Original Research ARTICLE
Genetic Resistance Determinants, In Vitro Time-Kill Curve Analysis and Pharmacodynamic Functions for the Novel Topoisomerase II Inhibitor ETX0914 (AZD0914) in Neisseria gonorrhoeae
- 1Institute for Infectious Diseases, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- 2Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- 3WHO Collaborating Centre for Gonorrhoea and other STIs, National Reference Laboratory for Pathogenic Neisseria, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
- 4Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
- 5Laboratories of Bacterial Pathogenesis, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Decatur, GA, USA
Resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae to all available therapeutic antimicrobials has emerged and new efficacious drugs for treatment of gonorrhea are essential. The topoisomerase II inhibitor ETX0914 (also known as AZD0914) is a new spiropyrimidinetrione antimicrobial that has different mechanisms of action from all previous and current gonorrhea treatment options. In this study, the N. gonorrhoeae resistance determinants for ETX0914 were further described and the effects of ETX0914 on the growth of N. gonorrhoeae (ETX0914 wild type, single step selected resistant mutants, and eﬄux pump mutants) were examined in a novel in vitro time-kill curve analysis to estimate pharmacodynamic parameters of the new antimicrobial. For comparison, ciprofloxacin, azithromycin, ceftriaxone, and tetracycline were also examined (separately and in combination with ETX0914). ETX0914 was rapidly bactericidal for all wild type strains and had similar pharmacodynamic properties to ciprofloxacin. All selected resistant mutants contained mutations in amino acid codons D429 or K450 of GyrB and inactivation of the MtrCDE eﬄux pump fully restored the susceptibility to ETX0914. ETX0914 alone and in combination with azithromycin and ceftriaxone was highly effective against N. gonorrhoeae and synergistic interaction with ciprofloxacin, particularly for ETX0914-resistant mutants, was found. ETX0914, monotherapy or in combination with azithromycin (to cover additional sexually transmitted infections), should be considered for phase III clinical trials and future gonorrhea treatment.
The sexually transmitted infection gonorrhea, caused by Neisseria gonorrhoeae, is a significant global public health concern (World Health Organization [WHO], 2008; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC], 2012; World Health Organization and Department of Reproductive Health and Research, 2012a,b). In vitro resistance, including high-level resistance, to the last available option for first-line empirical antimicrobial monotherapy, the third-generation extended-spectrum cephalosporin ceftriaxone, has emerged (Ohnishi et al., 2011; Cámara et al., 2012; Ison, 2012; Unemo and Nicholas, 2012; Unemo et al., 2012a; Unemo and Shafer, 2014). Sporadic failures to treat pharyngeal gonorrhea with ceftriaxone have also been verified in several countries (Ohnishi et al., 2011; Unemo and Nicholas, 2012; Unemo et al., 2011, 2012b; Chen et al., 2013; Read et al., 2013; Golparian et al., 2014a).
New drugs with mechanisms of action that are distinct from previously used antimicrobials are urgently needed to forestall scenarios in which gonorrhea becomes very difficult to treat or even untreatable. Spiropyrimidinetriones represent a recently developed class of antimicrobials that inhibit bacterial DNA type II topoisomerases, i.e., DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV (Basarab et al., 2015). Their mechanisms of action differs from that of all other available antimicrobials, including DNA topoisomerase inhibitors such as the fluoroquinolones (Mayer and Janin, 2014; Huband et al., 2015; Kern et al., 2015). ETX0914 (also known as AZD0914; Entasis Therapeutics, Waltham, MA, USA) is a novel, not yet clinically used or commercially available, spiropyrimidinetrione, aimed for oral administration, with potent in vitro activity against key Gram-positive, fastidious Gram-negative, atypical and anaerobic bacterial species, including isolates with high-level resistance to fluoroquinolones (Huband et al., 2015). ETX0914 was recently shown to have an excellent in vitro activity against a wide variety of clinical N. gonorrhoeae strains, including many multidrug-resistant (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) strains. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values for ETX0914 ranged between ≤0.004 and 0.25 mg/L and no cross-resistance to the fluoroquinolone ciprofloxacin or other antimicrobials previously or currently used in the treatment of gonorrhea was observed (Jacobsson et al., 2014).
ETX0914 stabilizes and arrests the cleaved covalent complex of DNA gyrase with double-strand broken DNA and thus blocks religation of the double-strand cleaved DNA to form fused circular DNA (Mayer and Janin, 2014; Huband et al., 2015; Kern et al., 2015). Accordingly, ETX0914 inhibits DNA biosynthesis and replication by an accumulation of DNA double strand cleavages and prevention of religation, in contrast to the fluoroquinolones (Mayer and Janin, 2014; Palmer et al., 2014; Huband et al., 2015; Kern et al., 2015). In N. gonorrhoeae, resistance to ETX0914 has been selected in vitro in a few gonococcal strains and the resistance mutations D429N and/or K450T, occurring at low frequencies, were mapped to gyrB (Alm et al., 2015). The effects on the MIC of ETX0914 by other gyrB mutations and possible mutations in gyrA, parC, parE, or porB, encoding the PorB porin, genes as well as over-expression of eﬄux pumps remain unknown.
The evaluation of a new antimicrobial includes an assessment of the relationship between exposure to the drug and bacterial growth (Drusano, 2004). The MIC gives a biological measure of the susceptibility of a pathogen to an antimicrobial, but does not give any information about how different antimicrobial concentrations affect bacterial growth over time (Li et al., 1999). Regoes et al. (2004) introduced the concept of pharmacodynamic functions, which are related to maximum effect (Emax) models, to examine the relationship between antimicrobial concentration and bacterial growth and death rates, estimated from in vitro time-kill curves. Antimicrobials with identical MICs but a different pharmacodynamic function can have differences in antimicrobial efficacy. Appropriate in vitro growth and pharmacodynamic assays for the obligate human pathogen N. gonorrhoeae have been lacking and would be exceedingly valuable.
