Impact Factor
This article is part of the Research Topic Neurobiology of Choice

Original Research ARTICLE

Front. Neurosci., 18 April 2011 | http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2011.00049

Interoception drives increased rational decision-making in meditators playing the ultimatum game

Ulrich Kirk1, Jonathan Downar2,3 and P. Read Montague1,4*
  • 1 Human Neuroimaging Laboratory, Virginia Tech Carilion Research Institute, Virginia Tech, Roanoke, VA, USA
  • 2 Neuropsychiatry Clinic, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
  • 3 Centre for Addition and Mental Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
  • 4 Department of Physics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA

Human decision-making is often conceptualized as a competition between cognitive and emotional processes in the brain. Deviations from rational processes are believed to derive from inclusion of emotional factors in decision-making. Here, we investigate whether experienced Buddhist meditators are better equipped to regulate emotional processes compared with controls during economic decision-making in the Ultimatum Game. We show that meditators accept unfair offers on more than half of the trials, whereas controls only accept unfair offers on one-quarter of the trials. By applying fMRI we show that controls recruit the anterior insula during unfair offers. Such responses are powerful predictors of rejecting offers in social interaction. By contrast, meditators display attenuated activity in high-level emotional representations of the anterior insula and increased activity in the low-level interoceptive representations of the posterior insula. In addition we show that a subset of control participants who play rationally (i.e., accepts >85% unfair offers) recruits the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex presumably reflecting increased cognitive demands, whereas rational meditators by contrast display elevated activity in the somatosensory cortex and posterior superior temporal cortex. In summary, when assessing unfairness in the Ultimatum Game, meditators activate a different network of brain areas compared with controls enabling them to uncouple negative emotional reactions from their behavior. These findings highlight the clinically and socially important possibility that sustained training in mindfulness meditation may impact distinct domains of human decision-making.

Keywords: decision-making, fMRI, mindfulness, posterior insula, anterior insula, social fairness, DLPFC, striatum

Citation: Kirk U, Downar J, and Montague PR (2011) Interoception drives increased rational decision-making in meditators playing the ultimatum game. Front. Neurosci. 5:49. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2011.00049

Received: 07 December 2010; Accepted: 24 March 2011;
Published online: 18 April 2011.

Edited by:

Julia Trommershaeuser, New York University, USA

Reviewed by:

Kerstin Preuschoff, University of Zurich, Switzerland
Jill X. O’Reilly, University of Oxford, UK
Daniel Campbell-Meiklejohn, Aarhus University, Denmark

Copyright: © 2011 Kirk, Downar and Montague. This is an open-access article subject to a non-exclusive license between the authors and Frontiers Media SA, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited and other Frontiers conditions are complied with.

*Correspondence: P. Read Montague, Human Neuroimaging Laboratory, Virginia Tech Carilion Research Institute, 2 Riverside Circle, Roanoke, VA 24016, USA. e-mail: read@vt.edu