Skip to main content

EDITORIAL article

Front. Microbiol., 16 June 2015
Sec. Aquatic Microbiology
This article is part of the Research Topic Microbial symbiosis of marine sessile hosts- diversity, function and applications. View all 11 articles

Editorial for: Microbial symbiosis of marine sessile hosts- diversity and function

  • School of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Science and Centre for Marine Bio-Innovation, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia

The marine surface environment is home to a large and often diverse community of microorganisms. Yet compared to terrestrial ecosystems we still know little about the diversity, degree of host-specificity, functional role or the molecular mechanisms of host-microbe interactions in marine systems. This research topic brings together 10 articles that highlight advances in our understanding of microbial communities associated with marine sessile eukaryotic hosts.

Many papers in this research topic have a particular focus on the stability and diversity of bacterial symbionts of marine sponges. Sponges are a diverse group of sessile organisms, which represent one of the earliest metazoan life forms and play an important role in benthic ecosystems due to their filter feeding activity (e.g., De Goeij et al., 2013). Many biogeochemical processes are carried out by sponge-associated microorganisms, which can comprise up to 35% of the sponge biomass (Hentschel et al., 2012). The evolutionary history and biological importance of the sponge-microbe interaction make them attractive models to study general concepts in marine microbial-host symbiosis. Three articles (Burgsdorf et al., 2014; Cuvelier et al., 2014; Easson and Thacker, 2014) use molecular approaches to elucidate the major factors that determine the composition of sponge symbiotic microbial communities. Burgsdorf et al. (2014) show that the local environment, rather than the host features, influences the community composition of distinct morphotypes of the sponge Petrosia ficiformis. In contrast, Cuvelier et al. (2014) conclude for the sponge Cinachyrella that the sponge host itself has the greatest influence on determining its microbial community composition. These seemingly opposing views are in part reconciled in the findings of Easson and Thacker (2014) that support the concept of a “core” microbial community in sponges, in line with previous studies (Schmitt et al., 2012), but also highlight that for individual sponge species the taxonomic identity of microbial symbionts can vary greatly.

Using seaweed as another marine model, Campbell et al. (2015) performed a local transplantation experiment to show that the symbiont community of the brown macroalgae Phyllospora comosa is primarily influenced by the local conditions, with some evidence for host-specificity. Thus, like sponges, the microbial community composition of seaweeds is also likely determined by a combination of environmental and host factors, a pattern that is emerging now of several sessile marine systems (Wahl et al., 2012; Egan et al., 2013).

Aside from diversity patterns, functional processes such as nitrogen fixation are also important for the dynamics of host-microbe symbiosis, as demonstrated in the research article by Zhang et al. (2014). This study found that expression of nitrogen fixation genes (nifH) occurred in two Caribbean sponges over the entire day-night cycle. Comparison between the two sponge species suggested that nitrogen fixation is dominated by a conserved group of cyanobacteria, with the heterotrophic bacterial community mainly contributing during the night.

In contrast to these beneficial aspects of symbiosis, interactions can also be negative and thus result in disease (Webster, 2007; Burge et al., 2013; Egan et al., 2014). Two papers in this research topic examine negative interactions in different marine sessile hosts (Raftos et al., 2014; Zozaya-Valdes et al., 2015). Raftos et al. (2014) review the history and impact of microbial disease on shellfish and using QX disease in Sydney rock oysters, illustrate the complex interactions that exist between pathogens, the environment and hosts. Zozaya-Valdes et al. (2015) provides molecular evidence for the ecological importance of certain bacteria in the bleaching disease of the red macroalga Delisea pulchra and also highlight the possibility that multiple opportunistic bacterial pathogens exist.

During the last decade, next-generation sequencing technologies have rapidly advanced our understanding of microbial diversity in the marine environment (Gilbert and Dupont, 2011; Williamson and Yooseph, 2012). However, these culture-independent approaches should be complemented by the culturing of representative microorganisms, followed by detailed physiological, biochemical and genetic studies (Giovannoni and Stingl, 2007; Joint et al., 2010). Hardoim et al. (2014) tackle this challenge using a range of culturing, molecular and microscopy techniques to address cultivation bias when studying microbial communities in sponges. Using a “plate-washing method” they were able to culture an order of magnitude more bacterial species than previous cultivation studies (Hardoim et al., 2012). Approximately half of the bacterial species cultured were not detected in the sponge by culture-independent methods demonstrating the need for these complementary approaches to be used to fully characterize microbial diversity.