The aims of the present study were to extend the characterization of the resistance determinants for ETX0914 and to investigate how ETX0914 affects the growth of N. gonorrhoeae (ETX0914 wild type, single step resistant mutants and eﬄux pump mutants) using a novel in vitro time-kill curve analysis to estimate pharmacodynamic parameters of the new antimicrobial (Foerster et al., 2015). The results for ETX0194 were compared to those of ciprofloxacin, azithromycin, ceftriaxone, and tetracycline. Combinations of these antimicrobials with ETX0194 were also further investigated using checkerboard analysis and time-kill curve analysis.
Material and Methods
The international N. gonorrhoeae reference strains WHO F, WHO O, WHO P (Unemo et al., 2009), the ceftriaxone high-level resistant XDR strain H041 (Ohnishi et al., 2011), and single step selected resistant mutants of WHO O and P were included in this study. The relevant phenotypic and genetic characteristics of these parental strains are summarized in Table 1. All strains were cultured on GCAGP agar plates (3.6% Difco GC Medium Base agar [BD, Diagnostics, Sparks, MD, USA] supplemented with 1% hemoglobin [BD, Diagnostics], 1% IsoVitalex [BD, Diagnostics] and 10% horse serum) for 18–20 h at 37°C in a humid 5% CO2-enriched atmosphere.
Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing
The MICs (mg/L) of ETX0914 (Entasis Therapeutics, Waltham, MA, USA) were determined by agar dilution technique, in accordance with the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines (Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, 2014) and as previously described (Jacobsson et al., 2014). Susceptibility to ciprofloxacin, azithromycin, ceftriaxone, and tetracycline was determined using the Etest method (bioMérieux, Marcy l’Etoile, France) in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions, on GCRAP agar plates (3.6% Difco GC Medium Base agar [BD, Diagnostics] supplemented with 1% hemoglobin [BD, Diagnostics] and 1% IsoVitalex [BD, Diagnostics]).
Selection of Single Step ETX0914-Resistant Mutants
Resistant mutants were selected on GC agar plates (3.6% Difco GC Medium Base agar [BD, Diagnostics] supplemented with 1% IsoVitalex [BD, Diagnostics]) containing 2-fold increasing concentrations of ETX0914 (0.032-8 mg/L). Briefly, WHO F, WHO P, WHO O, and H041 (Table 1) were cultured on GCAGP agar plates for 18–20 h at 37°C in a humid 5% CO2-enriched atmosphere. Fresh cultures (18 h) from 10 agar plates were pooled and suspended in 2 mL of sterile PBS. A dilution series (ranging from 1:100 to 1:1014) of the bacterial suspension in PBS was plated on compound free GC agar plates. Undiluted 100 μL aliquots were plated on ETX0914-containing GC agar plates and grown for 48 h at 37°C in a humid 5% CO2-enriched atmosphere. Selected resistant mutants that grew at the highest ETX0914 concentration were sub-cultured for 24 h on GCAGP agar plates and frozen at -70°C.
To identify the ETX0914 resistance mutations in the selected mutants, gyrB was amplified by PCR and sequenced as described (Jacobsson et al., 2014).
Generation of Eﬄux Pump Mutants
The mtrD, macA, and norM genes, coding for components of the MtrCDE, MacAB and NorM eﬄux pumps, were inactivated in strains by spot transformation (Gunn and Stein, 1996) using 0.1 μg of chromosomal DNA from genetic derivatives of strain FA19 or wild type strain FA19 bearing insertions in mtrD (strain KH14; mtrD::kan), macA (strain BR54 macA::spc) or norM (strain FA19 norM::kan), as previously described (Golparian et al., 2014b).
Time-kill curve analyses were performed by culturing the N. gonorrhoeae strains in liquid Graver–Wade (GW) medium (Wade and Graver, 2007). Eleven antimicrobial-concentrations in doubling dilutions ranging from 0.016 × MIC to 16 × MIC, in Sarstedt 96-well round bottom microtiter plates (360 μL wells) were examined for the following antimicrobials: ETX0914 (Entasis Therapeutics), ciprofloxacin (Sigma Aldrich, USA), azithromycin (Sigma Aldrich), ceftriaxone (Sigma Aldrich), and tetracycline (Sigma Aldrich). Growth curves were initially performed to confirm that all strains would reach a stable early- to mid-log phase after 4 h of pre-incubation in antimicrobial-free GW medium. Subsequently, a 0.5 McFarland inoculum of N. gonorrhoeae was prepared in sterile PBS from cultures grown on GCAGP agar plates for 18–20 h at 37°C in a humid 5% CO2-enriched atmosphere. For each strain, 30 μL of the inoculum was diluted in 15 mL pre-warmed antimicrobial-free GW medium (37°C) and 90 μL per well was dispersed in Sarstedt 96-well round bottom microtiter plates (360 μL wells). The plates were pre-incubated for 4 h shaking at 150 rpm, 35°C in a humid 5% CO2-enriched atmosphere. To each well containing 90 μL of pre-incubated bacteria, 10 μL of one of the antimicrobial concentrations (or PBS) was added, resulting in eight identical rows containing bacteria exposed to 11 different antimicrobial concentrations and one untreated control. Colony forming units (CFUs) were measured using a modified Miles and Misra method as previously described (Chen et al., 2003). At 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 h after exposure, the total volume of one row was removed using a multichannel pipette and diluted in PBS in six subsequent 1:10 dilutions. Ten μL droplets of each dilution were spotted on GCRAP agar plates (diameter 14 cm; pre-dried with open lid in a sterile environment for 30–60 min). After drying the plates (∼5–10 min), they were incubated for 24 h at 37°C in a humid 5% CO2–enriched atmosphere. Colonies were then counted and numbers extrapolated to CFUs/mL by multiplying the initial volume of 10 μL with 100 and the dilution factor.
