
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
EDITORIAL article
Front. Environ. Sci. , 24 March 2025
Sec. Environmental Informatics and Remote Sensing
Volume 13 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2025.1594457
This article is part of the Research Topic Remote Sensing of the Cryosphere View all 10 articles
Editorial on the Research Topic
Remote sensing of the cryosphere
The understanding of key environmental parameters operating within the cryosphere is of importance for climate change and sea level rise studies, and also for the assessment and characterization of snowmelt and snow pollution episodes. It is known that the year 2024 was the warmest year on the observational record. If the trend established since industrialisation continues for the next decade, the multiple climate tipping points may be triggered and humankind will face a multidimensional global crisis not seen before. Currently, the world is heading toward 2°C–3°C of global warming by 2100. The observed global warming leads to the increased speed of snow melting, the decrease in snow-covered area and snow duration, disappearance of glaciers, decrease in sea ice extent (https://seaice.uni-bremen.de/sea-ice-concentration/amsre-amsr2/time-series/), change in the precipitation patterns, sea level rise, the degradation of the permafrost, catalyse widespread temporal turnover in biodiversity and intensification of various nonlinear feedbacks in the climate system including surface - atmosphere interactions and change in precipitation patterns and increase of hazard probabilities. Therefore, the spaceborne monitoring of the key parameters of the terrestrial cryosphere is of great significance. The papers presented in this Research Topic can be grouped in three categories. The largest category contains four papers (Chen et al.; Kokhanovsky et al.; Kokhanovsky et al.; Wilder et al.) aimed at the presentation of algorithms to retrieve snow characteristics (e.g., snow grain size and albedo) from spaceborne multispectral measurements over Greenland (Chen et al.), spaceborne hyperspectral measurements over Antarctica (Kokhanovsky et al.; Kokhanovsky et al.); and airborne lidar measurements in steep forested terrain in United States (Wilder et al.). While Chen et al. concentrate on the validation of their snow property retrieval algorithm, Kokhanovsky et al., Kokhanovsky et al. show the benefits of hyperspectral observations (PRISMA, EnMAP) for snow monitoring including the detection of sizes of ice grains in the snow surface layer and also at some distance from the snow surface. Wilder et al. introduces fast and simple technique to retrieve the snow grain size in steep forested terrain using airborne lidar measurements at the single wavelength (1,064 nm). The presence of liquid water is a strict limitation on their method, preventing reliable results during the melt period. In particular, mixed ice grains and liquid water manifests into the respective ice absorption feature widening and shifting towards shorter wavelengths.
The second group of papers (Gascoin et al.; Gu et al.; Meyer et al.) is aimed at studies of snow cover in mountainous regions of our planet. In particular, the spatial and temporal changes of snow cover area, and derivation of snow depth and snow volume and also other snow properties are discussed in depth. For example, Gu et al. has found that from 2010 to 2019, the spatial fragmentation of snow cover in Northeast China increased by 50% compared to the 1980–1989 period. This paper suggests that the increase in temperature is the major factor leading to the fragmentation of snow cover in the studies area. Clearly, similar trends exist in other mountainous areas. It is pointed out by Meyer et al. that time series mapping of snow volume (governed by snow cover area and snow depth) in the mountains at global scales and at resolutions needed for water resource management is an unsolved challenge to date. The authors of this paper underline that digital surface models from multi-view Structure from Motion (SfM) photogrammetry can map snow depth up to alpine catchments size. They compared snow depth mapped from multi-view Structure from Motion photogrammetry to that mapped by lidar at multiple resolutions over an entire mountain basin (300
The third group of papers (Pukanská et al.; Temuujin et al.) is aimed at studies of particular regions of the cryosphere (Dobšiná Ice Cave in Slovakia and Khenti Mountain in the permafrost zone of central Mongolia). Temuujin et al. presents the analysis of 2 years of measurements of spatially distributed near-surface ground temperatures from a 6
AK: Conceptualization, Writing–review and editing, Investigation, Methodology, Writing–original draft. BD: Writing–original draft, Writing–review and editing. ZS: Writing–review and editing, Writing–original draft.
The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article.
We thank the authors for submitting their work to this Research Topic and the reviewers who agreed to review individual contributions. This special Research Topic is dedicated to the memory of Jeff Dozier (1944–2024), who made outstanding contributions to the development of snow remote sensing techniques. Jeff was completely dedicated to science and did not stop his work until his death. He also served as a reviewer for this Research Topic.
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.
The authors declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Keywords: snow, ice, cryosphere, climate, remote sensing
Citation: Kokhanovsky AA, Di Mauro B and Sun Z (2025) Editorial: Remote sensing of the cryosphere. Front. Environ. Sci. 13:1594457. doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2025.1594457
Received: 16 March 2025; Accepted: 17 March 2025;
Published: 24 March 2025.
Edited and reviewed by:
Martin Siegert, University of Exeter, United KingdomCopyright © 2025 Kokhanovsky, Di Mauro and Sun. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: A. A. Kokhanovsky, alexander.kokhanovsky@gfz-potsdam.de
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.