Having model bacteria is clearly important to explore mechanistic aspects of symbiosis. The article by Gardiner et al. (2014) illustrates this by showing that the seaweed-associated bacterium P. tunicata utilizes a surface lipoprotein (designated Ptl32) to attach to its host. Interestingly, Ptl32 shares homology to a conserved protein in Leptospira species, the causative agent of leptospirosis in animals (Murray, 2013), and this suggests that this attachment mechanism might be distributed between distantly related bacterial species via horizontal gene transfer (HGT). A clear link between organisms and their functions is important to define the importance of HGT in marine microbial symbiosis and this is further explored in the final article of this research topic. Here, Degnan (2014) raised a number of compelling points of how HGT between symbiotic microorganisms and marine invertebrates can shape the evolution of holobionts. HGT is clearly an underappreciated mechanism by which bacteria can influence their host (or vice versa).

The articles presented in this research topic highlight the diverse microbial communities associated with marine sessile macroorganisms play important roles in their health, function and evolution. Through the contributions of experts in classical microbiology (Gardiner et al., 2014; Hardoim et al., 2014), cell biology (Raftos et al., 2014), ecology (Campbell et al., 2015), evolution (Degnan, 2014) and molecular ecology (Burgsdorf et al., 2014; Cuvelier et al., 2014; Easson and Thacker, 2014; Zhang et al., 2014; Zozaya-Valdes et al., 2015), the papers in this research topic also demonstrate the benefits of using a multidisciplinary approach to understand the diversity, function and evolution of complex symbiotic systems.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by two Future Fellowships (FT130100828 and FT140100197) of the Australian Research Council awarded to S.E. and T.T.

References

Burge, C. A., Kim, C. J., Lyles, J. M., and Harvell, C. D. (2013). Special issue Oceans and Humans Health: the ecology of marine opportunists. Microb. Ecol. 65, 869–879. doi: 10.1007/s00248-013-0190-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Burgsdorf, I., Erwin, P. M., Lopez-Legentil, S., Cerrano, C., Haber, M., Frenk, S., et al. (2014). Biogeography rather than association with cyanobacteria structures symbiotic microbial communities in the marine sponge Petrosia ficiformis. Front. Microbiol. 5:529. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00529

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Campbell, A. H., Marzinelli, E. M., Gelber, J., and Steinberg, P. D. (2015). Spatial variability of microbial assemblages associated with a dominant habitat-forming seaweed. Front. Microbiol. 6:230. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00230

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cuvelier, M. L., Blake, E., Mulheron, R., McCarthy, P. J., Blackwelder, P., Thurber, R. L., et al. (2014). Two distinct microbial communities revealed in the sponge Cinachyrella. Front. Microbiol. 5:581. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00581

CrossRef Full Text | PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Degnan, S. M. (2014). Think laterally: horizontal gene transfer from symbiotic microbes may extend the phenotype of marine sessile hosts. Front. Microbiol. 5:638. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00638

CrossRef Full Text | PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

De Goeij, J. M., Van Oevelen, D., Vermeij, M. J. A., Osinga, R., Middelburg, J. J., De Goeij, A. F. P. M., et al. (2013). Surviving in a marine desert: the sponge loop retains resources within coral reefs. Science 342, 108–110. doi: 10.1126/science.1241981

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Easson, C. G., and Thacker, R. W. (2014). Phylogenetic signal in the community structure of host-specific microbiomes of tropical marine sponges. Front. Microbiol. 5:532. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00532

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Egan, S., Fernandes, N. D., Kumar, V., Gardiner, M., and Thomas, T. (2014). Bacterial pathogens, virulence mechanism and host defence in marine macroalgae. Environ. Microbiol. 16, 925–938. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.12288