Pharmacodynamic Function and Hierarchical Clustering
The results of the novel in vitro time-kill curve analysis were used to estimate pharmacodynamic parameters of antimicrobials. In brief, the bacterial net growth rates were estimated from changes in the density of viable bacteria (CFU/mL) between 0 and 6 h of the time-kill experiments, as previously described (Foerster et al., 2015). A pharmacodynamic function was then fitted to the bacterial net growth rates in response to different concentrations of antimicrobials as earlier detailed (Regoes et al., 2004). In this pharmacodynamic function, the bottom asymptote (parameter ψmin) and top asymptote (parameter ψmax) represent the minimal and maximal bacterial net growth rate at high concentrations and in absence of antimicrobial, respectively. The slope of the sigmoidal curve at the inflection point (Hill coefficient or parameter κ) describes the steepness of the relationship between bacterial growth and antimicrobial concentration. The pharmacodynamic MIC (parameter zMIC) is the antimicrobial concentration that results in a net growth rate of zero. The heatmap was produced by plotting the numeric values of the minimal bacterial net growth rate at high concentrations of antimicrobial (ψmin) and the Hill coefficient (κ; steepness of the relationship between bacterial growth and antimicrobial concentration) in a color gradient from red (high values) to blue (low values). The fitting routine was based on self-starter models as implemented in the R package drc (Ritz and Streibig, 2005). The hierarchical clustering was performed using the complete linkage algorithm as implemented in the package heatmap3 (Zhao et al., 2014). The distances in the resulting dendrogram represented similarities between strains and antimicrobials. Further details regarding fitting the pharmacodynamic function to the bacterial net growth rates in response to different concentrations of antimicrobials and all estimated parameters using the function in the present study have been summarized in Supplementary Table S1.
Checkerboard assays for examination of antimicrobial combinations were performed as previously described (Meletiadis et al., 2010), with minor modifications. Doubling dilution series for both antimicrobials starting at 16 × MIC of each antimicrobial (combined in 1:1 ratios) were prepared in PBS. Five micro liter of each of the dilution series were combined in a Sarstedt 96 well round bottom microtiter plate (360 μL wells), resulting in a gradient that contained the highest concentration of drugs in well A1. A bacterial suspension in GW medium (Wade and Graver, 2007), containing approximately 105 CFU/mL from 18–20 h old culture on GCAGP agar plates was prepared and incubated for 4 h at 150 rpm, 37°C, humid 5% CO2-enriched atmosphere in a 50 mL Erlenmeyer flask. These cultures were added to the checkerboard plates containing the antimicrobial combinations (90 μL culture + 10 μL antimicrobial dilution per well). Bacterial growth in each well was assessed visually after 24 h of incubation with a magnifying glass. The isoeffective combinations were determined as the lowest drug concentrations showing no visual growth (optically clear well).
Fractional Inhibitory Concentration Index (FICI) Analysis
The fractional inhibitory concentration index (FICI) was calculated as follows (White et al., 1996):
Among all the FICIs calculated for all isoeffective combinations, the minimum FIC (FICImin) and the maximum FIC (FICImax) were reported in order to identify synergistic and antagonistic interactions. Cut-off criteria of ≤0.5 for synergy and >4 for antagonism were applied (Odds, 2003). The FICI was also calculated for the zMIC values of the time-kill experiments, applying the same criteria. To calculate the concentrations of both antimicrobials in the combination, the ratio was calculated dividing zMIC/(maximal concentration A + maximal concentration of B). The antimicrobial interaction was only considered to be verified if checkerboard and time-kill assay results agreed.
Selection of Single Step ETX0914-Resistant Mutants
Single step mutants were selected at very low frequencies on GC agar plates (<1.9 × 10-14) from the reference strains WHO F, O, and P, but not for H041. All selected resistant mutants contained a single amino acid alteration (D429N, D429A, or K450T) in GyrB, which resulted in ETX0914 MICs of 0.5–4 mg/L. However, these gyrB mutations did not significantly affect the MICs of ciprofloxacin, azithromycin, ceftriaxone, and tetracycline (Table 2). The selected resistant mutants OM-5 and PM-4 were selected for further analysis.
TABLE 2. Single step selected resistant mutants, gyrB mutations, frequency of selected mutations, and effects on MIC of examined antimicrobials.
Effect on ETX0914 Susceptibility by Inactivation of Eﬄux Pumps
By inactivation of the MtrCDE eﬄux pump, susceptibility to ETX0914 was fully restored (MIC = 0.125 mg/L) in both resistant mutants and the ETX0914 MIC values in the ETX0914 wild type WHO F, O, P and H041 strains decreased significantly (3- to 5-fold). Additional inactivation of the MacAB or NorM eﬄux pumps decreased the MIC of ETX0914 in the H041 strain (from 0.125 mg/L to 0.008 mg/L), but these inactivations had no significant effect on the MICs of ETX0914 in the other strains. As previously shown (Golparian et al., 2014b), the inactivation of the MtrCDE eﬄux pump significantly increased the susceptibility also to azithromycin in all strains and to ceftriaxone in most strains (Table 3).
TABLE 3. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MICs)a,b in Neisseria gonorrhoeae wild type strains and selected ETX0914-resistant mutants after inactivation of the MtrCDE, MacAB, and NorM eﬄux pumps.
Time-kill Curve Analysis
The phenotypic effects of ETX0914 on the ETX0914 wild type WHO F, O, P and H041 strains, as well as the resistant OM-5 and PM-4 mutants were assessed in time-kill curve analysis. Similar time-kill curve profiles were obtained for all the wild type strains (Figures 1A–C,E). The CFUs of all wild type strains were reduced to below the limit of detection (100 CFU/mL) at 8 × MIC and 16 × MIC, and killed, albeit more slowly at 2 × MIC and 4 × MIC, within 4 h of exposure. The net growth rates decreased quickly in the first hour and then leveled off. ETX0914 also killed the resistant mutants OM-5 and PM-4 at concentrations above the MIC but the mutants were above the limit of detection (100 CFU/mL) even at the highest ETX0914 concentration (16 × MIC) for the exposure time of 6 h. The decrease in net growth rates in response to increased ETX0914 concentrations was smaller and more gradual compared to their respective wild type strains (Figures 1D,F).
