Curt Balch
Jayaram B. Ramapuram4
Amit K. Tiwari- 1Department of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, School of Pharmacy, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH, USA
- 2Bioscience Advising, Ypsilanti, MI, USA
- 3Complex Biological Systems Alliance, North Andover, MA, USA
- 4Department of Drug Discovery and Development, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second-leading cause of cancer death in developed countries. While early detection (e.g., colonoscopy) generally yields excellent outcomes, metastatic and drug-resistant disease is uniformly fatal, and non-compliance for screening remains over 25%. Familial CRCs (10% of total cases) primarily include mutations in the gene APC. Somatic disease is linked to several environmental several risk factors, including mutations in WNT, KRAS, and TGFβ. To reflect the genesis/progression of CRC, a series of five discrete stages, from normal colon mucosa to fully invasive carcinoma, each regulated by specific “gatekeeper” genes, remains well-accepted after 20 years. However, many CRC tumors do not possess those particular mutations, suggesting alternative mechanisms. More recently, embryo-like “cancer stem cells” have been proposed to undergo self-renewal and drive tumorigenesis (and possibly, metastasis), as governed by specific “epigenomic” alterations. Here, we review recent literature describing possible mechanisms that underlie these phenotypes, including cancer “stemness,” believed by many to associate with the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT). We further propose that the maintenance of undifferentiated phenotypes, by the activity of distinct transcription factors, facilitates chromatin remodeling and phenotypic plasticity. With that regard, we support recent assertions that EMT is not an “either/or” event, but rather a continuous spectrum of mesenchymal vs. epithelial phenotypes (in various degrees of aberrant differentiation/undifferentiation). Finally, we discuss possible methods of pharmacologically targeting such aberrant epigenomes, with regard to their possible relevance toward halting, or even reversing, colorectal cancer progression.
Introduction
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second-leading cause of cancer deaths in the United States, with an estimated 50,130 deaths in 2014, a national expenditure of $14 billion, and an individual lifetime risk of 1 in 20. While the 5-year survival rate for localized CRC is >90%, only 40% of cases are detected at this (largely asymptomatic) stage, and for metastatic disease, survival falls to 8–12%. The risk of CRC increases with age (>50 years), diets high in red and processed meats, sedentary lifestyle, obesity, history of inflammatory bowel disease, and smoking. Non-compliance with screening for these at-risk individuals remains approximately 25% (Wong et al., 2016), and 5–10% of CRC cases are due to hereditary conditions, the majority of which include mutations in the tumor suppressor gene APC. Consequently, while optimism persists for increased compliance with preventative screening, possibly due to healthcare reforms to alleviate cost, it appears a large number of advanced cases will remain (Siegel et al., 2014).
In this review, we set forth a model whereby “epigenomic” anomalies in normal colon crypt stem cells, and their terminally differentiated progeny cells, transform to an embryonic-like state, followed by further benign and malignant progression. Consideration of these mechanisms may support further study of “epigenetic” therapies for this life-threatening pathology.
Initiation and Pathology of Colorectal Cancer
Colon Development
The colon is a quadrate-shaped organ possessing six substructures, facilitating progression of solid waste through the cecum (attached to the ilium of the small intestine), which is then transported through the ascending, traverse, descending, and sigmoid colon, which attaches to the rectum/anus (Colon Cancer Alliance, 1983) The colon serves to remove water, salt, and nutrients throughout the progressive elimination of solid waste, in symbiosis with over 700 species of bacteria and various simple eukaryotes (gut flora) (Colon Cancer Alliance, 1983). Six major colonic cell types include surface columnar epithelial (absorptive “colonocytes”), goblet (mucus-secreting) cells, vacuolated cells, deep crypt secretory cells, M-fold cells, and crypt colonic stem cells (Colony, 1996).
Colorectal Tumorigenesis
Colorectal cancer is well-accepted to proceed through five distinct stages: (1) aberrant foci; (2) small adenoma (adenomatous polyps); (3) large adenoma; (4) adenocarcinoma; and (5) invasion/metastasis. The pathology of non-familial CRCs is often associated with overactivity of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), mutations in Wnt, loss of APC, activating KRAS mutations, and mutations in NRAS, BRAF (8–12%), PIK3CA, and TP53 (50% of cases). Additionally, a balance between “gatekeeper” (anti-proliferation), “caretaker” (maintain genomic stability) and “drivers” (oncogenes) has been hypothesized to regulate other CRC phenotypes, including (1) the development of microsatellite instability (MSI) (due largely to loss of DNA mismatch repair), leading to overactivity of COX-2, EGFR, and/or Wnt pathways (leading to small adenomas); (2) KRAS and/or PIK3CA pathway overactivity (leading to large adenomas); and (3) inactivation of the tumor suppressor gene TP53 and downregulation of TGF-β signaling, leading to invasive/metastatic carcinomas (Wang et al., 2002; Markowitz and Bertagnolli, 2009; Vogelstein and Kinzler, 2015). With regard to specific gene mutations in non-hereditary (i.e., somatic) CRC, APC is mutated in 85%, TP53 in 40–50%, PIK3CA in 35% (activating mutations), and TGFBR2 in 45–50% of sporadic CRCs (Markowitz and Bertagnolli, 2009).
