Fluconazole and Echinocandin Resistance of Candida glabrata Correlates Better with Antifungal Drug Exposure Rather than with MSH2 Mutator Genotype in a French Cohort of Patients Harboring Low Rates of Resistance

Candida glabrata is a major pathogenic yeast in humans that is known to rapidly acquire resistance to triazole and echinocandin antifungal drugs. A mutator genotype (MSH2 polymorphism) inducing a mismatch repair defect has been recently proposed to be responsible for resistance acquisition in C. glabrata clinical isolates. Our objectives were to evaluate the prevalence of antifungal resistance in a large cohort of patients in Saint-Louis hospital, Paris, France, some of whom were pre-exposed to antifungal drugs, as well as to determine whether MSH2 polymorphisms are associated with an increased rate of fluconazole or echinocandin resistance. We collected 268 isolates from 147 patients along with clinical data and previous antifungal exposure. Fluconazole and micafungin minimal inhibition concentrations (MICs) were tested, short tandem repeat genotyping was performed, and the MSH2 gene was sequenced. According to the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility breakpoints, 15.7% of isolates were resistant to fluconazole (MIC > 32 mg/L) and 0.7% were resistant to micafungin (MIC > 0.03 mg/L). A non-synonymous mutation within MSH2 occurred in 44% of the isolates, and 17% were fluconazole resistant. In comparison, fluconazole resistant isolates with no MSH2 mutation represented 15% (P = 0.65). MSH2 polymorphisms were associated with the short tandem repeat genotype. The rate of echinocandin resistance is low and correlates with prior exposure to echinocandin. The mutator genotype was not associated with enrichment in fluconazole resistance but instead corresponded to rare and specific genotypes.

Introduction

Ascomycetous yeasts are the most common agents responsible for fungal infections in humans, and the incidence of Candida spp. infections has significantly increased over the last two decades (Lass-Flörl, 2009). Up to 17% of all ICU-acquired infections are caused by Candida spp. and are associated with a high mortality rate, which is showing increasing trends (Lass-Flörl, 2009; Lortholary et al., 2014). Candida glabrata is the second most-common bloodstream Candida species isolated in Europe and North-America (Pfaller and Diekema, 2007). Even though C. glabrata cannot form hyphae, a well-known virulence factor in C. albicans, its pathogenic traits and rapid acquisition of resistance, especially to azoles and echinocandins, are a matter of concern (Cleveland et al., 2012; Wisplinghoff et al., 2014; Vale-Silva and Sanglard, 2015). This yeast has intrinsically low susceptibility to fluconazole, with 10–30% of C. glabrata isolates harboring high fluconazole MICs (MIC >32 mg/L) (Pfaller and Diekema, 2007).

The mechanisms leading to high fluconazole or echinocandin MICs have been documented (Jensen et al., 2015; Vale-Silva and Sanglard, 2015). Most published epidemiological data report the emergence of echinocandin resistance in C. glabrata, especially in North America. The prevalence of echinocandin resistance varies depending on the geographical location, with Europe showing lower rates (0–9%) (Klotz et al., 2016) compared to the rates of 0–25% in the USA (Vallabhaneni et al., 2015). Furthermore, echinocandin resistance seems to have increasing prevalence over time (Alexander et al., 2013; Farmakiotis et al., 2014) and to be associated with a higher mortality rate (Alexander et al., 2013; Shields et al., 2015). C. glabrata develops echinocandin resistance through target mutation of the 1,3-beta-D-glucan synthase gene encoded by FKS1 and FKS2 genes (Alexander et al., 2013; Perlin, 2015). Simultaneous resistance to all echinocandins (caspofungin, micafungin, and anidulafungin) has been detected using various susceptibility-testing methods after specific hotspot polymorphisms develop.

The reason why C. glabrata acquires resistance more rapidly to multiple antifungal classes than other Candida species is unclear and has been attributed to its haploid genome. However, Healey et al. recently suggested that a defect in DNA repair may account for accelerated emergence of various genetic changes responsible for drug resistance (Healey et al., 2016). The aim of this study is to evaluate the factors associated with the isolation of fluconazole or echinocandin resistance in a single French hospital using all isolates recovered over a specific period of time. The association between resistance and antifungal drug pre-exposure as well as MSH2 sequence type, representing potential mutator genotypes, were carefully studied after all isolates were genotyped with short tandem repeat markers to identify individual strains of C. glabrata.

Materials and Methods

Ethics Statement

Saint-Louis Hospital, Paris, France, is a tertiary university hospital with major clinical activities in hematology, renal transplantation, burn unit, and oncology. This study was a non-interventional study with no change in the usual procedures. Biological material and clinical data were obtained only for standard diagnostics following physicians' prescriptions with no specific sampling. According to French Health Public Law (CSP Art L1121-1.1), such a protocol does not require the approval of an ethics committee and is exempted from specific informed consent application.

