%A Campbell,Ruth %A MacSweeney,Mairéad %A Woll,Bencie %D 2014 %J Frontiers in Human Neuroscience %C %F %G English %K cochlear implantation outcome,prelingual deafness,late learning of sign language,critical period for language development,auditory critical period,cortical organization of language in deafness %Q %R 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00834 %W %L %M %P %7 %8 2014-October-17 %9 Review %+ Prof Ruth Campbell,Deafness Cognition and Language Research Centre, University College London,London, UK,r.campbell@ucl.ac.uk %# %! CI and first language acquisition %* %< %T Cochlear implantation (CI) for prelingual deafness: the relevance of studies of brain organization and the role of first language acquisition in considering outcome success %U https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00834 %V 8 %0 JOURNAL ARTICLE %@ 1662-5161 %X Cochlear implantation (CI) for profound congenital hearing impairment, while often successful in restoring hearing to the deaf child, does not always result in effective speech processing. Exposure to non-auditory signals during the pre-implantation period is widely held to be responsible for such failures. Here, we question the inference that such exposure irreparably distorts the function of auditory cortex, negatively impacting the efficacy of CI. Animal studies suggest that in congenital early deafness there is a disconnection between (disordered) activation in primary auditory cortex (A1) and activation in secondary auditory cortex (A2). In humans, one factor contributing to this functional decoupling is assumed to be abnormal activation of A1 by visual projections—including exposure to sign language. In this paper we show that that this abnormal activation of A1 does not routinely occur, while A2 functions effectively supramodally and multimodally to deliver spoken language irrespective of hearing status. What, then, is responsible for poor outcomes for some individuals with CI and for apparent abnormalities in cortical organization in these people? Since infancy is a critical period for the acquisition of language, deaf children born to hearing parents are at risk of developing inefficient neural structures to support skilled language processing. A sign language, acquired by a deaf child as a first language in a signing environment, is cortically organized like a heard spoken language in terms of specialization of the dominant perisylvian system. However, very few deaf children are exposed to sign language in early infancy. Moreover, no studies to date have examined sign language proficiency in relation to cortical organization in individuals with CI. Given the paucity of such relevant findings, we suggest that the best guarantee of good language outcome after CI is the establishment of a secure first language pre-implant—however that may be achieved, and whatever the success of auditory restoration.