While there is hope that increased screening (e.g., colonoscopy, laproscopy, highly sensitive human occult fecal blood testing, etc. for persons over age 50) compliance will further increase early detection and treatment, due to increased education, access to health insurance, etc. However, at present, the only option for unresectable metastatic disease is conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy. While response to those initial chemotherapy regimens usually occur, resistance generally ensues within 6 months. Life-extending agents include conventional cytotoxics, such as 5-fluoracil, capecitabine, and topotecan, in various combinations with one another, and “targeted” therapeutics, such as bevacizumab (VEGFR antagonist) and the EGFR-inhibitory drugs cetuximab and panitumumab (Aparo and Goel, 2012; Recondo et al., 2014), Unfortunately, resistance to these agents eventually ensues, with a mere 13.3-month subsequent survival rate (O’Connell et al., 2008).
Epigenetics
Although mutated genes unequivocally contribute to the progression of CRC, gatekeeper, caretaker, and driver genes are not always altered in all CRC stages (Feinberg et al., 2006). Consequently, many cancer investigators are now focusing on the importance of epigenetics to the phenotypic plasticity that is crucial for CRC tumor progression (Tam and Weinberg, 2013; Pereira et al., 2015). Epigenetics refers to the regulation of gene transcription absent DNA-coding sequence alterations, and includes post-translational modifications to DNA and histones, nucleosome repositioning, and microRNA regulation of mRNA translation and/or stability (Goel and Boland, 2012). The most well-known of these, methylation of deoxycytosine (commonly referred to as the “fifth base” comprising DNA), within CG dinucleotides, is universally throughout higher eukaryotes, particularly in heterochromatin and large intergenic regions (Beyersmann, 2000). However, specific CG-rich (>60%) regions of <1000 base pairs (“CpG islands”), associated with over 70% of gene promoters are protected from transcriptionally repressive DNA methylation in normal cells (Deaton and Bird, 2011). A hallmark of cancer is a redistribution of DNA methylation patterns, i.e., hypermethylation of CpG islands, often resulting in repression of tumor suppressor genes, and loss of methylation in heterochromatin, resulting in genomic instability (Rodriguez-Paredes and Esteller, 2011). Moreover, early deoxycytosine methylation may occur in DNA repair genes (e.g., MLH1, MSH2, etc.), further favoring MSI and genetic mutations (Feinberg et al., 2006).
Epigenetics in Colorectal Cancer Development
In CRC specifically, it has been asserted that epigenetic changes occur very early in tumorigenesis. Specifically, MSI, and DNA methylation/silencing of DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes, lead to a poorly understood phenomenon known as “CIMP” (CpG island methylator phenotype). The CIMP phenotype involves widespread (but not random) promoter methylation throughout the genome (Issa, 2004). Moreover, it has been reported that typical metastatic CRCs possess ∼61 infrequently mutated genes, with 15 of these designated as driver genes, and the remainder representing mutated passenger genes (Markowitz and Bertagnolli, 2009). By contrast, one recent genome-wide analysis revealed that approximately 5% of the total CRC tumor genome (>1000 genes) harbors abnormal DNA methylation (Schuebel et al., 2007). Thus, it would appear prudent to consider both genetic and epigenetic aberrations in the etiology of CRC (You and Jones, 2012). For example, while 85% of sporadic CRCs possess transcriptional loss of APC, in addition to inactivating mutations, this gatekeeper can also be silenced by promoter DNA methylation (Lee et al., 2009).
Another example of epigenetic/genetic “crosstalk” during CRC tumorigenesis is the finding of genetic mutations in genes encoding epigenetic modifiers. For example, in a study of the genetic landscape of CRC, it was found that 50% of mutation-driver genes were those encoding epigenetic modifiers (e.g., DNMT3b, EZH2, etc.) (Vogelstein et al., 2013). Another genome-wide association study revealed mutations in the gene encoding the Tet methylcytosine dioxygenase 2, an enzyme involved in DNA demethylation (Toth et al., 2017). These (and many other studies) demonstrate the complex interplay between genetics and epigenetics (Feinberg et al., 2006), thus increasing the challenges of designing targeted CRC therapies.
