of all identified publications. For clinical trials (CTs), the Jadad Scoring System was used to evaluate quality (9).

Results

A total of ten relevant studies were identified and included for systematic review (Table 1). The full texts of all ten studies were retrieved for in depth analysis. The three CTs (1012) were of high quality, according to Jadad scoring.

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. An overview on the data acquisition from relevant studies for systematic review.

Ibuprofen and Aspirin

Ibuprofen acts as an unselective cyclooxygenase (COX)-inhibitor. COX control the production of lipid mediators derived from arachidonic acid, such as prostaglandins (PGs), resolvins, lipoxins, leukotriene, and thromboxanes (TXAs). Three studies were found for Ibuprofen (1315).

Acetylsalicylic acid (AAS) is a non-selective COX-inhibitor, which irreversibly inhibits COX-enzymes. In addition to its anti-inflammatory effects, it is widely used in prevention of cardiovascular disease and strokes (20) due to its cardio-protective effects mediated by irreversible inhibition of TXA A2 production in nuclei-free platelets. Five studies were identified for Systematic Review of aspirin (1012, 14, 15).

Vilaplana et al. treated Mtb infected C3HeB/FeJ mice—in a murine model of active TB—with 80 mg/kg/day ibuprofen (13). Ibuprofen increased survival and significantly decreased the number and size of lung lesions consistent with decreased bacillary loads in the lungs. Histologic examination revealed excessive neutrophilic infiltration in the control group, which was found to be alleviated in the Ibuprofen-group (13).

Byrne et al. treated Mtb-infected mice with either the first-line anti-TB drugs pyrazinamid (Z) or isoniazid (H), or with the NSAIDs ibuprofen or aspirin, alone or in combination with H. Treatment was started 1 day after infection (14). Compared to controls, Z alone reduced bacterial counts significantly in lungs and spleens. Ibuprofen with H enhanced this effect, while with aspirin reduced it. Ibuprofen and aspirin alone did not have any significant effect on bacterial counts compared to controls but enhanced the clearance of Mtb in tissues achieved by H. The authors suggest the use of ibuprofen rather than aspirin as adjunctive analgesic in TB-treatment (14). However, another in vivo study by Byrne et al. showed that both ibuprofen and aspirin enhance the effect of Z and might be evaluated to shorten therapy (15). Mtb-infected mice were treated with aspirin (20 mg/day), ibuprofen (20 mg/day) or Z (150 mg/day) alone or Z in combination with either aspirin or ibuprofen, from one day after infection. Z alone reduced bacterial counts compared to controls, and this effect was enhanced by both aspirin and ibuprofen (15).

Two CT were found supportive of the synergistic effect of aspirin and Z: short-term, low-dose aspirin was shown to prevent the side effect of hyperuricaemia in Z-treatment of TB (12). Petty et al. treated TB patients who received anti-TB treatment with Z (and H and ethionamide) with additional oral low-dose aspirin 2.4 g/day for three consecutive days. Short-term, low-dose aspirin significantly lowered serum uric acid concentrations to almost normal levels in all enrolled patients, and in three patients who presented with mild arthralgias, AAS controlled them. In line with the results from Petty et al., aspirin has been vsuggested to ameliorate arthralgia in Z-treatment of TB (11). Horsfall et al. followed patients with arthralgia during common TB-therapy containing Z, administered with additional anti-arthralgia treatment: aspirin 2.4 mg/day or allopurinol 200 mg/day or a placebo (11). Most patients in all three treatment groups reported improvement, though the improvement was greater and faster in in the aspirin group (11).

Schoeman et al. conducted a double-blind, randomized phase II CT to evaluate the effect of aspirin-treatment as an add-on to standard anti-TB treatment (and prednisone) on mortality and morbidity of children with a probable diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis (TBM) (10). The primary endpoints were survival, motor and cognitive outcome and the number of serious adverse events. Patients were randomly grouped into three adjunctive treatment groups (Table 2). There was no effect of aspirin on the outcome of hemiplegia when it was already present at admission, though of nine children who developed hemiplegia, none was in the high dose aspirin group. In total, eight children died, relatively equally distributed to all three treatment groups, one death possibly caused by aspirin treatment (75 mg/day) (10). Results did not show any significant beneficial or adverse effect of aspirin. The high-dose aspirin group in this study turned out to have worse baseline characteristics at start, with more hemiparesis at baseline, which might have distorted the results (10).

