Murugesan Velayutham1,2
Arturo J. Cardounel
Govindasamy Ilangovan- 1Center for Biomedical EPR Spectroscopy and Imaging, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States
- 2Department of Anesthesiology, Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States
- 3Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Davis Heart and Lung Research Institute, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States
Heat-shock factor-1 (HSF-1) is an important transcription factor that regulates pathogenesis of many human diseases through its extensive transcriptional regulation. Especially, it shows pleiotropic effects in human cancer, and hence it has recently received increased attention of cancer researchers. After myriad investigations on HSF-1, the field has advanced to the phase where there is consensus that finding a potent and selective pharmacological inhibitor for this transcription factor will be a major break-through in the treatment of various human cancers. Presently, all reported inhibitors have their limitations, made evident at different stages of clinical trials. This brief account summarizes the advances with tested natural products as HSF-1 inhibitors and highlights the necessity of phytochemistry in this endeavor of discovering a potent pharmacological HSF-1 inhibitor.
Stress response, in plants and animals, produces bioactive compounds that offer persistent stress resistance and increases survival and longevity (Xenohormesis) (1). However, increasing survival is not always desired. A classic example of such a case is survival of cancer cells after treatment and recurrence of cancer with vigorous growth. Heat-shock factor-1 (HSF-1) is a primary translator of stress in eukaryotic cells. It is one of the well-characterized transcription factors in eukaryotic cells due to its comprehensive transcriptional activity to regulate many diseases (2, 3). Its fundamental role is to induce expression of heat-shock proteins (HSPs) in stressed cells, either due to heat stress or other cytotoxic stress, and assist the cells to repair the damage and survive. Even though this is a wonderful and extremely efficient natural process, which is conserved through evolution to protect organisms, this factor becomes detrimental in situations where intentional killing of cells is desired, such as treating cancer with both radiation and chemotherapy. Since HSF-1 is present both in healthy and malignant cells, it invariably protects the cells from cytotoxicity and the targeted DNA damage caused by chemotherapeutic agents or radiation therapy. Hence, the targeted cancer cells escape the death pathways and survive to relapse later as much more complicated drug-resistant cancer cells. Therefore, there is a need for a strategy to successfully inhibit HSF-1 in cancer cells. However, there is no such reliable inhibitor as a pharmacological drug on the market. This account briefly summarizes the development of the field of pharmacological inhibition of HSF-1 and the inevitable need of phytochemistry in discovering potential candidates, meeting all the requirements of an effective pharmaceutical, which could evolve as a adjunct therapeutic agent.
HSF-1 Promotes Carcinogenesis and Tumor Growth
The pathophysiology of carcinogenesis is regulated by many factors, primarily by the oncogenes. There are also many additional factors, which are not yet classified as oncogenes, that modulate the overall genesis and growth of cancer (4, 5). HSF-1 indeed has been reported to drive a transcriptional program in cancer cells, which is distinct from its conventional response to heat stress (6). Interestingly, key evidence has emerged in recent literature that HSF-1 is playing an important role in transforming benign tumors into malignant, and therefore converting cancer cell to “non-oncogenic addiction” (7). Moreover, many experimental animal models have revealed that HSF-1 indeed aggravated tumor xenograft growth. Carcinogenesis of skin cancer (4), promotion of hepatocellular carcinoma (8), and aggravation of breast cancer (9) are recent examples of how it is playing critical roles in cancer incidence, promotion, and invasion. Indeed, HSF-1 has been found to program a unique transcription scheme consisting of a spectrum of oncogenes (6). Also, human breast cancer tissue showed high abundance of HSF-1, and decreased level of HSF-1 has been linked to improved cancer prognosis (10). The knockout of HSF-1 impairs carcinogenesis and progression, suggesting that HSF-1 is a promising and potential therapeutic target in several cancers. There is a general consensus among scientists working in the field that discovering a potent and selective inhibitor of HSF-1 could be very valuable to suppress carcinogenesis and tumor growth (Figure 1).
Figure 1. Schematic illustrations of pathways by which the heat-shock proteins (HSPs) interfere in human cancer prognosis.