Isolates and Patients

All consecutive C. glabrata isolates recovered from June 2015 to February 2016 in our mycology laboratory (Saint-Louis Hospital, Paris, France) were prospectively collected. A total of 268 isolates were obtained from various anatomical sites of 147 patients (1–19 isolates per patient, Table 1). All isolates were primary cultured on CHROMagar^® Candida Medium (Becton Dickinson, Heidelberg, Germany) incubated at 37°C for 5 days and identified as C. glabrata using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF, Vitek MS; Biomérieux, Marcy l'Etoile, France). For each isolate, a minimum of 5 colonies were picked together and stored at −80°C. DNA was extracted using a MagNA Pure LC apparatus (Roche, Mannheim, Germany) according to the manufacturer's recommendations and stored at −20°C until PCR was performed. In our hospital, each antifungal drug prescription except for fluconazole is recorded by the pharmacy department with the corresponding indication. This registry has been used to analyze the duration of previous antifungal exposure for each C. glabrata isolate.

TABLE 1

Table 1. Characteristics of patients and isolates.

Susceptibility Testing

Although our hospital does not prescribe micafungin, we tested for it instead of caspofungin according to the recommendations of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) and European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility (EUCAST) (Arendrup et al., 2013). Since interlaboratory variability occurs with caspofungin testing (Espinel-Ingroff et al., 2013), micafungin or anidulafungin can serve as testing surrogates for the echinocandin class to assess resistance (Pfaller et al., 2014a,b; Perlin, 2015). In addition, high micafungin MIC results have been shown to correlate with the occurrence of FKS mutations, which is also the case for high caspofungin MICs (Pham et al., 2014). We used Etest^® for the echinocandin susceptibility testing since it is considered a valuable alternative to the EUCAST broth microdilution method for routine susceptibility testing of micafungin in C. glabrata isolates, with categorical agreement of 96.7% (Bougnoux et al., 2016)

Micafungin and fluconazole MICs were prospectively determined after isolation with Etest^® strips (Biomerieux, Marcy L'Etoile, France) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Briefly, a pool of five yeast colonies of each isolate was suspended in 0.9% sterile saline solution to adjust to a turbidity of a 0.5 McFarland standard (Biomérieux). Candida krusei ATCC 6258 and C. parapsilosis ATCC 22019 were used as quality controls. A broth microdilution reference was used according to the EUCAST method (Arendrup et al., 2012) to test for susceptibility to fluconazole and micafungin in vitro using 18 randomly chosen isolates and 2 isolates showing high micafungin MICs. AM3 medium was used for dilution of micafungin instead of RPMI due to its better ability to distinguish between mutant and wild-type isolates for fks protein (Desnos-Ollivier et al., 2008).

C. krusei ATCC 6258 and C. parapsilosis ATCC 22019 were used as quality controls. We used breakpoint tables of the EUCAST document v8.0 (http://www.eucast.org/clinical_breakpoints/), which were valid as of November 16, 2015 (European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST), 2015), and the EUCAST and Etest^® database of MIC distribution and ECOFFs (http://www.mic.eucast.org). Isolates were categorized as high fluconazole MICs for MICs > 32 mg/L and high micafungin MICs for MICs > 0.03 mg/L (Espinel-Ingroff et al., 2016). Notably, some isolates, including reference strain ATCC MYA 2950 displayed macrocolonies in the inhibition ellipse of Etest^® after 48 h of incubation with fluconazole. These macrocolonies were not observed with the EUCAST technique and were hence not taken into account for Etest^® interpretation.

MSH2 Sequencing

The first 156 consecutive isolates and the two isolates harboring high micafungin MICs were selected for MSH2 sequencing. Twelve primers to cover the 2874 bp gene were used for PCR and sequencing the amplified DNA and to identify msh2 mutations in C. glabrata isolates (Supplementary Table 1). Initial amplification of MSH2 was performed using 3 couples of primers (33F/1888R; 1013F/2170R; 1914F/2985R) and sequenced with the 12 primers listed in Supplementary Table 1. PCR was performed in a volume of 50 μL using 25 μL of ampliTaq Gold 360 MasterMix (Applied Biosystems, Forster City, USA), isolate extracted DNA (1 ng/μL), forward primer (0.6 μM), and reverse primer (0.6 μM). The thermal cycling parameters were as follows: initial denaturation of 10 min at 95°C; 35 cycles of 95°C for 30 s, 55°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 1 min 30 s; and a final elongation step at 72°C for 7 min.

PCR sequencing was performed using BigDye Terminator v1.1 (Thermo) as recommended by the manufacturer. The purification of the PCR products was performed using illustra ExoProStar™ 1-Step (GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Little Chalfont, UK). Sequencing was performed with all primers described (Supplementary Table 1) and using a 3500 series sequencing analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Forster City, USA). The obtained sequences were compared with the reference wild-type sequence of C. glabrata MSH2 (GenBank accession number XM_447585.1) using Geneious v. 8.0 software (Auckland, New Zealand). Non wild-type sequences are available under the GenBank accession numbers KY110686–KY110696.