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Egan, S., Harder, T., Burke, C., Steinberg, P., Kjelleberg, S., and Thomas, T. (2013). The seaweed holobiont: understanding seaweed-bacteria interactions. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 37, 462–476. doi: 10.1111/1574-6976.12011

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gardiner, M., Hoke, D. E., and Egan, S. (2014). An ortholog of the Leptospira interrogans lipoprotein LipL32 aids in the colonization of Pseudoalteromonas tunicata to host surfaces. Front. Microbiol. 5:323. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00323

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gilbert, J. A., and Dupont, C. L. (2011). Microbial metagenomics: beyond the genome. Ann. Rev. Mar. Sci. 3, 347–371. doi: 10.1146/annurev-marine-120709-142811

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Giovannoni, S., and Stingl, U. (2007). The importance of culturing bacterioplankton in the ‘omics’ age. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 5, 820–826. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1752

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hardoim, C. C., Cardinale, M., Cucio, A. C., Esteves, A. I., Berg, G., Xavier, J. R., et al. (2014). Effects of sample handling and cultivation bias on the specificity of bacterial communities in keratose marine sponges. Front. Microbiol. 5:611. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00611

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hardoim, C. C., Esteves, A. I., Pires, F. R., Goncalves, J. M., Cox, C. J., Xavier, J. R., et al. (2012). Phylogenetically and spatially close marine sponges harbour divergent bacterial communities. PLoS ONE 7:e53029. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0053029

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hentschel, U., Piel, J., Degnan, S. M., and Taylor, M. W. (2012). Genomic insights into the marine sponge microbiome. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 10, 641–654. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2839

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Joint, I., Muhling, M., and Querellou, J. (2010). Culturing marine bacteria—an essential prerequisite for biodiscovery. Microb. Biotechnol. 3, 564–575. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7915.2010.00188.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Murray, G. L. (2013). The lipoprotein LipL32, an enigma of leptospiral biology. Vet. Microbiol. 162, 305–314. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2012.11.005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Raftos, D. A., Kuchel, R., Aladaileh, S., and Butt, D. (2014). Infectious microbial diseases and host defense responses in Sydney rock oysters. Front. Microbiol. 5:135. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00135

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Schmitt, S., Tsai, P., Bell, J., Fromont, J., Ilan, M., Lindquist, N., et al. (2012). Assessing the complex sponge microbiota: core, variable and species-specific bacterial communities in marine sponges. ISME J. 6, 564–576. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2011.116

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wahl, M., Goecke, F., Labes, A., Dobretsov, S., and Weinberger, F. (2012). The second skin: ecological role of epibiotic biofilms on marine organisms. Front. Microbiol. 3:292. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2012.00292

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Webster, N. S. (2007). Sponge disease: a global threat? Environ. Microbiol. 9, 1363–1375. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2007.01303.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Williamson, S. J., and Yooseph, S. (2012). From bacterial to microbial ecosystems (metagenomics). Methods Mol. Biol. 804, 35–55. doi: 10.1007/978-1-61779-361-5_3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, F., Vicente, J., and Hill, R. T. (2014). Temporal changes in the diazotrophic bacterial communities associated with Caribbean sponges Ircinia stroblina and Mycale laxissima. Front. Microbiol. 5:561. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00561

CrossRef Full Text | PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Zozaya-Valdes, E., Egan, S., and Thomas, T. (2015). A comprehensive analysis of the microbial communities of healthy and diseased marine macroalgae and the detection of known and potential bacterial pathogens. Front. Microbiol. 6:146. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00146

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: microbial interactions, microbial diversity, sponges, seaweeds, macroalgae, oysters, marine diseases, beneficial microorganisms

Citation: Egan S and Thomas T (2015) Editorial for: Microbial symbiosis of marine sessile hosts- diversity and function. Front. Microbiol. 6:585. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00585

Received: 13 April 2015; Accepted: 27 May 2015;
Published: 16 June 2015.

Edited by:

Jonathan P. Zehr, University of California, Santa Cruz, USA

Reviewed by:

Nicole Webster, Australian Institute of Marine Science, Australia

Copyright © 2015 Egan and Thomas. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Suhelen Egan, s.egan@unsw.edu.au

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.