FIGURE 1. Time-kill curves of six different Neisseria gonorrhoeae strains with ETX0914: H041 (A), WHO F (B), WHO O (C), OM-5 (D; in vitro selected resistant mutant from WHO O), WHO P (E), and PM-4 (F; in vitro selected resistant mutant from WHO P). Untreated controls are shown in red, each line corresponds to a doubling concentration of the antimicrobial, and circles indicate each measured time point. The limit of detection in the assay was 100 colony forming units (CFUs)/mL.
The net growth rates for each ETX0914 concentration examined were calculated and a pharmacodynamic function fitted to the data (Figure 2). The minimal bacterial net growth rate at high concentrations of antimicrobial (parameter ψmin) was not identifiable (below ∼10 h-1) for all the wild type strains and was substantially higher for both the resistant mutants (-1.2 for OM-5 and -1.4 for PM-4). The steepness of the slope of the pharmacodynamic relationship (Hill coefficient; parameter κ) did not differ for the wild type strains compared to the resistant mutants. The pharmacodynamic zMIC (concentration that results in net growth rate of zero) of ETX0914 was within one MIC doubling dilution of those obtained with agar dilution technique. The pharmacodynamic parameter estimates for ETX0941 were compared to those of ciprofloxacin, azithromycin, ceftriaxone, and tetracycline (Figure 3). In general, each antimicrobial resulted in a unique pharmacodynamic profile. For ciprofloxacin, the “minimal growth rate” (parameter ψmin) was low for all four wild type strains (Figure 3B). For the highly ciprofloxacin-resistant strain H041, the “minimal growth rate” (ψmin) was below detection limit (100 CFU/mL) and did not level off in the range of examined concentrations (<-15). However, the “minimal growth rate” (ψmin) was significantly increased in both the resistant mutants, i.e., similar as was observed for ETX0914. The high zMIC of ciprofloxacin in H041 shifted its curve away from the curves of the susceptible strains (Figure 3B). Ciprofloxacin and ETX0914 had the lowest “minimal growth rates” (ψmin), followed by azithromycin, ceftriaxone, and tetracycline. Tetracycline exposure resulted in “minimal growth rate” (ψmin) values relatively close to zero in all strains with exception of WHO F (Figure 3E).
FIGURE 2. Pharmacodynamic functions based on the time-kill curve data for ETX0914 and six different Neisseria gonorrhoeae strains: H041 (A), WHO F (B), WHO O (C), OM-5 (D; in vitro selected resistant mutant from WHO O), WHO P (E), and PM-4 (F; in vitro selected resistant mutant from WHO P). The bacterial growth rates per hour derived from linear regression on time-kill curves for each ETX0914 concentration are plotted. Growth in absence of ETX0914 was plotted as a red circle, at a tenth of the lowest concentration to allow plotting on a log scale, and decreasing ETX0914 concentrations are shown from dark to light blue color.
FIGURE 3. Comparisons of pharmacodynamic functions based on the time-kill curve data for ETX0914 (A), ciprofloxacin (B), azithromycin (C), ceftriaxone (D), and tetracycline (E) and six different Neisseria gonorrhoeae strains: H041, WHO F, WHO O, OM-5 (in vitro selected resistant mutant from WHO O), WHO P, and PM-4 (in vitro selected resistant mutant from WHO P). The bacterial growth rates per hour derived from linear regression on time-kill curves for each antimicrobial concentration are plotted.
In the hierarchical clustering of the “minimal growth rate” (ψmin) (Figure 4A), ETX0914 and ciprofloxacin clustered together. Azithromycin showed relatively close similarity to this cluster, followed by ceftriaxone and tetracycline. The two resistant mutants OM-5 and PM-4 clustered together and could be clearly distinguished from the wild type strains. Hierarchical clustering did not reveal any clearly distinguishable pattern between the steepness of the slope of the pharmacodynamic relationship (Hill coefficient; parameter κ) for resistant mutants and the wild type strains. Only the XDR strain H041 appeared distinctly separated from the other strains in this clustering. The highest value of the Hill coefficient (steepest slope of the pharmacodynamic relationship) were obtained for ciprofloxacin (Figure 4B). The maximal growth rate in the absence of antimicrobial (ψmax parameter) ranged between 0.3 and 1.4 h-1 for the susceptible strains, corresponding to a bacterial doubling time of 30–139 min. This parameter was substantially lower in the resistant mutants compared to their respective wild type strains (Figure 4C). Overall, the pharmacodynamic zMIC values were very similar to the MICs determined using agar dilution technique and/or Etest (Spearman rank correlation coefficient 0.95). The 95% confidence interval for the regression line was substantially wider for the very low and high MIC values (Figure 4D).
FIGURE 4. Pharmacodynamic properties of ETX0914 in direct comparison to ciprofloxacin, azithromycin, ceftriaxone and tetracycline. (A) Shows a hierarchical clustering for the minimal bacterial net growth rate at high concentrations of antimicrobial (parameter ψmin), (B) for the steepness of the slope of the pharmacodynamic function (Hill coefficient, κ), (C) shows the maximal growth rate in the absence of antimicrobial (parameter ψmax) for each strain calculated as mean and standard error from all independent experiments (Supplementary Table S1) and (D) the correlation between MICs measured with conventional methods (Etest or agar dilution technique; values below <0.002 mg/L and >32 mg/L (Etest detection limit) were excluded from the analysis) and pharmacodynamic MIC (zMIC). The linear regression line is drawn in black and the confidence interval shaded in gray. The heatmap was produced by plotting the numeric values of ψmin and the Hill coefficient (κ) in a color gradient from red (high values) to blue (low values). The hierarchical clustering was performed using the complete linkage algorithm as implemented in the package heatmap3 (Zhao et al., 2014). The distances in the resulting dendrogram represented similarities between strains and antimicrobials.