FKS Sequencing

Twelve primers were used for sequencing the two hotspots regions of the FKS1 and FKS2 genes as described previously (Zimbeck et al., 2010) of the two isolates harboring high micafungin MICs and 9 susceptible isolates. PCR was performed in a volume of 50 μL with 25 μL of ampliTaq Gold 360 MasterMix (Applied Biosystems, Forster City, USA), isolate extracted DNA (1 ng/μL), forward primer (0.25 μM), and reverse primer (0.25 μM). The thermal cycling parameters were as follows: initial denaturation of 10 min at 95°C; 30 cycles at 95°C for 30 s, 58°C for 30 s and 72°C for 30 s; and a final elongation step at 72°C for 10 min. The sequencing parameters where similar to those used for the MSH2 PCR described above. The sequences were compared with those of a reference strain ATCC 2001 (FKS1 GenBank accession number XM_446406, FKS2 GenBank accession number XM_448401, and FKS3 GenBank accession number HQ_845285). Newly described partial FKS sequences are available under the GenBank accession number KY110697.

MSH2 Polymorphism Phenotyping Assay

A phenotyping assay was used to assess the impact of MSH2 polymorphisms on the induction of echinocandin resistance as described previously (Healey et al., 2016). Isolates harboring the previously undescribed MSH2 polymorphisms (E7K, P208S/N890I/Y949C, S591Y, E478Q, S346T, and M651T) were selected and tested. Briefly, the MSH2 sequence was amplified from the corresponding clinical isolates, expressed on a yeast centromere plasmid under the control of their native promoter, and transformed into a laboratory strain carrying a deletion of MSH2 according to Healey et al. (2016). Forward mutation frequencies were analyzed by measuring frequencies of colonies resistant to caspofungin in order to identify whether the tested MSH2 polymorphism contributed to an increase in mutation rate and increased emergence of antifungal resistance.

Short Tandem Repeat (STR) Genotyping Analysis

Ten previously described STRs markers VNTR2bis, VNTR3, VNTR4, VNTR5, VNTR6, VNTR8, VNTR9 (Brisse et al., 2009), GLM5, GLM6 (Abbes et al., 2012), and Cg6 (Grenouillet et al., 2007) were amplified. The forward primers were tagged with fluorophores (FAM, HEX, or ATTO565). All PCR reactions were performed on a GeneAmp PCR System 9700 Thermocycler (Applied Biosystems) in a final volume of 20 μL containing 1X Ampli Taq Gold buffer (Life technologies) with 0.25 μM of each primer, 2.5 mM of MgCl2, 0.8 μM of dNTPs, 0.25 UI of Ampli Taq Gold polymerase (Life technologies), and 2 μL of DNA. The reaction consisted of 10 min at 95°C; 35 cycles of 30 s at 95°C, 30 s at 55°C, and 60 s at 72°C; and a final extension at 72°C for 10 min. After amplification, 2 μL of PCR product was prepared for fragment analysis by adding 18.5 μL of formamide (3700 formamide, Life technologies) and 0.5 μL of Genescan-500 LYZ Size Standard (Life technologies). Capillary electrophoresis was performed with the denaturing polymer POP-7 (Life technologies) in a 50-mm capillary tube at 60°C. The lengths of the PCR fragments were determined on an ABI 3500 genetic analyzer with ABI Gene mapper v4.1 software (Applied Biosystems). Rare genotypes were those for which fewer than 3 isolates/patient were found in our collection. Singletons are genotypes found in only one isolate of our cohort.

Statistical Analyses and Graphs

All analyses were performed with GraphPad Prism software v6.0 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA). Chi-square tests were used to determine differential repartition in MSH2 mutational status, in anatomical localization in specific genotypes between susceptibility groups and to determine resistance. P-values were determined by a non-parametric t-test. A P < 0.05 (two-tailed) is considered statistically significant.

Results

Resistance Rate to Fluconazole and Micafungin

Fluconazole and micafungin Etest^® MICs were determined for the 268 C. glabrata isolates. The characteristics of the 147 patients and isolates are summarized in Table 1, and the distributions of the Etest^® MICs are presented in Figure 1. MIC50 and MIC90 were 16 mg/L and 256 mg/L for fluconazole and 0.016 mg/L and 0.023 mg/L for micafungin, respectively. Fluconazole MICs > 32 mg/L occurred in 42 (15.7%) of the 268 isolates. Two isolates (0.7%) had micafungin MICs > 0.032 mg/L (isolates #96 [0.047 mg/L] and #230 [0.25 mg/L]). Isolate #96 exhibited both high fluconazole and micafungin MICs. Essential agreement (± 2 dilutions) for fluconazole and micafungin MICs was observed for the 20 isolates tested with Etest^® and EUCAST methods (data not shown). EUCAST MICs for isolates #96 and #230 were 64 and 8 mg/L for fluconazole and 0.03 and 0.25 mg/L for micafungin, respectively.

FIGURE 1

Figure 1. Distribution of fluconazole (A) and micafungin (B) MICs using Etest^® for 268 clinical isolates of C. glabrata from 147 patients. Dotted line shows recently published EUCAST breakpoints for C. glabrata susceptibility.

The two hotspots of the three FKS genes of the two isolates harboring high micafungin MICs were sequenced and revealed mutation K1323T in HS2 of FKS1 for isolate #96 and mutation FKS2-F658Δ in HS1 of FKS2 for isolate #230. Notably, the nine randomly selected isolates without high micafungin MICs had wild-type sequence for FKS genes.

