TY - JOUR AU - Barnard, Allison AU - Hughes, Kelly AU - Gerhardt, Regina AU - DiVincenti, Louis AU - Bovee, Jenna AU - Cantlon, Jessica PY - 2013 M3 - Original Research TI - Inherently Analog Quantity Representations in Olive Baboons (Papio anubis) JO - Frontiers in Psychology UR - https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00253 VL - 4 SN - 1664-1078 N2 - Strong evidence indicates that non-human primates possess a numerical representation system, but the inherent nature of that system is still debated. Two cognitive mechanisms have been proposed to account for non-human primate numerical performance: (1) a discrete object-file system limited to quantities <4, and (2) an analog system which represents quantities comparatively but is limited by the ratio between two quantities. To test the underlying nature of non-human primate quantification, we asked eight experiment-naive olive baboons (Papio anubis) to discriminate between number pairs containing small (<4), large (>4), or span (small vs. large) numbers of food items presented simultaneously or sequentially. The prediction from the object-file hypothesis is that baboons will only accurately choose the larger quantity in small pairs, but not large or span pairs. Conversely, the analog system predicts that baboons will be successful with all numbers, and that success will be dependent on numerical ratio. We found that baboons successfully discriminated all pair types at above chance levels. In addition, performance significantly correlated with the ratio between the numerical values. Although performance was better for simultaneous trials than sequential trials, evidence favoring analog numerical representation emerged from both conditions, and was present even in the first exposure to number pairs. Together, these data favor the interpretation that a single, coherent analog representation system underlies spontaneous quantitative abilities in primates. ER -