HSF-1 Inhibition Sensitizes Cancer Cell Death
Activation of HSF-1 is not only involved in carcinogenesis but it also enhances cancer cell survival post-chemotherapy or radiotherapy. For example, UV or doxorubicin-induced cancer cell death was found to be enhanced by inhibiting with HSF-1 (11, 12). HSF-1 is activated by phosphorylation through mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) (13, 14). Interestingly, both chemotherapeutic agents and radiation activate MAPKs. Hence, phosphorylation and activation of HSF-1 followed by protection of cancer cells occurs invariably during chemotherapy and radiation. After radiation or chemotherapy, HSPs are induced in cancer cells causing an anti-apoptotic effect (11, 12). Chemotherapy-induced HSPs trigger survival-signaling pathways, leading to relapse of cancer [e.g., GRP78 (15, 16) and Hsp27 (17, 18)]. Hence, HSF-1 promotes survival and proliferation of malignant cells.
It has been reported that the increased level of HSF-1 is associated with a reduced survival outcome in human breast and liver cancer (10, 19). In liver cancer, the increased expression of HSF-1 in peritumoral tissue is associated with early recurrence (20). A strong correlation was observed between HSF-1-positive tumor and worsened clinical outcome/mortality. The use of different approaches to inhibit HSF-1, alone or in combination with other target proteins, in vitro and in small animal models have shown promising results in increasing drug sensitivity and avoiding cancer relapse. Although there is no clinical investigation on inhibition of HSF-1 and demonstration of enhanced efficacy of cancer treatment, many preclinical studies, including our recent study (11), show promise for the potential to use as HSF-1 inhibitor as novel chemotherapeutic agents.
Current Experimental Approaches of HSF-1 Inhibition
Naturally, pharmacological inhibition of transcription factors is very difficult to achieve due to a lack of potential target sites in their tertiary structures. HSF-1 is a ligand-less transcription factor with poor druggability. This is one of the reasons why achieving improved specificity for HSF-1 inhibition and experimental drugs is a difficult task. To overcome this, genetic approaches such as use of silencing RNAs are extensively pursued. Currently, both genetic and pharmacological approaches are being explored (21).
Genetic Approaches
Small hairpin RNA (shRNA), which can target HSF-1 mRNA, sequence cloned expressions vectors have been successfully developed and demonstrated to knockdown HSF-1 in different cell types (21, 22). Typically, the shRNA target sequence containing sense and antisense oligonucleotides is cloned into an expression vector, and the cells are co-transfected with adeno- or lenti-viral DNA to generate target sequence containing viral particles. Both lenti- and adeno-virus based, viral titers have been used (23). Upon infection of the target cells with these viral particle, a hairpin RNA is produced, which is expected to bind to the HSF-1 mRNA preventing translation and decreasing total HSF-1 production. shRNA generation by lenti-viral vector was successfully employed recently to knockdown HSF-1 in human cancer cells (9). Another approach that was recently reported was to overexpress dominant-negative HSF-1 mutants. The dominant-negative HSF-1, which is usually appropriately engineered mutants, dilutes the transcriptional ability of endogenous HSF-1. These could be further modified to respond to a small molecular pharmaceutical (ligand regulated) either to activate (so that overall HSF1 transcriptional activity is inhibited) or to inhibit (in which case the endogenous HSF-1 activity is not affected) (24). However, serious limitations of these genetic approaches are that viral transduction methods are known to have poor efficacy and untoward side effects. In addition, FDA approval for retroviral agents for human use is complicated. Moreover, the World Health Organization has drafted a general restriction on the use of viral vector-based gene transfer or silencing for human application.
Pharmacological Approaches
Direct Inhibition of HSF-1
Various pharmacological agents (Figure 2) have been developed to inhibit HSF-1 activity in various tissues and have been tested or are in clinical trial (3). The KNK 437 has been successfully demonstrated in vitro human cells that it could inhibit HSPs expression by inhibiting their transcription factor HSF-1. Triptolide, an active ingredient in the Tripterygium wilfordii, sometimes called thunder god vine but more properly translated thunder duke vine, was found to be a HSF-1 inhibitor (3). However, this compound could wide range of activity including immune suppression (25), and hence indicting the effects of Triptolide to the consequence of HSf-1 inhibition is not possible. Quercetin, a medicinally important member of the flavonoid family, is one of the most prominent dietary antioxidants. It is present in a variety of foods—including fruits, vegetables, tea, wine, as well as other dietary supplements—and is responsible for various health benefits (26). This has been shown to prevent the HSF-1 trimer binding to heat-shock elements in the DNA (3). Other drugs such as nucleotide analogs (Ly101-4B) were shown to inhibit HSF-1 expression in ovarian cancer cells (27). Overall, these drugs showed promises, and this approach is more viable and offers a more traditional introduction into the clinical realm. Each of these compounds has its complexity in use as a HSF-1 inhibitor (3). Pfithrin-α was originally developed as a p53 inhibitor but was later found to inhibit HSF-1 (28).