Impact of Drug Exposure on Antifungal Resistance

The duration of exposure and the date of initiation of caspofungin, voriconazole, and posaconazole within the past 6 months before sampling was recorded for all patients. Pre-exposed isolates were defined as isolates recovered from patients exposed for at least 7 days to antifungal drugs (treatment began ≥ 7 days before sampling). Voriconazole and posaconazole pre-exposure was significantly associated with recovery of isolates with fluconazole MICs > 32 mg/L (P < 0.001). The proportion of isolates harboring fluconazole MICs > 32 mg/L was significantly higher (20/41, 48.8%) among isolates exposed to triazoles than among unexposed isolates (23/227, 10.1%). Pre-exposure to caspofungin was also significantly associated with higher occurrence of resistance to micafungin (P = 0.007), with two isolates having high micafungin MICs among the 23 isolates exposed to caspofungin. The patient with isolate #230 suffered from extensive burns and was treated with caspofungin and voriconazole for invasive skin infection due to molds. Recurrent mouth and skin swabs showed the emergence of echinocandin resistant C. glabrata after 8 days of treatment. Patient with isolate #96 received caspofungin, but data concerning duration of treatment were lacking.

Impact of Mutator Genotype on Antifungal Resistance

MSH2 sequencing was performed for the first 156 isolates and two micafungin resistant isolates (90 patients).Ŏverall, 69 (44%) isolates harbored non-synonymous polymorphisms within MSH2 gene as compared with the ATCC 2001 reference strain (GenBank accession number: XM_447585.1). Non-synonymous msh2 polymorphisms led to several amino acid changes: P208S/N890I (n = 17), V239L/A942T (n = 14), V239L (n = 11), E7K (n = 9), and E456D (n = 8; Table 2). One isolate harboring a pure microsatellite genotype (one allele per marker) had two different MSH2 genotypes P208S/N890I and V239L/A942T upon sequencing (double peaks at specific positions). Notably, micafungin-resistant isolates #96 and #230 displayed P208S/N890I and wild-type MSH2 sequences, respectively.

TABLE 2

Table 2. Fluconazole MIC distribution of 158 isolates according to MSH2 genotype.

Overall, MSH2 non-synonymous polymorphisms were observed in 48% (12/25) of the isolates harboring high fluconazole MICs and 42.8% (57/133) of isolates harboring low fluconazole MICs (P = 0.66). To avoid any biases in this analysis, we selected one more isolate per genotype per patient (111 isolates, 90 patients) in order to avoid counting the same genotype several times in a given patient. In this situation, no significant association was observed (MSH2 non-synonymous polymorphisms were observed in 62.5% (10/16) of the isolates harboring high fluconazole MICs and 49.5% (47/95) of isolates harboring low fluconazole MICs (P = 0.42)). To enable comparison with data presented in Healey et al. (2016), no significant association was also observed when the threshold for fluconazole resistance was considered as MIC ≥ 32 mg/L.

Relationship between Mutator Genotype and Short Tandem Repeat Genotype

Genotyping analysis of the 268 isolates determined by validated microsatellite genotyping (10 markers) revealed the presence of 49 genotypes (Gt) (median number of isolates per genotypes = 1, range = 1–18). Rare (≤3 isolates per genotype) and frequent (>3 isolates per genotype) genotypes represented 43 minor genotypes (median 1, interquartile [1–1]) and 9 major genotypes (median 4, interquartile [3–6], range [1–18]). Among the 156 isolates sequenced for MSH2, 101 isolates, corresponding to one isolate per genotype per patient, were selected to analyze the correlation between microsatellite genotype and MSH2 sequence. From these 49 genotypes, 44 were considered rare (≤3 isolates per genotype) and 5 frequent (>3 isolates per genotype). Association between MSH2 polymorphism and genotype exists since in the 17 genotypes found more than once in our collection, 13 (76%) harbored the same MSH2 polymorphism in all isolates from a specific genotype (Table 3).

TABLE 3

Table 3. Genotype distribution of 101 isolates (one isolate per genotype per patient) according to the most frequent MSH2 genotype.

In our collection, wild-type isolates harbored 26 different genotypes (including 19 singletons). We found the E7K isolates in one genotype (Gt1), P208/N890I in 11 genotypes (including 7 singletons), E456D in 1 genotype (Gt30), V239L/A942T in 6 genotypes (including 2 singletons), and V239L in 4 genotypes. The seven isolates harboring other MSH2 sequences were found in 7 genotypes (including 4 singletons). Notably, M651T isolates were found in 2 singletons. In total, there was a significant differential distribution of MSH2 polymorphisms in rare and frequent genotypes (P = 0.004, Table 3).

