@ARTICLE{10.3389/fmicb.2015.00320, AUTHOR={Thingstad, T. Frede and Pree, Bernadette and Giske, Jarl and Våge, Selina}, TITLE={What difference does it make if viruses are strain-, rather than species-specific?}, JOURNAL={Frontiers in Microbiology}, VOLUME={6}, YEAR={2015}, URL={https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2015.00320}, DOI={10.3389/fmicb.2015.00320}, ISSN={1664-302X}, ABSTRACT={Theoretical work has suggested an important role of lytic viruses in controlling the diversity of their prokaryotic hosts. Yet, providing strong experimental or observational support (or refutation) for this has proven evasive. Such models have usually assumed “host groups” to correspond to the “species” level, typically delimited by 16S rRNA gene sequence data. Recent model developments take into account the resolution of species into strains with differences in their susceptibility to viral attack. With strains as the host groups, the models will have explicit viral control of abundance at strain level, combined with explicit predator or resource control at community level, but the direct viral control at species level then disappears. Abundance of a species therefore emerges as the combination of how many strains, and at what abundance, this species can establish in competition with other species from a seeding community. We here discuss how species diversification and strain diversification may introduce competitors and defenders, respectively, and that the balance between the two may be a factor in the control of species diversity in mature natural communities. These models can also give a dominance of individuals from strains with high cost of resistance; suggesting that the high proportion of “dormant“ cells among pelagic heterotrophic prokaryotes may reflect their need for expensive defense rather than the lack of suitable growth substrates in their environment.} }