Abhishek MishraA commentary on
Superoxide Generation and Its Involvement in the Growth of Mycobacterium smegmatis
by Yeware, A. M., Shurpali, K. D., Athalye, M. C., and Sarkar, D. (2017). Front. Microbiol. 8:105. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00105
In a recent publication authors claim that a continuous generation of superoxide via NADH oxidase is essential for the growth of Mycobacterium smegmatis (Yeware et al., 2017). The major issue with this report is extremely high superoxide estimation which is contrary to a previous study that records a negligible production of superoxide in M. smegmatis cells using the same method (Tyagi et al., 2015). To address this controversy, I did a careful investigation and concluded that dihydroethidium (DHE)-HPLC profiles were misrepresented which has led to an overestimation of superoxide production. Therefore, I present the case that the authors have failed to show evidence for superoxide generation from NADH oxidase/cell and presumed its physiological role in growth of M. smegmatis. This conclusion is supported by following reasons.
Stoichiometric ratio of superoxide and oxyethidium formation is 1:1 in superoxide reaction with DHE (Zielonka et al., 2008). Yeware et al. (2017), showed ~8 μM 2-OH-E+ per 15 μg of cell protein in 30 min which translate into ~0.5 mM 2-OH-E+ per mg protein, which is extremely high concentration, almost 1,000 times more in comparison to the maximum reported in biological system. In general physiological consequence of such high concentration should be deleterious as it is a potent disrupter of biomolecules. To date superoxide estimation in living organism was found to be in the range of 10−9–10−12 mole/mg of protein. In cells and tissues, DHE reacts specifically with superoxide to form 2-OH-E+, whereas other cellular components non-specifically react with DHE to form E+. As a result E+ is produced in much higher concentration than 2-OH-E+ in biological systems (Zielonka et al., 2008; Kalyanaraman et al., 2014). Based on previous reports, Table 1 represents the approximate ratio of 2-OH-E+ and E+ to emphasize the higher concentration E+ among the two in biological samples. Whereas, the HPLC profile presented by Yeware et al., shows a tiny peak of E+ which is negligibly smaller than 2-OH-E+ on an arbitrary scale. Furthermore, authors observed constant increase in 2-OH-E+ but no significant change in E+ for the period of 3 h in their study. This discrepancy could have been avoided if authors ensured that some detectable amount of unoxidized DHE remain in their assay while standarizing the balance between cell number and incubation time with dye. Importantly, the authors should present standard chromatographic profile of DHE, 2-OH-E+, and E+ with positive (menadione or pyrogallol) and negative control (SOD or TEMPOL) to justify the exceptional HPLC profile obtained in the experiment.
Table 1. Relative detection of 2-OH-E+ and E+ in biological samples.
SOD is a standard negative control for the detection of superoxide due to the fact that it reacts with superoxide at 1,000 times higher rate in comparison to DHE (Zielonka et al., 2008). Yeware et al. (2017), observed no effect of PEG-SOD on either growth or superoxide production in cells, which they interpret as non-permeability of PEG-SOD. Moreover, in crude membrane preparation PEG-SOD could barely inhibit 0.37 folds of 2-OH-E+. Another important superoxide scavenger used in this study is membrane permeable SOD mimetic TEMPOL (4-hydroxy-Tempo). Although reaction rate constant of TEMPOL with superoxide is much lower than that of SOD it has a similar in vivo efficacy which is ascribed to its smaller size and higher pentrability (Luo et al., 2009). However, unlike SOD, TEMPOL can non-specifically react with other reactive oxygen species like hydrogen peroxide or hydroxyl radical. Contrary to their claim, authors report TEMPOL was able to inhibit superoxide production but has no effect on growth of M. smegmatis even at 10 times higher concentration. This leads to an ambiguous conclusion that superoxide generation inhibited by diphenyliodonium (DPI), but not by TEMPOL, has a role in growth. Noteworthy, DPI is a non-specific inhibitor of flavoenzymes, in addition, it inhibits pentose phosphate pathway and tricarboxylic acid cycle (Riganti et al., 2004). Therefore, superoxide lowering effect of DPI in vivo could have been observed due to reduced derivation of both, 2-OH-E+ and E+. Obviously, no effect of rotenone and antimycin A was observed as they are inhibitor of mitochondrial electron transport chain (ETC) and generally ineffective against bacteria. In particular, mycobacterial ETC is more complex than mitochondrial ETC due to diversity of components and branching (Cook et al., 2004). Surprisingly, authors have not used any of the standard mycobacterial ETC inhibitor (Black et al., 2014).
DHE-HPLC assay needs a careful standardization and should be supported by another standard method of superoxide estimation to affirm its biological role (Forman et al., 2015). Particularly in this case author should have been able to measure microMolar concentration of superoxide, as per their claim, by gold standard cytochrome C reduction assay. The purpose of the present communication is to ensure that the inappropriate quantitative estimation of superoxide generation do not form the basis for further erroneous papers. Moreover, to highlight the general aspects of experimental design and considerations for the measurement of superoxide radical in biological samples.
Author Contributions
The author confirms being the sole contributor of this work and approved it for publication.