Impact of MSH2 Mutations on Mutator Phenotype

To assess the impact of MSH2 polymorphisms on the induction of echinocandin resistance, a phenotyping assay was used as previously described (Healey et al., 2016). Wild-type or MSH2Δ cells expressing an empty or mutated MSH2-containing plasmid were selected on agar plates containing 1 mg/L of caspofungin (8 to 32-fold above wild type MICs). Upon caspofungin selection in vitro, MSH2Δ exhibited a hyper-mutable phenotype consistent with previous findings (Healey et al., 2016) (average caspofungin resistant colony frequency = 3.47E-7 ± 6.64E-8). Several MSH2 polymorphisms (E478Q, S346T, M651T) found in our clinical isolates demonstrated moderate increases in caspofungin-resistant colony frequencies (4- to 5-fold vs. wild type), although the differences were not significant (P > 0.05) (Figure 2, Supplementary Table 2). However, the MSH2-P208S/N890I/Y949C and MSH2-S591Y alleles did exhibit greater increases (9 to 10-fold vs. wild type) in colony frequencies and an increasing trend (average caspofungin resistant colony frequency = 2.17E-7 ± 7.65E-8 and 1.98E10-7 ± 1.04E-7; P = 0.07 and P = 0.06, respectively). MSH2-E7K yielded caspofungin resistant colonies similar to wild type.

FIGURE 2

Figure 2. Impact of MSH2 mutations on mutator phenotype. Wild-type or MSH2Δ cells expressing an empty or MSH2-containing plasmid were selected on caspofungin. Frequency data are mean ± standard deviation (s.d.) from three independent experiments; representative images are shown. P-values determined by student's t-test. A P < 0.05 (two-tailed) is considered statistically significant.

Discussion

In our cohort, we found an intermediate level of resistant isolates to fluconazole (15.7%) and low level of resistance to micafungin (0.7%) using Etest^® testing and EUCAST breakpoints, with only 1/268 isolates showing cross-resistance to both antifungal classes. There were 28 patients (19.0%) with at least one isolate with high fluconazole MIC, one patient (0.7%) with high micafungin MIC, and one patient (0.7%) with high fluconazole and high micafungin MICs. The resistance rate of C. glabrata to fluconazole (15.7%) builds on previous studies showing similar rates. Worldwide studies from 1997 to 2005 describe resistance rates of 14.3–19.2% with no consistent trend toward increasing resistance to fluconazole (Pfaller et al., 2007).

The prevalence of echinocandin resistance is consistent with that found in other European studies. Studies showed 1.5% resistance in a cohort of 64 bloodstream isolates in two university hospitals in Germany and Austria (Klotz et al., 2016), none in Spain and Italy from 79 bloodstream isolates (Bassetti et al., 2013), 2.1% of 94 invasive isolates obtained from Lombardy, Italy (Tortorano et al., 2013), and 1% of 193 isolates obtain from urine samples from France (Bourgeois et al., 2014). In the USA, the prevalence was between 2 and 4% to echinocandins from 1997 to 2000 (Castanheira et al., 2016).

The alarming increase in echinocandin resistance observed in the USA began in the last 10 years (Alexander et al., 2013; Vallabhaneni et al., 2015), but it does not seem to concern Europe. In addition, the prevalence in the USA seems to change from one center to another with a proportion varying from 0 to 25% of resistant isolates (Vallabhaneni et al., 2015), depending on the patient population and the presence of specific antifungal stewardship (Pfaller and Diekema, 2007; Vallabhaneni et al., 2015). The main risk factor for developing resistance to echinocandin is prior and prolonged exposure (Thompson et al., 2008; Dannaoui et al., 2012; Beyda et al., 2014; Vallabhaneni et al., 2015). This is well illustrated in our cohort, with two patients showing echinocandin resistant isolates out of 23 pre-exposed to echinocandin. However, it mostly required prolonged and repeated treatment (Thompson et al., 2008; Fekkar et al., 2014) with echinocandins, it can emerge shortly after treatment initiation (Lewis et al., 2013).

FKS-sequencing of isolate #230 revealed a previously described mutation in FKS2 (Fks2-658delF) (Jensen et al., 2015; Healey et al., 2016). The FKS1 K1323T mutation found in #96 has never been described to our knowledge. This mutation is located upstream of the DWVRRYTL FKS1 hotspot, suggesting an implication in echinocandin resistance, but a glucan synthase inhibition assay should be implemented to help confirm the resistance.

We observed an increased proportion of colonizing isolates with high fluconazole MICs in patients who received voriconazole or posaconazole for more than 7 days. Indeed, all patients at risk of candidiasis under triazole prophylaxis or treatment for invasive or non-invasive fungal infections should be considered at risk for fluconazole resistant C. glabrata isolates. The kinetics of disappearance of these resistant colonizing isolates, whether they are resistant to azoles or echinocandins, is not known and would not be predictable. An important bias of our study is the lack of data concerning the use of fluconazole, the most common azole antifungal agent, because the consumption of this molecule is not prospectively monitored in our hospital. This should underestimate the rate of resistance acquired in isolates pre-exposed to triazoles.

The association of MSH2 mutation and mutator phenotype with an increased emergence of antifungal resistance has recently been established (Healey et al., 2016). However, this study did not focus on clinical facts and treatment history, although individual center differences were noted. Several centers did not demonstrate significant differences between resistant and susceptible isolates when grouped according to MSH2 genotype, while others did (Healey et al., 2016). Indeed, MSH2 mutation might be better associated with multidrug resistance, which was not observed in this study. Among the most frequent mutations, P208S/N890I, V239L, and E231G/L269F were associated with an increased emergence of caspofungin-resistant colonies, while E456D was not (Healey et al., 2016). They observed a greater rate of MSH2 mutation among fluconazole-resistant (≥32 mg/L) isolates than among susceptible ones (65 vs. 52%; P = 0.04).