Figure 2. Molecular structures of heat-shock factor-1 (HSF-1) inhibitors currently evaluated.
Other large quantity screening of compounds for potential inhibitors are undergoing. Recently an unbiased cell-based phenotypic screen was conducted to identify inhibitors of HSF-1. Among the 200,000 small molecules 4,6-disubstituted pyrimidine 1 with IC50 value of 2.00 µM was found to be good inhibitor (29). However, this class of compounds are also reported to be inhibiting CDK9 pathway (29), and therefore it is not clear whether the direct inhibition of HSF-1 or CDK2 is responsible for the inhibition of heat-shock response in the cells. Very recently, an elaborate attempt was made and reported the de novo development of a drug-like inhibitor hat targets human HSF-1 (30). In this approach, unlike any other previous attempts, potential drug-like inhibitor binding cavities in HSF-1 DNA binding domain (obtained from NMR and crystal structure of HSF-1/DNA complexes) was obtained to accommodate small drug-like molecules. Subsequently, a virtual screening of over 300,000 commercially available lead-like molecules were identified by identifying suitability for putative binding pockets and three-point pharmacophores. Then, 2,000 compounds were subjected to experimental screening and a potential candidate for HSF-1 inhibitor (IHSF, Fig) and its derivatives were proved to be inhibitor of HSF-1 transcriptional activity.
Inhibition of Secondary Targets
Heat-shock factor-1 is present in the cytoplasm as an inactive monomer, bound to other co-factors such as HSP90 (HSF-1/HSP90 complex). HSF-1 is released/untethered from the complex upon phosphorylation of Hsp90, and it becomes active by forming HSF-1 trimers. Therefore, inhibiting the phosphorylation of HSP90 could prevent the trimer formation. This approach has been attempted with novel pharmacological agents (31). Tanespimycin (17-N-allylamino-17-demethoxygeldanamycin, 17AAG) was developed with so much hope but before it was commercialized and clinical trials were stopped (32). HSF-1 functions both as an activator and a repressor of its target genes.
The approaches, used thus far, have been useful in determining mechanism but are not very clinically applicable. Unfortunately, drug(s) that selectively inhibit HSF-1 with high-binding activity have not been developed. Importantly, studies to date support efforts to identify and tailor novel drugs that specifically target HSF-1. There is an urgent need to explore natural product(s) for highly efficient and specific inhibition of HSF-1 and its transcriptional activity, or secondary targets. The use of pharmacological agents to inhibit HSF-1 is very clinically relevant, since the delivery of a single dose of a well-characterized and safe pharmacological agent is far more feasible and often safer than using genetic approaches.
What the Future Holds for Phytochemists
Despite preclinical success of inhibiting HSF-1 in in vitro assays and successful demonstration of retardation of tumor growth in small animal models, each of the inhibitors listed above has limitations in translation into a drug for clinical use. As HSF-1 is important for both cancer and normal cells under stress conditions, systemic inhibition of HSF-1 could exert not only anticancer activity but also toxicity to normal cells. Therefore, for its use in cancer treatment, it is important to identify cancer cell specific inhibitors to minimize the cytotoxic effects on normal cells. This requires either fine-tuning of existing compounds by altering the functional groups/motifs by synthetic approaches or discovering and isolating new natural product(s) that can overcome the existing challenges. Such a potential pharmacological agent for HSF-1 inhibition could be identified from plants or plant-derived metabolites by screening a vast number of compounds. It is a potential opportunity for phytochemists to discover and isolate natural product(s) as a reliable inhibitor of HSF-1 to improve the lives of cancer patients. There are some compounds that have been identified as potential leads. A terpenoid, cantharidin (33), isolated from blister beetles and other insects, induces cancer cell death by blocking HSF-1 binding to target gene promoters and subsequently inhibits transcription. Also, in cancer cells, the protein translation initiation inhibitor rocaglates, secondary metabolites of plant genus Aglaia, inactivates the transcriptional activity of HSF-1 (34). A serious limitation with all these agents is their lack of specificity, cellular toxicity, and deleterious effects on normal cells. Targeting Hsp27, by natural products and plant extracts, is also found to be very effective way of killing cancer cells (35, 36).