Epigenetics likely also contributes to the wide degree of heterogeneity of CRC tumors. Recently, an international consortium recognized four CRC consensus molecular subtypes, including: (1) CMS1 (microsatellite instable, hypermutated); (2) CMS2 (activated canonical WNT and MYC signaling; (3) CMS3, with metabolic dysregulation; and (4) CMS4, having activated TGF-β signaling, with stromal invasion and angiogenesis. Each of these subtypes was found to have their own distinctive epigenomes (Guinney et al., 2015). Moreover, CRC tumors with relative epigenomic homogeneity associated with short relapse-free and overall survival (Martinez-Cardus et al., 2016).
Epithelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition
The importance of epigenomics to cancer is further supported by studies in melanoma, in which plating of melanoma cells onto an extracellular matrix derived from embryonic stem cells, could reverse the malignant phenotype (Costa et al., 2009). Such malignant reversion was later found to associate with epigenetic remodeling by microenvironmental paracrine release of the cytokine Lefty, which is silenced by DNA methylation, and also by the microRNA miRNA-302, in melanoma cells. Analogously, Lefty is inhibited by the oncoprotein Nodal, and the embryonic transcription factor Notch4 (Costa et al., 2009; Barroso-delJesus et al., 2011). Other studies showed that the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT)-opposing microRNAs miR-34 and the miR-200 family are silenced by DNA methylation in CRC metastatic cells and tissues. Re-expression of these miRNA genes, by DNA methylation inhibitors, inhibited the synthesis of the EMT modulators TWIST, SNAIL, and ZEB1 (Siemens et al., 2011; Roy et al., 2012; Hur et al., 2013). Moreover, a p53/miR-34 axis has been reported to stabilize the β-catenin antagonist GSK-3β within the nucleus, resulting in repression of Wnt and Snail pathway transcriptional targets (Kim et al., 2013).
Consequently, we posit that an additional aspect of CRC neoplastic epigenomic alterations is their intimate role in regulating EMT (Tam and Weinberg, 2013), which has further been linked to the cancer “stemness” phenotype (Polyak and Weinberg, 2009). The EMT transition involves massive, genome-wide epigenomic changes that underlie phenotypic plasticity, such as the loss of tight junctions, loss of cell-to-cell adherence, loss of cell polarity, changes in cell morphology to an elongated shape (allowing traverse between endothelial cells), and the formation of lamellapodia and cytoskeletal remodeling, thus facilitating motility and invasion (Figure 1) (Hugo et al., 2007).
FIGURE 1. Illustration of autocrine and paracrine signaling pathways in colorectal cancer. Diagram shows how numerous oncogenic signaling pathways, including Wnt, PDGF, c-MET, and KRAS, converge to effect epigenomes that facilitate pro-neoplastic (“dedifferentiation”) gene transcription. Possible points of epigenetic interventions, potentially reversing dedifferentiating epigenomes, are shown. For example activation of epithelial-to-mesenchymal transcription factors (e.g., Twist) leads to whole-genome chromatin remodeling and phenotypic plasticity, which can be inhibited or reversed.
Epigenomic Reactivation of Embryonic Developmental Pathways
In addition to EMT, most cancers are now known to reactivate embryonic self-renewal pathways, including Hedgehog, Notch, and TGFβ/Stat3. As described above, most CRCs are reliant on the Wnt (Wingless) developmental pathway. It is possible that direct targeting of embryonic pathways might be more effective against both stem and dedifferentiating tumor cells (Takebe et al., 2011; Medema, 2013; Pattabiraman and Weinberg, 2014), and cancers “addicted to” upregulated embryonic pathway activity (e.g., Wnt in CRC and PIK3CA in metastatic breast cancer), combined with high tumor heterogeneity, might be more vulnerable to such therapies (Bienz and Clevers, 2000; Segditsas and Tomlinson, 2006; Hernandez-Aya and Gonzalez-Angulo, 2011). Another “master regulator” of chromatin remodeling to an undifferentiated phenotype is the Polycomb oncoprotein EZH2, which represses transcription by trimethylation of histone H3, lysine 27 (H3K27me3) (Chang and Hung, 2012).