In our study, using cut-offs of >32 mg/L (EUCAST recommendation) and ≥32 mg/L (Healey et al., 2016), we did not find a significant association between MSH2 mutations and fluconazole resistance, although we observed the same most frequent mutations in our isolates, P208S/N890I, V239L/A942T, and V239L. However, we did not observe the mutation E231G/L269F and found one unknown mutation (E7K) in notable proportion that had not been previously analyzed for its role in MMR activity. E7K isolates were associated with a rate of 11% fluconazole-resistant strains (Table 3). Experimentally, E7K mutator phenotype is similar to that of the wild-type and E456D isolates, suggesting a conservative mutation (Healey et al., 2016).

Although the P208S/N890I/Y949C and S591Y mutants show a slight increase in frequency of caspofungin-resistant colonies, they could not be assigned to the mutator phenotype. Other mechanisms could rely on other genes involved in mismatch repair, such as PMS1 or RAD50, a double strand break repair gene. Both genes were implicated in the mutator phenotype in C. albicans (Legrand et al., 2007). Considering the small proportion (2/268) of isolates showing resistance to echinocandin out of our 268 isolates, we were not able to interpret the impact of MSH2 mutations on echinocandin resistance. Microsatellite genotyping analysis of the isolates showed a significant association between MSH2 mutations and the short tandem repeat genotypes (frequent or rare) (P = 0.009, Table 3). This suggests that MSH2 could be a genotyping hallmark rather than an indicator of fluconazole resistance acquisition risk. Indeed, MSH2 could be considered as one of the yeast's housekeeping genes, and sequence variations in this gene could be related to differences in the genetic complex rather than a direct link to fluconazole resistance.

Alternatively, the elevated rates of MSH2 genotypes that do demonstrate partial loss of function may facilitate the pathogenesis of C. glabrata through acquisition of mutations that increase fitness or virulence. In agreement with the data presented here, Healey and colleagues recently described that MSH2 genotypes largely correspond to strain type as measured by multi-locus sequence typing (Healey et al., unpublished data). Additionally, sequence types associated with MSH2 partial loss of function genotypes, including E231G/L269F (ST16) and P208S/N890I (ST10), are among the most frequently identified in at least two American cities (Lott et al., 2010). This further highlights the differences in strain distribution between the U.S. and Europe and potentially provides insight into differences in resistance rates.

In summary, we found a low prevalence rate of resistance to echinocandins and fluconazole for C. glabrata in comparison with data from North America. In our study, resistance was a consequence of previous exposure to antifungal drugs. This difference in prevalence should be explained by different medical care habits and recommendations. MSH2 mutations alone cannot explain why C. glabrata exhibits a rapid acquisition of resistance compared to other Candida spp. MSH2 seems to be associated with the STR genotype and could be a simple marker of the genetic group of a strain.

Author Contributions

SD, KH, SB, DP and AA conceived and designed the experiments. SD, KH, BC, AB, and MG performed the experiments. SD, MG, CL, ST, NG, MD and AA analyzed the data. SD and AA wrote the manuscript. KH, SB, MD, and DP reviewed the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

We thank Anne Boullie for EUCAST testing and Francoise Dromer for careful reading and improvement of the manuscript.

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fmicb.2016.02038/full#supplementary-material

References

Abbes, S., Sellami, H., Sellami, A., Hadrich, I., Amouri, I., Mahfoudh, N., et al. (2012). Candida glabrata strain relatedness by new microsatellite markers. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 31, 83–91. doi: 10.1007/s10096-011-1280-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Alexander, B. D., Johnson, M. D., Pfeiffer, C. D., Jiménez-Ortigosa, C., Catania, J., Booker, R., et al. (2013). Increasing echinocandin resistance in Candida glabrata: clinical failure correlates with presence of FKS mutations and elevated minimum inhibitory concentrations. Clin. Infect. Dis. 56, 1724–1732. doi: 10.1093/cid/cit136

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Arendrup, M. C., Cuenca-Estrella, M., Lass-Flörl, C., Hope, W., and EUCAST-AFST (2012). EUCAST technical note on the EUCAST definitive document EDef 7.2: method for the determination of broth dilution minimum inhibitory concentrations of antifungal agents for yeasts EDef 7.2 (EUCAST-AFST). Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 18, E246–E247. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2012.03880.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Arendrup, M. C., Cuenca-Estrella, M., Lass-Flörl, C., and Hope, W. W. (2013). Breakpoints for antifungal agents: an update from EUCAST focussing on echinocandins against Candida spp. and triazoles against Aspergillus spp. Drug Resist. Updat. 16, 81–95. doi: 10.1016/j.drup.2014.01.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bassetti, M., Merelli, M., Righi, E., Diaz-Martin, A., Rosello, E. M., Luzzati, R., et al. (2013). Epidemiology, species distribution, antifungal susceptibility, and outcome of candidemia across five sites in Italy and Spain. J. Clin. Microbiol. 51, 4167–4172. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01998-13

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Beyda, N. D., John, J., Kilic, A., Alam, M. J., Lasco, T. M., and Garey, K. W. (2014). FKS mutant Candida glabrata: risk factors and outcomes in patients with candidemia. Clin. Infect. Dis. 59, 819–825. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciu407