TABLE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Treatment groups in Schoeman et al. (10).

Indomethacin

Indomethacin is a non-selective COX-inhibitor and a non-salicylate NSAID similar to ibuprofen. Two studies were identified which furthermore provide special insights into apparent immune-modulatory properties of NSAIDs-like indomethacin (16, 17).

A study by Hernandez-Pando et al. evaluated immunosuppressive phenomena based on T-cell imbalance in the TB-granuloma and its treatability with cyclophosphamide and indomethacin (17). Cyclophosphamide is an alkylating agent used during cancer-treatment and for autoimmune-disorders. Mice were immunized against Mtb and 10 days after immunization, infected with Mtb-coated beads to induce granuloma formation. To evaluate their effect, 5 mg/kg/day indomethacin was administered intraperitoneally (i.p.) during the whole experimental procedure and 20 mg/kg cyclophosphamide was injected i.p. 1 day before infection. Control granulomas induced by mBSA-coated beads were composed quite equally of CD8+ and CD4+ T-cells and did not alter antibody titers against Mtb. TB granulomas were significantly bigger, mainly composed of CD8+ cytotoxic T-cells and showed a drop in DTH-reaction (delayed type hypersensitivity reaction) and antibody titers against Mtb. This imbalance was reversible upon administration of indomethacin or cyclophosphamide with significant reduction of granuloma size, increase in DTH and antibody titers. Conclusively, an imbalance in T-cells within TB-induced granulomas mainly being composed of CD8+ cytotoxic T-cells, and few CD4+ T-helper cells down-regulates cell-mediated and humoral immunity to Mtb locally. This is reversible upon treatment with indomethacin (17).

Shroff et al. found that indomethacin enhance the response of mice to intraperitoneal immunization with M. vaccae (16). Mice were pre-treated with indomethacin and then immunized with M. vaccae. After 48 h DTH-reaction was tested, the non-pre-treated did not show any reaction of immunization, the pre-treated mice did show immunization responses. Thus, the non-responder state of mice to M. vaccae by i.p. route of immunization was corrected by pre-treatment with indomethacin (16).

Diclofenac

Diclofenac is an unselective COX-inhibitor with anti-bacterial properties. Anti-mycobacterial action has been shown in two animal studies (18, 19).

Dutta et al. treated Mtb-infected mice with DCL shortly after infection (18), the DCL-treated mice showing less lesions and lower bacillary loads (measured by positive smears for acid-fast bacilli and positive subculture for Mtb) compared to controls (18).

A second study by Dutta et al. showed synergistic activity of DCL in combination with Streptomycin (S) (19). Mice were infected with Mtb and treated with DCL, S or S + DCL in combination (19). Both, treatment with S or DCL alone decreased bacterial counts in lungs and spleens and mean spleen weight, and increased survival. All these effects were increased by the simultaneous administration of S + DCL (19).

Discussion

Our results are based on the search for specific NSAID drug names, we include only English written articles and exclude open-label and self-reporting studies as well as Case Reports. These restrictions in the search strategy impose a selection bias on results. Our review combines results, expressed as various endpoints, from ten different studies, where experimental approach, patients, sample size, and intervention differ (see Table 1). Figure 1 shows two of the main pathways (COX and 5-LOX) of eicosanoid biosynthesis from arachidonic acid, and where the NSAIDs have an effect.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. COX and 5-LOX pathways of eicosanoid biosynthesis from arachidonic acid. The physiological role of each eicosanoid and eicosanoid group is explained. The figure shows where the non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) evaluated in this review have an effect, blocking both COX enzymes or the COX-2 selectively. By inhibiting the COX enzymes, NSAIDs inhibit prostaglandin synthesis. They also promote a switch to arachidonic acid oxidation by 5-LOX. COX, cyclooxygenase; LOX, lipoxygenase; TXA, thromboxane; TXAS, thromboxane synthase; PG, prostaglandin; PGDS, PGD synthase; PGFS, PGF synthase; PGES, PGE synthase; PGIS, PGI synthase; LT, leukotriene; LTC4S, LTC4 synthase; LTA4H, LTA4 hydrolase; LX, Lipoxin.