Checkerboard Assay and Time-kill Curve Analysis for Antimicrobial Combinations
The checkerboard assay identified an indifferent effect (FICI = 0.5–3) for most antimicrobial combinations and strains (Table 4). However, the combination of ETX0914 and ciprofloxacin indicated synergism for the resistant mutants OM-5 and PM-4 in both the checkerboard assay (FICI range: 0.4–1 for both mutants) and time-kill curve analysis (FICI: 0.1 and 0.10, respectively). The combination of ETX0914 and ciprofloxacin also indicated synergism for the wild type strain WHO F in the time-kill curve analysis (FICI: 0.4), and in the checkerboard assays the corresponding FICI was at the breakpoint for synergy, that is, 0.5. Furthermore, the combination of ETX0914 and ceftriaxone indicated synergism for the wild type WHO P strain and its isogenic selected resistant mutant (PM-4) in the time-kill curve analysis (FICI: 0.3 and 0.02, respectively), and in the checkerboard assays the corresponding FICIs were at the breakpoint for synergy, that is, 0.5–0.6. The only antagonism indicated in the checkerboard assays was for the combination of ETX0914 and tetracycline and the XDR strain H041 (FICI range: 2–8), but no antagonism was detected in the time-kill curve analysis (FICI = 1.9). A qualitative comparison of the time-kill curves revealed that ETX0914 combined with ciprofloxacin or azithromycin resulted in a more rapid bactericidal effect compared to ETX0914 alone (Supplementary Figure S1). For the resistant mutants, the “minimal growth rate” (ψmin) was significantly lower with both these combinations compared to ETX0914 alone.
TABLE 4. Fractional inhibitory concentration index (FICI) from the checkerboard assay and time-kill curve analysis.
This study extends the characterization of N. gonorrhoeae resistance determinants for the novel spiropyrimidinetrione ETX0914; the new D429A resistance mutation in GyrB was identified and it was shown that the MtrCDE eﬄux pump exports ETX0914 (MtrCDE inactivation restored susceptibility to wild type MIC levels). The effects of ETX0914 on the growth of N. gonorrhoeae (ETX0914 wild type, single step selected resistant mutants, and eﬄux pump mutants) were detailed in a novel in vitro time-kill curve analysis to estimate pharmacodynamic parameters (Foerster et al., 2015) of the new antimicrobial. For comparison, ciprofloxacin, azithromycin, ceftriaxone and tetracycline were also investigated, separately and in combination with ETX0914, using time-kill curve analysis and checkerboard analysis. ETX0914 was rapidly bactericidal for all wild type strains and had similar pharmacodynamic properties to ciprofloxacin. ETX0914 in combination with azithromycin and ceftriaxone was highly effective and synergistic interaction with ciprofloxacin, particularly for ETX0914-resistant mutants, was also found.
Single step ETX0914-resistant mutants, ETX0914 MICs of 0.5–4 mg/L, were selected at very low frequencies on GC agar plates (<1.9 × 10-14) from the wild type N. gonorrhoeae WHO F, O, and P strains, but not from H041. All resistant mutants had mutations in the DNA gyrase subunit GyrB. In addition to previously identified gyrB D429N and K450T mutations in selected ETX0914-resistant mutants (Alm et al., 2015), the present study also found a D429A mutation in one of the resistant mutants. Interestingly, using the more nutritious GCAGP agar medium (including also 1% hemoglobin and 10% horse serum) and selection during 72 h incubation, resistant mutants were obtained from all four strains and in a higher frequency, that is, with a frequency of 5 × 10-9 for WHO F, 1 × 10-8 for WHO O and WHO P, and 8 × 10-9 for H041, consistent with a previous publication (Alm et al., 2015). Notably, no gyrB mutations were found in H041. The choice of medium used for selecting mutants strongly influences the mutational frequency, which shows the difficulties of predicting how rapidly resistance to ETX0914 will be selected in vivo. Furthermore, in the present study it was also obvious that the resistance mutations in gyrB reduced the growth rates compared to their isogenic wild type strains and this decreased biological fitness might also make it difficult to predict the initial spread of ETX0914-resistant mutants in vivo.
Inactivation of the MtrCDE eﬄux pump increased susceptibility in wild type strains and restored the susceptibility to wild type levels in the selected ETX0914-resistant mutants (from 2–4 mg/L to 0.125 mg/L). In one strain (H041), inactivation of also the MacAB and NorM eﬄux pumps substantially decreased the MIC of ETX0914 (from 0.125 mg/L to 0.008 mg/L). This shows that eﬄux pumps, especially the MtrCDE pump, can influence susceptibility to ETX0914.