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bougnoux, M.-E., Dannaoui, E., Accoceberry, I., Angoulvant, A., Bailly, E., Botterel, F., et al. (2016). Multicenter comparison of the etest and EUCAST methods for antifungal susceptibility testing of Candida isolates to micafungin. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 60, 5088–5091. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00630-16

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bourgeois, N., Laurens, C., Bertout, S., Balard, Y., Krasteva, D., Rispail, P., et al. (2014). Assessment of caspofungin susceptibility of Candida glabrata by the Etest®, CLSI, and EUCAST methods, and detection of FKS1 and FKS2 mutations. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 33, 1247–1252. doi: 10.1007/s10096-014-2069-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Brisse, S., Pannier, C., Angoulvant, A., de Meeus, T., Diancourt, L., Faure, O., et al. (2009). Uneven distribution of mating types among genotypes of Candida glabrata isolates from clinical samples. Eukaryot. Cell 8, 287–295. doi: 10.1128/EC.00215-08

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Castanheira, M., Messer, S. A., Rhomberg, P. R., and Pfaller, M. A. (2016). Antifungal susceptibility patterns of a global collection of fungal isolates: results of the SENTRY antifungal surveillance program (2013). Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 85, 200–204. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2016.02.009

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cleveland, A. A., Farley, M. M., Harrison, L. H., Stein, B., Hollick, R., Lockhart, S. R., et al. (2012). Changes in incidence and antifungal drug resistance in candidemia: results from population-based laboratory surveillance in Atlanta and Baltimore, 2008-2011. Clin. Infect. Dis. 55, 1352–1361. doi: 10.1093/cid/cis697

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text

Dannaoui, E., Desnos-Ollivier, M., Garcia-Hermoso, D., Grenouillet, F., Cassaing, S., Baixench, M.-T., et al. (2012). Candida spp. with acquired echinocandin resistance, France, 2004-2010. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 18, 86–90. doi: 10.3201/eid1801.110556

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Desnos-Ollivier, M., Bretagne, S., Raoux, D., Hoinard, D., Dromer, F., Dannaoui, E., et al. (2008). Mutations in the fks1 gene in Candida albicans, C. tropicalis, and C. krusei correlate with elevated caspofungin MICs uncovered in AM3 medium using the method of the European Committee on antibiotic susceptibility testing. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 52, 3092–3098. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00088-08

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Espinel-Ingroff, A., Arendrup, M., Cantón, E., Cordoba, S., Dannaoui, E., García-Rodríguez, J., et al. (2016). A multi-center study of method-dependent epidemiological cutoff values (ECVs) for resistance detection in Candida spp. and Aspergillus spp. to amphotericin B and echinocandins for the Etest agar diffusion method. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01792-16. [Epub ahead of print].

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Espinel-Ingroff, A., Arendrup, M. C., Pfaller, M. A., Bonfietti, L. X., Bustamante, B., Canton, E., et al. (2013). Interlaboratory variability of Caspofungin MICs for Candida spp. Using CLSI and EUCAST methods: should the clinical laboratory be testing this agent? Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 57, 5836–5842. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01519-13

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) (2015). Antifungal Agents: Brekpoint Tables for Interpretation of MICs, Version 8.0.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Farmakiotis, D., Tarrand, J. J., and Kontoyiannis, D. P. (2014). Drug-resistant Candida glabrata infection in cancer patients. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 20, 1833–1840. doi: 10.3201/eid2011.140685

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fekkar, A., Dannaoui, E., Meyer, I., Imbert, S., Brossas, J. Y., Uzunov, M., et al. (2014). Emergence of echinocandin-resistant Candida spp. in a hospital setting: a consequence of 10 years of increasing use of antifungal therapy? Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 33, 1489–1496. doi: 10.1007/s10096-014-2096-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Grenouillet, F., Millon, L., Bart, J.-M., Roussel, S., Biot, I., Didier, E., et al. (2007). Multiple-locus variable-number tandem-repeat analysis for rapid typing of Candida glabrata. J. Clin. Microbiol. 45, 3781–3784. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01603-07

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Healey, K. R., Zhao, Y., Perez, W. B., Lockhart, S. R., Sobel, J. D., Farmakiotis, D., et al. (2016). Prevalent mutator genotype identified in fungal pathogen Candida glabrata promotes multi-drug resistance. Nat. Commun. 7:11128. doi: 10.1038/ncomms11128

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jensen, R. H., Johansen, H. K., Søes, L. M., Lemming, L. E., Rosenvinge, F. S., Nielsen, L., et al. (2015). Posttreatment antifungal resistance among colonizing Candida isolates in candidemia patients: results from a systematic multicenter study. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 60, 1500–1508. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01763-15

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Klotz, U., Schmidt, D., Willinger, B., Steinmann, E., Buer, J., Rath, P.-M., et al. (2016). Echinocandin resistance and population structure of invasive Candida glabrata isolates from two university hospitals in Germany and Austria. Mycoses 59, 312–318. doi: 10.1111/myc.12472

