%A Hadwin,Julie A. %A Richards,Helen J. %D 2016 %J Frontiers in Psychology %C %F %G English %K Anxiety,working memory,Interventions,Attentional control theory,Attention bias %Q %R 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00047 %W %L %M %P %7 %8 2016-February-02 %9 Original Research %+ Dr Julie A. Hadwin,Developmental Brain-Behaviour Laboratory, School of Psychology, University of Southampton,Southampton, UK,jah7@soton.ac.uk %# %! WM training and CBT interventions: anxiety and attentional control %* %< %T Working Memory Training and CBT Reduces Anxiety Symptoms and Attentional Biases to Threat: A Preliminary Study %U https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00047 %V 7 %0 JOURNAL ARTICLE %@ 1664-1078 %X Research indicates that cognitive processes linked to the detection of threat stimuli are associated with poor attentional control, placing children and adolescents at increased risk for the development of anxious affect. The current study aimed to provide preliminary data to assess whether an intervention designed to improve attentional control (via working memory; WM) would lead to better performance in tests of WM and would be associated with positive changes in symptoms of trait and test anxiety, increased inhibitory control and reduced attention to threat. Forty adolescents aged 11–14 years who reported elevated anxiety and low attentional control were randomly allocated to a WM training or an active cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) control group. Post intervention, WM training was associated with greater improvements (versus. CBT) in trained WM tasks. Both groups, however, reported fewer anxiety symptoms, demonstrated increased inhibitory control and a reduction in attentional biases to threat post intervention and these results were maintained at follow up. The study provides indicative evidence which suggests that WM training has similar benefits to a more traditional CBT intervention on reduced anxiety and attentional biases for threat. Future research should aim to replicate the findings in a large sample size and explore the broader impact of training on day-to-day functioning. In addition, further research is needed to identify which participants benefit most from different interventions (using baseline characteristics) on treatment compliance and outcome.