Current and Potential CRC Therapeutic Approaches
In Figure 1, we present a model for the genesis and progression of CRC, via canonical or non-canonical Wnt signaling. Here, the simplest means of carcinogenesis would be genetic or epigenetic anomalies in colonic crypt stem cells, particularly those expressing the Wnt signaling component LGR5 (Zeki et al., 2011; Carmon et al., 2012). However, epigenomic alterations also allow for dedifferentiation of villi cells (transient-amplifying or even fully differentiated, polarized colonocytes), particularly in response to inflammation (and activity of the oncogenic pathway NF-κB (Schwitalla et al., 2013), and various environmental agents (Haggar and Boushey, 2009). As >95% of CRCs are believed to involve overactive Wnt signaling, this may occur via numerous mechanisms, including APC mutation, DNA methylation silencing of SFRP (secreted frizzled receptor protein), activating mutations in beta-catenin, loss of AXIN2 degradation by silencing of the E3 ligase gene tankyrase (TNKS2), and upregulated signaling of the hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) pathway (Suzuki et al., 2004; Fodde and Brabletz, 2007; Schneikert and Behrens, 2007; Schwitalla et al., 2013).
In this scenario, reactivation of embryonic signaling pathways (possibly via aberrant paracrine interactions with a pericryptal myofibroblast “stem cell niche”) (Vermeulen et al., 2010) and CRC upregulation of Wnt signaling, in conjunction with the loss of gatekeeper genes (SFRP, APC, DKK, etc.) upregulate EMT and other promalignant processes (Aguilera et al., 2006; Silva et al., 2014). Additional activating mutations in CRC driver genes/pathways may also “crosstalk” (e.g., HGF, PI3K/AKT, TNKS2) with Wnt signaling to facilitate rapid proliferation into a fully malignant tumor (via β-catenin stabilization, nuclear translocation, and cotransactivation of TEF/LEF-occupied gene promoters). These events then initiate a cascade that eventually results in EMT and a cancer stem-like phenotype, involving highly plastic phenotypes, such as cell shape distortion (extravasation between endothelial cells), motility to reach the circulatory system, and suppression of immunosurveillence by downregulating specific HLA, and other antigenic cell surface immunophenotypes (Yaguchi et al., 2011).
Possible Epigenome-Targeting Therapeutic Approaches for CRC
Wnt Inhibitors
As mentioned above, APC and/or CTNNB1 (β-catenin) mutation(s) are present in >90% of CRC cases, thus singling out the Wnt pathway as predominant in this cancer type (Ayadi et al., 2015). Moreover, Wnt ligands can stimulate various non-canonical and non-frizzled related pathways, and Wnt signaling has been found to “crosstalk” with several other signal cascades (e.g., KRAS, BRAF, etc.) (Figure 1). In particular, tyrosine (not serine/threonine) phosphorylation of β-catenin (and loss of its degradation), leads to its nuclear translocation and oncogene transactivation (Piedra et al., 2001). Consequently, a number of Wnt inhibitors have now been developed, including those targeting tankarases 1 and 2 (affecting AXIN2 degradation), porcupine, and disheveled (Voronkov and Krauss, 2013). Thus, while inhibitors of canonical Wnt signaling may well be beneficial, even more ideal therapeutics might target the downstream effectors that act as convergence points for several pathways (e.g., TCF/LEF, TWIST, MYC, etc.) (Voronkov and Krauss, 2013).
Epigenome-Modulating Agents
In addition to Wnt inhibitors, we posit that epigenetic transcriptional derepressors might be a complimentary means of enhancing the efficacy of embryonic pathway-targeting therapies. For example, DNA methylation specifically silences a number of tumor suppressor genes (e.g., miR-34, miR-200 family, SFRP, etc.), while global epigenomic alterations underlie the phenotypic plasticity of EMT/stemness. Such dedifferentiating phenotypic alterations correlate with widespread trimethylation of histone H3, lysine 27 (H3K27me3), a transcriptionally repressive modification catalyzed by the Polycomb group protein, and histone methyltransferase, EZH2 (Widschwendter et al., 2007; Friedman et al., 2009; Yan and Guo, 2015) (Figure 1). Most recently, the retinoblastoma-binding protein-2, RBP2 (JARED1A, KDM5a), a histone H3 lysine 4 (H3K4, an activating modification) demethylase, was discovered in various other cancers as complexed with EZH2 (Pasini et al., 2008; Schuettengruber and Cavalli, 2009), and is now the subject of intense investigation for inhibitors (Zeng et al., 2010; Lin et al., 2011).