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lass-Flörl, C. (2009). The changing face of epidemiology of invasive fungal disease in Europe. Mycoses 52, 197–205. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0507.2009.01691.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Legrand, M., Chan, C. L., Jauert, P. A., and Kirkpatrick, D. T. (2007). Role of DNA mismatch repair and double-strand break repair in genome stability and antifungal drug resistance in Candida albicans. Eukaryotic Cell 6, 2194–2205. doi: 10.1128/EC.00299-07

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lewis, J. S., Wiederhold, N. P., Wickes, B. L., Patterson, T. F., and Jorgensen, J. H. (2013). Rapid emergence of echinocandin resistance in Candida glabrata resulting in clinical and microbiologic failure. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 57, 4559–4561. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01144-13

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lortholary, O., Renaudat, C., Sitbon, K., Madec, Y., Denoeud-Ndam, L., Wolff, M., et al. (2014). Worrisome trends in incidence and mortality of candidemia in intensive care units (Paris area, 2002-2010). Intensive Care Med. 40, 1303–1312. doi: 10.1007/s00134-014-3408-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lott, T. J., Frade, J. P., and Lockhart, S. R. (2010). Multilocus sequence type analysis reveals both clonality and recombination in populations of Candida glabrata bloodstream isolates from U.S. Surveillance Studies. Eukaryot. Cell 9, 619–625. doi: 10.1128/EC.00002-10

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Perlin, D. S. (2015). Echinocandin resistance in Candida. Clin. Infect. Dis. 61(Suppl. 6), S612–S617. doi: 10.1093/cid/civ791

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pfaller, M. A., and Diekema, D. J. (2007). Epidemiology of invasive candidiasis: a persistent public health problem. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 20, 133–163. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00029-06

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pfaller, M. A., Diekema, D. J., Gibbs, D. L., Newell, V. A., Meis, J. F., Gould, I. M., et al. (2007). Results from the ARTEMIS DISK global antifungal surveillance study, 1997 to 2005: an 8.5-year analysis of susceptibilities of Candida species and other yeast species to fluconazole and voriconazole determined by CLSI standardized disk diffusion testing. J. Clin. Microbiol. 45, 1735–1745. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00409-07

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pfaller, M. A., Diekema, D. J., Jones, R. N., and Castanheira, M. (2014a). Use of anidulafungin as a surrogate marker to predict susceptibility and resistance to caspofungin among 4,290 clinical isolates of Candida by using CLSI methods and interpretive criteria. J. Clin. Microbiol. 52, 3223–3229. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00782-14

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pfaller, M. A., Espinel-Ingroff, A., Bustamante, B., Canton, E., Diekema, D. J., Fothergill, A., et al. (2014b). Multicenter study of anidulafungin and micafungin MIC distributions and epidemiological cutoff values for eight Candida species and the CLSI M27-A3 broth microdilution method. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 58, 916–922. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02020-13

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pham, C. D., Iqbal, N., Bolden, C. B., Kuykendall, R. J., Harrison, L. H., Farley, M. M., et al. (2014). Role of FKS mutations in Candida glabrata: MIC values, echinocandin resistance, and multidrug resistance. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 58, 4690–4696. doi: 10.1128/AAC.03255-14

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shields, R. K., Nguyen, M. H., Press, E. G., Cumbie, R., Driscoll, E., Pasculle, A. W., et al. (2015). Rate of FKS Mutations among consecutive Candida isolates causing bloodstream infection. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 59, 7465–7470. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01973-15

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Thompson, G. R., Wiederhold, N. P., Vallor, A. C., Villareal, N. C., Lewis, J. S., and Patterson, T. F. (2008). Development of caspofungin resistance following prolonged therapy for invasive candidiasis secondary to Candida glabrata infection. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 52, 3783–3785. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00473-08

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tortorano, A. M., Prigitano, A., Lazzarini, C., Passera, M., Deiana, M. L., Cavinato, S., et al. (2013). A 1-year prospective survey of candidemia in Italy and changing epidemiology over one decade. Infection 41, 655–662. doi: 10.1007/s15010-013-0455-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Vale-Silva, L. A., and Sanglard, D. (2015). Tipping the balance both ways: drug resistance and virulence in Candida glabrata. FEMS Yeast Res. 15:fov025. doi: 10.1093/femsyr/fov025

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Vallabhaneni, S., Cleveland, A. A., Farley, M. M., Harrison, L. H., Schaffner, W., Beldavs, Z. G., et al. (2015). Epidemiology and risk factors for echinocandin nonsusceptible Candida glabrata bloodstream infections: data from a large multisite population-based candidemia surveillance program, 2008-2014. Open Forum Infect. Dis. 2:ofv163. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofv163

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wisplinghoff, H., Ebbers, J., Geurtz, L., Stefanik, D., Major, Y., Edmond, M. B., et al. (2014). Nosocomial bloodstream infections due to Candida spp. in the USA: species distribution, clinical features and antifungal susceptibilities Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 43, 78–81. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2013.09.005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zimbeck, A. J., Iqbal, N., Ahlquist, A. M., Farley, M. M., Harrison, L. H., Chiller, T., et al. (2010). FKS mutations and elevated echinocandin MIC values among Candida glabrata isolates from U.S. population-based surveillance. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 54, 5042–5047. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00836-10

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar