TY - JOUR AU - Leydesdorff, Loet AU - Bornmann, Lutz AU - Comins, Jordan A. AU - Milojević, Staša PY - 2016 M3 - Original Research TI - Citations: Indicators of Quality? The Impact Fallacy JO - Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics UR - https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frma.2016.00001 VL - 1 SN - 2504-0537 N2 - We argue that citation is a composed indicator: short-term citations can be considered as currency at the research front, whereas long-term citations can contribute to the codification of knowledge claims into concept symbols. Knowledge claims at the research front are more likely to be transitory and are therefore problematic as indicators of quality. Citation impact studies focus on short-term citation, and therefore tend to measure not epistemic quality, but involvement in current discourses in which contributions are positioned by referencing. We explore this argument using three case studies: (1) citations of the journal Soziale Welt as an example of a venue that tends not to publish papers at a research front, unlike, for example, JACS; (2) Robert K. Merton as a concept symbol across theories of citation; and (3) the Multi-RPYS (“Multi-Referenced Publication Year Spectroscopy”) of the journals Scientometrics, Gene, and Soziale Welt. We show empirically that the measurement of “quality” in terms of citations can further be qualified: short-term citation currency at the research front can be distinguished from longer term processes of incorporation and codification of knowledge claims into bodies of knowledge. The recently introduced Multi-RPYS can be used to distinguish between short-term and long-term impacts. ER -