Interestingly, one study in YB5 CRC cells comprised of a screen of FDA-approved drugs that could synergize with the DNA methylation inhibitor decitabine to derepress a silenced reporter gene (Raynal et al., 2017). This screen revealed, in particular, that the antiarrhythmic proscillaridin, paired with decitabine, effected widespread epigenomic reprogramming, including silencing of two CRC oncogenes, SYMD3 and KDM8 (Raynal et al., 2017).
Several other recent studies support our hypothesis. In one study of chemoresistant CRC and other cell lines, histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACIs) reversed EMT and cancer stem cell phenotypes (Wu et al., 2017), while one specific HDACI, resminostat, has now completed a Phase I clinical trial (Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT01277406) for patients with advanced CRC (Ahmed et al., 2017). Another Phase II trial of the HDACI entinostat, combined with the demethylating agent azacitidine proved tolerable, but unfortunately, poorly efficacious (Azad et al., 2017). Other HDACIs, however, in Phase I or II trials, include CUDC-907 (Curis, Inc., Lexington, MA, USA) and CXD101 (Celleron Therapeutics, Oxford, UK). Thus, while HDACIs have yet only shown efficacy against specific lymphomas, it is likely that well-designed clinical trials will validate their promise against solid tumors (particularly as adjuvant therapies).
Summary
Much progress has been made in the treatment of CRC, including a tripling of the 5-year survival for stage IV disease, from 11 to 30 months. Nonetheless, following most first-line therapies, secondary approaches remain only minimally life-extending. Due to the essential and complex involvement of epigenetics, in CRC and most cancers, approaches to reverse the various DNA and histone modifications related to self-renewal of cancer stem cells, hold promise for more effective treatment of CRC and other malignant diseases.
Author Contributions
CB and AT: idea generation, literature review. AT: supervised the outline, designed the figure in collaboration with CB and JR. CB, JR, and AT contributed to the writing and proofing of the manuscript. All the authors read and approved the final version of this manuscript.
Funding
This work was supported by start-up funds (F- 110760) to Dr. Tiwari from the University of Toledo.
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
The reviewer KM and handling Editor declared their shared affiliation, and the handling Editor states that the process nevertheless met the standards of a fair and objective review.
Acknowledgments
We thank Mr. Kyle McIntosh (UT) and Ms. Haneen Amawi (UT) for polishing the figure. We thank Ms. Charisse Montgomery (UT) for critical review of this manuscript.
References
Aguilera, O., Fraga, M. F., Ballestar, E., Paz, M. F., Herranz, M., Espada, J., et al. (2006). Epigenetic inactivation of the Wnt antagonist DICKKOPF-1 (DKK-1) gene in human colorectal cancer. Oncogene 25, 4116–4121. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1209439
Ahmed, M., Chaudhari, K., Babaei-Jadidi, R., Dekker, L. V., and Shams Nateri, A. (2017). Concise review: emerging drugs targeting epithelial cancer stem-like cells. Stem Cells 35, 839–850. doi: 10.1002/stem.2579
Aparo, S., and Goel, S. (2012). Evolvement of the treatment paradigm for metastatic colon cancer. From chemotherapy to targeted therapy. Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol. 83, 47–58. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2011.08.006
Ayadi, M., Bouygues, A., Ouaret, D., Ferrand, N., Chouaib, S., Thiery, J. P., et al. (2015). Chronic chemotherapeutic stress promotes evolution of stemness and WNT/beta-catenin signaling in colorectal cancer cells: implications for clinical use of WNT-signaling inhibitors. Oncotarget 6, 18518–18533. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.3934
Azad, N. S., El-Khoueiry, A., Yin, J., Oberg, A. L., Flynn, P., Adkins, D., et al. (2017). Combination epigenetic therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) with subcutaneous 5-azacitidine and entinostat; a phase 2 consortium/stand Up 2 cancer study. Oncotarget doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.15108 [Epub ahead of print].