There are also multiple evidences that stress can produce bioactive compounds in plants, and these compounds have been proven to offer anti-carcinogenic effect in small animal models and human, and therefore to be useful in cancer therapy as dietary supplements. Examples of such compounds are increase of curcumin content in stressed Curcuma longa, increase of Jasmonate in stressed Arabidopsis (Mustard), higher Carvacrol in stressed Oregano x majoricum, and so on [refer the Table 1 in the reference (1)]. It is not currently known how the HSF-1 is involved in the increased production of anticancer agents in these stressed plants, and whether inhibiting HSF-1 activity in these plants will reduce the contents of these cancer-inhibiting compounds. Also, dietary supplementation of the stress-inducible natural products is proven to be effective in treating cancer. However, it is not well established that the beneficial effect of these compounds are due to inhibition of HSF-1 in cancer cells. As these compounds associate with multiple targets, it is extremely difficult to determine whether HSF-1 inhibition is a major contributor to the observed positive effect. Only a few compounds have been thoroughly studied for their action on HSF-1 in cancer cells. For example, resveratrol, a phenolic compound, found in grape seed, inhibits Akt phosphorylation to suppress HSF-1 activation in cancer cells, so that the efficacy is increased (37). Contrarily, Curcumin, an established anticancer agent, increases HSP expression, likely due to activation of HSF-1 (38). This paradox further strengthens our perception that highly specific HSF-1 inhibitors are essential, not only to use as a cancer therapeutic but it is also required to understand HSF-1-dependent mechanistic pathways of these nutraceuticals in laboratory studies. Therefore, identifying a suitable inhibitor for successful inhibition of HSF-1 to assist/enhance treatment outcome of human cancer should come from the hands of phytochemists, who can isolate the natural compounds and modify the efficacy of these inhibitors.
Author Contributions
All authors contributed intellectually and in writing the manuscript.
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Funding
The work, summarized in this brief account, was supported by National Institutes of Health (R21HL078796-02 and R01HL78796-02 to GI; 5RO1HL081734-09 to AC).
References
1. Hooper PL, Hooper PL, Tytell M, Vigh L. Xenohormesis: health benefits from an eon of plant stress response evolution. Cell Stress Chaperones (2010) 15:761–70. doi:10.1007/s12192-010-0206-x
2. Voellmy R. Dominant-positive and dominant-negative heat shock factors. Methods (2005) 35:199–207. doi:10.1016/j.ymeth.2004.08.010
3. Whitesell L, Lindquist S. Inhibiting the transcription factor HSF1 as an anticancer strategy. Expert Opin Ther Targets (2009) 13:469–78. doi:10.1517/14728220902832697
4. Dai C, Whitesell L, Rogers AB, Lindquist S. Heat shock factor 1 is a powerful multifaceted modifier of carcinogenesis. Cell (2007) 130:1005–18. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2007.07.020
5. Scherz-Shouval R, Santagata S, Mendillo ML, Sholl LM, Ben-Aharon I, Beck AH, et al. The reprogramming of tumor stroma by HSF1 is a potent enabler of malignancy. Cell (2014) 158:564–78. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2014.05.045
6. Mendillo ML, Santagata S, Koeva M, Bell GW, Hu R, Tamimi RM, et al. HSF1 drives a transcriptional program distinct from heat shock to support highly malignant human cancers. Cell (2012) 150:549–62. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2012.06.031
7. Solimini NL, Luo J, Elledge SJ. Non-oncogene addiction and the stress phenotype of cancer cells. Cell (2007) 130:986–8. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2007.09.007