Pharmacodynamic modeling and prediction of the efficacy of different dosing regimens for cefixime and ceftriaxone have been previously performed using a combination of clinical data and in vitro data (Chisholm et al., 2010). There is, however, no appropriate in vitro method to determine whether single dose or multiple doses of new antimicrobials, such as ETX0914, in monotherapy or in dual therapy provide effective bactericidal activity. The present study quantified the antibacterial effects of ETX0914 and compared the results to those of previously or currently used antimicrobials by calculating the net growth rates from time-kill curve analysis and fitting a pharmacodynamic function to the time-kill curve data. The highest concentration included was 16 × MIC (measured with agar dilution technique prior to the experiment), to avoid toxic off-target effects that can occur at unrealistically high antimicrobial concentrations. For all wild type strains, ETX0914 exhibited bactericidal activity (>99.9% killing) after only 4 h at 8 × MIC and 16 × MIC, and more gradual bactericidal activity at 2 × MIC and 4 × MIC in the susceptible strains, but not in the mutants. Analysis of the pharmacodynamic function to predict the concentration- and time-dependent properties of antimicrobials from time-kill curve data was established in an Escherichia coli model (Regoes et al., 2004). For antimicrobials with a steep slope of the pharmacodynamic relationship, as characterized by a high value for the Hill coefficient (parameter κ), the Cmax/MIC ratio should be maximized, showing concentration dependency. When MIC, steepness of the slope of the pharmacodynamic function (Hill coefficient; parameter κ) and maximal bacterial net growth rate in the absence of antimicrobial (ψmax) were equal, low values of the minimal bacterial net growth rate at high concentrations of antimicrobial (ψmin) were suggested to predict efficacy of the antimicrobial. That study, however, only examined a single E. coli strain over a time-course of 70 min (Regoes et al., 2004). The present study examined the parameters of the pharmacodynamic function for several different N. gonorrhoeae strains (wild type and selected ETX0914-resistant mutants) and an extended 6 h sampling window. An excellent correlation between the zMIC and the MIC measured with Etest or agar dilution technique was found, despite the different growth medium and exposure time. This indicates that the time-kill curve analysis was optimized, quality assured and consistent. The highest deviations were found for ceftriaxone, probably because the sampling period of 6 h was too short to capture the full effect of this time-dependent antimicrobial.
Hierarchical clustering also helped to find similarities across antimicrobials and strains. The “minimal growth rate” (ψmin) summarized the highest killing rate measured within the 6 h assay time in response to the antimicrobial. The values for the “minimal growth rate” (ψmin) were much higher in the isogenic ETX0914-resistant mutants compared to the susceptible wild type strains and these clustered together. Nevertheless, additional work is needed to evaluate whether this increase in the “minimal growth rate” (ψmin) is characteristic of gyrB mutations or if it is generalizable to other resistance mechanisms and antimicrobials. In general, ETX0914 and ciprofloxacin showed the highest similarity in the clustering across all strains, which is not surprising considering that both compounds target the same enzyme(s) and are mechanistically quite similar. These similarities are not captured by means of conventional MIC determinations alone. The time-kill curve analysis and subsequent pharmacodynamic analyses used in this study provide additional information. The hierarchical clustering of values of the steepness of the slope of the pharmacodynamic function (Hill coefficient; parameter κ) resulted in a less clear pattern and the Hill coefficient (κ) differed greatly between strains but not significantly in the mutants compared to the wild type strains. There was a non-significant trend for steeper slopes of the pharmacodynamic functions [higher Hill coefficient (κ) values] in the time-dependent antimicrobial ceftriaxone and the bacteriostatic compound tetracycline compared to the more bactericidal azithromycin, ETX0914 and ciprofloxacin.
The results of in vitro time-kill curve analysis and pharmacodynamic functions for ciprofloxacin, azithromycin, ceftriaxone, and tetracycline were, in general, consistent with previous findings using other pharmacodynamic analysis methods (Drusano, 2004). For drugs like fluoroquinolones (e.g., ciprofloxacin) and macrolides (e.g., azithromycin), a high ratio of maximum concentration to MIC (Cmax/MIC ratio) predicts a successful treatment outcome (Li et al., 1999; Drusano, 2004). This requires maximizing the dose given to a patient. ETX0914 was rapidly bactericidal with a pharmacodynamic profile similar to ciprofloxacin, so maximizing the concentration of ETX0914 in a single dose should be highly effective. In contrast, for time-dependent drugs (including β-lactams and tetracyclines) a long time of free antimicrobial above MIC (fT/MIC ratio) or a large ratio of the area under the pharmacokinetic curve to MIC (AUC/MIC) predicts a successful treatment outcome. Therefore, several smaller doses or continuous infusions to maximize the time above MIC can have a better treatment outcome than one large dose (Jacobs, 2001; Drusano, 2004; Asín-Prieto et al., 2015).
Combinations of ETX0914 with ciprofloxacin, azithromycin, ceftriaxone, or tetracycline were explored comparing FICIs from the time-kill curve analysis and checkerboard assay. In general, the results of the time-kill curve analysis and checkerboard assay were concordant, but the error for estimating the zMIC was high in some pharmacodynamic models and this was reflected in the uncertainty of the FICI values. ETX0914 and ciprofloxacin showed synergy particularly in the ETX0914 resistant mutants. It was also recently found that specific gyrB mutations might result in a conformational change creating a more favorable binding pocket for ciprofloxacin and, accordingly, a decreased ciprofloxacin MIC in ciprofloxacin-resistant N. gonorrhoeae strains (Alm et al., 2015) as well as the fact that K450T mutation, resulting in ETX0914 resistance, conveys increased susceptibility to ciprofloxacin (Kern et al., 2015). The combination of ETX0914 and ciprofloxacin might be beneficial because ETX0914 acts bactericidal on ciprofloxacin resistant strains and vice versa. The drug interaction between ETX0914 and ciprofloxacin strengthens the hypothesis of two different targets that influence each other. Non-competitive inhibition of the same enzyme by two antimicrobials that follow the rule of Bliss independence will also lead to synergy in a theoretical model based on Michaelis Menten kinetics (Breitinger, 2012). The combination of ETX0914 with azithromycin showed a more rapid killing in a qualitative analysis of the time-kill curve and no antagonism was observed for any of the examined strains in the time-kill curve analysis or checkerboard assays. These results indicate that ETX0914 could also be beneficially administered together with azithromycin in an oral dual antimicrobial therapy, which also would be able to treat concomitant sexually transmitted infections such as Chlamydia trachomatis and many Mycoplasma genitalium infections.