Barroso-delJesus, A., Lucena-Aguilar, G., Sanchez, L., Ligero, G., Gutierrez-Aranda, I., and Menendez, P. (2011). The Nodal inhibitor Lefty is negatively modulated by the microRNA miR-302 in human embryonic stem cells. FASEB J. 25, 1497–1508. doi: 10.1096/fj.10-172221
Beyersmann, D. (2000). Regulation of mammalian gene expression. EXS 89, 11–28. doi: 10.1007/978-3-0348-8393-1_2
Bienz, M., and Clevers, H. (2000). Linking colorectal cancer to Wnt signaling. Cell 103, 311–320. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)00122-7
Carmon, K. S., Lin, Q., Gong, X., Thomas, A., and Liu, Q. (2012). LGR5 interacts and cointernalizes with Wnt receptors to modulate Wnt/beta-catenin signaling. Mol. Cell. Biol. 32, 2054–2064. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00272-12
Chang, C. J., and Hung, M. C. (2012). The role of EZH2 in tumour progression. Br. J. Cancer 106, 243–247. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2011.551
Colony, P. C. (1996). Structural characterization of colonic cell types and correlation with specific functions. Dig. Dis. Sci. 41, 88–104. doi: 10.1007/BF02208589
Costa, F. F., Seftor, E. A., Bischof, J. M., Kirschmann, D. A., Strizzi, L., Arndt, K., et al. (2009). Epigenetically reprogramming metastatic tumor cells with an embryonic microenvironment. Epigenomics 1, 387–398. doi: 10.2217/epi.09.25
Deaton, A. M., and Bird, A. (2011). CpG islands and the regulation of transcription. Genes Dev. 25, 1010–1022. doi: 10.1101/gad.2037511
Feinberg, A. P., Ohlsson, R., and Henikoff, S. (2006). The epigenetic progenitor origin of human cancer. Nat. Rev. Genet. 7, 21–33. doi: 10.1038/nrg1748
Fodde, R., and Brabletz, T. (2007). Wnt/beta-catenin signaling in cancer stemness and malignant behavior. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 19, 150–158. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2007.02.007
Friedman, J. M., Liang, G., Liu, C. C., Wolff, E. M., Tsai, Y. C., Ye, W., et al. (2009). The putative tumor suppressor microRNA-101 modulates the cancer epigenome by repressing the polycomb group protein EZH2. Cancer Res. 69, 2623–2629. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-3114
Goel, A., and Boland, C. R. (2012). Epigenetics of colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology 143, 1441–1460.e. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.09.032
Guinney, J., Dienstmann, R., Wang, X., de Reynies, A., Schlicker, A., Soneson, C., et al. (2015). The consensus molecular subtypes of colorectal cancer. Nat. Med. 21, 1350–1356. doi: 10.1038/nm.3967
Haggar, F. A., and Boushey, R. P. (2009). Colorectal cancer epidemiology: incidence, mortality, survival, and risk factors. Clin. Colon Rectal Surg. 22, 191–197. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1242458
Hernandez-Aya, L. F., and Gonzalez-Angulo, A. M. (2011). Targeting the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase signaling pathway in breast cancer. Oncologist 16, 404–414. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2010-0402
Hugo, H., Ackland, M. L., Blick, T., Lawrence, M. G., Clements, J. A., Williams, E. D., et al. (2007). Epithelial–mesenchymal and mesenchymal–epithelial transitions in carcinoma progression. J. Cell. Physiol. 213, 374–383. doi: 10.1002/jcp.21223
Hur, K., Toiyama, Y., Takahashi, M., Balaguer, F., Nagasaka, T., Koike, J., et al. (2013). MicroRNA-200c modulates epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) in human colorectal cancer metastasis. Gut 62, 1315–1326. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2011-301846
Issa, J. P. (2004). CpG island methylator phenotype in cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 4, 988–993. doi: 10.1038/nrc1507
Kim, N. H., Cha, Y. H., Kang, S. E., Lee, Y., Lee, I., Cha, S. Y., et al. (2013). p53 regulates nuclear GSK-3 levels through miR-34-mediated Axin2 suppression in colorectal cancer cells. Cell Cycle 12, 1578–1587. doi: 10.4161/cc.24739
Lee, B. B., Lee, E. J., Jung, E. H., Chun, H. K., Chang, D. K., Song, S. Y., et al. (2009). Aberrant methylation of APC, MGMT, RASSF2A, and Wif-1 genes in plasma as a biomarker for early detection of colorectal cancer. Clin. Cancer Res 15, 6185–6191. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-0111
Lin, W., Cao, J., Liu, J., Beshiri, M. L., Fujiwara, Y., Francis, J., et al. (2011). Loss of the retinoblastoma binding protein 2 (RBP2) histone demethylase suppresses tumorigenesis in mice lacking Rb1 or Men1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 108, 13379–13386. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1110104108
Markowitz, S. D., and Bertagnolli, M. M. (2009). Molecular origins of cancer: molecular basis of colorectal cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 361, 2449–2460. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra0804588
Martinez-Cardus, A., Moran, S., Musulen, E., Moutinho, C., Manzano, J. L., Martinez-Balibrea, E., et al. (2016). Epigenetic homogeneity within colorectal tumors predicts shorter relapse-free and overall survival times for patients with locoregional cancer. Gastroenterology 151, 961–972. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.08.001
