%A Palmeri,Thomas J. %A Mack,Michael L. %D 2015 %J Frontiers in Psychology %C %F %G English %K Categorization,category learning,context,Basic level,experimental design %Q %R 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00180 %W %L %M %P %7 %8 2015-February-19 %9 Perspective %+ Dr Thomas J. Palmeri,Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt Vision Research Center, Vanderbilt University,Nashville, TN, USA,thomas.j.palmeri@vanderbilt.edu %# %! How Trial Context Affects Categorization %* %< %T How experimental trial context affects perceptual categorization %U https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00180 %V 6 %0 JOURNAL ARTICLE %@ 1664-1078 %X To understand object categorization, participants are tested in experiments often quite different from how people experience object categories in the real world. Learning and knowledge of categories is measured in discrete experimental trials, those trials may or may not provide feedback, trials appear one after another, after some fixed inter-trial interval, with hundreds of trials in a row, within experimental blocks with some structure dictated by the experimental design. In the real world, outside of certain educational and vocational contexts, opportunities to learn and use categories are intermixed over time with a whole multitude of intervening experiences. It is clear from any elementary understanding of human cognition that sequential effects matter, yet this understanding is often ignored, and categorization trials are often instead treated as independent events, immune to local trial context. In this perspective, we use some of our work to illustrate some of the consequences of the fact that categorization experiments have a particular trial structure. Experimental trial context can affect performance in category learning and categorization experiments in ways that can profoundly affect theoretical conclusions.