ETX0914 (AZD0914) was rapidly bactericidal and had similar pharmacodynamic properties to ciprofloxacin. Specific mutations in GyrB result in resistance to ETX0914 and MtrCDE inactivation restore susceptibility to wild type levels. ETX0914 alone and in dual combinations with ciprofloxacin, azithromycin, or ceftriaxone were highly effective against N. gonorrhoeae. ETX0914, as oral monotherapy or combined with azithromycin (to cover also additional sexually transmitted infections), should be considered for appropriate Phase III clinical trials and future gonorrhea treatment.
SF, NL, CLA, WS, and MU designed and initiated the study. SF, DG, SJ, LH, and MU coordinated and performed all the laboratory analyses. SF and MU analyzed and interpreted all the data, and wrote a first draft of the paper. All authors read, commented on and approved the final manuscript.
The present study was funded by an Interdisciplinary Ph.D. (IPh.D.) project grant from SystemsX.ch (The Swiss Initiative for Systems Biology), RaDAR-Go (Rapid Diagnosis of Antibiotic Resistance in Gonorrhoea) financed by SwissTransMed (Platforms for Translational Research in Medicine), the Örebro County Council Research Committee, and the Foundation for Medical Research at Örebro University Hospital, Sweden.
WS is a recipient of a Senior Research Career Scientist Award from the Biomedical Laboratory Research and Development branch of the Medical Research Service of the United States Department of Veterans Affairs. The contents of the paper do not represent the views of the Department of Veterans Affairs or the United States government.
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
We are very grateful to Entasis Therapeutics, particularly to Michael Huband, Kenneth, Lawrence and John Mueller, for providing the ETX0914 compound.
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fmicb.2015.01377
Alm, R. A., Lahiri, S. D., Kutschke, A., Otterson, L. G., McLaughlin, R. E., Whiteaker, J. D., et al. (2015). Characterization of the novel DNA gyrase inhibitor AZD0914: low resistance potential and lack of cross-resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 59, 1478–1486. doi: 10.1128/AAC.04456-14
Asín-Prieto, E., Rodríguez-Gascón, A., and Isla, A. (2015). Applications of the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) analysis of antimicrobial agents. J. Infect. Chemother. 21, 319–329. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2015.02.001
Basarab, G. S., Kern, G. H., McNulty, J., Mueller, J. P., Lawrence, K., Vishwanathan, K., et al. (2015). Responding to the challenge of untreatable gonorrhea: ETX0914, a first-in-class agent with a distinct mechanism-of-action against bacterial Type II topoisomerases. Sci. Rep. 5:11827. doi: 10.1038/srep11827
Cámara, J., Serra, J., Ayats, J., Bastida, T., Carnicer-Pont, D., and Andreu, A., et al. (2012). Molecular characterization of two high-level ceftriaxone-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolates detected in Catalonia, Spain. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 67, 1858–1860. doi: 10.1093/jac/dks162
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC] (2012). Cephalosporin-Resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae Public Health Response Plan. Atlanta, GA, 1–43. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/std/treatment/ceph-r-responseplanjuly30-2012.pdf [Accessed July 30, 2015].
Chen, C. Y., Nace, G. W., and Irwin, P. L. (2003). A 6 x 6 drop plate method for simultaneous colony counting and MPN enumeration of Campylobacter jejuni, Listeria monocytogenes, and Escherichia coli. J. Microbiol. Methods 55, 475–479. doi: 10.1016/S0167-7012(03)00194-5
Chen, M. Y., Stevens, K., Tideman, R., Zaia, A., Tomita, T., Fairley, C. K., et al. (2013). Failure of 500 mg of ceftriaxone to eradicate pharyngeal gonorrhoea, Australia. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 68, 1445–1447. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkt017
Chisholm, S. A., Mouton, J. W., Lewis, D. A., Nichols, T., Ison, C. A., and Livermore, D. M. (2010). Cephalosporin MIC creep among gonococci: time for a pharmacodynamic rethink? J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 65, 2141–2148. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkq289
Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (2014). Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing; 24th Informational Supplement. CLSI Document M100-S24. Wayne, PA: CLSI. Available at: http://antimicrobianos.com.ar/ATB/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/M100S22E.pdf
Foerster, S., Unemo, M., Hathaway, L. J., Low, N., and Althaus, C. L. (2015). Time-kill curve analysis and pharmacodynamic functions for in vitro evaluation of antimicrobials against Neisseria gonorrhoeae. bioRxiv doi: 10.1101/028506
Golparian, D., Ohlsson, A., Janson, H., Lidbrink, P., Richtner, T., Ekelund, O., et al. (2014a). Four treatment failures of pharyngeal gonorrhoea with ceftriaxone (500 mg) or cefotaxime (500 mg), Sweden, 2013 and 2014. Euro Surveill. 19:20862. doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES2014.19.30.20862
Golparian, D., Shafer, W. M., Ohnishi, M., and Unemo, M. (2014b). Importance of multi-drug eﬄux pumps in the antimicrobial resistance property of clinical multi-drug resistant isolates of Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 58, 3556–3559. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00038-14
Gunn, J. S., and Stein, D. C. (1996). Use of a non-selective transformation technique to construct a multiply restriction/modification-deficient mutant of Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Mol. Gen. Genet. 251, 509–517.