Medema, J. P. (2013). Cancer stem cells: the challenges ahead. Nat. Cell Biol. 15, 338–344. doi: 10.1038/ncb2717
O’Connell, M. J., Campbell, M. E., Goldberg, R. M., Grothey, A., Seitz, J. F., Benedetti, J. K., et al. (2008). Survival following recurrence in stage II and III colon cancer: findings from the ACCENT data set. J. Clin. Oncol. 26, 2336–2341. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.15.8261
Pasini, D., Hansen, K. H., Christensen, J., Agger, K., Cloos, P. A., and Helin, K. (2008). Coordinated regulation of transcriptional repression by the RBP2 H3K4 demethylase and polycomb-repressive complex 2. Genes Dev. 22, 1345–1355. doi: 10.1101/gad.470008
Pattabiraman, D. R., and Weinberg, R. A. (2014). Tackling the cancer stem cells - what challenges do they pose? Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 13, 497–512. doi: 10.1038/nrd4253
Pereira, L., Mariadason, J. M., Hannan, R. D., and Dhillon, A. S. (2015). Implications of epithelial-mesenchymal plasticity for heterogeneity in colorectal cancer. Front. Oncol. 5:13. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2015.00013
Piedra, J., Martinez, D., Castano, J., Miravet, S., Dunach, M., and de Herreros, A. G. (2001). Regulation of beta-catenin structure and activity by tyrosine phosphorylation. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 20436–20443. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M100194200
Polyak, K., and Weinberg, R. A. (2009). Transitions between epithelial and mesenchymal states: acquisition of malignant and stem cell traits. Nat. Rev. Cancer 9, 265–273. doi: 10.1038/nrc2620
Raynal, N. J., Da Costa, E. M., Lee, J. T., Gharibyan, V., Ahmed, S., Zhang, H., et al. (2017). Repositioning FDA-approved drugs in combination with epigenetic drugs to reprogram colon cancer epigenome. Mol. Cancer Ther. 16, 397–407. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-16-0588
Recondo, G. Jr., Díaz-Cantón, E., de la Vega, M., Greco, M., Recondo, G. Sr., and Valsecchi, M. E. (2014). Advances and new perspectives in the treatment of metastatic colon cancer. World J. Gastrointest. Oncol. 6, 211–224. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v6.i7.211
Rodriguez-Paredes, M., and Esteller, M. (2011). Cancer epigenetics reaches mainstream oncology. Nat. Med. 17, 330–339. doi: 10.1038/nm.2305
Roy, S., Levi, E., Majumdar, A. P., and Sarkar, F. H. (2012). Expression of miR-34 is lost in colon cancer which can be re-expressed by a novel agent CDF. J. Hematol. Oncol. 5:58. doi: 10.1186/1756-8722-5-58
Schneikert, J., and Behrens, J. (2007). The canonical Wnt signalling pathway and its APC partner in colon cancer development. Gut 56, 417–425. doi: 10.1136/gut.2006.093310
Schuebel, K. E., Chen, W., Cope, L., Glockner, S. C., Suzuki, H., Yi, J. M., et al. (2007). Comparing the DNA hypermethylome with gene mutations in human colorectal cancer. PLoS Genet. 3:1709–1723. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.0030157
Schuettengruber, B., and Cavalli, G. (2009). Recruitment of polycomb group complexes and their role in the dynamic regulation of cell fate choice. Development 136, 3531–3542. doi: 10.1242/dev.033902
Schwitalla, S., Fingerle, A. A., Cammareri, P., Nebelsiek, T., Goktuna, S. I., Ziegler, P. K., et al. (2013). Intestinal tumorigenesis initiated by dedifferentiation and acquisition of stem-cell-like properties. Cell 152, 25–38. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.12.012
Segditsas, S., and Tomlinson, I. (2006). Colorectal cancer and genetic alterations in the Wnt pathway. Oncogene 25, 7531–7537. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1210059
Siegel, R., Desantis, C., and Jemal, A. (2014). Colorectal cancer statistics, 2014. CA Cancer J. Clin. 64, 104–117. doi: 10.3322/caac.21220
Siemens, H., Jackstadt, R., Hunten, S., Kaller, M., Menssen, A., Gotz, U., et al. (2011). miR-34 and SNAIL form a double-negative feedback loop to regulate epithelial-mesenchymal transitions. Cell Cycle 10, 4256–4271. doi: 10.4161/cc.10.24.18552
Silva, A. L., Dawson, S. N., Arends, M. J., Guttula, K., Hall, N., Cameron, E. A., et al. (2014). Boosting Wnt activity during colorectal cancer progression through selective hypermethylation of Wnt signaling antagonists. BMC Cancer 14:891. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-14-891
Suzuki, H., Watkins, D. N., Jair, K. W., Schuebel, K. E., Markowitz, S. D., Chen, W. D., et al. (2004). Epigenetic inactivation of SFRP genes allows constitutive WNT signaling in colorectal cancer. Nat. Genet. 36, 417–422. doi: 10.1038/ng1330
Takebe, N., Harris, P. J., Warren, R. Q., and Ivy, S. P. (2011). Targeting cancer stem cells by inhibiting Wnt, Notch, and Hedgehog pathways. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 8, 97–106. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2010.196
Tam, W. L., and Weinberg, R. A. (2013). The epigenetics of epithelial-mesenchymal plasticity in cancer. Nat. Med. 19, 1438–1449. doi: 10.1038/nm.3336
Toth, R., Scherer, D., Kelemen, L. E., Risch, A., Hazra, A., Balavarca, Y., et al. (2017). Genetic variants in epigenetic pathways and risks of multiple cancers in the GAME-ON consortium. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-16-0728 [Epub ahead of print].