8. Jin XJ, Moskophidis D, Mivechi NF. Heat shock transcription factor 1 is a key determinant of HCC development by regulating hepatic steatosis and metabolic syndrome. Cell Metab (2011) 14:91–103. doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2011.03.025
9. Gabai VL, Meng L, Kim G, Mills TA, Benjamin IJ, Sherman MY. Heat shock transcription factor Hsf1 is involved in tumor progression via regulation of hypoxia-inducible factor 1 and RNA-binding protein HuR. Mol Cell Biol (2012) 32:929–40. doi:10.1128/MCB.05921-11
10. Santagata S, Hu R, Lin NU, Mendillo ML, Collins LC, Hankinson SE, et al. High levels of nuclear heat-shock factor 1 (HSF1) are associated with poor prognosis in breast cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (2011) 108:18378–83. doi:10.1073/pnas.1115031108
11. Kanagasabai R, Karthikeyan K, Vedam K, Qien W, Zhu Q, Ilangovan G. Hsp27 protects adenocarcinoma cells from UV-induced apoptosis by Akt and p21-dependent pathways of survival. Mol Cancer Res (2010) 8:1399–412. doi:10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-10-0181
12. Kanagasabai R, Krishnamurthy K, Druhan LJ, Ilangovan G. Forced expression of heat shock protein 27 (Hsp27) reverses P-glycoprotein (ABCB1)-mediated drug efflux and MDR1 gene expression in adriamycin-resistant human breast cancer cells. J Biol Chem (2011) 286:33289–300. doi:10.1074/jbc.M111.249102
13. Rabindran SK, Haroun RI, Clos J, Wisniewski J, Wu C. Regulation of heat shock factor trimer formation: role of a conserved leucine zipper. Science (1993) 259:230–4. doi:10.1126/science.8421783
14. Morimoto RI. Regulation of the heat shock transcriptional response: cross talk between a family of heat shock factors, molecular chaperones, and negative regulators. Genes Dev (1998) 12:3788–96. doi:10.1101/gad.12.24.3788
15. Cook KL, Clarke R. Role of GRP78 in promoting therapeutic-resistant breast cancer. Future Med Chem (2015) 7:1529–34. doi:10.4155/FMC.15.80
16. Zhang LY, Li PL, Xu A, Zhang XC. Involvement of GRP78 in the resistance of ovarian carcinoma cells to paclitaxel. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev (2015) 16:3517–22. doi:10.7314/APJCP.2015.16.8.3517
17. Stope MB, Weiss M, Preuss M, Streitborger A, Ritter CA, Zimmermann U, et al. Immediate and transient phosphorylation of the heat shock protein 27 initiates chemoresistance in prostate cancer cells. Oncol Rep (2014) 32:2380–6. doi:10.3892/or.2014.3492
18. Wang X, Chen M, Zhou J, Zhang X. HSP27, 70 and 90, anti-apoptotic proteins, in clinical cancer therapy (review). Int J Oncol (2014) 45:18–30. doi:10.3892/ijo.2014.2399
19. Calderwood SK. Elevated levels of HSF1 indicate a poor prognosis in breast cancer. Future Oncol (2012) 8:399–401. doi:10.2217/fon.12.21
20. Zhang JB, Guo K, Sun HC, Zhu XD, Zhang B, Lin ZH, et al. Prognostic value of peritumoral heat-shock factor-1 in patients receiving resection of hepatocellular carcinoma. Br J Cancer (2013) 109:1648–56. doi:10.1038/bjc.2013.488
21. McConnell JR, Buckton LK, McAlpine SR. Regulating the master regulator: controlling heat shock factor 1 as a chemotherapy approach. Bioorg Med Chem Lett (2015) 25:3409–14. doi:10.1016/j.bmcl.2015.06.052
22. Nakamura Y, Fujimoto M, Hayashida N, Takii R, Nakai A, Muto M. Silencing HSF1 by short hairpin RNA decreases cell proliferation and enhances sensitivity to hyperthermia in human melanoma cell lines. J Dermatol Sci (2010) 60:187–92. doi:10.1016/j.jdermsci.2010.09.009
23. Chira S, Jackson CS, Oprea I, Ozturk F, Pepper MS, Diaconu I, et al. Progresses towards safe and efficient gene therapy vectors. Oncotarget (2015) 6:30675–703. doi:10.18632/oncotarget.5169
24. Moore CL, Dewal MB, Nekongo EE, Santiago S, Lu NB, Levine SS, et al. Transportable, chemical genetic methodology for the small molecule-mediated inhibition of heat shock factor 1. ACS Chem Biol (2016) 11:200–10. doi:10.1021/acschembio.5b00740
