@ARTICLE{10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00386, AUTHOR={Perez-Felkner, Lara and Nix, Samantha and Thomas, Kirby}, TITLE={Gendered Pathways: How Mathematics Ability Beliefs Shape Secondary and Postsecondary Course and Degree Field Choices}, JOURNAL={Frontiers in Psychology}, VOLUME={8}, YEAR={2017}, URL={https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00386}, DOI={10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00386}, ISSN={1664-1078}, ABSTRACT={Do mathematics ability beliefs explain gender gaps in the physical science, engineering, mathematics, and computer science fields (PEMC) and other science fields? We leverage U.S. nationally representative longitudinal data to estimate gendered differences in girls' and boys' perceptions of mathematics ability with the most difficult or challenging material. Our analyses examine the potentially interacting effects of gender and these ability beliefs on students' pathways to scientific careers. Specifically, we study how beliefs about ability with challenging mathematics influence girls' and boys' choices to pursue PEMC degrees, evaluating educational milestones over a 6-year period: advanced science course completion in secondary school and postsecondary major retention and selection. Our findings indicate even at the same levels of observed ability, girls' mathematics ability beliefs under challenge are markedly lower than those of boys. These beliefs matter over time, potentially tripling girls' chances of majoring in PEMC sciences, over and above biological science fields, all else being equal. Implications and potential interventions are discussed.} }