Vermeulen, L., De Sousa, E. M. F., van der Heijden, M., Cameron, K., de Jong, J. H., Borovski, T., et al. (2010). Wnt activity defines colon cancer stem cells and is regulated by the microenvironment. Nat. Cell Biol. 12, 468–476. doi: 10.1038/ncb2048
Vogelstein, B., and Kinzler, K. W. (2015). The path to cancer –three strikes and you’re out. N. Engl. J. Med. 373, 1895–1898. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1508811
Vogelstein, B., Papadopoulos, N., Velculescu, V. E., Zhou, S., Diaz, L. A. Jr., and Kinzler, K. W. (2013). Cancer genome landscapes. Science 339, 1546–1558. doi: 10.1126/science.1235122
Voronkov, A., and Krauss, S. (2013). Wnt/beta-catenin signaling and small molecule inhibitors. Curr. Pharm. Des. 19, 634–664. doi: 10.2174/138161213804581837
Wang, T. L., Rago, C., Silliman, N., Ptak, J., Markowitz, S., Willson, J. K., et al. (2002). Prevalence of somatic alterations in the colorectal cancer cell genome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99, 3076–3080. doi: 10.1073/pnas.261714699
Widschwendter, M., Fiegl, H., Egle, D., Mueller-Holzner, E., Spizzo, G., Marth, C., et al. (2007). Epigenetic stem cell signature in cancer. Nat. Genet. 39, 157–158. doi: 10.1038/ng1941
Wong, M. C., Ching, J. Y., Chan, V. C., Lam, T. Y., Luk, A. K., Wong, S. H., et al. (2016). Colorectal cancer screening based on age and gender: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Medicine 95:e2739. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000002739
Wu, G., Wilson, G., George, J., Liddle, C., Hebbard, L., and Qiao, L. (2017). Overcoming treatment resistance in cancer: current understanding and tactics. Cancer Lett. 387, 69–76. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2016.04.018
Yaguchi, T., Sumimoto, H., Kudo-Saito, C., Tsukamoto, N., Ueda, R., Iwata-Kajihara, T., et al. (2011). The mechanisms of cancer immunoescape and development of overcoming strategies. Int. J. Hematol. 93, 294–300. doi: 10.1007/s12185-011-0799-6
Yan, W., and Guo, M. (2015). Epigenetics of colorectal cancer. Methods Mol. Biol. 1238, 405–424. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-1804-1_22
You, J. S., and Jones, P. A. (2012). Cancer genetics and epigenetics: two sides of the same coin? Cancer Cell 22, 9–20. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2012.06.008
Zeki, S. S., Graham, T. A., and Wright, N. A. (2011). Stem cells and their implications for colorectal cancer. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 8, 90–100. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2010.211
Keywords: colorectal cancer, embryonic signaling pathways, epigenomics, epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition, tumor progression
Citation: Balch C, Ramapuram JB and Tiwari AK (2017) The Epigenomics of Embryonic Pathway Signaling in Colorectal Cancer. Front. Pharmacol. 8:267. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2017.00267
Received: 21 February 2017; Accepted: 28 April 2017;
Published: 19 May 2017.
Edited by:
Brion William Murray, Pfizer (United States), USAReviewed by:
Karen Maegley, Pfizer (United States), USAMaitri Yogen Shah, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, USA
Copyright © 2017 Balch, Ramapuram and Tiwari. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Amit K. Tiwari, amit.tiwari@utoledo.edu