25. Ziaei S, Halaby R. Immunosuppressive, anti-inflammatory and anti-cancer properties of triptolide: a mini review. Avicenna J Phytomed (2016) 6:149–64. doi:10.22038/AJP.2016.6329
26. Khan F, Niaz K, Maqbool F, Ismail Hassan F, Abdollahi M, Nagulapalli Venkata KC, et al. Molecular targets underlying the anticancer effects of quercetin: an update. Nutrients (2016) 8:529. doi:10.3390/nu8090529
27. Chen YF, Dong Z, Xia Y, Tang J, Peng L, Wang S, et al. Nucleoside analog inhibits microRNA-214 through targeting heat-shock factor 1 in human epithelial ovarian cancer. Cancer Sci (2013) 104:1683–9. doi:10.1111/cas.12277
28. Komarova EA, Neznanov N, Komarov PG, Chernov MV, Wang K, Gudkov AV. p53 inhibitor pifithrin alpha can suppress heat shock and glucocorticoid signaling pathways. J Biol Chem (2003) 278:15465–8. doi:10.1074/jbc.C300011200
29. Rye CS, Chessum NE, Lamont S, Pike KG, Faulder P, Demeritt J, et al. Discovery of 4,6-disubstituted pyrimidines as potent inhibitors of the heat shock factor 1 (HSF1) stress pathway and CDK9. Medchemcomm (2016) 7:1580–6. doi:10.1039/c6md00159a
30. Vilaboa N, Bore A, Martin-Saavedra F, Bayford M, Winfield N, Firth-Clark S, et al. New inhibitor targeting human transcription factor HSF1: effects on the heat shock response and tumor cell survival. Nucleic Acids Res (2017) 45:5797–817. doi:10.1093/nar/gkx194
31. Samadi A, Loo P, Mukerji R, O’Donnell G, Tong X, Timmermann BN, et al. A novel HSP90 modulator with selective activity against thyroid cancers in vitro. Surgery (2009) 146:1196–207. doi:10.1016/j.surg.2009.09.028
32. Dimopoulos MA, Mitsiades CS, Anderson KC, Richardson PG. Tanespimycin as antitumor therapy. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk (2011) 11:17–22. doi:10.3816/CLML.2011.n.002
33. Kim JA, Kim Y, Kwon BM, Han DC. The natural compound cantharidin induces cancer cell death through inhibition of heat shock protein 70 (HSP70) and Bcl-2-associated athanogene domain 3 (BAG3) expression by blocking heat shock factor 1 (HSF1) binding to promoters. J Biol Chem (2013) 288:28713–26. doi:10.1074/jbc.M113.488346
34. Li-Weber M. Molecular mechanisms and anti-cancer aspects of the medicinal phytochemicals rocaglamides (=flavaglines). Int J Cancer (2015) 137:1791–9. doi:10.1002/ijc.29013
35. Ucar EO, Arda N, Aitken A. Extract from mistletoe, Viscum album L., reduces Hsp27 and 14-3-3 protein expression and induces apoptosis in C6 rat glioma cells. Genet Mol Res (2012) 11:2801–13. doi:10.4238/2012.August.24.5
36. Tsai JR, Liu PL, Chen YH, Chou SH, Yang MC, Cheng YJ, et al. Ginkgo biloba extract decreases non-small cell lung cancer cell migration by downregulating metastasis-associated factor heat-shock protein 27. PLoS One (2014) 9:e91331. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0091331
37. Banerjee Mustafi S, Chakraborty PK, Raha S. Modulation of Akt and ERK1/2 pathways by resveratrol in chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) cells results in the downregulation of Hsp70. PLoS One (2010) 5:e8719. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0008719
Keywords: heat-shock factors, inhibitor, natural products, heat-shock proteins, triptolide, quercetin, pfithrin alpha, cancer
Citation: Velayutham M, Cardounel AJ, Liu Z and Ilangovan G (2018) Discovering a Reliable Heat-Shock Factor-1 Inhibitor to Treat Human Cancers: Potential Opportunity for Phytochemists. Front. Oncol. 8:97. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2018.00097
Received: 04 January 2018; Accepted: 20 March 2018;
Published: 06 April 2018
Edited by:
Zhi Sheng, Virginia Tech, United StatesReviewed by:
Sanchita Bhatnagar, University of Virginia, United StatesK. B. Harikumar, Rajiv Gandhi Centre for Biotechnology, India
Copyright: © 2018 Velayutham, Cardounel, Liu and Ilangovan. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Govindasamy Ilangovan, govindasamy.ilangovan@osumc.edu