Huband, M. D., Bradford, P. A., Otterson, L. G., Basarab, G. S., Kutschke, A. C., Giacobbe, R. A., et al. (2015). In vitro antibacterial activity of AZD0914, a new spiropyrimidinetrione DNA gyrase/topoisomerase inhibitor with potent activity against Gram-positive, fastidious Gram-Negative, and atypical bacteria. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 59, 467–474. doi: 10.1128/AAC.04124-14
Ison, C. A. (2012). Antimicrobial resistance in sexually transmitted infections in the developed world: implications for rational treatment. Curr. Opin. Infect. Dis. 25, 73–78. doi: 10.1097/QCO.0b013e32834e9a6a
Jacobsson, S., Golparian, D., Alm, R. A., Huband, M., Mueller, J., Jensen, J. S., et al. (2014). High in vitro activity of the novel spiropyrimidinetrione AZD0914, a DNA gyrase inhibitor, against multidrug-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolates suggests a new effective option for oral treatment of gonorrhea. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 58, 5585–5588. doi: 10.1128/AAC.03090-14
Kern, G., Palmer, T., Ehmann, D. E., Shapiro, A. B., Andrews B., Basarab, G. S., et al. (2015). Inhibition of Neisseria gonorrhoeae type II topoisomerases by the novel spiropyrimidinetrione AZD0914. J. Biol. Chem. 290, 20984–20994. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M115.663534
Li, R. C., Zhu, M., and Schentag, J. J. (1999). Achieving an optimal outcome in the treatment of infections. The role of clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of antimicrobials. Clin. Pharmacokinet. 37, 1–16. doi: 10.2165/00003088-199937010-00001
Meletiadis, J., Pournaras, S., Roilides, E., and Walsh, T. J. (2010). Defining fractional inhibitory concentration index cutoffs for additive interactions based on self-drug additive combinations, Monte Carlo simulation analysis, and in vitro-in vivo correlation data for antifungal drug combinations against Aspergillus fumigatus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 54, 602–609. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00999-09
Ohnishi, M., Golparian, D., Shimuta, K., Saika, T., Hoshina, S., and Iwasaku, K., et al. (2011). Is Neisseria gonorrhoeae initiating a future era of untreatable gonorrhea?: detailed characterization of the first strain with high-level resistance to ceftriaxone. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 55, 3538–3545. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00325-11
Palmer, T., Walkup, G., Basarab, G., Fan, J., Mills, S. D., Shapiro, A., et al. (2014). “AZD0914: a Neisseria gonorrhoeae Topoisomerase II inhibitor with novel mode of inhibition, poster C-1422,” in Proceedings of the Abstracts 54th Interscience Conference Antimicrobial Agents Chemotherapy American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC.
Read, P. J., Limnios, E. A., McNulty, A., Whiley, D., and Lahra, M. M. (2013). One confirmed and one suspected case of pharyngeal gonorrhoea treatment failure following 500 mg ceftriaxone in Sydney, Australia. Sex Health 10, 460–462. doi: 10.1071/SH13077
Regoes, R. R., Wiuff, C., Zappala, R. M., Garner, K. N., Baquero, F., and Levin, B. R. (2004). Pharmacodynamic functions: a multiparameter approach to the design of antibiotic treatment regimens. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 48, 3670–3676. doi: 10.1128/AAC.48.10.3670-3676.2004
Ritz, C., and Streibig, J. C. (2005). Bioassay Analysis Using R. J. Stat. Softw. 12. Available at: http://www.jstatsoft.org/v12/i05/paper
Unemo, M., Fasth, O., Fredlund, H., Limnios, A., and Tapsall, J. W. (2009). Phenotypic and genetic characterization of the 2008 WHO Neisseria gonorrhoeae reference strain panel intended for global quality assurance and quality control of gonococcal antimicrobial resistance surveillance for public health purposes. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 63, 1142–1151. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkp098
Unemo, M., Golparian, D., Nicholas, R., Ohnishi, M., Gallay, A., and Sednaoui, P. (2012a). High-level cefixime- and ceftriaxone-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae in France: novel penA mosaic allele in a successful international clone causes treatment failure. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 56, 1273–1280. doi: 10.1128/AAC.05760-11
Unemo, M., Golparian, D., Potočnik, M., and Jeverica, S. (2012b). Treatment failure of pharyngeal gonorrhoea with internationally recommended first-line ceftriaxone verified in Slovenia, September 2011. Euro Surveill. 17:20200.
Wade, J. J., and Graver, M. A. (2007). A fully defined, clear and protein-free liquid medium permitting dense growth of Neisseria gonorrhoeae from very low inocula. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 273, 35–37. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2007.00776.x
White, R. L., Burgess, D. S., Manduru, M., and Bosso, J. A. (1996). Comparison of three different in vitro methods of detecting synergy: time-kill, checkerboard, and E test. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 40, 1914–1918.
World Health Organization and Department of Reproductive Health and Research (2012a). Global Action Plan to Control the Spread and Impact of Antimicrobial Resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Available at: http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/rtis/9789241503501/en/ [Accessed July 30, 2015].
World Health Organization and Department of Reproductive Health and Research (2012b). Global Incidence and Prevalence of Selected Curable Sexually Transmitted Infections – 2008. Available at: http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/rtis/stisestimates/en/ [Accessed July 30, 2015].
World Health Organization [WHO] (2008). Global Incidence and Prevalence of Selected Curable Sexually Transmitted Infections - 2008. Available at: http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/rtis/2008_STI_estimates.pdf [Accessed July 30, 2015].
Keywords: gonorrhea, treatment, antimicrobial resistance, time-kill curve analysis, pharmacodynamics, DNA topoisomerase II inhibitor, ETX0914
Citation: Foerster S, Golparian D, Jacobsson S, Hathaway LJ, Low N, Shafer WM, Althaus CL and Unemo M (2015) Genetic Resistance Determinants, In Vitro Time-Kill Curve Analysis and Pharmacodynamic Functions for the Novel Topoisomerase II Inhibitor ETX0914 (AZD0914) in Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Front. Microbiol. 6:1377. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.01377
Received: 09 August 2015; Accepted: 20 November 2015;
Published: 10 December 2015.
Edited by:Fiona Walsh, National University of Ireland Maynooth, Ireland
Reviewed by:Peter A. Rice, University of Massachusetts Medical School/UMass Memorial Medical Center, USA
John Papp, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, USA
Copyright © 2015 Foerster, Golparian, Jacobsson, Hathaway, Low, Shafer, Althaus and Unemo. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Magnus Unemo, firstname.lastname@example.org