Conflict of Interest Statement
The author declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
Black, P. A., Warren, R. M., Louw, G. E., van Helden, P. D., Victor, T. C., and Kana, B. D. (2014). Energy metabolism and drug efflux in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 58, 2491–2503. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02293-13
Cook, G. M., Berney, M., Gebhard, S., Hienemann, M., Cox, R. A., Danilchanka, O., et al. (2004). Physiology of mycobacteria. Adv. Microb. Physiol. 55, 81–182. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2911(09)05502-7
De Iuliis, G. N., Wingate, J. K., Koppers, A. J., McLaughlin, E. A., and Aitken, R. J. (2006). Definitive evidence for the nonmitochondrial production of superoxide anion by human spermatozoa. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 91, 1968–1975. doi: 10.1210/jc.2005-2711
Dranka, B. P., Zielonka, J., Kathansamy, A. G., and Kalyanaraman, B. (2012). Alterations in bioenergetics function induced by Parkinson's disease mimetic compounds: lack of correlation with superoxide generation. J. Neurochem. 122, 941–951. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2012.07836.x
Fernandes, D. C., Wosniak, J. Jr., Pescatore, L. A., Bertoline, M. A., Liberman, M., Laurindo, F. R., et al. (2007). Analysis of DHE-derived oxidation products by HPLC in the assessment of superoxide production and NADPH oxidase activity in vascular systems. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 292, C413–C422. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00188.2006
Forman, H. J., Augusto, O., Brigelius-Flohe, R., Dennery, P. A., Kalyanaraman, B., Ischiropoulos, H., et al. (2015). Even free radicals should follow some rules: a guide to free radical research terminology and methodology. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 78, 233–235 doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2014.10.504
Gray, J. P., Heck, D. E., Mishin, V., Smith, P. J. S., Hong, J. Y., and Thiruchelvam, M. (2007). Paraquat increases cyanide-insensitive respiration in murine lung epithelial cells by activating an NAD(P)H:Paraquat Oxidoreductase. J. Biol. Chem. 82, 7939–7949. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M611817200
Kalyanaraman, B., Dranka, B. P., Hary, M., Michalski, R., and Zielonka, J. (2014). HPLC-based monitoring of products formed from hydroethidine based fluorogenic probes–The ultimate approach for intra-and extracellular superoxide detection. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1840, 739–744. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2013.05.008
Laurindo, F. R., Fernandes, D. C., and Santos, C. X. (2008). Assessment of superoxide production and NADPH oxidase activity by HPLC analysis of dihydroethidium oxidation products. Methods Enzymol. 441, 237–260. doi: 10.1016/S0076-6879(08)01213-5
Luo, Z., Chen, Y., Chen, S., Welch, W. J., Andresen, B. T., Jose, P. A., et al. (2009). Comparison of inhibitors of superoxide generation in vascular smooth muscle cells. Br. J. Pharmacol. 157, 935–943. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2009.00259.x
Riganti, C., Gazzano, E., Polimeni, M., Costamagna, C., Bosia, A., and Ghigo, D. (2004). Diphenyleneiodonium Inhibits the cell redox metabolism and induces oxidative stress. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 47726–47731. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M406314200
Shang, T., Kotamraju, S., Zhao, H., Kalivendi, S. V., Hillard, C. J., and Kalyanaraman, B. (2005). Sepiapterin attenuates 1-methyl-4-phenylpyridinium-induced apoptosis in neuroblastoma cells transfected with neuronal NOS: role of tetrahydrobiopterin, nitric oxide, and proteasome activation. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 39, 1059–1074. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2005.05.022
Tyagi, P., Dharmaraja, A. T., Bhaskar, A., Chakrapani, H., and Singh, A. (2015). Mycobacterium tuberculosis has diminished capacity to counteract redox stress induced by elevated levels of endogenous superoxide. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 84, 344–354. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2015.03.008
Yeware, A. M., Shurpali, K. D., Athalye, M. C., and Sarkar, D. (2017). Superoxide generation and its involvement in the growth of Mycobacterium smegmatis. Front. Microbiol. 8:105. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00105
Zhao, H., Joseph, J., Fales, H. M., Sokoloski, E. A., Levine, R. L., Vasquez-Vivar, J., et al. (2005). Detection and characterization of the product of hydroethidine and intracellular superoxide by HPLC and limitations of fluorescence. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 102, 5727–5732. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0501719102
Zielonka, J., Hardy, M., and Kalyanaraman, B. (2009). HPLC study of oxidation products of hydroethidine in chemical and biological systems: ramifications in superoxide measurements. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 46, 329–338.
Zielonka, J., Srinivasan, S., Hardy, M., Ouari, O., Lopez, M., Vasquez-Vivar, J., et al. (2008). Cytochrome c-mediated oxidation of hydroethidine and mito-hydroethidine in mitochondria: identification of homo-and heterodimers. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 44, 835–846. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2007.11.013
Keywords: dihydroethidium, HPLC, superoxide, PEG-SOD, NADH oxidase, Mycobacterium smegmatis
Citation: Mishra A (2017) Commentary: Superoxide Generation and Its Involvement in the Growth of Mycobacterium smegmatis. Front. Microbiol. 8:1114. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01114
Received: 10 February 2017; Accepted: 31 May 2017;
Published: 13 June 2017.
Edited by:
Biswarup Mukhopadhyay, Virginia Tech, United StatesReviewed by:
Robert Henry Mach, University of Pennsylvania, United StatesDenise C. Fernandes, University of São Paulo, Brazil
Copyright © 2017 Mishra. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Abhishek Mishra, ab.mish@gmail.com