Though in total 10 studies were identified for Systematic Review, the anti-inflammatory effect of NSAIDs was only investigated as an endpoint (granuloma size in lungs) by two studies, which furthermore assessed differing characteristics of assessed granulomas (13, 17). However, all seven reported animal studies provide evidence for a clear beneficial effect of NSAIDs in TB (expressed by various endpoints), and two of three reported CT found mild beneficial effects of aspirin alleviating side-effects of Z (11, 12). Included animal studies did not report side-effects of treatment with NSAIDs. The three CTs reported no severe side effects except two, including one death, which underline the importance of monitoring for risk factors and side-effects when investigating NSAIDs in general (10). To conclude, our results from seven animal studies point to a clear beneficial effect of NSAIDs in TB, but the individually reported beneficial effects need more investigation and, when supported, consequently clinical confirmation.

Regarding the animal studies included, need to remember that humans respond with a wide spectrum to infection with Mtb, from innately resistant to extremely susceptible (21). Key factor for survival of Mtb in the human host is the induction of lung necrosis, which enables spreading of the bacilli (21). The immunologic response to Mtb infection in mice is largely genetically determined (21). None of the currently available models in mice represents the whole spectrum of human TB, but specific models match specific phenotypes and pathways of inflammation of human TB (21). The two most commonly employed inbred laboratory mouse strains [C75BL/6 (B6) and BALB/c mice] do not develop necrotic lesions (21), in spite of developing chronic asymptomatic infection. There are animal models available which effectively mimic lung necrosis of the susceptible human individual, i.e., the C3HeB/FeJ model mimics both necrosis and cavitation (21). Therefore, the choice of the specific animal model matching the specific research question is of great importance. Vilaplana et al. employ C3HeB/FeJ mice to evaluate the effect of ibuprofen on lung pathology in TB (13). Four of the seven animal studies assessed employed BALB/c mice (Table 1) to assess ibuprofen and aspirin as adjunct to commonly used TB drugs (14, 15), to evaluate the effect of indomethacin on vaccination with M. vaccae (16) and to study the effect of indomethacin on granuloma composition (specifically T-cell balance) (17). Dutta et al. employ Swiss white mice to assess the anti-bacterial effect of DCL (18, 19).

According to the results of our Systematic Review, NSAIDs can be beneficial if given as co-therapy during TB therapy. This protective effect is possibly mediated by their anti-inflammatory properties, by enhancing activity of TB-antibiotics and possibly by own directly bactericidal activity.

Excess recruitment of granulocytes (primarily neutrophils) leads to uncontrolled inflammation and exacerbation of TB disease (6, 22). Infection of macrophages leads to a neutrophilic-dominated inflammatory response (8, 13), which—in absence of sufficient Mtb-elimination—leads to an excessive, neutrophilic-dominated, inflammatory response, and disease exacerbation: eventually, the host succumbs to infection, before the adaptive immune response can fully start working (7, 22, 23). NSAIDs could impact on these interactions by reducing the destructive inflammatory response via inhibition of PGE2 in granulocytes as well as by enhancing effectors of adaptive immunity such as IFN-γ (4, 24, 25). In agreement with this hypothesis, Vilaplana et al. found that neutrophils are of major responsibility for chronic inflammation and tissue damage associated with granulomas (8), and that the anti-inflammatory properties of NSAIDs can mitigate this phenotype (8, 13). Findings by Hernandez-Pando and Shroff et al. point to NSAIDs possibly balancing cell-mediated, adaptive immune response to Mtb. Hernandez-Pando et al. found that indomethacin can balance CD8+- and CD4+-ratio in TB-granulomas reducing excessive inflammation and morbidity (17).

The reduction of prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) is considered one mechanistic explanation underlying the anti-inflammatory benefit of NSAIDs in the context of Mtb infection (4), as PGE2 inhibits phagocytosis and bacterial killing at late stage of Mtb-infection. However, a protective effect of PGE2 on the mitochondrial membrane against Mtb in macrophages has been described, suggesting it to be beneficial at early stages (4). Another explanation is NSAIDs action against PG-production in polymorphonuclear leukocytes in late stage Mtb-infection, as all these cells are highly implicated in the formation and maintenance of granulomas (4, 7). They all possess COX-2 activity producing PGs and therefore drive the chronic inflammation and tissue damage associated with granulomas in late Mtb-infection (4). For all these, an accurate evaluation of the timing of NSAIDs as an add-on in TB-treatment is warranted. The beneficial effect of NSAIDs is based on their ability to reduce excessive and tissue-damaging inflammation mainly in late stage infection. They may control liquefaction of the granulomas and consequently enhance healing (4, 13); thus might have positive effects in patients with active TB, usually present after months of infection.

On the other hand, patients with severe TB-disease are at higher risk of developing thrombosis and stroke, due to an hypercoagulable state in advanced stages of the diseases (26). Low-dose aspirin is proven to have protective effects in other patients at risk of developing ischemic stroke (20). Though in the reviewed CT by Schoeman et al. anti-coagulative therapy with low-dose aspirin did not show any beneficial effects in childhood TBM, different baseline characteristics of the patients enrolled might have distorted results (10).

There is evidence that suggests an immune-mediated pathoetiology of vascular events in TB patients. Vasculitis in TBM is morphologically similar to other immune-mediated vasculitis (27) and the anti-inflammatory effect of glucocorticoids has successfully been used in treatment of TBM (28) as well as TB-IRIS (TB-associated Immune Reconstitution Inflammatory Syndrome) (29). Likewise, a recent open-label CT has evaluated aspirin in combination with corticosteroids in TBM and found a reduction of strokes and mortality (30). Indeed, hypercoagulability cannot be uncoupled from inflammatory processes. Increased cytokine levels are associated with progression of atherosclerosis and development of ischemia in patients with stable angina (31), injured epithelia secrete more cytokines and cause local inflammation which fuels atherosclerosis (31). Atherosclerosis and hypercoagulability are cytokine-mediated and thus an inflammatory process, this could explain the benefit of corticosteroids in TBM and TB-IRIS. The effect of NSAIDs in states of inflammatory hypercoagulability of TB should further be investigated.

With rising drug-resistances against commonly employed anti-TB drugs, new add-on drugs need to be employed, enhancing anti-mycobacterial efficacy to avoid the need to increase doses to potentially toxic levels (31). In vivo data by Dutta et al. suggests an enhancing effect of DCL on the TB-antibiotic S as well as an own anti-mycobacterial effect of DCL (18). In vitro data equally demonstrated some inhibitory effect of many NSAIDs on mycobacteria by targeting various biological functions in the bacilli (32) (see Table 3). Aspirin reduces the expression of genes for energy metabolism in bacteria (33).

TABLE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) acting as anti-tubercular non-antibiotics (including in vitro studies).

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs as add-on could leverage the efficacy of commonly used antibiotic anti-TB drugs, but if displaying intrinsic bactericidal activity, development of drug-resistance against NSAIDs themselves would have to be considered (19). However, most anti-tubercular non-antibiotics so far have displayed in vitro MICs from 10–25 µg/ml, which are concentrations beyond clinical achievability (48). However, intracellular concentration of NSAIDs by macrophages may enhance killing: by phagocytosis, they might concentrate drugs in question more than 10× in the phagocytosed target Mtb (48). The bactericidal dose might be achievable in situ. Therefore, possible benefits of various NSAIDs as anti-tubercular non-antibiotics implied by in vitro data (see Table 3) require in vivo and consequently clinical confirmation.

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs as potential HDT would be considered as adjunctive in TB-treatment and would be intended to be administered in addition to common anti-TB treatment regimens. Thus, interaction mechanisms with commonly used anti-TB drugs and alterations of pharmacodynamics need to be evaluated. So far, no published study has evaluated interaction of NSAIDs with the current full four-drug regimen used for human drug-susceptible TB.

Salicylate was found to have in vitro adverse effects in combination with the first line TB-drugs H, R, E, and Streptomycin (S) (33). In contrast, in in vivo combination with the first line TB-drug Z it showed synergistic effect (15). Z is converted to pyrazinoic acid and needs an acidic pH for full efficacy, which increases as the metabolism of the mycobacterium decreases. This is why it acts best against dormant, persistent Mtb (49). Microarray data suggest that salicylates cause a de-energized status in Mtb by down-regulating translation and transcription of genes for energy production (38). This is supported by the fact that aspirin enhanced the effect of Z in vivo, but not in vitro (15). This does however not explain the synergistic effect of ibuprofen in combination with Z. Byrne et al. suggest that an anti-inflammatory mechanism via reduction of PGs was less likely, as this would antagonize the acidic pH built in inflammation needed for action of Z (15). However, since the efficacy of Z is not pH-dependent despite a slightly acidic pH optimum, the excessive inflammation might reduce its efficacy, which is the case for the other anti-TB drugs as well.

Currently, four CTs are ongoing to evaluate the effect of NSAIDs during TB treatment. The anti-inflammatory properties of NSAIDs seem of potential benefit in TB-IRIS (29): an ongoing trial is evaluating the benefit of meloxicam in TB-IRIS (NCT02060006). Based on the findings by Vilaplana et al. (13), a pilot study is currently conducted in Georgia, to assess the potential safety and efficacy of ibuprofen as an add-on in the treatment of pre-XDR and XDR-TB patients (NCT02781909). Moreover, there is a pilot study on the way, which aims to evaluate the benefit of low-dose (75 mg/day) and high-dose aspirin: 1 g/day (much higher than in Schoeman et al. (100 mg/day) (10) as an adjunctive to anti-TB treatment of HIV-negative adults with TBM (NCT02237365). Shroff et al. found that the non-responder state of mice to M. vaccae by i.p. route of immunization was corrected by pre-treatment with indomethacin (16); and this strategy should be evaluated for other therapeutic vaccines as well. In this sense, there is an ongoing CT (NCT02503839) evaluating the concurrent administration of a COX-2 inhibitor (etoricoxib) and a therapeutic vaccine in addition to conventional TB-treatment in MDR-TB. In vitro and in vivo data showed that DCL and many other NSAIDs have direct bactericidal properties (see Table 3) (18). A CT is evaluating the bactericidal ex vivo activity of celecoxib (a COX-selective NSAID) against Mtb in whole blood from healthy volunteers (NCT02602509).

In conclusion, and despite open questions that should be addressed in further research and the well-known side effects, NSAIDs potentially have beneficial effect in treatment of TB (8, 13). Even if most of the evidence is limited to preclinical studies and consequently clinical studies are warranted for confirmation of safety and efficacy, NSAIDs could be a secure, simple, and (depending on the NSAID drug) a cheap adjunction for future TB (including MDR/XDR-TB)-treatment regimens.

Author Contributions

All authors made substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work. VK and MG contributed to the acquisition, analysis, interpretation of data for the work. All authors drafted the work, revised it critically for important intellectual content, and gave final approval of the version to be published; and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Funding

This work was supported by the Plan Nacional I + D + I co-financed by ISCIII-Subdirección General de Evaluación and Fondo-EU de Desarrollo Regional (FEDER) through CV contract CP13/00174. VMK received a PROMOS-grant by German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD) and a Fernweh-grant from the International Student Office (ISO) of the University of Oldenburg. The study and evaluation of host-directed therapies against tuberculosis is part of the EDCTP2 programme supported by the European Union. The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

1. Pai M, Behr MA, Dowdy D, Dheda K, Divangahi M, Boehme CC, et al. Tuberculosis. Nat Rev Dis Primers (2016) 2:16076. doi:10.1038/nrdp.2016.76

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. WHO. Treatment of Tuberculosis: Guidelines. 4th ed. Geneva: World Health Organization (2010).

Google Scholar

3. Zumla A, Maeurer M, Host-Directed Therapies Network Consortium. Host-directed therapies for tackling multi-drug resistant tuberculosis: learning from the Pasteur-Bechamp debates. Clin Infect Dis (2015) 61(9):1432–8. doi:10.1093/cid/civ631

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Ivanyi J, Zumla A. Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs for adjunctive tuberculosis treatment. J Infect Dis (2013) 208(2):185–8. doi:10.1093/infdis/jit153

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Zumla A, Maeurer M, Host-Directed Therapies NetworkChakaya J, Hoelscher M, Ntoumi F, et al. Towards host-directed therapies for tuberculosis. Nat Rev Drug Discov (2015) 14(8):511–2. doi:10.1038/nrd4696

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Hawn TR, Matheson AI, Maley SN, Vandal O. Host-directed therapeutics for tuberculosis: can we harness the host? Microbiol Mol Biol Rev (2013) 77(4):608–27. doi:10.1128/MMBR.00032-13

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Kiran D, Podell BK, Chambers M, Basaraba RJ. Host-directed therapy targeting the Mycobacterium tuberculosis granuloma: a review. Semin Immunopathol (2016) 38(2):167–83. doi:10.1007/s00281-015-0537-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Marzo E, Vilaplana C, Tapia G, Diaz J, Garcia V, Cardona PJ. Damaging role of neutrophilic infiltration in a mouse model of progressive tuberculosis. Tuberculosis (Edinb) (2014) 94(1):55–64. doi:10.1016/j.tube.2013.09.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Berger VW, Alperson SY. A general framework for the evaluation of clinical trial quality. Rev Recent Clin Trials (2009) 4(2):79–88. doi:10.2174/157488709788186021

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Schoeman JF, Janse van Rensburg A, Laubscher JA, Springer P. The role of aspirin in childhood tuberculous meningitis. J Child Neurol (2011) 26(8):956–62. doi:10.1177/0883073811398132

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Horsfall PA, Plummer J, Allan WG, Girling DJ, Nunn AJ, Fox W. Double blind controlled comparison of aspirin, allopurinol and placebo in the management of arthralgia during pyrazinamide administration. Tubercle (1979) 60(1):13–24. doi:10.1016/0041-3879(79)90051-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Petty TL, Dalrymple GV. Inhibition of pyrazinamide hyperuricemia by small doses of acetylsalicylic acid. Ann Intern Med (1964) 60:898–900. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-60-5-898

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Vilaplana C, Marzo E, Tapia G, Diaz J, Garcia V, Cardona PJ. Ibuprofen therapy resulted in significantly decreased tissue bacillary loads and increased survival in a new murine experimental model of active tuberculosis. J Infect Dis (2013) 208(2):199–202. doi:10.1093/infdis/jit152

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Byrne ST, Denkin SM, Zhang Y. Aspirin antagonism in isoniazid treatment of tuberculosis in mice. Antimicrob Agents Chemother (2007) 51(2):794–5. doi:10.1128/AAC.01145-06

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Byrne ST, Denkin SM, Zhang Y. Aspirin and ibuprofen enhance pyrazinamide treatment of murine tuberculosis. J Antimicrob Chemother (2007) 59(2):313–6. doi:10.1093/jac/dkl486

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Shroff KE, Sainis KB, Sengupta SR, Kamat RS. Role of antigen-presenting cells in variation in immunogenicity of mycobacteria. Clin Exp Immunol (1990) 79(2):285–90. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2249.1990.tb05192.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Hernandez-Pando R, Orozco H, Mancilla R. T-cell lung granulomas induced by sepharose-coupled Mycobacterium tuberculosis protein antigens: immunosuppressive phenomena reversed with cyclophosphamide and indomethacin. Immunology (1995) 86(4):506–11.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

18. Dutta NK, Kumar KA, Mazumdar K, Dastidar SG. In vitro and in vivo antimycobacterial activity of antiinflammatory drug, diclofenac sodium. Indian J Exp Biol (2004) 42(9):922–7.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

19. Dutta NK, Mazumdar K, Dastidar SG, Park JH. Activity of diclofenac used alone and in combination with streptomycin against Mycobacterium tuberculosis in mice. Int J Antimicrob Agents (2007) 30(4):336–40. doi:10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2007.04.016

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Hankey GJ, Eikelboom JW. Antithrombotic drugs for patients with ischaemic stroke and transient ischaemic attack to prevent recurrent major vascular events. Lancet Neurol (2010) 9(3):273–84. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(10)70038-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Kramnik I, Beamer G. Mouse models of human TB pathology: roles in the analysis of necrosis and the development of host-directed therapies. Semin Immunopathol (2016) 38(2):221–37. doi:10.1007/s00281-015-0538-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Kimmey JM, Huynh JP, Weiss LA, Park S, Kambal A, Debnath J, et al. Unique role for ATG5 in neutrophil-mediated immunopathology during M. tuberculosis infection. Nature (2015) 528(7583):565–9. doi:10.1038/nature16451

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Jamwal SV, Mehrotra P, Singh A, Siddiqui Z, Basu A, Rao KV. Mycobacterial escape from macrophage phagosomes to the cytoplasm represents an alternate adaptation mechanism. Sci Rep (2016) 6:23089. doi:10.1038/srep23089

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Eisen DP, McBryde ES, Walduck A. Low-dose aspirin and ibuprofen’s sterilizing effects on Mycobacterium tuberculosis suggest safe new adjuvant therapies for tuberculosis. J Infect Dis (2013) 208(11):1925–7. doi:10.1093/infdis/jit476

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Saha B, Das G, Vohra H, Ganguly NK, Mishra GC. Macrophage-T cell interaction in experimental mycobacterial infection. Selective regulation of co-stimulatory molecules on Mycobacterium-infected macrophages and its implication in the suppression of cell-mediated immune response. Eur J Immunol (1994) 24(11):2618–24. doi:10.1002/eji.1830241108

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Schoeman J, Mansvelt E, Springer P, van Rensburg AJ, Carlini S, Fourie E. Coagulant and fibrinolytic status in tuberculous meningitis. Pediatr Infect Dis J (2007) 26(5):428–31. doi:10.1097/01.inf.0000261126.60283.cf

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Lammie GA, Hewlett RH, Schoeman JF, Donald PR. Tuberculous cerebrovascular disease: a review. J Infect (2009) 59(3):156–66. doi:10.1016/j.jinf.2009.07.012

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Schoeman JF, Van Zyl LE, Laubscher JA, Donald PR. Effect of corticosteroids on intracranial pressure, computed tomographic findings, and clinical outcome in young children with tuberculous meningitis. Pediatrics (1997) 99(2):226–31. doi:10.1542/peds.99.2.226

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Meintjes G, Wilkinson RJ, Morroni C, Pepper DJ, Rebe K, Rangaka MX, et al. Randomized placebo-controlled trial of prednisone for paradoxical tuberculosis-associated immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome. AIDS (2010) 24(15):2381–90. doi:10.1097/QAD.0b013e32833dfc68

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Misra UK, Kalita J, Nair PP. Role of aspirin in tuberculous meningitis: a randomized open label placebo controlled trial. J Neurol Sci (2010) 293(1–2):12–7. doi:10.1016/j.jns.2010.03.025

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Ikonomidis I, Andreotti F, Economou E, Stefanadis C, Toutouzas P, Nihoyannopoulos P. Increased proinflammatory cytokines in patients with chronic stable angina and their reduction by aspirin. Circulation (1999) 100(8):793–8. doi:10.1161/01.CIR.100.8.793

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Maitra A, Bates S, Shaik M, Evangelopoulos D, Abubakar I, McHugh TD, et al. Repurposing drugs for treatment of tuberculosis: a role for non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Br Med Bull (2016) 118(1):138–48. doi:10.1093/bmb/ldw019

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Schaller A, Sun Z, Yang Y, Somoskovi A, Zhang Y. Salicylate reduces susceptibility of Mycobacterium tuberculosis to multiple antituberculosis drugs. Antimicrob Agents Chemother (2002) 46(8):2636–9. doi:10.1128/AAC.46.8.2636-2639.2002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Elvers KT, Wright SJ. Antibacterial activity of the anti-inflammatory compound ibuprofen. Lett Appl Microbiol (1995) 20(2):82–4. doi:10.1111/j.1472-765X.1995.tb01291.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Simonetti A, Marzi S, Billas IM, Tsai A, Fabbretti A, Myasnikov AG, et al. Involvement of protein IF2 N domain in ribosomal subunit joining revealed from architecture and function of the full-length initiation factor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (2013) 110(39):15656–61. doi:10.1073/pnas.1309578110

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Guzman JD, Evangelopoulos D, Gupta A, Birchall K, Mwaigwisya S, Saxty B, et al. Antitubercular specific activity of ibuprofen and the other 2-arylpropanoic acids using the HT-SPOTi whole-cell phenotypic assay. BMJ Open (2013) 3(6):e002672. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002672

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Yin Z, Wang Y, Whittell LR, Jergic S, Liu M, Harry E, et al. DNA replication is the target for the antibacterial effects of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Chem Biol (2014) 21(4):481–7. doi:10.1016/j.chembiol.2014.02.009

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Denkin S, Byrne S, Jie C, Zhang Y. Gene expression profiling analysis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis genes in response to salicylate. Arch Microbiol (2005) 184(3):152–7. doi:10.1007/s00203-005-0037-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Dastidar SG, Ganguly K, Chaudhuri K, Chakrabarty AN. The anti-bacterial action of diclofenac shown by inhibition of DNA synthesis. Int J Antimicrob Agents (2000) 14(3):249–51. doi:10.1016/S0924-8579(99)00159-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Annadurai S, Basu S, Ray S, Dastidar SG, Chakrabarty AN. Antibacterial activity of the antiinflammatory agent diclofenac sodium. Indian J Exp Biol (1998) 36(1):86–90.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

41. Sriram D, Yogeeswari P, Devakaram RV. Synthesis, in vitro and in vivo antimycobacterial activities of diclofenac acid hydrazones and amides. Bioorg Med Chem (2006) 14(9):3113–8. doi:10.1016/j.bmc.2005.12.042

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Kalle AM, Rizvi A. Inhibition of bacterial multidrug resistance by celecoxib, a cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor. Antimicrob Agents Chemother (2011) 55(1):439–42. doi:10.1128/AAC.00735-10

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Patel VA, Dunn MJ, Sorokin A. Regulation of MDR-1 (P-glycoprotein) by cyclooxygenase-2. J Biol Chem (2002) 277(41):38915–20. doi:10.1074/jbc.M206855200

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Salunke SB, Azad AK, Kapuriya NP, Balada-Llasat JM, Pancholi P, Schlesinger LS, et al. Design and synthesis of novel anti-tuberculosis agents from the celecoxib pharmacophore. Bioorg Med Chem (2015) 23(9):1935–43. doi:10.1016/j.bmc.2015.03.041

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Gold B, Pingle M, Brickner SJ, Shah N, Roberts J, Rundell M, et al. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug sensitizes Mycobacterium tuberculosis to endogenous and exogenous antimicrobials. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (2012) 109(40):16004–11. doi:10.1073/pnas.1214188109

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Chiniforoshan H, Tabrizi L, Hadizade M, Sabzalian MR, Chermahini AN, Rezapour M. Anti-inflammatory drugs interacting with Zn (II) metal ion based on thiocyanate and azide ligands: synthesis, spectroscopic studies, DFT calculations and antibacterial assays. Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc (2014) 128:183–90. doi:10.1016/j.saa.2014.02.135

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Kovala-Demertzi D, Dokorou V, Primikiri A, Vargas R, Silvestru C, Russo U, et al. Organotin meclofenamic complexes: synthesis, crystal structures and antiproliferative activity of the first complexes of meclofenamic acid – novel anti-tuberculosis agents. J Inorg Biochem (2009) 103(5):738–44. doi:10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2009.01.014

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Dutta NK, Annadurai S, Mazumdar K, Dastidar SG, Kristiansen JE, Molnar J, et al. Potential management of resistant microbial infections with a novel non-antibiotic: the anti-inflammatory drug diclofenac sodium. Int J Antimicrob Agents (2007) 30(3):242–9. doi:10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2007.04.018

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Mitchison DA, Davies GR. Assessment of the efficacy of new anti-tuberculosis drugs. Open Infect Dis J (2008) 2:59–76. doi:10.2174/1874279300802010059

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, host-directed therapies, tuberculosis, systematic review, infectious diseases

Citation: Kroesen VM, Gröschel MI, Martinson N, Zumla A, Maeurer M, van der Werf TS and Vilaplana C (2017) Non-Steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs As Host-Directed Therapy for Tuberculosis: A Systematic Review. Front. Immunol. 8:772. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.00772

Received: 12 May 2017; Accepted: 19 June 2017;
Published: 30 June 2017

Edited by:

Kuldeep Dhama, Indian Veterinary Research Institute (IVRI), India

Reviewed by:

Elsa Anes, Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal
Shoor Vir Singh, Central Institute for Research on Goats (ICAR), India

Copyright: © 2017 Kroesen, Gröschel, Martinson, Zumla, Maeurer, van der Werf and Vilaplana. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Cristina Vilaplana, cvilaplana@igtp.cat, cvilaplana@gmail.com

These authors also act as representatives of the Africa-Europe Host-Directed Therapies Network (HDT-NET) Consortium.